Im sorry but Obama will just utterly DESTROY McCain in the debate...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#101 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="Palax"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

Correction: McCain will wipe the floor with Uh-bama. And I wouldn't count out Palin so quickly.

killtactics

Palin will fail badly, and obama saying Uh wont lose him the debate :roll:

Actually saying uh, during a debate greatly decreases your performance, if you've ever seen your high school (or sorry middle School) Debate teams.. The person who says uhh, usually ends up losing the debate..

ha ha ha your funny, Im in college,

Those people that are being kicked out of their houses dont care about Uhms they care about who can help them the most,

that man is Barack Obama

Sure but others will like what McCain is saying. The whole world isn't poor people.. Especially considering a majority of Obama's supporters are in college and poor. Most won't watch the Debate so who exactly is he talking to? And Youth are terrible at the polls so what's going to happen on voting day when they don't show up?

That would be a valid argument.... 4 years ago

People like Obama, alot more than Kerry

It's still a valid argument, 90% of teens obama supports support him blindly, don't argue against it cause it's true.. and throughout history youth have been terrible at the polls I don't see any difference here.

Did you stop to think that maybe people support Obama simply because they don't support McCain, and btw I can argue against this because you straight pulled that 90% statistic from your arse.

All the Youth I've talked to about why they support Obama couldn't give me clear answers at all. And a good speaker always came up.... And they may only support Obama because of the fact that they don't like McCain, but still doesn't change the fact, that youth prove very unreliable at the polls.

And yes I did make up that statistic, I'll admit that, it was overexaturated but you get my point. The fact that many unreliable voters support obama for really no reason.

What i find funny is that you said the majority of Obama supporters are in college.... since Obama is often ahead of McCain in the polls are you saying more then 50% of Americans are in college?

I said a majority of his support were in college AND in the lower clas$. Which isn't and overexateration. The lower Clas is pretty large and they are several million college students, which can all equal a large chuck of obama's supporters. all 300 million Americans don't vote. So even a small group of voters can be consider a significant portion of votes.

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts

again the liberal media card

Carter wasnt a good president and a shame to the democratic party

alexmurray
Why do you keep dodging my points about Reagan? Low inflation, low taxes, low unemployment, low interest rates, higher prodcutivity, a higher GDP, and a higher median family income.
Avatar image for halfirishhomer
halfirishhomer

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 halfirishhomer
Member since 2007 • 550 Posts
Are you saying that 90% of the media isn't liberal? And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#104 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
[QUOTE="alexmurray"]

again the liberal media card

Carter wasnt a good president and a shame to the democratic party

famicommander

Why do you keep dodging my points about Reagan? Low inflation, low taxes, low unemployment, low interest rates, higher prodcutivity, a higher GDP, and a higher median family income.

None of that matters if the Gov't is in debt.. :roll:

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#105 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts

What about the part where Obama has to answer realistic questions?Xx_CYC756_xX

Excellent post. :lol:

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#106 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts

Are you saying that 90% of the media isn't liberal? And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?halfirishhomer

Besides the Wall Street Journal and Fox, who isn't liberal? I can't think of any news site... :|

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#107 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]Are you saying that 90% of the media isn't liberal? And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?battlefront23

Besides the Wall Street Journal and Fox, who isn't liberal? I can't think of any news site... :|

I'm conservative and I love fox news but I'm starting to really like CNN, It may be slightly liberal but it's not enought to influence opinions a whole lot.

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts
And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?halfirishhomer
That had nothing to do with Clinton, as we can clearly see by the fact that he took an economy on auto-pilot and drove it straight into a recession. There were three factors in the economic success of the 90s: 1. The Internet and computer boom. The Internet created 23 million jobs alone in the 90s. 2. The Gulf War. It kept oil flowing freely and history shows that most counties undergo a large economic boom after a successful military campaign. 3. Reaganomics. The effects of Reagan's policies took quite some time to wear off.
Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#109 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts
[QUOTE="alexmurray"]

again the liberal media card

Carter wasnt a good president and a shame to the democratic party

famicommander

Why do you keep dodging my points about Reagan? Low inflation, low taxes, low unemployment, low interest rates, higher prodcutivity, a higher GDP, and a higher median family income.

Look Reagan is seriously overrated, he was is a recession and got out of it, big deal

Avatar image for halfirishhomer
halfirishhomer

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 halfirishhomer
Member since 2007 • 550 Posts
CNN does have Glenn Beck.
Avatar image for killtactics
killtactics

5957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 killtactics
Member since 2004 • 5957 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_CYC756_xX"]What about the part where Obama has to answer realistic questions?battlefront23

Excellent post. :lol:

Obama was interviewed by O'Relliy recently...
Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#112 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts
[QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]Are you saying that 90% of the media isn't liberal? And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?ferrari2001

Besides the Wall Street Journal and Fox, who isn't liberal? I can't think of any news site... :|

I'm conservative and I love fox news but I'm starting to really like CNN, It may be slightly liberal but it's not enought to influence opinions a whole lot.

I have to agree

FAUX news is too conservative

MSNBC the most liberal name in news is a joke

All news is Biased but it is seriously overagerated

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts
[QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"]

again the liberal media card

Carter wasnt a good president and a shame to the democratic party

alexmurray

Why do you keep dodging my points about Reagan? Low inflation, low taxes, low unemployment, low interest rates, higher prodcutivity, a higher GDP, and a higher median family income.

Look Reagan is seriously overrated, he was is a recession and got out of it, big deal

How can you say that in the face of the facts? You can't deny what he did. You can't just say he was overrated without any facts. The facts in that post you quoted clearly indicate that he had a more positive effect on the economy than any president in recent memory. Reagan: Recession---->Period of economic prosperity Clinton: Period of economic prosperity---->Recession.
Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#114 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts

CNN does have Glenn Beck. halfirishhomer

I love that guy. Have you ever seen the back of his books? The comments he gets are simply epic.

Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#115 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?famicommander
That had nothing to do with Clinton, as we can clearly see by the fact that he took an economy on auto-pilot and drove it straight into a recession. There were three factors in the economic success of the 90s: 1. The Internet and computer boom. The Internet created 23 million jobs alone in the 90s. 2. The Gulf War. It kept oil flowing freely and history shows that most counties undergo a large economic boom after a successful military campaign. 3. Reaganomics. The effects of Reagan's policies took quite some time to wear off.

No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO

yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts

No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO

yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession

alexmurray
That makes zero sense. There has to be something to spur the economy, otherwise we'd stay in recession forever.
Avatar image for Aquat1cF1sh
Aquat1cF1sh

11096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 Aquat1cF1sh
Member since 2006 • 11096 Posts
I don't think anyone's going to win the debates...
Avatar image for killtactics
killtactics

5957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 killtactics
Member since 2004 • 5957 Posts

I said a majority of his support were in college AND in the lower clas$. Which isn't and overexateration. The lower Clas is pretty large and they are several million college students, which can all equal a large chuck of obama's supporters. all 300 million Americans don't vote. So even a small group of voters can be consider a significant portion of votes.

Where are you getting this info from? I did't know college students were so powerful that they decid the Democratic presidential nominee and keep him higher then McCain in the national Polls...

Avatar image for Palax
Palax

2399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Palax
Member since 2003 • 2399 Posts

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?famicommander
That had nothing to do with Clinton, as we can clearly see by the fact that he took an economy on auto-pilot and drove it straight into a recession. There were three factors in the economic success of the 90s: 1. The Internet and computer boom. The Internet created 23 million jobs alone in the 90s. 2. The Gulf War. It kept oil flowing freely and history shows that most counties undergo a large economic boom after a successful military campaign. 3. Reaganomics. The effects of Reagan's policies took quite some time to wear off.

The dot com boom took place during the 90's. The computer boom is from the 80's.

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#120 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
[QUOTE="alexmurray"]

No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO

yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession

famicommander

That makes zero sense. There has to be something to spur the economy, otherwise we'd stay in recession forever.

If something good happened that was because of a conservative president, he'll say it's overrated. No matter what.

Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts

CNN does have Glenn Beck. halfirishhomer

glen beck roxorz

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#122 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

[QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?alexmurray

That had nothing to do with Clinton, as we can clearly see by the fact that he took an economy on auto-pilot and drove it straight into a recession. There were three factors in the economic success of the 90s: 1. The Internet and computer boom. The Internet created 23 million jobs alone in the 90s. 2. The Gulf War. It kept oil flowing freely and history shows that most counties undergo a large economic boom after a successful military campaign. 3. Reaganomics. The effects of Reagan's policies took quite some time to wear off.

No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO

yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession

yea it does but with that thinking, you can't put any blame on Bush for the quality of our economy at the moment, because our economy is at the low point and so no matter who is elected our ecomony should at least improve.

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts

The dot com boom took place during the 90's. The computer boom is from the 80's.

Palax
I wasn't referring to the different booms. I was including the successes of non-internet based computer companies during the 90s. I know that the computer boom is an entirely different matter.
Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]Are you saying that 90% of the media isn't liberal? And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?alexmurray

Besides the Wall Street Journal and Fox, who isn't liberal? I can't think of any news site... :|

I'm conservative and I love fox news but I'm starting to really like CNN, It may be slightly liberal but it's not enought to influence opinions a whole lot.

I have to agree

FAUX news is too conservative

MSNBC the most liberal name in news is a joke

All news is Biased but it is seriously overagerated

fox being conservative... thats news to me

Avatar image for lostprodigy3141
lostprodigy3141

420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 lostprodigy3141
Member since 2008 • 420 Posts
[QUOTE="lostprodigy3141"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"]

[QUOTE="butteman12"]and Biden will destroy palin in their debate. that is all.H8sMikeMoore

i feel bad if you plan on voting for either one of them

I respect McCain for what hes done. I dont think he should be president

Obama is just a socialist underneath it all. That alone makes him unworthy of a vote

You do realize they are the only available people, right? I suppose you're just going to write in your favorite person?

third party

Ah I see. Which candidate do you think is worth supporting enough to vote for, knowing they will lose?

Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"] No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession battlefront23
That makes zero sense. There has to be something to spur the economy, otherwise we'd stay in recession forever.

If something good happened that was because of a conservative president, he'll say it's overrated. No matter what.

thats because he goes to moveon.org and asks "what do i believe oh holy website"
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#127 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]Are you saying that 90% of the media isn't liberal? And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?H8sMikeMoore

Besides the Wall Street Journal and Fox, who isn't liberal? I can't think of any news site... :|

I'm conservative and I love fox news but I'm starting to really like CNN, It may be slightly liberal but it's not enought to influence opinions a whole lot.

I have to agree

FAUX news is too conservative

MSNBC the most liberal name in news is a joke

All news is Biased but it is seriously overagerated

fox being conservative... thats news to me

Please tell me your joking :| its widely known fact that Fox has a real conservative slant.. See this is what I am talking about, your a extreme republican in denial.

Avatar image for halfirishhomer
halfirishhomer

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 halfirishhomer
Member since 2007 • 550 Posts
Yea I forgot about how the economy heals itself. :P
Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="lostprodigy3141"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"]

[QUOTE="butteman12"]and Biden will destroy palin in their debate. that is all.lostprodigy3141

i feel bad if you plan on voting for either one of them

I respect McCain for what hes done. I dont think he should be president

Obama is just a socialist underneath it all. That alone makes him unworthy of a vote

You do realize they are the only available people, right? I suppose you're just going to write in your favorite person?

third party

Ah I see. Which candidate do you think is worth supporting enough to vote for, knowing they will lose?

voting for the lesser of two evils is a throw away vote. im voting bob barr

Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="ferrari2001"][QUOTE="battlefront23"]

[QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]Are you saying that 90% of the media isn't liberal? And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?sSubZerOo

Besides the Wall Street Journal and Fox, who isn't liberal? I can't think of any news site... :|

I'm conservative and I love fox news but I'm starting to really like CNN, It may be slightly liberal but it's not enought to influence opinions a whole lot.

I have to agree

FAUX news is too conservative

MSNBC the most liberal name in news is a joke

All news is Biased but it is seriously overagerated

fox being conservative... thats news to me

Please tell me your joking :| its widely known fact that Fox has a real conservative slant.. See this is what I am talking about, your a extreme republican in denial.

im not even republican.

i want a very specific definition FROM YOUR OWN WORDS what conservative means

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts

Please tell me your joking :| its widely known fact that Fox has a real conservative slant.. See this is what I am talking about, your a extreme republican in denial.

sSubZerOo
He's saying that they have a neoconservative slant, which has nothing to do with true conservatism (cIassical liberalism, libertarianism, paleoconservatism).
Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#132 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts
[QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"]

again the liberal media card

Carter wasnt a good president and a shame to the democratic party

famicommander

Why do you keep dodging my points about Reagan? Low inflation, low taxes, low unemployment, low interest rates, higher prodcutivity, a higher GDP, and a higher median family income.

Look Reagan is seriously overrated, he was is a recession and got out of it, big deal

How can you say that in the face of the facts? You can't deny what he did. You can't just say he was overrated without any facts. The facts in that post you quoted clearly indicate that he had a more positive effect on the economy than any president in recent memory. Reagan: Recession---->Period of economic prosperity Clinton: Period of economic prosperity---->Recession.

really the president doesn't have much influence over the economy, the 2001 recession was responsible because of jobs leaving overseas, and the recession was a good one compared to others and the Dow only fell on 9/11

the Clinton years where sandwiched between two recessions

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts

voting for the lesser of two evils is a throw away vote. im voting bob barr

H8sMikeMoore
Bob Barr's voting record is more Neoconservative than McCain's.
Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#134 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts

[QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"] No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession H8sMikeMoore
That makes zero sense. There has to be something to spur the economy, otherwise we'd stay in recession forever.

If something good happened that was because of a conservative president, he'll say it's overrated. No matter what.

thats because he goes to moveon.org and asks "what do i believe oh holy website"

Ive never visited Moveon.org, I got my old sig from google :roll:

Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"]

again the liberal media card

Carter wasnt a good president and a shame to the democratic party

alexmurray

Why do you keep dodging my points about Reagan? Low inflation, low taxes, low unemployment, low interest rates, higher prodcutivity, a higher GDP, and a higher median family income.

Look Reagan is seriously overrated, he was is a recession and got out of it, big deal

How can you say that in the face of the facts? You can't deny what he did. You can't just say he was overrated without any facts. The facts in that post you quoted clearly indicate that he had a more positive effect on the economy than any president in recent memory. Reagan: Recession---->Period of economic prosperity Clinton: Period of economic prosperity---->Recession.

really the president doesn't have much influence over the economy, the 2001 recession was responsible because of jobs leaving overseas, and the recession was a good one compared to others and the Dow only fell on 9/11

the Clinton years where sandwiched between two recessions

yes the president does have influence over the economy. youll say anything wont you?

policy changes our economy.

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts

really the president doesn't have much influence over the economy, the 2001 recession was responsible because of jobs leaving overseas, and the recession was a good one compared to others and the Dow only fell on 9/11

the Clinton years where sandwiched between two recessions

alexmurray
I like how you change your opinion to something different, yet still incorrect, every time you lose an argument. You keep saying that McCain will be bad for the economy. How will he do that if "really the president doesn't have much influence over the economy"? Give Reagan his credit and accept that fact that Clinton and Carter both led us into recessions.
Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"] No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession alexmurray
That makes zero sense. There has to be something to spur the economy, otherwise we'd stay in recession forever.

If something good happened that was because of a conservative president, he'll say it's overrated. No matter what.

thats because he goes to moveon.org and asks "what do i believe oh holy website"

Ive never visited Moveon.org, I got my old sig from google :roll:

then enter any liberal source to replace it. its just comical how you spout such typical liberal garbage and can barely back it up
Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#138 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts
[QUOTE="alexmurray"]

[QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="halfirishhomer"]And how can you claim that the success of the 90's was due solely to Clinton?ferrari2001

That had nothing to do with Clinton, as we can clearly see by the fact that he took an economy on auto-pilot and drove it straight into a recession. There were three factors in the economic success of the 90s: 1. The Internet and computer boom. The Internet created 23 million jobs alone in the 90s. 2. The Gulf War. It kept oil flowing freely and history shows that most counties undergo a large economic boom after a successful military campaign. 3. Reaganomics. The effects of Reagan's policies took quite some time to wear off.

No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO

yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession

yea it does but with that thinking, you can't put any blame on Bush for the quality of our economy at the moment, because our economy is at the low point and so no matter who is elected our ecomony should at least improve.

yea everybody except the average voter knows that, the president really cant do anthing

Avatar image for RyuHayabusaX
RyuHayabusaX

7838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#139 RyuHayabusaX
Member since 2005 • 7838 Posts
Whether you want to be unbiased or not, Obama always has a more charismatic eloquence with his speeches. In a debate, he would seem overall more exciting compared to an old John McCain. Personally I want to see the VP debate so people can see someone who is good for the people vs someone who is good for the country.
Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#140 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts

[QUOTE="alexmurray"] [QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"] No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession H8sMikeMoore
That makes zero sense. There has to be something to spur the economy, otherwise we'd stay in recession forever.

If something good happened that was because of a conservative president, he'll say it's overrated. No matter what.

thats because he goes to moveon.org and asks "what do i believe oh holy website"

Ive never visited Moveon.org, I got my old sig from google :roll:

then enter any liberal source to replace it. its just comical how you spout such typical liberal garbage and can barely back it up

I don't visit heavily biased websites, yes I'm liberal but that doesn't mean I vist Moveon.org Ect

The only news websites I visit are BBC news and CNN

Avatar image for -RocBoys9489-
-RocBoys9489-

6336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 -RocBoys9489-
Member since 2008 • 6336 Posts

bla bla mccain is a leader

OBAMA FTW!!!

Avatar image for H8sMikeMoore
H8sMikeMoore

5427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 H8sMikeMoore
Member since 2008 • 5427 Posts
[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="alexmurray"] [QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"] No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession alexmurray
That makes zero sense. There has to be something to spur the economy, otherwise we'd stay in recession forever.

If something good happened that was because of a conservative president, he'll say it's overrated. No matter what.

thats because he goes to moveon.org and asks "what do i believe oh holy website"

Ive never visited Moveon.org, I got my old sig from google :roll:

then enter any liberal source to replace it. its just comical how you spout such typical liberal garbage and can barely back it up

I don't visit heavily biased websites, yes I'm liberal but that doesn't mean I vist Moveon.org Ect The only news websites I visit are BBC news and CNN

do you think the bbc is going to say anything nice about right wing politics? CNN is meh. i got to be honest and say im not big on the news tv thing in general. i get my news from the internet mostly.
Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#143 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts

bla bla mccain is a leader

OBAMA FTW!!!

-RocBoys9489-

But the fundamentals of the economy are strong:o

Avatar image for alexmurray
alexmurray

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#144 alexmurray
Member since 2005 • 2665 Posts

[QUOTE="alexmurray"] [QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="alexmurray"] [QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"][QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"] No, Reaganomics is overrated IMO yes he helped the economy but the economy naturally booms after a recession H8sMikeMoore
That makes zero sense. There has to be something to spur the economy, otherwise we'd stay in recession forever.

If something good happened that was because of a conservative president, he'll say it's overrated. No matter what.

thats because he goes to moveon.org and asks "what do i believe oh holy website"

Ive never visited Moveon.org, I got my old sig from google :roll:

then enter any liberal source to replace it. its just comical how you spout such typical liberal garbage and can barely back it up

I don't visit heavily biased websites, yes I'm liberal but that doesn't mean I vist Moveon.org Ect The only news websites I visit are BBC news and CNN

do you think the bbc is going to say anything nice about right wing politics? CNN is meh. i got to be honest and say im not big on the news tv thing in general. i get my news from the internet mostly.

C-span FTW!!!

PS the BBC doesn't really say anything about anything, they just report the news

No silly round table discussions just some guy reading off a teleprompter

Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts
[QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"]

bla bla mccain is a leader

OBAMA FTW!!!

alexmurray

But the fundamentals of the economy are strong:o

You just said that the president doesn't really affect the economy.
Avatar image for blazinpuertoroc
blazinpuertoroc

12245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#146 blazinpuertoroc
Member since 2004 • 12245 Posts
Obama can't alk without a tele-prompter...(which is why he brought it back on the campaign trail after trying to go without one......Debates are a funny creature.....it's not about speaking the best....it's about expressing the better ideas in a way that the viewer can grasp it..........Omni-Slash
seem you cant either...haha :lol: Just messing
Avatar image for trix5817
trix5817

12252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 trix5817
Member since 2004 • 12252 Posts
[QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="alexmurray"]

Regan was mediocre as a leader, so was Carter. The reason the graph rises is the Regan equation

Lower taxes + More spending = less debt????

alexmurray

He amassed that debt in anticipation of a nuclear freaking war. That was all military spending, and it seemed to work out alright. Notice how we didn't end up at war with Russia, and the Soviet Union fell?

Yea he should have spend money against that, but he should have raised taxes

Raising taxes is bad for the economy. Period.

history disagrees

No it agrees.

Okay :roll:

its better, lower taxes for poorer people so they can spend more, Higher taxes on richer people, but not so high that they become poor and lose significant amounts of money

The bottom 48% get more money back from the government than they pay in taxes.......

The top 10% pay 70% of the nations taxes.

The top 1% account for 25% of the nations spending.

You really have no idea how the economy works, do you?

Raising taxes for ANYONE is the WORST thing to do in a recession.

Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#148 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts
[QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="-RocBoys9489-"]

bla bla mccain is a leader

OBAMA FTW!!!

famicommander

But the fundamentals of the economy are strong:o

You just said that the president doesn't really affect the economy.

He reminds me of Uh-Bama.

Avatar image for blackngold29
blackngold29

14137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#149 blackngold29
Member since 2004 • 14137 Posts
I had a revalation a few days ago and realized, "Why not just eliminate all biased media?" So I've been watching no FOX, no CNN, and reading Reuters and watching C-SPAN. I find myself with less of a headache (at least about politics) and a little bit smarter.
Avatar image for halfirishhomer
halfirishhomer

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 halfirishhomer
Member since 2007 • 550 Posts
If the fundamentals of the economy aren't strong then how does Obama plan on rebuilding the economy?