How good is your religious knowledge?

  • 115 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
14/ 15, I answered nirvana as belonging to Hinduism instead of Buddhism :( I have to refresh what I know on the two.gamefan606
If I remember correctly, Hinduism has a system similar to Buddhism's Nirvana, and given that to two religions are pretty similar in themselves, it would not be hard to miss that question.
Avatar image for zeldaluff
zeldaluff

3387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#102 zeldaluff
Member since 2008 • 3387 Posts

Meh, I don't know anything about supreme court rulings. However, I remember everything I was taught in school :P

13/15

Avatar image for Lab392
Lab392

6217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Lab392
Member since 2006 • 6217 Posts

14/15

Catholics REALLY think communion becomes the literal blood and body of christ? That's horrible. When I was a Christian, I figured communion was symbolic.

Avatar image for zeldaluff
zeldaluff

3387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#104 zeldaluff
Member since 2008 • 3387 Posts

14/15

Catholics REALLY think communion becomes the literal blood and body of christ? That's horrible. When I was a Christian, I figured communion was symbolic.

Lab392

I still think of it as symbolic anyways. I actually started off with pretty bad marks in grade 9 religion because my teacher didn't like my opinions. :P

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

14/15

Catholics REALLY think communion becomes the literal blood and body of christ? That's horrible. When I was a Christian, I figured communion was symbolic.

Lab392
Yeah. It goes like this: Catholics: Literal body and blood of Christ. Anglicans: Christ is within the bread and wine, but the bread and wine is not ACTUALLY part of Christ. Other Protestants: Symbolic.
Avatar image for vidplayer8
vidplayer8

18549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#106 vidplayer8
Member since 2006 • 18549 Posts

13/15

I'm kinda surprised. I didn't know about the jewish sabbath, I haven't had much exposure to Judaism. Also the one with the person who was most obedient to god despite suffering.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#107 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

[QUOTE="Lab392"]

14/15

Catholics REALLY think communion becomes the literal blood and body of christ? That's horrible. When I was a Christian, I figured communion was symbolic.

Theokhoth

Yeah. It goes like this: Catholics: Literal body and blood of Christ. Anglicans: Christ is within the bread and wine, but the bread and wine is not ACTUALLY part of Christ. Other Protestants: Symbolic.

I've talked to Catholics before on this matter and I still have no idea what is really meant by it. It's like, it's still bread and wine, and nothing physically changes, but it's actually Christ's body and blood, even though physically it's still bread and wine, and... this is about where I get sufficiently confused to give up.

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#108 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
I got a 14/15 so I'd say pretty dang good!
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#109 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

14/15. I missed the last question because it was so obscure compared to the rest. Plus, the rest of the questions were incredibly simple and focused highly on Western traditions.

And its pretty obvious why atheists tend to have greater knowledge of religions... because they invest time in actually learning about them, instead of just accepting what their religious community leader talks about.

I'm going on to be a professor of religious studies... so I hope I would have done well on this quiz... >_>

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#110 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

14/15. I missed the last question because it was so obscure compared to the rest.

foxhound_fox

Oh good, another Canadian missed the last question, I don't feel so bad now. :P

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#111 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Lab392"]

14/15

Catholics REALLY think communion becomes the literal blood and body of christ? That's horrible. When I was a Christian, I figured communion was symbolic.

GabuEx

Yeah. It goes like this: Catholics: Literal body and blood of Christ. Anglicans: Christ is within the bread and wine, but the bread and wine is not ACTUALLY part of Christ. Other Protestants: Symbolic.

I've talked to Catholics before on this matter and I still have no idea what is really meant by it. It's like, it's still bread and wine, and nothing physically changes, but it's actually Christ's body and blood, even though physically it's still bread and wine, and... this is about where I get sufficiently confused to give up.

It all has primarily to do with what St. Thomas calls matter and form. While in the matter you have substance and accidents. Now the early Christians held that the Eucharistic did indeed become the true body and true blood of Christ. It was in the form that it changed while the matter stays the same. So while it still looks and tastes like bread and wine, Christ is fully present spiritually in the Eucharist which also means he must be there physically as well since Christ is true God and True man, you cannot separate the 2. Justin Martyr would be a good read on the Eucharist as he is one of the first people to do so explicitly in the 2 century. Unfortunately to go into it further you must differentiate what makes up the matter and what makes up the form and how each relate and simply put it takes a good chunk of time to do so.
Avatar image for ImaPirate0202
ImaPirate0202

4473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#112 ImaPirate0202
Member since 2005 • 4473 Posts

14/15

Catholics REALLY think communion becomes the literal blood and body of christ? That's horrible. When I was a Christian, I figured communion was symbolic.

Lab392

That's a pretty important part of the Catholic faith. I'm surprised so many Catholics got that one wrong. In fact, I have a hard time believing that those people are really practicing Catholics.

Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts

Article about this in the NY Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/28/us/28religion.html?_r=2&src=ISMR_HP_LO_MST_FB

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#114 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

"One finding that may grab the attention of policy makers is that most Americans wrongly believe that anything having to do with religion is prohibited in public schools."

"But fewer than one of four knew that a public school teacher is permitted "to read from the Bible as an example of literature." And only about one third knew that a public school teacher is permitted to offer a cIass comparing the world's religions."

This surprises me a lot. I would have expected quite the opposite from the religious people.

--

"Fifty-three percent of Protestants could not identify Martin Luther as the man who started the Protestant Reformation."

"Forty-five percent of Catholics did not know that their church teaches that the consecrated bread and wine in holy communion are not merely symbols, but actually become the body and blood of Christ."

Wow. That is incredibly surprising. It just goes to show how little people are actually learning "about" their religions... and are just participating in the community and rituals.

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#115 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

"One finding that may grab the attention of policy makers is that most Americans wrongly believe that anything having to do with religion is prohibited in public schools."

"But fewer than one of four knew that a public school teacher is permitted "to read from the Bible as an example of literature." And only about one third knew that a public school teacher is permitted to offer a cIass comparing the world's religions."

This surprises me a lot. I would have expected quite the opposite from the religious people.

--

"Fifty-three percent of Protestants could not identify Martin Luther as the man who started the Protestant Reformation."

"Forty-five percent of Catholics did not know that their church teaches that the consecrated bread and wine in holy communion are not merely symbols, but actually become the body and blood of Christ."

Wow. That is incredibly surprising. It just goes to show how little people are actually learning "about" their religions... and are just participating in the community and rituals.

foxhound_fox

Yes it's very sad indeed. If you do believe in a God how can you worship Him and have any sort of relationship with Him at all if you don't understand Him and know who he is. I mean every basic relationship always starts with understanding. I do think it has a lot to do with our society though, where people just simply follow along. They go with the crowd and don't bother learning more than is absolutely necessary for what they are doing. I guess it's up to people like me who will someday be preaching to them on the pulpit to actually try and educate them.