[QUOTE="Barbariser"]Invisible people wouldn't actually be able to see anything, so all that would happen is that I'd be bumping into random objects as I walk and eventually I'd get squashed by a car or encounter some other similarly undesirable end to my life.
jo-joGun
you would probably die first of not having any imagination or sense of fun.Yes, clearly it requires a powerful imagination or a sense of fun to answer "locker" to a thread about invisibility - the sort of thread which pops up on this forum once every few days and receives the "locker" as an answer for about 200% of its post. This is so enlightening; to think that the peak of enjoyment and creativity is to think about being a voyeur over and over and over again. :roll:
For the record, I'm hardly a prude or whatnot. As a matter of fact I happen to be a person who hates prudes with a passion because they're very dull people. It's just that invisibility threads are, in fact, hideously boring because they always have the same answer popping up in them all the damn time.
Thank you... I did say invisible, not blind. All the invisible people in movies are never blind. Where do people come up with this stuff??? Duh!jo-joGun
I do hope that you have at least a basic understanding of science (unlike the directors for said movies) because if you bend light around your body to the point where you're entirely invisible.... there's no light going into your eyes and you obviously can't see anything when that happens.
Log in to comment