I honestly can't think of a reason for him getting so much praise so early in his career, normally awards are given when people look back at what you do, not what the *think* you are going to do.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"][QUOTE="Wet_Sand"]That Obamameter website was pretty interesting. He may be getting showered with awards, but people are just excited that we have a smart, young President. I think he's doing a fine job so far.Wet_Sand
Being smart and young do nothing to make you a more qualified or effective president.
I would say that a smart and young president is generally going to have more success than a dumb and old one.Having smarts means nothing if you don't have leadership qualities. And being young means you can't have a lot of experience behind you. I'd take an old unintelligent leader with experience over an intelligent young one with no experience any day of the week.
Having smarts means nothing if you don't have leadership qualities. And being young means you can't have a lot of experience behind you. I'd take an old unintelligent leader with experience over an intelligent young one with no experience any day of the week.
chesterocks7
Seriously?
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
Having smarts means nothing if you don't have leadership qualities. And being young means you can't have a lot of experience behind you. I'd take an old unintelligent leader with experience over an intelligent young one with no experience any day of the week.
Espada12
Seriously?
It's been said many times, the president doesn't have much power at all. Let alone the countless advisors he has who would make sure he doesn't do something stupid. But yes, when times like 9/11 happen, experience and being a good leader are far more important than smarts.
[QUOTE="Espada12"]
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
Having smarts means nothing if you don't have leadership qualities. And being young means you can't have a lot of experience behind you. I'd take an old unintelligent leader with experience over an intelligent young one with no experience any day of the week.
chesterocks7
Seriously?
It's been said many times, the president doesn't have much power at all. Let alone the countless advisors he has who would make sure he doesn't do something stupid. But yes, when times like 9/11 happen, experience and being a good leader are far more important than smarts.
Maybe it's just me but I rather not have an idiot leading the most powerful military in the world. Experience is easier to gain than stupidity is to fix.
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
[QUOTE="Espada12"]
Seriously?
Espada12
It's been said many times, the president doesn't have much power at all. Let alone the countless advisors he has who would make sure he doesn't do something stupid. But yes, when times like 9/11 happen, experience and being a good leader are far more important than smarts.
Maybe it's just me but I rather not have an idiot leading the most powerful military in the world. Experience is easier to gain than stupidity is to fix.
By unintelligent I was referring to a leader without great book smarts. That's what Obama is praised for when referred to as a young smart politician. You don't have to have an extraordinary IQ to be a great leader.
I think Angela Merkel is the leader of the year. People thought she was toast, but she got a coalition together and whipped some socialist ass a few weeks back. fidosim
With boobs.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.e2bccc05aa54b3091c9b0ac0ab1e3b55.641&show_article=1
[QUOTE="MuddVader"]
Apparently
Things are getting better
Things are getting better?
What promises has Obama Kept
I havent read all of it, so excuse me if there are any parts that repeat themselves in the first two, but anyways.Ace_WondersX
Throw this link in too
Every major economic factor except employment is improving, and employment is supposedly the last to improve.
Nobody payed attention to us, besides the one guy who disregards all else because one thing wasnt top rate =P[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"]
[QUOTE="MuddVader"]
Apparently
Things are getting better
Things are getting better?
What promises has Obama Kept
I havent read all of it, so excuse me if there are any parts that repeat themselves in the first two, but anyways.MuddVader
Throw this link in too
Every major economic factor except employment is improving, and employment is supposedly the last to improve.
Nobody payed attention to us, besides the one guy who disregards all else because one thing wasnt top rate =PWhen unemployment is the one thing that isn't top rate I would say the other things really aren't doing much for our country.
The Swedes can tell bull from blessed cow. Any Nobel Peace Prize winner is on the right track, and you don't need me to prove it.
Nobody payed attention to us, besides the one guy who disregards all else because one thing wasnt top rate =P[QUOTE="MuddVader"]
[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"]
Throw this link in too
Every major economic factor except employment is improving, and employment is supposedly the last to improve.
chesterocks7
When unemployment is the one thing that isn't top rate I would say the other things really aren't doing much for our country.
But just because unemployment is still up it doesnt mean its alright to turn a blind eye to all and any other accomplishments.At this tie, if anyone can drag us out of the fire, its Obama, thats all there is to it in my opinion.[QUOTE="chesterocks7"][QUOTE="MuddVader"]Nobody payed attention to us, besides the one guy who disregards all else because one thing wasnt top rate =P
MuddVader
When unemployment is the one thing that isn't top rate I would say the other things really aren't doing much for our country.
But just because unemployment is still up it doesnt mean its alright to turn a blind eye to all and any other accomplishments.At this tie, if anyone can drag us out of the fire, its Obama, thats all there is to it in my opinion.If the other statistics in on that page were improved enough unemployment would diminish. They would create jobs. That's not happening. Obama can cry change all he wants but actions speak louder than words and so far he's all words.
But just because unemployment is still up it doesnt mean its alright to turn a blind eye to all and any other accomplishments.At this tie, if anyone can drag us out of the fire, its Obama, thats all there is to it in my opinion.[QUOTE="MuddVader"][QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
When unemployment is the one thing that isn't top rate I would say the other things really aren't doing much for our country.
chesterocks7
If the other statistics in on that page were improved enough unemployment would diminish. They would create jobs. That's not happening. Obama can cry change all he wants but actions speak louder than words and so far he's all words.
He still has 3 years to finish up =P. To expect immediate perfect results is a foolish thing.[QUOTE="chesterocks7"][QUOTE="MuddVader"]But just because unemployment is still up it doesnt mean its alright to turn a blind eye to all and any other accomplishments.At this tie, if anyone can drag us out of the fire, its Obama, thats all there is to it in my opinion.MuddVader
If the other statistics in on that page were improved enough unemployment would diminish. They would create jobs. That's not happening. Obama can cry change all he wants but actions speak louder than words and so far he's all words.
He still has 3 years to finish up =P. To expect immediate perfect results is a foolish thing.Expecting a change in unemployment over the course of a year is anything but foolish. The Health Care Reform is one thing but unemployment does not take a lifetime to fix.
He still has 3 years to finish up =P. To expect immediate perfect results is a foolish thing.[QUOTE="MuddVader"][QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
If the other statistics in on that page were improved enough unemployment would diminish. They would create jobs. That's not happening. Obama can cry change all he wants but actions speak louder than words and so far he's all words.
chesterocks7
Expecting a change in unemployment over the course of a year is anything but foolish. The Health Care Reform is one thing but unemployment does not take a lifetime to fix.
Over a year isnt a lifetime, neither is 2-3 years either =P Its better we recover from this slowly than not at all is it not? regardless of how long it takes.[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
[QUOTE="MuddVader"]He still has 3 years to finish up =P. To expect immediate perfect results is a foolish thing.MuddVader
Expecting a change in unemployment over the course of a year is anything but foolish. The Health Care Reform is one thing but unemployment does not take a lifetime to fix.
Over a year isnt a lifetime, neither is 2-3 years either =P Its better we recover from this slowly than not at all is it not? regardless of how long it takes.Yeah that's all well and good but for families being put out on the streets, telling them it will be fixed in a couple years doesn't do much for them at all.
And if you read the report you just posted you'd realize that if the government did more to help households and businesses get financially stable and reduce debt, unemployment rates would not still be increasing.
Over a year isnt a lifetime, neither is 2-3 years either =P Its better we recover from this slowly than not at all is it not? regardless of how long it takes.[QUOTE="MuddVader"]
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
Expecting a change in unemployment over the course of a year is anything but foolish. The Health Care Reform is one thing but unemployment does not take a lifetime to fix.
chesterocks7
Yeah that's all well and good but for families being put out on the streets, telling them it will be fixed in a couple years doesn't do much for them at all.
And if you read the report you just posted you'd realize that if the government did more to help households and businesses get financially stable and reduce debt, unemployment rates would not still be increasing.
I dont think they can just do it.. If it were that simple do you really think we would have these problems in the first place?[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
[QUOTE="MuddVader"]Over a year isnt a lifetime, neither is 2-3 years either =P Its better we recover from this slowly than not at all is it not? regardless of how long it takes.
This.MuddVader
Yeah that's all well and good but for families being put out on the streets, telling them it will be fixed in a couple years doesn't do much for them at all.
And if you read the report you just posted you'd realize that if the government did more to help households and businesses get financially stable and reduce debt, unemployment rates would not still be increasing.
I dont think they can just do it.. If it were that simple do you really think we would have these problems in the first place?I never said it's simple but no one ever said being president was simple either. That's great that your dad gets unemployment and you have relatives to live with. That's not the case for everyone. You probably don't realize this but unemployment is not always easy to collect. And it doesn't last forever. The choice we have is the person we vote into office. The current administration could have done a better job up to now at lowering unemployment but the fact of the matter is they haven't and people's lives everywhere are being ruined because of it.
I dont think they can just do it.. If it were that simple do you really think we would have these problems in the first place?[QUOTE="MuddVader"]
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
Yeah that's all well and good but for families being put out on the streets, telling them it will be fixed in a couple years doesn't do much for them at all.
And if you read the report you just posted you'd realize that if the government did more to help households and businesses get financially stable and reduce debt, unemployment rates would not still be increasing.
chesterocks7
I never said it's simple but no one ever said being president was simple either. That's great that your dad gets unemployment and you have relatives to live with. That's not the case for everyone. You probably don't realize this but unemployment is not always easy to collect. And it doesn't last forever. The choice we have is the person we vote into office. The current administration could have done a better job up to now at lowering unemployment but the fact of the matter is they haven't and people's lives everywhere are being ruined because of it.
What makes you think I dont realize that? And everyone knows people. People in this world know others around them are going through the same problems they are so maybe there should be groups that you can join to find people willing to split a house payment while you guys share the premises. I dont know, either way though. I'm not ignorant, I know that everyone doesnt have somewhere to go but my point is that you can find one, somewhere, and even if you cant, as I believe I said, its better to know that someday things will better than never at all. If I could suffer to right the world, I would, but thats not an option, and complaining and ridiculing the people who are doing their best to right things doesnt help in the least.[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
[QUOTE="MuddVader"] I dont think they can just do it.. If it were that simple do you really think we would have these problems in the first place?
I'm fully aware of the financial struggles of some families. My family has always lived check by check even when this stuff wasnt going on, how do you think we get by now when with the economy the way it is my dad isnt even working anymore.
Its not like you cant still get unemployment. Atm, me, my father, my mother, my younger and older sister, my two nieces and my nephew all live off of my fathers unemployment while living in my grandmothers garage. If we can do it, other families can make some sacrifices and make it themselves as well till things get better and the providers of the family can get new jobs. Till then these people just need to be strong. Not so simple, and very difficult at times, but what other choice do we have right now?MuddVader
I never said it's simple but no one ever said being president was simple either. That's great that your dad gets unemployment and you have relatives to live with. That's not the case for everyone. You probably don't realize this but unemployment is not always easy to collect. And it doesn't last forever. The choice we have is the person we vote into office. The current administration could have done a better job up to now at lowering unemployment but the fact of the matter is they haven't and people's lives everywhere are being ruined because of it.
What makes you think I dont realize that? And everyone knows people. People in this world know others around them are going through the same problems they are so maybe there should be groups that you can join to find people willing to split a house payment while you guys share the premises. I dont know, either way though. I'm not ignorant, I know that everyone doesnt have somewhere to go but my point is that you can find one, somewhere, and even if you cant, as I believe I said, its better to know that someday things will better than never at all. If I could suffer to right the world, I would, but thats not an option, and complaining and ridiculing the people who are doing their best to right things doesnt help in the least.Not sure where you get this blind faith in Obama from if your situation really is how you described it, cause he's not doing **** right now to help you out. And if you think there are always others that can help you out when times get rough then please stop trying to convince me you know what living the hard life means.
And I ask the same question, why haven't they done more? Because he definitely could have. You can always do more than nothing.
i feel sorry for the people who really thought things were going to improve.
litewo
I want that shirt.
What makes you think I dont realize that? And everyone knows people. People in this world know others around them are going through the same problems they are so maybe there should be groups that you can join to find people willing to split a house payment while you guys share the premises. I dont know, either way though. I'm not ignorant, I know that everyone doesnt have somewhere to go but my point is that you can find one, somewhere, and even if you cant, as I believe I said, its better to know that someday things will better than never at all. If I could suffer to right the world, I would, but thats not an option, and complaining and ridiculing the people who are doing their best to right things doesnt help in the least.[QUOTE="MuddVader"]
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
I never said it's simple but no one ever said being president was simple either. That's great that your dad gets unemployment and you have relatives to live with. That's not the case for everyone. You probably don't realize this but unemployment is not always easy to collect. And it doesn't last forever. The choice we have is the person we vote into office. The current administration could have done a better job up to now at lowering unemployment but the fact of the matter is they haven't and people's lives everywhere are being ruined because of it.
chesterocks7
Not sure where you get this blind faith in Obama from if your situation really is how you described it, cause he's not doing **** right now to help you out. And if you think there are always others that can help you out when times get rough then please stop trying to convince me you know what living the hard life means.
And I ask the same question, why haven't they done more? Because he definitely could have. You can always do more than nothing.
There are results, and there will be more, just you refuse to accept them as results because they arent good enough. What do you think those links were for earlier?[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]
[QUOTE="litewo"]
i feel sorry for the people who really thought things were going to improve.
MuddVader
I want that shirt.
It is a pretty cool shirt, I wont lie =o I wouldn't want to wear it, it will probably piss a lot of people off. lolAnd really you want to count the non-hispanic? The non-hispanic is only their because government forms have choices for black(non-hispanic) and white(non-hispanic) considering their are whites and blacks that classify themselves as Hispanic.
Ace_WondersX
So? There are still less Whites overall. And Considering they make up a large percentage of the United States, hardly any are under the Line (26 Million out of 221.3, that's 8.5%)
[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"]
And really you want to count the non-hispanic? The non-hispanic is only their because government forms have choices for black(non-hispanic) and white(non-hispanic) considering their are whites and blacks that classify themselves as Hispanic.
Snipes_2
So? There are still less Whites overall. And Considering they make up a large percentage of the United States, hardly any are under the Line (26 Million out of 221.3, that's 8.5%)
No, because part of the "Non-Hispanic" are Whites. Unless 80% of the "non-hispanic" are black(which is very unlikely) then whites make up the majority of those below the poverty line.[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]
[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"]
And really you want to count the non-hispanic? The non-hispanic is only their because government forms have choices for black(non-hispanic) and white(non-hispanic) considering their are whites and blacks that classify themselves as Hispanic.
Ace_WondersX
So? There are still less Whites overall. And Considering they make up a large percentage of the United States, hardly any are under the Line (26 Million out of 221.3, that's 8.5%)
No, because part of the "Non-Hispanic" are Whites. Unless 80% of the "non-hispanic" are black(which is very unlikely) then whites make up the majority of those below the poverty line.They're not considered white though. Otherwise they'd be labeled as such.
No, because part of the "Non-Hispanic" are Whites. Unless 80% of the "non-hispanic" are black(which is very unlikely) then whites make up the majority of those below the poverty line.[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"]
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]
So? There are still less Whites overall. And Considering they make up a large percentage of the United States, hardly any are under the Line (26 Million out of 221.3, that's 8.5%)
Snipes_2
They're not considered white though. Otherwise they'd be labeled as such.
They are considered white, that category is "I'm White/Black and I'm Not Hispanic" because there are people who care enough about verifying they aren't Hispanic to not pick "Black/African" and "White/Caucasian"
Example: George Bush is "white and not hispanic" but he can also check "white/caucasian"
Emma Watson is "white and not hispanic" but she can also check "white/caucasian"
Denzel Washington is "black and not hispanic" but he can also check "black/african"
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment