If United States were changed from 'unofficial to 'official rulers of the world

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lompocus
lompocus

843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 lompocus
Member since 2005 • 843 Posts

...Think about it. It'd probably be the best dang thing to ever happen since sliced bread. Why would you NOT want the most successful country in the world today (and probably only one after we all get in space and stuff :D) to just be something of a big advisor. Kind of like how states are to countries, Mexico, Canada, etc. would be 'states' of the United States.

That would probably be the road to world peace imo. Just think about it.

*edit* and think about the fact that something like this will doubtless happen. Now, you wouldn't want it to be 'france' or 'China' now, would you?

Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
ummm, no. Thats actually a horrible idea.
Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts
I'd probably move, seeing as how every other nation on Earth will want to attack America after that.:|
Avatar image for Dethshoot
Dethshoot

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 Dethshoot
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts
I think that's a horrible idea.
Avatar image for Greatgone12
Greatgone12

25469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Greatgone12
Member since 2005 • 25469 Posts
Biafran Pride would come to a sudden halt.
Avatar image for lompocus
lompocus

843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 lompocus
Member since 2005 • 843 Posts

I'd probably move, seeing as how every other nation on Earth will want to attack America after that.:|Silver_Dragon17

So maybe I should change 'United States' to 'France', 'UK', or 'China'.

Avatar image for Powerhitter0418
Powerhitter0418

1950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 Powerhitter0418
Member since 2006 • 1950 Posts

I'd probably move, seeing as how every other nation on Earth will want to attack America after that.:|Silver_Dragon17

Same here, I wouldn't want to live in a country that ruled the world.

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#8 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

Avatar image for Silver_Dragon17
Silver_Dragon17

6205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 Silver_Dragon17
Member since 2007 • 6205 Posts

[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I'd probably move, seeing as how every other nation on Earth will want to attack America after that.:|lompocus

So maybe I should change 'United States' to 'France', 'UK', or 'China'.

Those places aren't hated by people all over the world. . .If it was the UK, then our technology would improve; If it was China, hell, EVERYTHING would improve; If it was France. . . . .:lol: France as the world's leading nation!:lol::lol::lol:

Avatar image for lompocus
lompocus

843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 lompocus
Member since 2005 • 843 Posts

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

THE_DRUGGIE

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

Avatar image for Slaveways
Slaveways

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Slaveways
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts
i would rather it just be be the US, Europe, Canada, Aus, NZ, and Japan. the other countries would just bring us down to be honest
Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
i like the current system quite well. I like being very far away from all those weirdo countries. Now if we could do something about the mexican border wede be all set.
Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
I'd probably move, seeing as how every other nation on Earth will want to attack America after that.:|Silver_Dragon17
They wouldnt stand a chance, trust me, the world wouldnt stand a chance
Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#14 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts
[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

lompocus

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

1. We butcher everyone equally. :)

2. Illegal wiretapping infringes on the rights to privacy guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.

3. With a dictatorship over the rest of the world, it is guaranteed to turn out that way.

4. Why would I say yes to either of those when that would not provide a sufficient answer in the way you wrote it?

Avatar image for mig_killer2
mig_killer2

4906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 mig_killer2
Member since 2007 • 4906 Posts
that would be nice, but unfortunately, it wont happen. too many people hate us
Avatar image for Powerhitter0418
Powerhitter0418

1950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#16 Powerhitter0418
Member since 2006 • 1950 Posts
[QUOTE="lompocus"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

THE_DRUGGIE

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

1. We butcher everyone equally. :)

2. Illegal wiretapping infringes on the rights to privacy guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment.

3. With a dictatorship over the rest of the world, it is guaranteed to turn out that way.

4. Why would I say yes to either of those when that would not provide a sufficient answer in the way you wrote it?

I can't imagine Bush in charge of the whole world, he can barely take care of the U.S. ,lol

Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
[QUOTE="lompocus"]

[QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]I'd probably move, seeing as how every other nation on Earth will want to attack America after that.:|Silver_Dragon17

So maybe I should change 'United States' to 'France', 'UK', or 'China'.

Those places aren't hated by people all over the world. . .If it was the UK, then our technology would improve; If it was China, hell, EVERYTHING would improve; If it was France. . . . .:lol: France as the world's leading nation!:lol::lol::lol:

you are seriously mislead, do you know why the US is the only super power, because they lead technologically, economically and militarily, contrary to what you might think, the UK does not have the best technology in the world, infact they havent for over a hundred years.
Avatar image for bradleybhoy
bradleybhoy

6501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 bradleybhoy
Member since 2005 • 6501 Posts
[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

lompocus

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

That says a lot about you, that you view that as a weakness.btw the population of china is 4x the population of the US.

Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#19 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts
everytime at the OT there is a topic related to the US o.O whats with u some of u? u have some other countries to talk about, please do so!!!!
Avatar image for Ghost_702
Ghost_702

7405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 Ghost_702
Member since 2006 • 7405 Posts
So you're idea is switching all countries into states? Interesting. Very interesting indeed. *wicked laugh*
Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
[QUOTE="lompocus"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

bradleybhoy

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

That says a lot about you, that you view that as a weakness.btw the population of china is 4x the population of the US.

Of course that is a weakness, thats over 300 million people who are poor in china
Avatar image for bradleybhoy
bradleybhoy

6501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 bradleybhoy
Member since 2005 • 6501 Posts
[QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="lompocus"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

UrbanSpartan125

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

That says a lot about you, that you view that as a weakness.btw the population of china is 4x the population of the US.

Of course that is a weakness, thats over 300 million people who are poor in china

Um yah. but then you have a massive working class generating wealth for the rest.

Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="lompocus"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

bradleybhoy

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

That says a lot about you, that you view that as a weakness.btw the population of china is 4x the population of the US.

Of course that is a weakness, thats over 300 million people who are poor in china

Um yah. but then you have a massive working class generating wealth for the rest.

And that stupid. Why should the working class have to provide for the poor people?
Avatar image for Elraptor
Elraptor

30966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Elraptor
Member since 2004 • 30966 Posts
No, we would make the world obese.
Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#25 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
No, we would make the world obese. Elraptor
Thats a massive generalization.
Avatar image for bradleybhoy
bradleybhoy

6501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 bradleybhoy
Member since 2005 • 6501 Posts
[QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="lompocus"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

Def_Jef88

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

That says a lot about you, that you view that as a weakness.btw the population of china is 4x the population of the US.

Of course that is a weakness, thats over 300 million people who are poor in china

Um yah. but then you have a massive working class generating wealth for the rest.

And that stupid. Why should the working class have to provide for the poor people?

What? No I mean the working class generate wealth for the upper classes, which is good, right?

Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="lompocus"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

bradleybhoy

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

That says a lot about you, that you view that as a weakness.btw the population of china is 4x the population of the US.

Of course that is a weakness, thats over 300 million people who are poor in china

Um yah. but then you have a massive working class generating wealth for the rest.

And that stupid. Why should the working class have to provide for the poor people?

What? No I mean the working class generate wealth for the upper classes, which is good, right?

Define "working class"

Avatar image for mark4091
mark4091

3780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 mark4091
Member since 2007 • 3780 Posts
no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.
Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="lompocus"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

bradleybhoy

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

That says a lot about you, that you view that as a weakness.btw the population of china is 4x the population of the US.

Of course that is a weakness, thats over 300 million people who are poor in china

Um yah. but then you have a massive working class generating wealth for the rest.

And that stupid. Why should the working class have to provide for the poor people?

What? No I mean the working class generate wealth for the upper classes, which is good, right?

No, not at all.
Avatar image for xXBuffJeffXx
xXBuffJeffXx

5913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 xXBuffJeffXx
Member since 2006 • 5913 Posts

ummm, no. Thats actually a horrible idea.Def_Jef88

This sums up my feelings on this proposal.

Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.mark4091
Good, let them attack, we're ready.
Avatar image for xXBuffJeffXx
xXBuffJeffXx

5913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 xXBuffJeffXx
Member since 2006 • 5913 Posts

[QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.UrbanSpartan125
Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
[QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.UrbanSpartan125
Good, let them attack, we're ready.

Britain + China + NK + Canada might be a little much for america to handle...
Avatar image for bradleybhoy
bradleybhoy

6501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 bradleybhoy
Member since 2005 • 6501 Posts
[QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="lompocus"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

It would probably have the same effect as Nazi Germany ruling the world...

UrbanSpartan125

Show me where we're butching a particular race.

Show me where we're limiting you free speech.

If you say 'yes' to either of those, tell me why you're still alive, because by your logic you should have been taken by the government by now.

Edit* @ silverdragon: France: Surrenderers. UK: our technology is far more advanced than theirs. China: They have a lower class the size of the population of the United States...Oh, and you have the 'great leap foward'

That says a lot about you, that you view that as a weakness.btw the population of china is 4x the population of the US.

Of course that is a weakness, thats over 300 million people who are poor in china

Um yah. but then you have a massive working class generating wealth for the rest.

And that stupid. Why should the working class have to provide for the poor people?

What? No I mean the working class generate wealth for the upper classes, which is good, right?

No, not at all.

Well dude. I hate to break it to you, but that's how America and nearly the rest of the worldworks. It's called Capitalism.

Avatar image for bradleybhoy
bradleybhoy

6501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 bradleybhoy
Member since 2005 • 6501 Posts

[QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.UrbanSpartan125
Good, let them attack, we're ready.

:lol: chill

Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.xXBuffJeffXx

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's
Avatar image for Elraptor
Elraptor

30966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Elraptor
Member since 2004 • 30966 Posts
[QUOTE="Elraptor"]No, we would make the world obese. UrbanSpartan125
Thats a massive generalization.

No, it's an unfounded piece of random speculation. :)
Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
[QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.UrbanSpartan125

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.
Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#39 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="Elraptor"]No, we would make the world obese. UrbanSpartan125
Thats a massive generalization.

Well, if we build as many McDonalds restauraunts in all the other countries as we do here, that actually might happen. You never know... >_>

Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.Def_Jef88
Good, let them attack, we're ready.

Britain + China + NK + Canada might be a little much for america to handle...

Look at it like this, right now the US has Air, sea and land superiority, we are the only country in the world who has that power projection. If they attack, which the countries that you named wouldnt be able to send a large force , would be crushed. North korea? China? come on, what about Germany and Russia, give us some threats not some country with a short crazy leader. It would all end up in nuclear war and we would all be dead, then everyone will be happy.. right?
Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="Elraptor"]No, we would make the world obese. THE_DRUGGIE

Thats a massive generalization.

Well, if we build as many McDonalds restauraunts in all the other countries as we do here, that actually might happen. You never know... >_>

Mcdonalds is a corporation. One that is no more american than it is chinese or British. Take up those problems with Ronald, not our government.
Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.Def_Jef88

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.

Yep, and sadly i think this is how this war is going to end, unless congress lets our military do what they need to do to win this war, because you can know this, we will never lose militarily but politically i dont think we can handle it
Avatar image for mig_killer2
mig_killer2

4906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 mig_killer2
Member since 2007 • 4906 Posts
[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.Def_Jef88

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.

"war is a much too serious matter to be left to the military"-Georges Clemenceau

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#44 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts
[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="Elraptor"]No, we would make the world obese. Def_Jef88

Thats a massive generalization.

Well, if we build as many McDonalds restauraunts in all the other countries as we do here, that actually might happen. You never know... >_>

Mcdonalds is a corporation. One that is no more american than it is chinese or British. Take up those problems with Ronald, not our government.

Seeing as it was founded in the US, and that there's more of those in the US than any other country las time I heard, I bet that corporation would find it as a window of opportunity if the US took over the world.

Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.UrbanSpartan125

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.

Yep, and sadly i think this is how this war is going to end, unless congress lets our military do what they need to do.

Sadly, I think theyll just pull out all whill nilly so things can go back to beeing right back as bad as they where about 5 years ago. I wish people would look at the big picture, but all america ever wants is instant gratification.
Avatar image for UrbanSpartan125
UrbanSpartan125

3684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 UrbanSpartan125
Member since 2006 • 3684 Posts
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.mig_killer2

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.

"war is a much too serious matter to be left to the military"-Georges Clemenceau

Yeah because congress has been really good at handling the past wars:roll:
Avatar image for mig_killer2
mig_killer2

4906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 mig_killer2
Member since 2007 • 4906 Posts
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.UrbanSpartan125

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.

Yep, and sadly i think this is how this war is going to end, unless congress lets our military do what they need to do.

problem is that it takes about 10 soldiers from a conventional army to deal with 1 insurgent. This war is being fought along cultural lines, we cant hope for the people of Iraq to settle their differences. Either we have to leave with our tail between our legs, or never leave at all. My money is on the latter
Avatar image for mig_killer2
mig_killer2

4906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 mig_killer2
Member since 2007 • 4906 Posts
[QUOTE="mig_killer2"][QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.UrbanSpartan125

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.

"war is a much too serious matter to be left to the military"-Georges Clemenceau

Yeah because congress has been really good at handling the past wars:roll:

just wanted to throw that out there for the hell of it.

anyhow, I have to agree with you guys who are saying that congress needs to shove it and give our troops what they need

Avatar image for bradleybhoy
bradleybhoy

6501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 bradleybhoy
Member since 2005 • 6501 Posts
[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.Def_Jef88

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.

Yep, and sadly i think this is how this war is going to end, unless congress lets our military do what they need to do.

Sadly, I think theyll just pull out all whill nilly so things can go back to beeing right back as bad as they where about 5 years ago. I wish people would look at the big picture, but all america ever wants is instant gratification.

Indeed, things are already far worse for America than they were 8 years ago. This so called "War on Terror" has no made more Terrorists than it's killed. Iraq was a step too far.

Avatar image for Def_Jef88
Def_Jef88

17441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 Def_Jef88
Member since 2006 • 17441 Posts
[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="xXBuffJeffXx"]

[QUOTE="UrbanSpartan125"][QUOTE="mark4091"]no the entire planet would attack the US if they tried, it's just not possible.mig_killer2

Good, let them attack, we're ready.

We could never control the entire world. We can't even control Baghdad, let alone north Philadelphia.

Thats because the ass hats in congress think they know more than our generals on how to conduct wars, and ROE's

Bingo. Everyon in congress needs to shove it and leave the war to the military. Look what happened when they ****ing politicians tried to run Vietnam, we failed.

Yep, and sadly i think this is how this war is going to end, unless congress lets our military do what they need to do.

problem is that it takes about 10 soldiers from a conventional army to deal with 1 insurgent. This war is being fought along cultural lines, we cant hope for the people of Iraq to settle their differences. Either we have to leave with our tail between our legs, or never leave at all. My money is on the latter

Or better yet, finish what we started and stabalizr the government, get the country running smoothly, help them bolster up their defences so they dont need our help with future insurgents and then leave that area for good. But no, we can run when the going gets tuff, so all this work so far can be for nothing. Im sure the soldiers would love to know what they died for was in vain.