Is the United States ready to vote in another Republican for 2012?

  • 120 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

If the Republicans field a competent, moderate candidate (Huntsman, or even Romney), I'd say they'd be the favorites. Huntsman I think would win easily unless the economy turned a 180 in the next 12 months, and Romney I think would be a favorite.

If they pick just about anyone else, I think Obama will have a very strong chance at reelection.

chessmaster1989

I kind of see Romney and Obama on the same playing field once you have weighed the pros and cons of each person.

Avatar image for Sunfyre7896
Sunfyre7896

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Sunfyre7896
Member since 2011 • 1644 Posts
[QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Is the United States ready to vote in another Republican? I seriously doubt that will happen. Obama has the 2012 election wrapped up. I do not think the majority of the US is ready to accept having another Republican in office simply because of Bush and what he did to the image of the party. Obama didn't really deliver on his "change" (positive change, maybe the health care bill though, I thought that was a good victory), but I think the US is more apt to giving Obama a second chance than handing the top spot back to Republicans. Discuss.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWW Are you serious. Nobody completely has the election ever before you even know who's on the other ticket. That's why they have the election. Obviously you are a liberal or you just can't stand Republicans to make a comment that bold. There are some candidates like Paul that are NOTHING like Bush or the traditional Republicans. Some people will vote Democrat no matter what, but there are many that don't like the fact that Obama is spending this nation into a huge hole of debt. Not to mention that Obama is pro-free handout money. That's what many left wingers believe in. They think that somehow the country will run just fine with Robin Hood helping out a mother of 8 that keeps popping out kids because each one guarantees another $20 thousand or so a year. How about fiscal responsibility? I see that the bank bailouts are working JUST FINE with all those new millions in bonuses to the CEO's. Great job. To say that Obama is as good as in is just asinine ludicrousness.
Avatar image for Sunfyre7896
Sunfyre7896

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Sunfyre7896
Member since 2011 • 1644 Posts

At this moment in time I feel anyone has got to be better than Obama...too bad the Democratic party just can't oust him out and select another candidate for the 2012 elections (and by ousting him out, I mean let him finish the term but pick a different candidate as if he's already served two terms).

Wren28
Actually they can. Obama still has to get re-elected in the primaries to represent the Democratic Party on the ticket. It's just that most of the time, the President will get the nod again as people just want to keep them.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="Sunfyre7896"][QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Is the United States ready to vote in another Republican? I seriously doubt that will happen. Obama has the 2012 election wrapped up. I do not think the majority of the US is ready to accept having another Republican in office simply because of Bush and what he did to the image of the party. Obama didn't really deliver on his "change" (positive change, maybe the health care bill though, I thought that was a good victory), but I think the US is more apt to giving Obama a second chance than handing the top spot back to Republicans. Discuss.

WOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWW Are you serious. Nobody completely has the election ever before you even know who's on the other ticket. That's why they have the election. Obviously you are a liberal or you just can't stand Republicans to make a comment that bold. There are some candidates like Paul that are NOTHING like Bush or the traditional Republicans. Some people will vote Democrat no matter what, but there are many that don't like the fact that Obama is spending this nation into a huge hole of debt. Not to mention that Obama is pro-free handout money. That's what many left wingers believe in. They think that somehow the country will run just fine with Robin Hood helping out a mother of 8 that keeps popping out kids because each one guarantees another $20 thousand or so a year. How about fiscal responsibility? I see that the bank bailouts are working JUST FINE with all those new millions in bonuses to the CEO's. Great job. To say that Obama is as good as in is just asinine ludicrousness.

I don't get the analogy between the success of the bailouts and bonuses. Also, the Republican field is absolutely terrible. If you are looking at a realistic chance at every candidate, it would be clear the Romney is the only one that stands a chance against Obama. The others are too centrist or too extreme to win. And even if Romney wins, theres already a playbook on how to dissect him in an election for Obama to use.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
if romney beats obama it would be just like if mccain had beaten obama, it would make no bleeping difference
Avatar image for Sunfyre7896
Sunfyre7896

1644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Sunfyre7896
Member since 2011 • 1644 Posts

[QUOTE="Sunfyre7896"][QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Is the United States ready to vote in another Republican? I seriously doubt that will happen. Obama has the 2012 election wrapped up. I do not think the majority of the US is ready to accept having another Republican in office simply because of Bush and what he did to the image of the party. Obama didn't really deliver on his "change" (positive change, maybe the health care bill though, I thought that was a good victory), but I think the US is more apt to giving Obama a second chance than handing the top spot back to Republicans. Discuss.DroidPhysX
Then don't worry about voting. If Obama's got it then he has it. We shouldn't even have an election and just elect him by default. And the fact that it was more important to bonus the CEO than pay back the money they owe the government is what I was referring to. This debate is going nowhere. People are either for Obama or for another candidate and will stick by them. Anyone with an inkling of conviction will stick by their candidate and not be swayed no matter what someone else says. For example, someone for Obama will say that he's the best for America and the Republicans are ruined. Someone for say, Paul, will say that he represents good change and a way to get out of debt. Neither will convince the other unless someone is wavering or isn't very strong minded or opinionated. WOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWW Are you serious. Nobody completely has the election ever before you even know who's on the other ticket. That's why they have the election. Obviously you are a liberal or you just can't stand Republicans to make a comment that bold. There are some candidates like Paul that are NOTHING like Bush or the traditional Republicans. Some people will vote Democrat no matter what, but there are many that don't like the fact that Obama is spending this nation into a huge hole of debt. Not to mention that Obama is pro-free handout money. That's what many left wingers believe in. They think that somehow the country will run just fine with Robin Hood helping out a mother of 8 that keeps popping out kids because each one guarantees another $20 thousand or so a year. How about fiscal responsibility? I see that the bank bailouts are working JUST FINE with all those new millions in bonuses to the CEO's. Great job. To say that Obama is as good as in is just asinine ludicrousness.

I don't get the analogy between the success of the bailouts and bonuses. Also, the Republican field is absolutely terrible. If you are looking at a realistic chance at every candidate, it would be clear the Romney is the only one that stands a chance against Obama. The others are too centrist or too extreme to win. And even if Romney wins, theres already a playbook on how to dissect him in an election for Obama to use.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts
Huntsman could win, but other than that I don't see it happening. Damn you Republican party! Why u no like Huntsman!
Avatar image for xbox360isgr8t
xbox360isgr8t

6600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 xbox360isgr8t
Member since 2006 • 6600 Posts
im so sick of the bush haters open your eyes people what has obama done that has really improved anything in 4 years? not much the economy still sucks employment is still high and has not improved much either. this guy is a one term president. we are far worse off with him in office 4 more years. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/oct/07/us-jobless-unemployment-data
Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23340

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23340 Posts

I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.

We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.

Planet_Pluto
Ah yes, the current party isn't fixing the situation fast enough, so let's vote back in the party who wrecked it in the first place.
Avatar image for Pittfan666
Pittfan666

8638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#60 Pittfan666
Member since 2003 • 8638 Posts
At this point I'm not even going to bother voting for anybody. None of the candidates are appealing. I'm just hoping that when I get my second BS degree in 2.5 years that I'll be able to find a job this go around.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#61 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
The United States needs a REAL Republican right now. Focusing on spending less, and not getting in the way of social freedoms. Not this neo-con, shove-our-religion-down-everyones-throats mess of a party the right has going now.
Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"][QUOTE="wellbigd"] and that my friend is the main problem companies don't care about this country same with politicians it's all about profit.wellbigd

It's all about profit? Why else have a company? That is why a company exists in the first place. It's not their job to make sure you eat. It's yours. They don't exist to fund beaurocrats, and social programs.

If you actually believe a company is right exploit labor in third world countries and undercut in quality and safety for profit, I feel sorry for you.

What does that have to do with I stated? 1. We have Child Labor Laws, and other employee protective laws. 2. USA is not a third world country.
Avatar image for wellbigd
wellbigd

240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 wellbigd
Member since 2007 • 240 Posts

[QUOTE="wellbigd"]

[QUOTE="DevilMightCry"] It's all about profit? Why else have a company? That is why a company exists in the first place. It's not their job to make sure you eat. It's yours. They don't exist to fund beaurocrats, and social programs. DevilMightCry

If you actually believe a company is right exploit labor in third world countries and undercut in quality and safety for profit, I feel sorry for you.

What does that have to do with I stated? 1. We have Child Labor Laws, and other employee protective laws. 2. USA is not a third world country.

Did you not say their only purpose is to make a profit. Do you think that if adds an extra billion a year they wouldn't drive down wages?

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51578 Posts

Hope so.

Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts
Has the Country gotten better? Has the Economy improved? Has the status of our Troops improved? Has unemployment rates improved? And most importantly... Are you better off today then you were four years ago? I would say the majority of Americans would vote NO to at least 4/6 of the questions
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

im so sick of the bush haters open your eyes people what has obama done that has really improved anything in 4 years? not much the economy still sucks employment is still high and has not improved much either. this guy is a one term president. we are far worse off with him in office 4 more years. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/oct/07/us-jobless-unemployment-dataxbox360isgr8t

being sick of Bush haters doesn't really change the facts. Just the way you view the facts.

Avatar image for Bubble_Man
Bubble_Man

3100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#67 Bubble_Man
Member since 2006 • 3100 Posts

I voted "nope." Not saying he can't win, but "in the bag" wouldn't be a realistic answer. The economy is bad and people tend to blame whoever happens to be in office at the time for these things. He could get re-elected, but he has a real fight on his hands.

Avatar image for MgamerBD
MgamerBD

17550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 MgamerBD
Member since 2006 • 17550 Posts

:lol: Hell no :| That wold be insane. I hope whatever you do this election don't go Republican. Go green party or libertarain for all I care. Just not Republican...their lineup is a joke.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

Has the Country gotten better? In some ways yes and in other ways no. Being a IT guy Obama has really done a lot for people in the information sector.

Has the Economy improved? Not in the way it should, but what it comes down to (for me) is who I see working to improve it and who is working to stagnate it for politcal points.

Has the status of our Troops improved? Actually yeah in a lot of ways. We are finally getting out of Iraq at the end of the year, we handled Libya in a way that didn't cost tens of thousands of American lives or that much money, and the more we can do with a light touch as opposed to an all out invasion the safer we shall be. We do need to get out of Afghanistan though so you have me there I suppose.

Has unemployment rates improved? No, but again I see certain people trying to improve the situation and others trying to stagnate the situation.

And most importantly... Are you better off today then you were four years ago? Yes, but that has nothing to do with Obama and everything to do with me getting out of fast food, more education, and getting a girlfriend. I suppose you could thank Obama for pushing for more education by granting more scholarships, but that never really affected me personally.

I would say the majority of Americans would vote NO to at least 4/6 of the questionsfueled-system

Avatar image for Dgalmun
Dgalmun

16266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#70 Dgalmun
Member since 2009 • 16266 Posts

I hope we do vote another Republican in. They can pick up where Bush left off and finish running the country into the ground. Maybe this time they'll finally be able to privitize Social Security and put it in the stock market where it belongs.:roll:

jdc6305
inb4 NWO
Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#71 The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.

We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.

Planet_Pluto
My life is actually worse now than it was four years ago. >_>
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#72 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
It's all about profit? Why else have a company? That is why a company exists in the first place. It's not their job to make sure you eat. It's yours. They don't exist to fund beaurocrats, and social programs. DevilMightCry
I think a lot of people sometimes confuse anger at companies being 'all about profit' as demanding something for nothing. I don't think people want big companies to GIVE them anything, they'd rather they stop ruining their lives. The biggest problem is that truly gigantic corporations are run by a small group of men called the board. Men who pay themselves tens of millions for their services, even continuing to pay themselves in excess of $100 million as their companies go bankrupt, ruining all of their shareholder's investments and making thousands unemployed. Just look at Enron. A company playing the 'all about profit' game to a master craft level, valued at billions and not caring at all about tomorrow so long as they were making profit today. The same year they filed the biggest bankruptcy in history, their CEO paid himself $140 million for doing such a grand job. He also took out a loan against the company of a further $70 million. Months later they were bankrupt, THOUSANDS lost their job and several other firms which worked for/with the corporation got dragged under with them. Exactly the same with the financial crisis; bankers playing roulette with consumer savings, so what if they lose all of your money? All they care about is the chance they'll make some cash and get a bonus. 'All about profit' just doesn't work. Over regulation is equally troublesome, but boardrooms left to go about their own designs leads to catastrophe every single time.
Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#73 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts

Doesn't matter what party gets elected to me. As long as someone gets in there and does their job - with my conservative views ;)

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
Not the bumblers the US has for Conservatives right now. They're awful, I honestly don't get how anyone could want them to lead their country.
Avatar image for Maniacc1
Maniacc1

5354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#75 Maniacc1
Member since 2006 • 5354 Posts
It's not that the people won't vote for a Republican candidate... if Obama does pull out the victory it will be because of the laughably weak candidates the GOP has to offer.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

The Republican field looks weaker and weaker. The most potential they have is in Romney, and with his viewpoints he'll just do jack s*** like Obama did. Paul won't get elected despite actually understanding economics and politics, and the rest of the GOP field is full of morons (Perry, Santorum, Cain, etc.).

But like others have said, it won't make much of a difference unless someone who actually knows what they're doing and won't give into the slightest pressures from corporations and bureaucratic sycophants is elected. That very obviously won't happen...

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
It's not that the people won't vote for a Republican candidate... if Obama does pull out the victory it will be because of the laughably weak candidates the GOP has to offer. Maniacc1
reminds me of Kerry. Democrats strategy of, "Anybody but Bush" wasn't exactly a compelling argument.
Avatar image for soulless4now
soulless4now

41388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#78 soulless4now
Member since 2003 • 41388 Posts

It's hard to tell, but Romney is the only sane choice compared to the rest. I think the main issue with next election will be not as many people voting as they did in 2008.

Avatar image for CrimzonTide
CrimzonTide

12187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#79 CrimzonTide
Member since 2007 • 12187 Posts
The US is perfectly ready to elect a Republican...but that would require a semi decent candidate, and this bizarre, mismatched selection of unelectables isn't it.
Avatar image for Maniacc1
Maniacc1

5354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#80 Maniacc1
Member since 2006 • 5354 Posts
[QUOTE="Maniacc1"]It's not that the people won't vote for a Republican candidate... if Obama does pull out the victory it will be because of the laughably weak candidates the GOP has to offer. Serraph105
reminds me of Kerry. Democrats strategy of, "Anybody but Bush" wasn't exactly a compelling argument.

Exactly. Herman Munster as President? Was never going to happen. :P
Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#81 ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.

We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.

Planet_Pluto

Ya im one of those 14 million not employed. I'm thrilled that Obama can take all the vacations he wants while congress fights among themselves like a bunch of elementary children. Looks like we have a bright future as long as the wayward wanna-be celebrity president is in office.

I can't honestly think of one good thing he has done, except put us in even more debt than all the previous presidents combined. I hope he gets elected again so we can have very expensive green jobs everywhere. Maybe another super stimulus bill so we can build more bridges to nowhere, or turle crossings because those turtles need safe areas to cross busy highways. Man he truly is the best president to ever sit in the oval office.

On a more serious note, my next door neighbor's dog creates more shovel ready jobs than that S.O.B ever claims he has created. Point blank, government does'nt create jobs, they interfere with jobs.

Newt for the win!!!!

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.

We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.

ristactionjakso

Ya im one of those 14 million not employed.

Herman Cain says to blame yourself.

Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#83 ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.

We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.

Serraph105

Ya im one of those 14 million not employed.

Herman Cain says to blame yourself.

Proof?

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.

We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.

Serraph105

Ya im one of those 14 million not employed.

Herman Cain says to blame yourself.

That's pretty much what the entire right seems to think. How many times have I seen people tell OWS to "Go get a job!".
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

[QUOTE="ristactionjakso"]Ya im one of those 14 million not employed.

ristactionjakso

Herman Cain says to blame yourself.

Proof?

he said it and at one of the debates he doubled down on it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHMEC8Xk9cg
Avatar image for curtkobain
curtkobain

3898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#86 curtkobain
Member since 2005 • 3898 Posts
I sure as heck hope not! The Republican candidates just seem to try to think of some random campaign that will give them buzz so they can elected. None of tehm seem to want to or plan on helping the country. They just want the position and power.
Avatar image for curtkobain
curtkobain

3898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#87 curtkobain
Member since 2005 • 3898 Posts

[QUOTE="Planet_Pluto"]

I'm sure the 14 million +/- chronically unemployed people are thrilled with Obama (not to mention those that are underemployed). As are the millions of college grads that have no career to speak of, yet have mountains of debt.

We'll see I suppose. As they say, "Is your life better now than it was 4 years ago?" Nothing will surprise me.

ristactionjakso

Ya im one of those 14 million not employed. I'm thrilled that Obama can take all the vacations he wants while congress fights among themselves like a bunch of elementary children. Looks like we have a bright future as long as the wayward wanna-be celebrity president is in office.

I can't honestly think of one good thing he has done, except put us in even more debt than all the previous presidents combined. I hope he gets elected again so we can have very expensive green jobs everywhere. Maybe another super stimulus bill so we can build more bridges to nowhere, or turle crossings because those turtles need safe areas to cross busy highways. Man he truly is the best president to ever sit in the oval office.

On a more serious note, my next door neighbor's dog creates more shovel ready jobs than that S.O.B ever claims he has created. Point blank, government does'nt create jobs, they interfere with jobs.

Newt for the win!!!!

If Obama is spending his time building bridges why don;t you join the department of transportation. There are jobs there. YOu can just build a bridge to know where.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

If Obama is spending his time building bridges why don;t you join the department of transportation. There are jobs there. YOu can just build a bridge to know where.curtkobain

Are you seriously suggesting we build bridges just for the hell of it to put people back to work? And you say Republicans are the problem. :lol:

Avatar image for curtkobain
curtkobain

3898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#89 curtkobain
Member since 2005 • 3898 Posts

[QUOTE="curtkobain"]If Obama is spending his time building bridges why don;t you join the department of transportation. There are jobs there. YOu can just build a bridge to know where.airshocker

Are you seriously suggesting we build bridges just for the hell of it to put people back to work? And you say Republicans are the problem. :lol:

No. I'm not the one claiming that bridges are being built to nowhere. You are the one who said you could join the military to get a job. You can't claim that the gov't doesn't supply jobs when they have the DOT and military.
Avatar image for Shadow4020
Shadow4020

2097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Shadow4020
Member since 2007 • 2097 Posts

I'm 99% sure Romney will get the nomination, because he's the most well known and not too extreme. But I don't think he has a chance against Obama.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#91 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

No. I'm not the one claiming that bridges are being built to nowhere. You are the one who said you could join the military to get a job. You can't claim that the gov't doesn't supply jobs when they have the DOT and military. curtkobain

Bridges to no where don't exist? :lol: And of course I'm only referring to the US ones.

Who claimed the government can't supply certain jobs? Not I. The military is a great supplier of jobs.

Avatar image for curtkobain
curtkobain

3898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#92 curtkobain
Member since 2005 • 3898 Posts

[QUOTE="curtkobain"]No. I'm not the one claiming that bridges are being built to nowhere. You are the one who said you could join the military to get a job. You can't claim that the gov't doesn't supply jobs when they have the DOT and military. airshocker

Bridges to no where don't exist? :lol: And of course I'm only referring to the US ones.

Who claimed the government can't supply certain jobs? Not I. The military is a great supplier of jobs.

Oh neat! One was built in 1973, how relevant. Oh wait, there was one supported by Sarah Palin in Alaska. And look at that it would only cast $400 mil and its still getting funding. I gotta say, Dems really are doing a lot of wasteful spending.
Avatar image for allicrombie
Allicrombie

26223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#93 Allicrombie
Member since 2005 • 26223 Posts
The only one that had a chance was Romney, but I dont think he'd beat Obama.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

:lol: Hell no :| That wold be insane. I hope whatever you do this election don't go Republican. Go green party or libertarain for all I care. Just not Republican...their lineup is a joke.

MgamerBD

i switched from independent to republican just to give paul my vote.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="curtkobain"]If Obama is spending his time building bridges why don;t you join the department of transportation. There are jobs there. YOu can just build a bridge to know where.curtkobain

Are you seriously suggesting we build bridges just for the hell of it to put people back to work? And you say Republicans are the problem. :lol:

No. I'm not the one claiming that bridges are being built to nowhere. You are the one who said you could join the military to get a job. You can't claim that the gov't doesn't supply jobs when they have the DOT and military.

http://mises.org/daily/5776/The-State-Is-the-1-Percent the government makes a lot of jobs, they spend 27-34% of the nations GDP depending on whos nuumbers you use, they are just paid for by people who dont willingly want to pay for it andthere are no market factors to make sure these jobs provide a net good to society.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="curtkobain"]No. I'm not the one claiming that bridges are being built to nowhere. You are the one who said you could join the military to get a job. You can't claim that the gov't doesn't supply jobs when they have the DOT and military. curtkobain

Bridges to no where don't exist? :lol: And of course I'm only referring to the US ones.

Who claimed the government can't supply certain jobs? Not I. The military is a great supplier of jobs.

Oh neat! One was built in 1973, how relevant. Oh wait, there was one supported by Sarah Palin in Alaska. And look at that it would only cast $400 mil and its still getting funding. I gotta say, Dems really are doing a lot of wasteful spending.

doing more bad things does not turn them into good things...

Avatar image for UprootedDreamer
UprootedDreamer

2036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 UprootedDreamer
Member since 2011 • 2036 Posts
I think that Obama's reelection chances are slim.
Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#98 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts
I think that Obama's reelection chances are slim.UprootedDreamer
You would be right with that assumption.
Avatar image for curtkobain
curtkobain

3898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#99 curtkobain
Member since 2005 • 3898 Posts
[QUOTE="UprootedDreamer"]I think that Obama's reelection chances are slim.Thuganomic05
You would be right with that assumption.

Except, he has the ace in his sleeve, Osama Bin Laden. The second reports were confirmed that Bin Laden was killed, Obama's chances at re-election sky-rocketed.
Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

[QUOTE="Thuganomic05"][QUOTE="UprootedDreamer"]I think that Obama's reelection chances are slim.curtkobain
You would be right with that assumption.

Except, he has the ace in his sleeve, Osama Bin Laden. The second reports were confirmed that Bin Laden was killed, Obama's chances at re-election sky-rocketed.

That card has been played and is no longer up his sleeve though.