I'm Proud to Be White!

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/late/jpr01.html-R3Vo

I might be going to Western's med. school once I'm done in Waterloo :):). But yea good quotation.

"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario SIapshot

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/late/jpr01.html SIapshot

Of course, the white racists' logic would lead them to come to the conclusion here that Asians are the superior race. But they ignore this because they want to be the superior race.

No, no, wait! I wasn't accusing you of being one of those racists. I'm just saying that, you know, by their logic, you'd have to come to that conclusion.

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario Mr_sprinkles

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/late/jpr01.html -R3Vo

Of course, the white racists' logic would lead them to come to the conclusion here that Asians are the superior race. But they ignore this because they want to be the superior race.

Do you know how many Asians there are in the world? Really blows statistics out of perportion. How does this make Mr. Rushton a white racist? If you also want to keep your race based logic the smartest people in the world have been white... Einstein, Tesla, etc... Those tests all come down to spam, it's like the zerg rush.

No it doesn't. The tests are done by averages. What do think they do,find the total IQ for the entire race? Christ.

[QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/late/jpr01.html Funky_Llama

Of course, the white racists' logic would lead them to come to the conclusion here that Asians are the superior race. But they ignore this because they want to be the superior race.

No, no, wait! I wasn't accusing you of being one of those racists. I'm just saying that, you know, by their logic, you'd have to come to that conclusion.

[QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario SIapshot

It could easily be argued that the asians come highest because of the strong work ethic ingrained in most of the far eastern countries. Likewise, prettymuch all over the world the black population has been severely economically disadvantaged up until 50 years ago, which probably doesn't help matters.

[QUOTE="-R3Vo"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/late/jpr01.html Funky_Llama

Of course, the white racists' logic would lead them to come to the conclusion here that Asians are the superior race. But they ignore this because they want to be the superior race.

Do you know how many Asians there are in the world? Really blows statistics out of perportion. How does this make Mr. Rushton a white racist? If you also want to keep your race based logic the smartest people in the world have been white... Einstein, Tesla, etc... Those tests all come down to spam, it's like the zerg rush.

No it doesn't. The tests are done by averages. What do think they do,find the total IQ for the entire race? Christ.

You didn't understand what I was saying, and I'm not Christ.

[QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario Mr_sprinkles

It could easily be argued that the asians come highest because of the strong work ethic ingrained in most of the far eastern countries. Likewise, prettymuch all over the world the black population has been severely economically disadvantaged up until 50 years ago, which probably doesn't help matters.

White power! Wait does that make me a racist? But black people do it... Wtf I'm so confused.-R3Vo

[QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario SIapshot

It could easily be argued that the asians come highest because of the strong work ethic ingrained in most of the far eastern countries. Likewise, prettymuch all over the world the black population has been severely economically disadvantaged up until 50 years ago, which probably doesn't help matters.

[QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario Mr_sprinkles

It could easily be argued that the asians come highest because of the strong work ethic ingrained in most of the far eastern countries. Likewise, prettymuch all over the world the black population has been severely economically disadvantaged up until 50 years ago, which probably doesn't help matters.

Which enforces my point. If you click (or copy/paste) the link I gave you, Professor Rushton explains the biological differences between the races. Do you really think that the entire world's black population has been severely disadvantaged because of the actions of other races?SIapshot

Uh yes. Colonialism...

imo these bioglogical differences are negligible in determining the potentail of an entire race. There are far too many more influential factors that affect the course of a persons life and shape their character. Besides there are no pure races. Everyone has a different gentic make up comprised of many different ethnicites or races or what have you.

It seems to me that people who choose to endevaour to prove that there is a superior race, physically, mentally etc., have shady motives. We are all genetic shades of grey and so biologically race is a myth. It only takes on importance socially and culturally.

I'm proud to be human!Assassinslay

Neither is Japan. But Africa is very rich in natural resources, which the natives could never figure out how to exploit to their advantage (except by selling captured tribal enemies into slavery), and there are many fertile areas of africa that never made it out of the stone age. Perhaps if they had learned how to navigate the oceans and taken advantage of strategic resources they would've developed alongside other races.SIapshot

Ah right so African cultures have to be measured on the scale of European civilisation...

Neither is Japan. But Africa is very rich in natural resources, which the natives could never figure out how to exploit to their advantage (except by selling captured tribal enemies into slavery), and there are many fertile areas of africa that never made it out of the stone age. Perhaps if they had learned how to navigate the oceans and taken advantage of strategic resources they would've developed alongside other races.SIapshot

and natural resources? no civilization on earth was mining before it could farm.

[QUOTE="Video_Game_King"]

The only reason its racist is because of the KKK. What if there were a black equivelant to that? Would black power be racist?

dracula_16

Absolutely. The KKK has nothing to do with saying "power" after your race. There plenty of racists who are not in the KKK or Black Panthers.

Wait, there is a black KKK? Then I declare hypocrisy, especially if they haven't been deemed a terrorist organization (KKK was in 1871).

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]Which enforces my point. If you click (or copy/paste) the link I gave you, Professor Rushton explains the biological differences between the races. Do you really think that the entire world's black population has been severely disadvantaged because of the actions of other races?bradleybhoy

Uh yes. Colonialism...

imo these bioglogical differences are negligible in determining the potentail of an entire race. There are far too many more influential factors that affect the course of a persons life and shape their character. Besides there are no pure races. Everyone has a different gentic make up comprised of many different ethnicites or races or what have you.

It seems to me that people who choose to endevaour to prove that there is a superior race, physically, mentally etc., have shady motives. We are all genetic shades of grey and so biologically race is a myth. It only takes on importance socially and culturally.

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]

Neither is Japan. But Africa is very rich in natural resources, which the natives could never figure out how to exploit to their advantage (except by selling captured tribal enemies into slavery), and there are many fertile areas of africa that never made it out of the stone age. Perhaps if they had learned how to navigate the oceans and taken advantage of strategic resources they would've developed alongside other races.Mr_sprinkles

and natural resources? no civilization on earth was mining before it could farm.

And for the record, although japan is now a heavily industrialised nation, they had been farming for many centuries. It was plenty fertile compared to most of africa.Mr_sprinkles

Most of Africa?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Africa_satellite_orthographic.jpg

Not really...sub-Saharan afriqa was and still is very fertile.

[QUOTE="bradleybhoy"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]Which enforces my point. If you click (or copy/paste) the link I gave you, Professor Rushton explains the biological differences between the races. Do you really think that the entire world's black population has been severely disadvantaged because of the actions of other races?SIapshot

Uh yes. Colonialism...

imo these bioglogical differences are negligible in determining the potentail of an entire race. There are far too many more influential factors that affect the course of a persons life and shape their character. Besides there are no pure races. Everyone has a different gentic make up comprised of many different ethnicites or races or what have you.

It seems to me that people who choose to endevaour to prove that there is a superior race, physically, mentally etc., have shady motives. We are all genetic shades of grey and so biologically race is a myth. It only takes on importance socially and culturally.

Wow, I love your source. Why don't you one that isn't from the same reasearcher trying to prove that there are inherent biological inequalities between "the races".

Oh I have one proving that biologically race is a myth, it's from The American Anthropological Association.

http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm

"indeed, physical variations in the human species have no meaning except the social ones that humans put on them."

[QUOTE="Assassinslay"]I'm proud to be human!SIapshot

And for the record, although japan is now a heavily industrialised nation, they had been farming for many centuries. It was plenty fertile compared to most of africa.Mr_sprinkles

[QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="SIapshot"]

Neither is Japan. But Africa is very rich in natural resources, which the natives could never figure out how to exploit to their advantage (except by selling captured tribal enemies into slavery), and there are many fertile areas of africa that never made it out of the stone age. Perhaps if they had learned how to navigate the oceans and taken advantage of strategic resources they would've developed alongside other races.SIapshot

and natural resources? no civilization on earth was mining before it could farm.

[QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="Mr_sprinkles"][QUOTE="SIapshot"]"The mean pattern of educational and economic achievement within multi-racial countries such as Canada and the United States has increasingly been found to prove valid internationally. For example, it is not often recognized, perhaps because it contradicts the politically correct theories that intelligence is purely a matter of socio-economic conditions, that Asian-Americans and Asians in Asia often outscore white Americans and white Europeans on IQ tests and on tests of educational achievement (even though the tests were largely developed by Europeans and white Americans for use in a Euro-American culture). Blacks in the Caribbean, Britain, Canada and sub-Saharan Africa as well as in the United States have low IQ scores relative to whites. For violent crime, analyses of INTERPOL data from the 1980s and 1990s show the same international distribution that occurs within the United States (that is, Asians least, Europeans in the middle, and Africans most). A similar racial gradient is found both within the U.S. and globally for measures of sexual activity and frequencies of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS (based on World Health Organization data). " Proffesor J Phillipe Rushton, University of Western Ontario SIapshot

It could easily be argued that the asians come highest because of the strong work ethic ingrained in most of the far eastern countries. Likewise, prettymuch all over the world the black population has been severely economically disadvantaged up until 50 years ago, which probably doesn't help matters.

This reminds me of a story I was told by one of my friends who attends university.
The school has social groups for Phillipinos, Asians, Africans, Latinos you name it. But the one social group the university would not allow was a caucasian club.
I just couldn't believe it. The university basically called the organisers a bunch of racists and sent them on their merry way.
Just disgusting.

Wow, I think this article from The American Anthropological Society has pretty much blown your argument out of the water slapshot.

"Race" thus evolved as a worldview, a body of prejudgments that distorts our ideas about human differences and group behavior. Racial beliefs constitute myths about the diversity in the human species and about the abilities and behavior of people homogenized into "racial" categories. The myths fused behavior and physical features together in the public mind, impeding our comprehension of both biological variations and cultural behavior, implying that both are genetically determined. Racial myths bear no relationship to the reality of human capabilities or behavior. Scientists today find that reliance on such folk beliefs about human differences in research has led to countless errors."

http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm

Read the whole thing and then get back to me.

This reminds me of a story I was told by one of my friends who attends university.
The school has social groups for Phillipinos, Asians, Africans, Latinos you name it. But the one social group the university would not allow was a caucasian club.
I just couldn't believe it. The university basically called the organisers a bunch of racists and sent them on their merry way.
Just disgusting.

Conjuration

[QUOTE="SIapshot"][QUOTE="bradleybhoy"]

[QUOTE="SIapshot"]Which enforces my point. If you click (or copy/paste) the link I gave you, Professor Rushton explains the biological differences between the races. Do you really think that the entire world's black population has been severely disadvantaged because of the actions of other races?bradleybhoy

Uh yes. Colonialism...

imo these bioglogical differences are negligible in determining the potentail of an entire race. There are far too many more influential factors that affect the course of a persons life and shape their character. Besides there are no pure races. Everyone has a different gentic make up comprised of many different ethnicites or races or what have you.

It seems to me that people who choose to endevaour to prove that there is a superior race, physically, mentally etc., have shady motives. We are all genetic shades of grey and so biologically race is a myth. It only takes on importance socially and culturally.

Wow, I love your source. Why don't you one that isn't from the same reasearcher trying to prove that there are inherent biological inequalities between "the races".

Oh I have one proving that biologically race is a myth, it's from The American Anthropological Association.

http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm

"indeed, physical variations in the human species have no meaning except the social ones that humans put on them."

link "The discovery has astonished scientists studying the human genome - the genetic recipe of man. Until now it was believed the variation between people was due largely to differences in the sequences of the individual "letters" of the genome.

It now appears much of the variation is explained instead by people having multiple copies of some key genes that make up the human genome."

there were enough racial differences to assign every person bar one to their correct ethnic origin.

why would some be proud of being white? I can understand someone being proud of being Irih, French Arab or else but why WHITE?

Sounds funny and pointless to me......thats not even nationalism. Why would you be proud of being a member of a skin color with 238765283746578325 members...nothing unique in skin color simply.

The black and white education gap is closing http://www.reason.com/news/show/116991.html

[QUOTE="kurama2002"]

The black and white education gap is closing http://www.reason.com/news/show/116991.html

SIapshot

lol you are ridiculous

That source is 10 years old, talking about "only 6% of genetic makeup". Here's a more updated source for you.

link "The discovery has astonished scientists studying the human genome - the genetic recipe of man. Until now it was believed the variation between people was due largely to differences in the sequences of the individual "letters" of the genome.

It now appears much of the variation is explained instead by people having multiple copies of some key genes that make up the human genome."

there were enough racial differences to assign every person bar one to their correct ethnic origin.

SIapshot

Ah touche. I'll have to get more up-to date with my sources.

Why are you proud of the colour of your skin?

im proud to be black, doesnt make me racist also being proud to be white is totally alrite and not racist in my view.yoyo462001

I'm not proud to be white...because I don't take pride in things that aren't my own accomplishemtns (and even then, its quite rare). It was none of my doing that I'm white.

But I do like being white, and if I could choose what race to be, I'd still remain white.

[QUOTE="bobaban"]

[QUOTE="-Keel-_basic"]I don't believe my heritage or skin tone is any sort of accomplishment, nor should it be a source of pride. My ancestor's have had little to no effect on my core being, or any of my personal motivations. That said, ancestry can be interesting to learn about.SIapshot

Yes can all those who have this "pride" explain why you are proud of your race?

Oh yea, here's a list of invention myths for anybody who's interested in learning the truth.
http://www33.brinkster.com/iiiii/inventions/

Accomplishments have no colour.

please don't take pride in accomplishments YOU had nothing to do with ...

this is again simular to nationalism, another pathetic attempt to contain a crowd so that you can belong to it

Accomplishments have no color.

please don't take pride in accomplishments YOU had nothing to do with ...

this is again simular to nationalism, another pathetic attempt to contain a crowd so that you can belong to it

soren008

*points* You racist!Cube_of_MooN

How is that a raciest comment?

[QUOTE="yoyo462001"]im proud to be black, doesnt make me racist also being proud to be white is totally alrite and not racist in my view.swizz-the-gamer

Well said.

[QUOTE="Cube_of_MooN"]*points* You racist!michael098

How is that a raciest comment?

Miss irony much?