[QUOTE="123625"]And while Jesus might have been God, he was also a man capable of suffering.Thinker_rebornSorry that's just not possible. Well it is in christianity.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
As the story within Christianity goes, Jesus was sacrificed and made to suffer so that humanity could be saved from our sins. Jesus was effectively punished in our stead in a way that would have been impossible had God stayed wholly external to our world, such that anyone who believes in him and accepts his punishment in their stead is forgiven of his or her past sins and can consequently go to heaven.GabuExAgain that simply indicates that jesus itself is nothing.
Anyways to argue christianity's trueness wasnt the point of the thread so I'll leave it there.
[QUOTE="123625"]And while Jesus might have been God, he was also a man capable of suffering.Thinker_rebornSorry that's just not possible.Why not?
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Sorry that's just not possible.GabuExIf God was capable of injecting himself as a human being within human history, it seems to me that he would be more than capable of making himself capable of suffering as a human.Again it is God who is suffering so what's the big deal with all this hailing of jesus having suffered for others?:?
I mean the moral of this story is that God forgave others.Big deal since the God of christianity is also considered all loving,mercifull and forgiving?
This may offend christians here but christianity has downright illogical beliefs as far as I am concerned.
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"][QUOTE="123625"]And while Jesus might have been God, he was also a man capable of suffering.Funky_LlamaSorry that's just not possible.Why not?God cannot suffer.
Either jesus is a separate entity from God or he couldnt suffer.Both things cannot co-exist.
Again it is God who is suffering so what's the big deal with all this hailing of jesus having suffered for others?:?The entire reason why it's not considered heresy or idolatry to pray to Jesus is precisely because Jesus is God. Jesus is simply a more personal face of God and one that humans are better capable of understanding, and thus better capable of being interacted with. The point is that God made himself into a human and suffered so that we wouldn't have to as long as we followed him and accepted his sacrifice; that's the entire crux of the Christian religion.I mean the moral of this story is that God forgave others.Big deal since the God of christianity is also considered all loving,mercifull and forgiving?
This may offend christians here but christianity has downright illogical beliefs as far as I am concerned.
Thinker_reborn
God cannot suffer.Thinker_rebornAs a being existing external to our world, yes. As a human being existing in our world, no.
Why not?God cannot suffer.[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Sorry that's just not possible.Thinker_reborn
Either jesus is a separate entity from God or he couldnt suffer.Both things cannot co-exist.
Christianity says they can, and I don't think God ccould be limited by that.
The entire reason why it's not considered heresy or idolatry to pray to Jesus is precisely because Jesus is God. Jesus is simply a more personal face of God and one that humans are better capable of understanding, and thus better capable of being interacted with. The point is that God made himself into a human and suffered so that we wouldn't have to as long as we followed him and accepted his sacrifice; that's the entire crux of the Christian religion.God and sacrifice cannot go together just cant.Atleast as long as you believe God to be a God if you know what I mean.[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Again it is God who is suffering so what's the big deal with all this hailing of jesus having suffered for others?:?
I mean the moral of this story is that God forgave others.Big deal since the God of christianity is also considered all loving,mercifull and forgiving?
This may offend christians here but christianity has downright illogical beliefs as far as I am concerned.
GabuEx
God and sacrifice cannot go together just cant.Atleast as long as you believe God to be a God if you know what I mean.Thinker_rebornYou're assuming that your impression of God is completely accurate and are then going from there. That doesn't exactly lead to a terribly productive discussion.
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Well it's certainly not true the way it is.However who knows zeus may have been a prophet and had his own miracles and now his history has just gone too far away from the truth.GabuExZeus never actually existed, though. that's what the christians want you to think....
Why not?God cannot suffer.[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Sorry that's just not possible.Thinker_reborn
Either jesus is a separate entity from God or he couldnt suffer.Both things cannot co-exist.
Why can't God suffer?Then why would there be so many religions and so much talk about God throughout the history of mankind?
Why would anyone make up false stories of God and all?And even if some did,why would they continue throughout time?
If God never ever communicated to man through His prophets then surely this much talk about God and religion just simply wont be there.
Thinker_reborn
That's a good question that the skepics do not have a good answer for.
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Then why would there be so many religions and so much talk about God throughout the history of mankind?
Why would anyone make up false stories of God and all?And even if some did,why would they continue throughout time?
If God never ever communicated to man through His prophets then surely this much talk about God and religion just simply wont be there.
Jemdude
That's a good question that the skepics do not have a good answer for.
Ummm, have you been living in isolation for your entire life, or do you just tend to ignore what the skeptics actually say?That's a good question that the skepics do not have a good answer for.
Jemdude
Saying something doesn't make it so. :P
Here's a question: do you believe that gods other than the Christian God exist, or do you believe that those gods were simply made up by humans?
Honestly? Organized religions were made to unify people under one belief, therefore under one control. Does God exist? I don't know but I wouldn't count on it.Then why would there be so many religions and so much talk about God throughout the history of mankind?
Why would anyone make up false stories of God and all?And even if some did,why would they continue throughout time?
If God never ever communicated to man through His prophets then surely this much talk about God and religion just simply wont be there.
Thinker_reborn
I know this will sound goofy but we're all in a Matrix World. All the Ghost, UFO's, Aliens, weird creatures, this is all mistakes the system makes. There is a Creator and his name is the Kernel.kid_who_grew_up... why would you think that would sound goofy?
[QUOTE="Jemdude"]That's a good question that the skepics do not have a good answer for.
GabuEx
Saying something doesn't make it so. :P
Here's a question: do you believe that gods other than the Christian God exist, or do you believe that those gods were simply made up by humans?
They'll just state they were made up by society at the time and paraphrase a few passages from the bible :P
It means a religion with only one God, eg Christianity or Islam, as opposed to, say, Hinduism.That's actually not true.Many old religions have gone far away from their orginal beliefs.Even Chritianity doesnt believe in just one God does it?[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]Dont know what the bolded part means but seems like it will be irrelavent to the discussion anyways since God has been talked about throughout the history of man.Thinker_reborn
But regardless that doesnt affect this discussion much.
Christianity believes in one God. In simple terms think of it as God takes three forms God, Jesus, and the holy spirit. kind of like water has ice, water, and steam
Â
Did God create the brains of atheists?SpaceMoose
he created everyone so yes, its that whole free will to believe thingÂ
Because people need stuff to believe in even if it is a worthless bunch of crap. Why make "false" stories of "g0d"?Controll.....simplyjmg128thinfrgt
im not fully sure what your refering to, but the control argument doesnt work with the bible. You see the bible has a lot of stuff in it that went against Hebrew tradition and law at the time so it wouldn't make a whole lot of sense that anyone would try to control a people with a text that went against their own laws.Â
[QUOTE="SpaceMoose"]Did God create the brains of atheists?metaldude05
he created everyone so yes, its that whole free will to believe thingÂ
Well, as I have stated in many threads, I find the whole concept of "free will" to be nonsensical. Decisions come from somewhere. They have to be based upon some sort of process, whether one wants to believe that that process exists in the physical realm or not.What better way to control the masses than to threaten them with eternal damnation?DJ_Novakain
have you not read my previous post in this topic. using the bible as a means of control probably would not have worked and doesn't make sense. Many things in the bible go against Hebrew law and tradition. if your writing a book to control people i would imagine you would want to make them follow your laws. if that was the case Jesus wouldve obeyed all laws and you woud not see him arguing with the jewish rabbi and the pharissees
[QUOTE="metaldude05"][QUOTE="SpaceMoose"]Did God create the brains of atheists?SpaceMoose
he created everyone so yes, its that whole free will to believe thingÂ
Well, as I have stated in many threads, I find the whole concept of "free will" to be nonsensical. Decisions come from somewhere. They have to be based upon some sort of process, whether one wants to believe that that process exists in the physical realm or not.i don't really understand what your saying explain further please. if im understading then i believe decisions are made in a physical realm. We make our own decisions using our God given Cognitive ability. you can choose to do or believe what you want. i guess the cognitive process is our decision making process. i don't see why free will is nonsense. Do you really know what your talking about or did you just hear that somewhereÂ
If an omniscient God created everything, then he created the mechanisms by which people make decisions, and therefore he created the decisions they make, and therefore he decided what everyone would do (including people) merely by creating everything. In fact, he would know what everyone would do before he even created them, which fits in with the whole concept of prophecies, so how then could they be said to have "free will"?i don't really understand what your saying explain further pleaseÂ
metaldude05
[QUOTE="metaldude05"]If an omniscient God created everything, then he created the mechanisms by which people make decisions, and therefor he created the decisions they make, and therefore he decided what everyone would do (including people) merely by creating everything. In fact, he would know what everyone would do before he even created them, which fits in with the whole concept of prophecies, so how then could they be said to have "free will"?i don't really understand what your saying explain further pleaseÂ
SpaceMoose
This topic kind of confuses me to be honest. I don't have the answer for the issue of God gives free will but also knows what you will do (being all knowing). i guess that even though God knows the decision you will make he does not make it for you. i don't see why that if God created the decision making process he has to actually make the decision. He created us and the process but we use the process to make our own decisions. i don't see how that is not possibleÂ
This topic kind of confuses me to be honest. I don't have the answer for the issue of God gives free will but also knows what you will do (being all knowing). i guess that even though God knows the decision you will make he does not make it for you. i don't see why that if God created the decision making process he has to actually make the decision. He created us and the process but we use the process to make our own decisions. i don't see how that is not possibleÂ
metaldude05
You may make decisions, but you don't decide the process by which thoes decisions are made in the first place; that would be paradoxical.
why does everyone always point to the things that religion has done wrong? the crusades, the inquisition, so on. why did the first christians get mauled by lions in the colloseum because they refused to deny their faith? what about missionaries that go and feed starving people? christian programs offer so much aid to so many. the few extremists make everyone look bad, and they are singled out as representatives of God.
the true aim of christianity is to love thy neighbor. does anyone ever think of that? even if there is no God at all, what if people spend their whole lives trying to fill the world with love? was it a wasted life? i believe in God, truly. i do my best to love others, and be kind to all people, even ones that unabashedly mock my beliefs as childish. i try my best to make this world a better place. i rarely even argue, for it is up to each individual to discover God, and when i do argue, i always keep my temper, because i remember that we are all God's children, and that love is what makes God what He is.
can you really say that all of the bad that religion has done, has been done at the behest of the religion itself? or was it people? arrogant, sinful, hate-filled, power-hungry people. i know that my belief in God, whether He exists or not, helps me through life, and helps me to love people, no matter how much they hate me. so if my belief in God fills me with love and compassion for all of mankind, then how can it be wrong? there is no way to prove that God exists, except in the love and kindness of others. when you see kindness that truly moves you, that, my friends, is God.
i don't see why free will is nonsense. metaldude05Because everything is predetermined. Everything was set into motion by the very first action, whatever it was. Ever since then, every action has simply been a reaction of the previous action. Life is pre-determined... but lucky for us, we don't have the ability to see past the present moment, thus everything always feels new to us. Which is good. If we knew about every action that was going to occur before it happened, life would probably be torture... just from the ensuing boredom, as a result of there being nothing fresh to experience. But still, it's all pre-determined. Sorry to shatter any illusions you may have been harboring. Well, no, actually I'm not sorry. Just accept the facts and be a man about it. Cool?
If we knew about every action that was going to occur before it happened, life would probably be torture... just from the ensuing boredom, as a result of there being nothing fresh to experience.Fire_SpiritActually, while I agree with your analysis that everything is effectively predetermined, I disagree with your implicit assertion that it would be even possible to know everything that was going to happen. Humans react to stimuli, and the knowledge of what will happen if someone does X is itself a form of stimuli; thus, the moment someone knew what was going to happen, that would no longer be what will happen. It's kind of like quantum physics on a macro level, where simply observing something alters it.
Humans react to stimuli, and the knowledge of what will happen if someone does X is itself a form of stimuli; thus, the moment someone knew what was going to happen, that would no longer be what will happen. It's kind of like quantum physics on a macro level, where simply observing something alters it.GabuExThen we would know about the change that our observation would bring to any given action. It would be a spontaneous change, yet still simultaneously forseeable, that is, if we had the ability to know EVERYTHING that will happen before it does. Things may happen differently if we knew what would occur before they do, but even the differences would be known given the circumstances. So we've effectively come full circle, and are now back at square one. What did we learn... ? :?
Then why would there be so many religions and so much talk about God throughout the history of mankind?
Why would anyone make up false stories of God and all?And even if some did,why would they continue throughout time?
If God never ever communicated to man through His prophets then surely this much talk about God and religion just simply wont be there.
Because like Zeus, Hercules, the Titans, the Fates, The Rainbow Serpent of Aboriginal Australian culture, Thor and Valhalla - they're myths. Surely you don't believe in any of these? And what would make your religion more 'real' than any other that you don't believe in? Just because people once believed in them, doesn't make them real. Fables, mythology and religion are all an intrinsic part of human nature in an attempt to explain the world around them. How does one explain how the Universe came to be? 100 years ago it was "God did it. Don't know how, don't know why, just God did it." Through advances in science, we can see that the galaxy is expanding by studying the redshift of other celestial objects and the rate at which they move away from us. If it is expanding, then perhaps it was all clumped together at one point and hence the Big Bang theory comes about... We have answers now. God doesn't really explain anything but create meaning for something we have no answer to. "What is the meaning of life" Simple answer, "There must be a God so we can have meaning". In many cultures, particularly in Greek and spiritual/animist types, they use drugs to become a 'medium' to the Gods. In those days, these prophecies were considered the words of their Gods, yet to us we know they were drug induced states and thus not real. What makes a prophet written about 2,000 years ago legitimate? How are we to be sure that he's really speaking to God? If someone told you that in this day, you'd think they are schizophrenic. But yet people insist it was the work of God. On what basis? I think this quote sums it up: "I contend we are both atheists; I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. RobertsIn many cultures, particularly in Greek and spiritual/animist types, they use drugs to become a 'medium' to the Gods. In those days, these prophecies were considered the words of their Gods, yet to us we know they were drug induced states and thus not real.Red-XIIIDrugs are real. The effects of drugs are real, therefore, experiences gained while under the real influence from these real drugs are also real. Just sayin...
[QUOTE="Fire_Spirit"]What did we learn... ? :?GabuExThat we should stop worrying about the issue of whether or not free will exists and just live our lives anyway. :P I agree with that. 100%.
It means one gods. And no "God" has not been talked about since the history of man, before Christainity anceint cultures like Eygpt believed in multiple gods.SaintLeonidas
*Ahem* Christianity was far from the first monotheic religion.
[QUOTE="Red-XIII"]In many cultures, particularly in Greek and spiritual/animist types, they use drugs to become a 'medium' to the Gods. In those days, these prophecies were considered the words of their Gods, yet to us we know they were drug induced states and thus not real.Fire_SpiritDrugs are real. The effects of drugs are real, therefore, experiences gained while under the real influence from these real drugs are also real. Just sayin... Perhaps you should check your reading comprehension, I never said the effects of drugs aren't real. I said the prophecies were drug induced and thus the prophecies aren't legitimate.
[QUOTE="Fire_Spirit"][QUOTE="Red-XIII"]In many cultures, particularly in Greek and spiritual/animist types, they use drugs to become a 'medium' to the Gods. In those days, these prophecies were considered the words of their Gods, yet to us we know they were drug induced states and thus not real.Red-XIIIDrugs are real. The effects of drugs are real, therefore, experiences gained while under the real influence from these real drugs are also real. Just sayin... Perhaps you should check your reading comprehension, I never said the effects of drugs aren't real. I said the prophecies were drug induced and thus the prophecies aren't legitimate. Yeah see, you didn't understand... Being drug induced doesn't make them any less legitimate.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment