Link...
I suppose people don't even have the right to defend themselves anymore without getting into trouble.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Link...
I suppose people don't even have the right to defend themselves anymore without getting into trouble.
.......she kept kicking the man in the head after he was unconsious. She easily could have killed him.
Considering that no charges were pressed against her I'm not totally in disagreement with this.
Its just 500 pounds, its not like its a really severe punishment.xTheExploited500 is a lot for some people, besides that's not the point and you know it. NO punishment is required for this situation.
[QUOTE="xTheExploited"] Its just 500 pounds, its not like its a really severe punishment.MushroomWig500 is a lot for some people, besides that's not the point and you know it. NO punishment is required for this situation. if this were two guys and one guy continued to beat the other long after the fight was over would you have the same attitude?
"No charges were brought against Docherty." .Rattlesnake_8this is the messed up thing if you ask me. Her being fined for continuing a fight that was already finished isn't really all that wrong, but the attacker getting off scott free is pretty messed up.
Really! The title needs to be changed on this thread!There's some serious misleading going on around here...
Oscar-Wilde
[QUOTE="Oscar-Wilde"]Really! The title needs to be changed on this thread! To what exactly? A girl was fined for defending herself, that's exactly what happened.There's some serious misleading going on around here...
HexedPelican
[QUOTE="HexedPelican"][QUOTE="Oscar-Wilde"]Really! The title needs to be changed on this thread! To what exactly? A girl was fined for defending herself, that's exactly what happened. A girl was fined for repeatedly kicking the head a guy that her boyfriend knocked out, you and the article were misleading. The only injustice here it's that charges weren't pressed against the drunk, probably because there's more to the story...There's some serious misleading going on around here...
MushroomWig
She used excessive force. It's not defending yourself once the person is unconscious.cd_romIt's hard to judge a situation when you're scared to death as someone is trying to attack you for no reason. I suppose it's easier to judge when you're on the sidelines reading about it.
It's hard to judge a situation when you're scared to death as someone is trying to attack you for no reason.
I suppose it's easier to judge when you're on the sidelines reading about it.
MushroomWig
The guy was knocked out. It's not like kicking him in the head will make him more knocked out.
[QUOTE="cd_rom"]She used excessive force. It's not defending yourself once the person is unconscious.MushroomWigIt's hard to judge a situation when you're scared to death as someone is trying to attack you for no reason. I suppose it's easier to judge when you're on the sidelines reading about it. I feel this is the reason she was merely fined and not arrested for assault. Cases like this are always in grey areas. "What constitutes self-defense? Yada yada yada." The cases I referred to were a bit extreme. Usually involving manslaughter in some way. Store clerks shooting a mugger in the back while he's running away and the like. Still, you're not supposed to go beyond what's happening to you.
[QUOTE="xTheExploited"] Its just 500 pounds, its not like its a really severe punishment.MushroomWig500 is a lot for some people, besides that's not the point and you know it. NO punishment is required for this situation. I'm not saying its not a lot of money but in terms of punishments by the law its not that bad. She could have gone to prison or had a much higher fine.
EDIT: Also yes people need to know that they can't just beat someone even when they're unconcious. Its similar to police brutality, a lot of the time the person being beaten by an officer did commit a crime. But that doesn't mean they are now open to being beaten severely. The girl had him unconcious already and continued beating him to a point where he wasn't far from death.
That's a very silly thing to say. =/foundher on facebook,she's not hot,hence the punishment is well deserved.
VaguelyTagged
She's lucky it was only £500, yes they guy was the initial attacker but when he was unconscious she should of stoped or her boyfriend should of stoped her (that is if he was still there as this happend). Using the excuse that she was scared to death isn't a good excuse, thats like saying its fine if you beat a friend unconscious or worse because they jumped out at you when its dark as a joke scaring you. The guy shouldn't of been let off without even a fine though, thats just ridiculous.
[QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"]That's a very silly thing to say. =/ define silliness.foundher on facebook,she's not hot,hence the punishment is well deserved.
MushroomWig
[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="VaguelyTagged"]That's a very silly thing to say. =/ define silliness. She's actually attractive...well I think so. :)foundher on facebook,she's not hot,hence the punishment is well deserved.
VaguelyTagged
The fact that she went too far is irrelevant in my opinion. It wouldn't have happened at all had he not followed her home in the first place. 100% the guys fault everything after that fact is just details.
Also, what a loser boyfriend :lol:
Of course, the idea of defending yourself is just silly, people need to just let the attack happen and somehow be able to call the police at the same time. Like I said, it's hard to judge a situation unless you're involved, was she supposed to ask her attacker if he was unconscious?hm, did you read the article? she's not being fined for defending herself, she's fined for kicking the guy in the face after he was unconscious. She also didn't call the cops, which would have a sensible thing to do, rather than kick his face in.
SirWander
However, she went too far by continuing to kick her attacker on the head even after he was knocked unconscious.
You have the right to use reasonable force, not bludgeon someone until they're unconscious i.e targetting the legs rather than the head after the person fell down.
Like I said, it's hard to judge a situation unless you're involved, was she supposed to ask her attacker if he was unconscious?MushroomWig
Yes. Civilians (e.g., most all of you) should be responsible for utilizing a measured continuum of force in a high intensity situation.
[QUOTE="MushroomWig"]Like I said, it's hard to judge a situation unless you're involved, was she supposed to ask her attacker if he was unconscious?Palantas
Yes. Civilians (e.g., most all of you) should be responsible for utilizing a measured continuum of force in a high intensity situation.
See this is what I mean, people react differently to different situations, when the adrenaline it's hard to be measured. She wouldn't of been in that situation if it wasn't for the guy, regardless of her actions it's his fault.[QUOTE="SirWander"]Of course, the idea of defending yourself is just silly, people need to just let the attack happen and somehow be able to call the police at the same time. Like I said, it's hard to judge a situation unless you're involved, was she supposed to ask her attacker if he was unconscious?hm, did you read the article? she's not being fined for defending herself, she's fined for kicking the guy in the face after he was unconscious. She also didn't call the cops, which would have a sensible thing to do, rather than kick his face in.
MushroomWig
you can defend yourself from an attacker, I don't think anyone here will dispute that. She went too far.
But wouldn't it be obvious that he was unconscious, unless he's a masochist and actually enjoyed being kicked.
it's not like I pity the drunkard, he deserved it as much as she deserves that fine.
So a woman repeatedly kicks a unconscious man in the head and then gets in trouble with the law.
Seems about right
[QUOTE="I"]See this is what I mean, people react differently to different situations, when the adrenaline it's hard to be measured. She wouldn't of been in that situation if it wasn't for the guy, regardless of her actions it's his fault.Civilians (e.g., most all of you) should be responsible for utilizing a measured continuum of force in a high intensity situation.
MushroomWig
Tough. She should have been more calm and collected, and relied on her military/police training when a crazy man broke into her house. I'm sure the people in this thread making comments like "She shouldn't have knocked him out" are very careful not render unconsious any assailants that have ever entered their homes.
EDIT: I was just informed that the crazy man didn't breake into her home. Correction noted.
By that you mean a scared woman defending herself against an attacker who acted the same way most people would react in that situation.So a woman repeatedly kicks a unconscious man in the head and then gets in trouble with the law.
Seems about right
toast_burner
See this is what I mean, people react differently to different situations, when the adrenaline it's hard to be measured. She wouldn't of been in that situation if it wasn't for the guy, regardless of her actions it's his fault.[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="I"]
Civilians (e.g., most all of you) should be responsible for utilizing a measured continuum of force in a high intensity situation.
Palantas
Tough. She should have been more calm and collected, and relied on her military/police training when a crazy man broke into her house. I'm sure the people in this thread making comments like "She shouldn't have knocked him out" are very careful not render unconsious any assailants that have ever entered their homes.
It wasn't in the house though so he didn't breake in, dosn't mean he should of done it though but you should get the facts right first :P
[QUOTE="xTheExploited"] Its just 500 pounds, its not like its a really severe punishment.MushroomWig500 is a lot for some people, besides that's not the point and you know it. NO punishment is required for this situation. After she took the guy down she beat the guys unconscious body....Which could of killed him. Deafening you self is one thing, finishing the guy off afterwards is another.
[QUOTE="toast_burner"]By that you mean a scared woman defending herself against an attacker who acted the same way most people would react in that situation. Defending her self from an unconscious drunk?So a woman repeatedly kicks a unconscious man in the head and then gets in trouble with the law.
Seems about right
MushroomWig
......You do know that she beat the guy after he was knocked out....Knocking out an attack is defending your self, beating when he's out cold is excessive force.Doesn't matter if she used excessive force. When someone breaks into your home, you're supposed to let them rape and plunder as they plesae, while waiting patiently for the police to arrive.
Palantas
Its similar to police brutality, a lot of the time the person being beaten by an officer did commit a crime. But that doesn't mean they are now open to being beaten severely. The girl had him unconcious already and continued beating him to a point where he wasn't far from death.
xTheExploited
I'm being sarcastic with Mushroom, but I'll be straight foward here. Police are trained to deal with situations like this. They are paid to protectpeople (even violent suspects), and supposed to be able to deal with stressful situations. Is there some sort of mandatory, government-certified self-defense training that all people in (wherever this took place; London, I think) London go through? I doubt it.
I'm glad she didn't get in any real trouble. Five hundred pounds may or may not be a lot depending on how much money she has.
Of course, the idea of defending yourself is just silly, people need to just let the attack happen and somehow be able to call the police at the same time. Like I said, it's hard to judge a situation unless you're involved, was she supposed to ask her attacker if he was unconscious?[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="SirWander"]
hm, did you read the article? she's not being fined for defending herself, she's fined for kicking the guy in the face after he was unconscious. She also didn't call the cops, which would have a sensible thing to do, rather than kick his face in.
SirWander
you can defend yourself from an attacker, I don't think anyone here will dispute that. She went too far.
But wouldn't it be obvious that he was unconscious, unless he's a masochist and actually enjoyed being kicked.
it's not like I pity the drunkard, he deserved it as much as she deserves that fine.
Off topic...what's anime is your sig from?It wasn't in the house though so he didn't breake in, dosn't mean he should of done it though but you should get the facts right first :P
knightseason
That detail is irrelevant to my point, but I'll change it anyway.
......You do know that she beat the guy after he was knocked out....Knocking out an attack is defending your self, beating when he's out cold is excessive force.dreman999
See my previous post. Yeah, I know that because I was in the military and have been trained to use a continuum of force when dealing with civilians. You expect everyone else to respond that way? You've received this training I suppose?
.........................
[QUOTE="xTheExploited"]
Its similar to police brutality, a lot of the time the person being beaten by an officer did commit a crime. But that doesn't mean they are now open to being beaten severely. The girl had him unconcious already and continued beating him to a point where he wasn't far from death.
Palantas
I'm being sarcastic with Mushroom, but I'll be straight foward here. Police are trained to deal with situations like this. They are paid to protectpeople (even violent suspects), and supposed to be able to deal with stressful situations. Is there some sort of mandatory, government-certified self-defense training that all people in (wherever this took place; London, I think) London go through? I doubt it.
I'm glad she didn't get in any real trouble. Five hundred pounds may or may not be a lot depending on how much money she has.
Just because you not trained not to use excessive force for it does not give the excuse to do it. The man was down, he was no threat anymore.[QUOTE="SirWander"][QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Of course, the idea of defending yourself is just silly, people need to just let the attack happen and somehow be able to call the police at the same time. Like I said, it's hard to judge a situation unless you're involved, was she supposed to ask her attacker if he was unconscious?dreman999
you can defend yourself from an attacker, I don't think anyone here will dispute that. She went too far.
But wouldn't it be obvious that he was unconscious, unless he's a masochist and actually enjoyed being kicked.
it's not like I pity the drunkard, he deserved it as much as she deserves that fine.
Off topic...what's anime is your sig from?Le Chevalier D'Eon
[QUOTE="knightseason"]
It wasn't in the house though so he didn't breake in, dosn't mean he should of done it though but you should get the facts right first :P
Palantas
That detail is irrelevant to my point, but I'll change it anyway.
......You do know that she beat the guy after he was knocked out....Knocking out an attack is defending your self, beating when he's out cold is excessive force.dreman999
See my previous post. Yeah, I know that because I was in the military and have been trained to use a continuum of force when dealing with civilians. You expect everyone else to respond that way? You've received this training I suppose?
.........................
It not the a case were you slip and find your self beating someone after they are down. It was clear he was out.Off topic...what's anime is your sig from?[QUOTE="dreman999"][QUOTE="SirWander"]
you can defend yourself from an attacker, I don't think anyone here will dispute that. She went too far.
But wouldn't it be obvious that he was unconscious, unless he's a masochist and actually enjoyed being kicked.
it's not like I pity the drunkard, he deserved it as much as she deserves that fine.
SirWander
Le Chevalier D'Eon
Is it anything like Rose of Versailles?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment