This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.
We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.
Pretty much how I see it. Unfortunately, I see Obama as the lesser of two evils and I think others would vote the same based on that.At this point I'm not sure it matters who gets to be president until we overhaul our governement.
junglist101
I hope not and doubt it considering what an absolute mess the Republican party is now.
Kinda ridiculous how losing one presidential election made the partylose it's mind and just fall apart.
but obama won in 2008... oh, you were talking about the republicans? i thought you might have been talking about the party that decided to give the country to big pharma at all costs, and did.I hope not and doubt it considering what an absolute mess the Republican party is now.
Kinda ridiculous how losing one presidential election made the partylose it's mind and just fall apart.
LostProphetFLCL
Gaining control of one branch and gaining seats in another is falling apart?I hope not and doubt it considering what an absolute mess the Republican party is now.
Kinda ridiculous how losing one presidential election made the partylose it's mind and just fall apart.
LostProphetFLCL
this post needed a RON PAUL 2012 at the end of itThis country will never change until people realize both parties have the same agenda.
wellbigd
We've done it in the past before, so a 2012 GOP victory is always possible. The only difference is that back then, the candidates who won tended to be moderate in their positions. The popular candidates are extreme while the moderate to conservative candidates are ignored.
Despite dismal unemployment and a poor economy, I still see Obama winning. I don't want him to win but it's still going to happen.
this post needed a RON PAUL 2012 at the end of it Pssh... Ron Paul is too old, but he does have some good ideals. seriously though look a this country it nothing gets done due to intentional indecisiveness while we allow all our companies to ship jobs over seas and then cry about unemployment. All why congress votes on the slogan on the back off the dollar.[QUOTE="wellbigd"]
This country will never change until people realize both parties have the same agenda.
surrealnumber5
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]this post needed a RON PAUL 2012 at the end of it Pssh... Ron Paul is too old, but he does have some good ideals. seriously though look a this country it nothing gets done due to intentional indecisiveness while we allow all our companies to ship jobs over seas and then cry about unemployment. All why congress votes on the slogan on the back off the dollar. we force companies to ship jobs over seas vie governance. both parties are filled with people who want to give everyone who calls for more government what they want.[QUOTE="wellbigd"]
This country will never change until people realize both parties have the same agenda.
wellbigd
unions want to price out un-unionised labor, politicians agree. people lose their jobs and want more unemployment and politicians agree.
I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.
We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.
Planet_Pluto
I'm unemployed and I'm thrilled with President Obama. I think's it's not just a question of unemployment, but of if the public is going to put the blame solely on President Obama or if they're going to react against a Republican congress that's been content not to pass any legislation at all. I also think people realize that as disenchanted as they are with President Obama, the majority of the Republican presidential candidates would be just as much of a foreign policy disaster as Bush if you go by their claims, that they're all on the far right side of the spectrum, and that when voting for the next President they may not be just voting for a President but for a Supreme Court justice or two as well.
Gaining control of one branch and gaining seats in another is falling apart?[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
I hope not and doubt it considering what an absolute mess the Republican party is now.
Kinda ridiculous how losing one presidential election made the partylose it's mind and just fall apart.
Planet_Pluto
This whole tea party business which seems to me has made it so there is no single focus with the Republican party besides "Blargh Democrats are bad we need to block everything they try and do."
Don't be fooled either, plenty of people are very PO'd at the Republicans in office and I can ver well see them getting the boot when elections come around.
It does not matter to me at this point. As long as either of them will be able to create jobs, bring back up the economy, and preventing no wars, then I will be happy. Thug2Wastelandpaul is the only one looking to end wars cut spending and lift crushing regulation on small businesses. everyone else might as well be the same person regardless of that party letter is next to their name
Gaining control of one branch and gaining seats in another is falling apart?[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
I hope not and doubt it considering what an absolute mess the Republican party is now.
Kinda ridiculous how losing one presidential election made the partylose it's mind and just fall apart.
LostProphetFLCL
This whole tea party business which seems to me has made it so there is no single focus with the Republican party besides "Blargh Democrats are bad we need to block everything they try and do."
Don't be fooled either, plenty of people are very PO'd at the Republicans in office and I can ver well see them getting the boot when elections come around.
What single focus do either party have?I think people are PO'd at politicians in general, regardless of the letter before their name.
paul is the only one looking to end wars cut spending and lift crushing regulation on small businesses. everyone else might as well be the same person regardless of that party letter is next to their nameIt's kinda misleading, alot of people are telling me to vote for Ron Paul. However, he might be the same as Obama, but hopefully he can at least bring the country in the right direction. We all want to live in a era where we don't have to go through wars, so I am hoping that he will prevent wars, or end wars.[QUOTE="Thug2Wasteland"]It does not matter to me at this point. As long as either of them will be able to create jobs, bring back up the economy, and preventing no wars, then I will be happy. surrealnumber5
[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]Gaining control of one branch and gaining seats in another is falling apart?
Planet_Pluto
This whole tea party business which seems to me has made it so there is no single focus with the Republican party besides "Blargh Democrats are bad we need to block everything they try and do."
Don't be fooled either, plenty of people are very PO'd at the Republicans in office and I can ver well see them getting the boot when elections come around.
What single focus do either party have?I think people are PO'd at politicians in general, regardless of the letter before their name.
both parties seem to be focused on MORE, the only divergance is how much more where.[QUOTE="LostProphetFLCL"]
[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]Gaining control of one branch and gaining seats in another is falling apart?
Planet_Pluto
This whole tea party business which seems to me has made it so there is no single focus with the Republican party besides "Blargh Democrats are bad we need to block everything they try and do."
Don't be fooled either, plenty of people are very PO'd at the Republicans in office and I can ver well see them getting the boot when elections come around.
What single focus do either party have?I think people are PO'd at politicians in general, regardless of the letter before their name.
Well at least with the democrats I feel they were trying to support their president for the most part.
But anyways, yeah people are PO'd at politicians in general, but with the way the Repubs in congress have been embarassing themselves with things like the debt crisis, or beyond congress where like here in Michigan people are ready to hang Rick Snyder who is not even two years into his reign as governor.
Unless the Dem party starts making some major boo-boo's, Amidst all this hate for politicians, I just don't see the Repubs being able to continue holding strong in office especially when you have Obama and all his charisma to woo people to the dem party.
I can't think of a single Republican right now who has any real charisma to swing voters outside of people who would already be voting Republican.
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]paul is the only one looking to end wars cut spending and lift crushing regulation on small businesses. everyone else might as well be the same person regardless of that party letter is next to their nameIt's kinda misleading, alot of people are telling me to vote for Ron Paul. However, he might be the same as Obama, but hopefully he can at least bring the country in the right direction. We all want to live in a era where we don't have to go through wars, so I am hoping that he will prevent wars, or end wars. paul has been saying the same thing since the 70's, he does not have a record of being a sham artist or flipflopper. as he said in a recent interview " the times have finally caught up to the predictions i have been warning about for decades" the man called the last 4 booms and busts including the current bust in college loans.[QUOTE="Thug2Wasteland"]It does not matter to me at this point. As long as either of them will be able to create jobs, bring back up the economy, and preventing no wars, then I will be happy. Thug2Wasteland
he is the only "intellectual" that i know of in the running, the man knew and spoke with great economic minds like milton and rothbard before they died in the 90's, he is a guy that actually understands the business cycle theory. none of these things can be said about obama
Pssh... Ron Paul is too old, but he does have some good ideals. seriously though look a this country it nothing gets done due to intentional indecisiveness while we allow all our companies to ship jobs over seas and then cry about unemployment. All why congress votes on the slogan on the back off the dollar. we force companies to ship jobs over seas vie governance. both parties are filled with people who want to give everyone who calls for more government what they want.[QUOTE="wellbigd"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] this post needed a RON PAUL 2012 at the end of it
surrealnumber5
unions want to price out un-unionised labor, politicians agree. people lose their jobs and want more unemployment and politicians agree.
and that my friend is the main problem companies don't care about this country same with politicians it's all about profit.[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]we force companies to ship jobs over seas vie governance. both parties are filled with people who want to give everyone who calls for more government what they want.[QUOTE="wellbigd"] Pssh... Ron Paul is too old, but he does have some good ideals. seriously though look a this country it nothing gets done due to intentional indecisiveness while we allow all our companies to ship jobs over seas and then cry about unemployment. All why congress votes on the slogan on the back off the dollar.wellbigd
unions want to price out un-unionised labor, politicians agree. people lose their jobs and want more unemployment and politicians agree.
and that my friend is the main problem companies don't care about this country same with politicians it's all about profit. why should they care about anyone/thing that seeks to harm them? i closed a business and let go 10 peoplebecause it was no longer worth the troubles of dealing with employment regulations, do i too hate america because i wound down a profitable business because of my disdain for ancillary bureaucracy?[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]we force companies to ship jobs over seas vie governance. both parties are filled with people who want to give everyone who calls for more government what they want.[QUOTE="wellbigd"] Pssh... Ron Paul is too old, but he does have some good ideals. seriously though look a this country it nothing gets done due to intentional indecisiveness while we allow all our companies to ship jobs over seas and then cry about unemployment. All why congress votes on the slogan on the back off the dollar.wellbigd
unions want to price out un-unionised labor, politicians agree. people lose their jobs and want more unemployment and politicians agree.
and that my friend is the main problem companies don't care about this country same with politicians it's all about profit. It's all about profit? Why else have a company? That is why a company exists in the first place. It's not their job to make sure you eat. It's yours. They don't exist to fund beaurocrats, and social programs.A two party system is always set to fail....
And if you do vote in a Republican there will be a collective Wtf from everyone else in the world.
that is fine, the world has no hold over us and i would have it no other way.A two party system is always set to fail....
And if you do vote in a Republican there will be a collective Wtf from everyone else in the world.
MattDistillery
Too soon to call it. It depends quite a degree upon factors which haven't been yet determined, such as who the GOP candidate is. In the case of Romney taking the nomination, pretty close to even money. The other candidates who could conceivably take the nomination would have to swing so far center that they'd look like the inverse of Romney if they expect to take the general.
i hate how "center" means you are for both civil and economic servitude.Too soon to call it. It depends quite a degree upon factors which haven't been yet determined, such as who the GOP candidate is. In the case of Romney taking the nomination, pretty close to even money. The other candidates who could conceivably take the nomination would have to swing so far center that they'd look like the inverse of Romney if they expect to take the general.
coolbeans90
i hate how "center" means you are for both civil and economic servitude.[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]
Too soon to call it. It depends quite a degree upon factors which haven't been yet determined, such as who the GOP candidate is. In the case of Romney taking the nomination, pretty close to even money. The other candidates who could conceivably take the nomination would have to swing so far center that they'd look like the inverse of Romney if they expect to take the general.
surrealnumber5
It says a bit more about the electorate than the political orientation of said policies.
Going for Obama. Not having republicans bury the country.YoshiYogurtI agree. Obama is doing a fine job himself.
It's not that people aren't upset with Obama (although he's been remarkably consistent about keeping campaign promises; we got what we voted for in 2008) but rather the Republican candidates are remarkably underwhelming.
[QUOTE="wellbigd"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] we force companies to ship jobs over seas vie governance. both parties are filled with people who want to give everyone who calls for more government what they want.and that my friend is the main problem companies don't care about this country same with politicians it's all about profit. It's all about profit? Why else have a company? That is why a company exists in the first place. It's not their job to make sure you eat. It's yours. They don't exist to fund beaurocrats, and social programs. If you actually believe a company is right exploit labor in third world countries and undercut in quality and safety for profit, I feel sorry for you.unions want to price out un-unionised labor, politicians agree. people lose their jobs and want more unemployment and politicians agree.
DevilMightCry
I'm certainly not ready to do so, but that probably comes as no surprise to everyone on this site.
However I do say I'm not ready because I have been watching the republicans as a whole since Obama got elected and because I have been watching the republican debates. Neither of these things that I have been paying attention to suggests that republicans should have control of anything in my opinion.
Obama's approval rating is creeping back up, and the public opion of republican cannidates is dropping. Unless something changes he will probably get reelected.
At this moment in time I feel anyone has got to be better than Obama...too bad the Democratic party just can't oust him out and select another candidate for the 2012 elections (and by ousting him out, I mean let him finish the term but pick a different candidate as if he's already served two terms).
If the Republicans field a competent, moderate candidate (Huntsman, or even Romney), I'd say they'd be the favorites. Huntsman I think would win easily unless the economy turned a 180 in the next 12 months, and Romney I think would be a favorite.
If they pick just about anyone else, I think Obama will have a very strong chance at reelection.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment