Why is it that ONLY America still performs the opperation in any significant numbers?
RKfromDownunder
Money.
In the end, this entirely optional yet completely benign operation nets an extra 400 million dollars a year.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I don't see why it matters. If we were to wait for the child's consent, they would have to be relatively older to understand what circumcision is, and then they would actually remember how painful it must be. I'm fine with having it cut off when I'm that young, since I'll never remember it. It doesn't have any sort of negative effect, so why get worked up over it?k_smoove
I agree, I don't really give a crap
I would just like to point out that on a hygene level, circumcision provides absolutely zero meaningful benefits.
Humans have been NOT circumcising themselves for well over 70,000 years, and we've been doing just fine. I hate to break it to you, but you don't get dick infections from not being circumcised. My mother works at the largest hospital in the country and has for the past 10 or so years, and can you guess what?
In the time she's been there, there hasn't been a single case of an infection caused by NOT being circumcised.
Infections in that area happen in the urethra, clogging from STD's or injuries etc. Bacterial buildup INSIDE of the tube. You can't cut that out but I'm sure some religious nut is working to make a theory on why we should try...
Face it. Its a load of crap. Why is it that ONLY America still performs the opperation in any significant numbers? What does it tell you when ISRAEL, the JEWISH, nation has lower rates of circumcision than America?
RKfromDownunder
Again I will say this:
Circumcision DOES provide benefits when it comes to hygiene.
We also didn't take baths for 70,000 years. That doesn't mean I would want everyone in the world to never take a bath.
Infections happen outside of the urethra too. And nice going trying to find a way to insult religion on this matter. Glad you got your daily pot-shot at religion out of the way.
Fact. Circumcision does have advantages. I guess Americans like being well groomed. Much like we like to cut our nails, and trim our hair. It is just for aesthetic appeal.
[QUOTE="RKfromDownunder"]I would just like to point out that on a hygene level, circumcision provides absolutely zero meaningful benefits.
Humans have been NOT circumcising themselves for well over 70,000 years, and we've been doing just fine. I hate to break it to you, but you don't get dick infections from not being circumcised. My mother works at the largest hospital in the country and has for the past 10 or so years, and can you guess what?
In the time she's been there, there hasn't been a single case of an infection caused by NOT being circumcised.
Infections in that area happen in the urethra, clogging from STD's or injuries etc. Bacterial buildup INSIDE of the tube. You can't cut that out but I'm sure some religious nut is working to make a theory on why we should try...
Face it. Its a load of crap. Why is it that ONLY America still performs the opperation in any significant numbers? What does it tell you when ISRAEL, the JEWISH, nation has lower rates of circumcision than America?
Redneck33
Again I will say this:
Circumcision DOES provide benefits when it comes to hygiene.
We also didn't take baths for 70,000 years. That doesn't mean I would want everyone in the world to never take a bath.
Infections happen outside of the urethra too. And nice going trying to find a way to insult religion on this matter. Glad you got your daily pot-shot at religion out of the way.
Fact. Circumcision does have advantages. I guess Americans like being well groomed. Much like we like to cut our nails, and trim our hair. It is just for aesthetic appeal.
(face palm) Redneck.. you're totally nuts, you know that. You really are a redneck aren't you?
[QUOTE="Redneck33"][QUOTE="RKfromDownunder"]I would just like to point out that on a hygene level, circumcision provides absolutely zero meaningful benefits.
Humans have been NOT circumcising themselves for well over 70,000 years, and we've been doing just fine. I hate to break it to you, but you don't get dick infections from not being circumcised. My mother works at the largest hospital in the country and has for the past 10 or so years, and can you guess what?
In the time she's been there, there hasn't been a single case of an infection caused by NOT being circumcised.
Infections in that area happen in the urethra, clogging from STD's or injuries etc. Bacterial buildup INSIDE of the tube. You can't cut that out but I'm sure some religious nut is working to make a theory on why we should try...
Face it. Its a load of crap. Why is it that ONLY America still performs the opperation in any significant numbers? What does it tell you when ISRAEL, the JEWISH, nation has lower rates of circumcision than America?
FamiBox
Again I will say this:
Circumcision DOES provide benefits when it comes to hygiene.
We also didn't take baths for 70,000 years. That doesn't mean I would want everyone in the world to never take a bath.
Infections happen outside of the urethra too. And nice going trying to find a way to insult religion on this matter. Glad you got your daily pot-shot at religion out of the way.
Fact. Circumcision does have advantages. I guess Americans like being well groomed. Much like we like to cut our nails, and trim our hair. It is just for aesthetic appeal.
(face palm) Redneck.. you're totally nuts, you know that. You really are a redneck aren't you?
Yes, and proud of it! :D
Much like we like to cut our nails, and trim our hair. It is just for aesthetic appeal.Redneck33How can you compare it to nails and hair? Both of those things grow and are trimmed. Circumcision is comparable to chopping off an earlobe or something.
[QUOTE="FamiBox"][QUOTE="Redneck33"][QUOTE="RKfromDownunder"]I would just like to point out that on a hygene level, circumcision provides absolutely zero meaningful benefits.
Humans have been NOT circumcising themselves for well over 70,000 years, and we've been doing just fine. I hate to break it to you, but you don't get dick infections from not being circumcised. My mother works at the largest hospital in the country and has for the past 10 or so years, and can you guess what?
In the time she's been there, there hasn't been a single case of an infection caused by NOT being circumcised.
Infections in that area happen in the urethra, clogging from STD's or injuries etc. Bacterial buildup INSIDE of the tube. You can't cut that out but I'm sure some religious nut is working to make a theory on why we should try...
Face it. Its a load of crap. Why is it that ONLY America still performs the opperation in any significant numbers? What does it tell you when ISRAEL, the JEWISH, nation has lower rates of circumcision than America?
Redneck33
Again I will say this:
Circumcision DOES provide benefits when it comes to hygiene.
We also didn't take baths for 70,000 years. That doesn't mean I would want everyone in the world to never take a bath.
Infections happen outside of the urethra too. And nice going trying to find a way to insult religion on this matter. Glad you got your daily pot-shot at religion out of the way.
Fact. Circumcision does have advantages. I guess Americans like being well groomed. Much like we like to cut our nails, and trim our hair. It is just for aesthetic appeal.
(face palm) Redneck.. you're totally nuts, you know that. You really are a redneck aren't you?
Yes, and proud of it! :D
Well.. that's good... I guess.
[QUOTE="Redneck33"]Much like we like to cut our nails, and trim our hair. It is just for aesthetic appeal.SolidSnake35How can you compare it to nails and hair? Both of those things grow and are trimmed. Circumcision is comparable to chopping off an earlobe or something.
Well, I compare it to those 2 things because I do not want foreskin. I mean, sure my nails and hair grow back, but I wish they wouldn't. Circumcision is simply a permanent fix to an irritating problem. Much like laser hair removal.
Circumcision is simply a permanent fix to an irritating problem. Much like laser hair removal.Redneck33What problem does it present?
[QUOTE="the_kidisblack"]I guess no one has watched sex and the city before. Samantha makes a big deal when the guy she is seeing is uncircumsized and he ends up doing so. Obviously there must be something annoying about it if it's highlighted in a successful tv show.Sajedene
Lol remember what happend after the guy got circumcised (and I believe it was Charlotte who was dating the guy) -- he ended up dumping her because he felt more confident and wanted to hook up with other girls.
Yeah that's the one!
[QUOTE="Redneck33"]Circumcision is simply a permanent fix to an irritating problem. Much like laser hair removal.SolidSnake35What problem does it present?
It is just an annoyance. The foreskin used to be necessary back in the day when we didn't have clothes, but now it is simply an inconvenience.
What problem does it present?[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Redneck33"]Circumcision is simply a permanent fix to an irritating problem. Much like laser hair removal.Redneck33
It is just an annoyance. The foreskin used to be necessary back in the day when we didn't have clothes, but now it is simply an inconvenience.
Annoyance when? During sex or all of the time?[QUOTE="RKfromDownunder"]Thank youI would just like to point out that on a hygene level, circumcision provides absolutely zero meaningful benefits.
Humans have been NOT circumcising themselves for well over 70,000 years, and we've been doing just fine. I hate to break it to you, but you don't get dick infections from not being circumcised. My mother works at the largest hospital in the country and has for the past 10 or so years, and can you guess what?
In the time she's been there, there hasn't been a single case of an infection caused by NOT being circumcised.
Infections in that area happen in the urethra, clogging from STD's or injuries etc. Bacterial buildup INSIDE of the tube. You can't cut that out but I'm sure some religious nut is working to make a theory on why we should try...
Face it. Its a load of crap. Why is it that ONLY America still performs the opperation in any significant numbers? What does it tell you when ISRAEL, the JEWISH, nation has lower rates of circumcision than America?
Toriko42
I concur
NOTICE
Can ever one get over this? Seriously. What is the HUGE fuss?
Circumcision is not such a huge issue. If you're circumsized there are benefits such as being 10% less likely to contract a STI etc etc. Girls prefere it etc etc
If you're not well well done.
It's neither moral or immoral. Put this into CONTEXT! Killing someone can be debatable of immoral or moral within context but circumsision is not such a big deal. Yes the baby doesn't have a say but surely the parents have a role is choosing what they want for their children. Does it really make a big difference? NO! The only people who are going to know are your partners or sex buddies whatever and they're not going to care!
Please everyone just get out this small issue.
What problem does it present?[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="Redneck33"]Circumcision is simply a permanent fix to an irritating problem. Much like laser hair removal.Redneck33
It is just an annoyance. The foreskin used to be necessary back in the day when we didn't have clothes, but now it is simply an inconvenience.
Why is it an annoyance? I don't find my foreskin annoying.
I wont be having my boys circumsized when the day comes.
It is barbaric and unneccesary. the only real reaon to defend it is hokey religious practices. Like, i dont care what your out dated website says you arent getting penile cancer from having foreskin.Europe isnt crawling with UTI, Penile cancer and so on and so forth. So any claim you have is just silly.
Listen to a circumsizion and tell me you want your own flesh and blood going through that.
Also, I strongly believe if a girl dosent like it then oh well. Its such a great thing her opinion is irrelevant!
I wont be having my boys circumsized when the day comes.
It is barbaric and unneccesary. the only real reaon to defend it is hokey religious practices. Like, i dont care what your out dated website says you arent getting penile cancer from having foreskin.Europe isnt crawling with UTI, Penile cancer and so on and so forth. So any claim you have is just silly.
Listen to a circumsizion and tell me you want your own flesh and blood going through that.
Also, I strongly believe if a girl dosent like it then oh well. Its such a great thing her opinion is irrelevant!
H8sMikeMoore
Again, it is not just for religious practices (in most cases it isn't a religious practice at all). Circumcision does have quite a few advantages, and these "outdated" studies are only from a few years ago, so they are still considered correct in the medical industry.
Here is proof-http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_21_170/ai_n26710823
And also if you have been reading this thread, then you would have noticed all the people who have already dispelled the pain portion. When you are a newborn, you remember nothing, so a circumcision will have no bad affects on the child.
Lastly, you should value the opinion of the woman you want to be with. Sex isn't just meant to be pleasing to the male.
And also if you have been reading this thread, then you would have noticed all the people who have already dispelled the pain portion. When you are a newborn, you remember nothing, so a circumcision will have no bad affects on the child.
Redneck33
It's still pain, whether it's remembered or not. And also, 55% of of child circumcisions are performed without anaesthetic. Ouch.
[QUOTE="Redneck33"]And also if you have been reading this thread, then you would have noticed all the people who have already dispelled the pain portion. When you are a newborn, you remember nothing, so a circumcision will have no bad affects on the child.
Funky_Llama
It's still pain, whether it's remembered or not. And also, 55% of of child circumcisions are performed without anaesthetic. Ouch.
Yes, but in all honesty, the brain capacity of an infant is pretty small. I doubt they even remember the pain 10 min. later. I also believe all of the circumcisions of newborns should be done without anaesthetic, because I think the anaesthetic itself could cause some severe complications and is unnecessary.
[QUOTE="Redneck33"]And also if you have been reading this thread, then you would have noticed all the people who have already dispelled the pain portion. When you are a newborn, you remember nothing, so a circumcision will have no bad affects on the child.
Funky_Llama
It's still pain, whether it's remembered or not. And also, 55% of of child circumcisions are performed without anaesthetic. Ouch.
Pain is irrelevant if the child will never recall it.
And anaesthetics could do more harm than good to the child at that age.
[QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"]I wont be having my boys circumsized when the day comes.
It is barbaric and unneccesary. the only real reaon to defend it is hokey religious practices. Like, i dont care what your out dated website says you arent getting penile cancer from having foreskin.Europe isnt crawling with UTI, Penile cancer and so on and so forth. So any claim you have is just silly.
Listen to a circumsizion and tell me you want your own flesh and blood going through that.
Also, I strongly believe if a girl dosent like it then oh well. Its such a great thing her opinion is irrelevant!
Redneck33
Again, it is not just for religious practices (in most cases it isn't a religious practice at all). Circumcision does have quite a few advantages, and these "outdated" studies are only from a few years ago, so they are still considered correct in the medical industry.
Here is proof-http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_21_170/ai_n26710823
And also if you have been reading this thread, then you would have noticed all the people who have already dispelled the pain portion. When you are a newborn, you remember nothing, so a circumcision will have no bad affects on the child.
Lastly, you should value the opinion of the woman you want to be with. Sex isn't just meant to be pleasing to the male.
The following cultural beliefs, or myths, are often used as reasons for circumcision.After each myth, some relevant facts are provided to present a more accurate picture of this procedure.Parents should understand the full implications of circumcision before making this irreversible decision for their child.
Myth #1: Circumcision is recommended by doctors and medical organizations
Fact: Circumcision is not recommended by any national medical association in the world.Fifteen national and international medical associations have extensively studied infant circumcision and its effects and found no significant evidence to support this practice.In March 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) concluded that infant circumcision is not recommended as a routine procedure.1The circumcision policy statements of the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Academy of Family Physicians have concurred with this position.2-3The AMA calls infant circumcision "non-therapeutic."
Myth #2: It's just a little piece of skin, he won't miss it.
Fact: The prepuce (foreskin) makes up as much as half of the skin system of the penis.4It is an extension of the shaft skin that folds over onto itself, completely covering and protecting the glans (an internal organ) and provides the mobility of the shaft skin necessary for frictionless intercourse and masturbation.The foreskin has three known functions: protective, immunological, and sexual.It contains about 10,000 highly specialized nerve endings and several feet of blood vessels.An adult male foreskin, if unfolded and spread out, would be about the size of index card (3 x 5 inches), much more than a "little piece of skin."Many sexually active men circumcised in adulthood report a significant decrease in sexual pleasure and comfort because of the loss of sensitive nerve endings, skin mobility and natural lubrication.
Myth #3: The care of a circumcised penis is easier than an intact penis.
Fact: For the care of an intact penis the AAP recommends, "Leave it alone." 5No special care is required – an intact child should have the external surface of his penis (and the rest of his body) washed regularly to keep clean.When a male is older and can retract his foreskin (which typically occurs by puberty), a simple rinsing is all that is necessary. 6Other cultural myths about special cleaning procedures are just that – myth.
Myth #4: Circumcision protects males from urinary tract infections.
Fact: Overall, urinary tract infections (UTI) occur at about the same rate in male and female infants during the first six months of life.7Regardless of circumcision status, infants who present with their first UTI at 6 months (or less) are likely to have an underlying genitouninary abnormality.In children with a normal underlying anatomy, a study found as many circumcised infants with a UTI as those who retained their foreskin.8The appropriate treatment for UTI, in males as well as females, is antibiotics, not prophylactic excision of the prepuce.According to the AAP, "Urinary tract infections are usually not life threatening and are easily treated in most cases."Breastfeeding provides some measure of protection against UTI during the first six months of life.9
Myth #5: Circumcision is effective in the prevention of penile cancer.
Fact: "The American Cancer Society does not consider routine circumcision to be a valid or effective measure to prevent such cancers... Penile cancer is an extremely rare condition, affecting one in 200,000 men... Perpetrating the mistaken belief that circumcision prevents cancer is inappropriate.'' 10
The American Medical Association, in a July 2000 report, states, "… because this disease [penile cancer] is rare and occurs later in life, the use of circumcision as a preventive practice is not justified." 2
Myth #6: Almost everyone is circumcised…I don't want my son to be teased in the locker room.
Fact:The circumcision rate for males worldwide is about 15%.Even in the US, the only country that circumcises a majority of its male newborns for non-religious reasons, the circumcision rate is decreasing.According the National Center for Health Statistics, the US circumcision rate is approximately 60% (varies widely by region) and slowly decreasing.According to many intact males, the "teasing" concern is vastly overstated.For many boys, genital status is neither an important issue nor one that is discussed.In the unlikely event of concerns later in life, at least the person can make his own decision about an irreversible body alteration that has no medical justification.
Myth #7: Circumcision is a simple and painless procedure… it only takes a few minutes.
Fact:While circumcision is a relatively quick procedure, it is extremely painful for the infant.The initial part of the process involves a forced separation of the foreskin, which is fused to the glans (head) in much the same way as a fingernail is joined to the finger.The AAP says the following about EMLA cream, one of the most common pain relief methods, "The analgesic effect is limited during the phases associated with extensive tissue trauma…" 1Although they cannot remember the pain as adults, circumcised male infants have increased pain response in vaccinations 4 to 6 months later.11Circumcision appears to lower the pain threshold.
Myth #8: Circumcision makes the penis cleaner and more hygienic.
Fact:Circumcision removes the protective portion of mobile shaft skin, which is intended to cover the glans (head) of the penis.The glans is the internal portion of genitalia (for both genders).Circumcision artificially exposes and denudes this highly sensitive tissue, resulting in a buildup of keratin and a dry, densensitized part of the penis.And contrary to popular myth, more sensation does not lead tp control problems.Based on reports from men circumcised as adults, just the opposite is true.With more sensation, a man has better feedback and can better determine his proximity to the "orgasmic threshold."
Myth #9: Circumcision prevents AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).
Fact:Some studies show that circumcision has a slight preventive effect for AIDS and some STDs; however, other studies show an insignificant or opposite effect, especially for chlamydia.The bottom line: sexual practices have a much greater effect on the chance of becoming infected than circumcision status.If someone acts on the misconception that circumcision alone will protect them, they are taking unwise chances.
Myth #10: The history of non-religious circumcision is based on disease prevention.
Fact:Non-ritual circumcision evolved from a misunderstanding of bodily function by physicians of the late-19th century.12Many doctors of that era believed that a normal foreskin could cause disease and lead to increased incidence of "self-abuse."John Harvey Kellogg, of cereal fame, was a proponent of genital cutting as a cure for this "horrible practice."He recommended performing circumcision "without administering an anesthetic, as the pain attending the operation will have a salutary [health-giving] effect upon the mind, especially if connected with the idea of punishment."
This fact sheet is a presentation of the Pennsylvania chapter of NOCIRC (National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers).
References:
1.American Academy of Pediatrics, Circumcision Policy Statement- March 1, 1999
2.American Medical Association, Report 10 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (I-99), July 6, 2000
3.American Academy of Family Physicians, Position Paper on Neonatal Circumcision, February 14, 2002
4.Cold CJ, Taylor J. The prepuce. BJU Int 1999; 83:34-44
5.American Academy of Pediatrics pamphlet. Newborns: Care of the Uncircumcised Penis – Guidelines for Parents. 1990
6. CIRP: Normal development of the prepuce: Birth through age 18. www.cirp.org/library/normal/
7. Marild S, Jodal U.Incidence rate of symptomatic urinary tract infection in children under 6 years of age.Acta Paediatrica 1998;87:549-52
8. Mueller E, Steinhardt G, Naseer S.The Incidence of Genitourinary Abnormalities in Circumcised and Uncircumcised Boys Presenting with an Initial Urinary Tract Infection by 6 Months of Age.Pediatrics 1997;100(supplement):580
9. Pisacane A, Graziano L, Mazzarella G, Scarpellino B, Zona G.Breast-feeding and urinary tract infection.Pediatrics 1992;120:87-89
10.Letter from the American Cancer Society (National Home Office) to the American Academy of Pediatrics, 16 Feb 1996
11. Taddio A, Katz J, Ilersich A, Koren G. Effect of Neonatal Circumcision on Pain Response During Subsequent Routine Vaccination. Lancet 1997;349:599-603.
12. Gollaher D. Circumcision: A History of the World's Most Controversial Surgery, New York, Basic Books, 2000
http://www.nocircpa.org/4642.html
^AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION IS REFRENCED. YOU CANNOT GET A BETTER SOURCE.
Foreskin adds to the girth, so if anything its more pleasing for a woman. But since I like women who are circumsized i guess they should get it? Or is this a double standard?
In other words, no her opinion dosent matter.
and yes it definitely is a hokey religious practice, even if christianity dosent require you to get circumsized the reason it was started for christians was to stop frequent masturbation the fact that it dosent STOP masturbation is ALSO irrelevant.
Hokey religious GARBAGE has no place in the medical fields. Pleasing god dosent matter. A child that wont feel the pain anyway is still more important. The practice isnt needed, it dosent prevent anything as I have proven. Also, if your LIES were true then Europe would be crawling with UTI and Penile Cancer and guess what? they arent! so thers no reason for you to argue because you lost! :)
I prefer circumcised men but I don't consider it a huge deal either way and I most definitely don't consider it a barbaric practice.
[QUOTE="Redneck33"][QUOTE="H8sMikeMoore"]I wont be having my boys circumsized when the day comes.
It is barbaric and unneccesary. the only real reaon to defend it is hokey religious practices. Like, i dont care what your out dated website says you arent getting penile cancer from having foreskin.Europe isnt crawling with UTI, Penile cancer and so on and so forth. So any claim you have is just silly.
Listen to a circumsizion and tell me you want your own flesh and blood going through that.
Also, I strongly believe if a girl dosent like it then oh well. Its such a great thing her opinion is irrelevant!
H8sMikeMoore
Again, it is not just for religious practices (in most cases it isn't a religious practice at all). Circumcision does have quite a few advantages, and these "outdated" studies are only from a few years ago, so they are still considered correct in the medical industry.
Here is proof-http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_21_170/ai_n26710823
And also if you have been reading this thread, then you would have noticed all the people who have already dispelled the pain portion. When you are a newborn, you remember nothing, so a circumcision will have no bad affects on the child.
Lastly, you should value the opinion of the woman you want to be with. Sex isn't just meant to be pleasing to the male.
*huge amount of facts*
You win.
and sajedene you should get your mouth circumcisded for thinking anyone should give a damn about your opinion. you ugly HOE. i bet you ten dollars if any man would even want to sleep with them you wouldnt care if they had foreskin or even a cawk at all.papageorgio22
How much do you care about what your woman looks like?
and sajedene you should get your mouth circumcisded for thinking anyone should give a damn about your opinion. you ugly HOE. i bet you ten dollars if any man would even want to sleep with them you wouldnt care if they had foreskin or even a cawk at all.papageorgio22
A little too harsh, forums are for fun not insults my dude.
Im circumised but not because im jewish or when i was a baby. I wasnt peeing right when i was 4 so the doctor suggested it.
listen if i want ot make my cawk look jus like you tools with cut cawks i do one simple porcedure. move the foreskin back and it looks just the same as a circucisded cawk. your are not special for having your dick cut off remeber that.papageorgio22
Nor are you. :|
listen if i want ot make my cawk look jus like you tools with cut cawks i do one simple porcedure. move the foreskin back and it looks just the same as a circucisded cawk. your are not special for having your dick cut off remeber that.papageorgio22
But yet you dont have to be flailing your "cawk" everywhere like crazy. I didnt say i was special at all just that have some respect for other users instead of calling them some horrid names, your gonna go afr in relatioships if all you care about is your "cawk"
[QUOTE="papageorgio22"]listen if i want ot make my cawk look jus like you tools with cut cawks i do one simple porcedure. move the foreskin back and it looks just the same as a circucisded cawk. your are not special for having your dick cut off remeber that.The_Ish
Nor are you. :|
Thanks Ish :D
and sajedene you should get your mouth circumcisded for thinking anyone should give a damn about your opinion. you ugly HOE. i bet you ten dollars if any man would even want to sleep with them you wouldnt care if they had foreskin or even a cawk at all.papageorgio22
Ahaha! For someone who shouldnt "give a damn" about my opinion, you surely got worked up over it. And you forget that sluts and hoes have no standards -- I do. You owe me 10 bucks.
How much do you care about what your woman looks like?The_IshIf a woman cares about such a minute detail, it's pathetic. Honestly, if you find the perfect someone, such a thing wouldn't even be a problem. Everyone has flaws, but usually you take the good with the bad because that's what makes the person who they are.
[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="Sajedene"]Gee thats not shallow at all[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="Sajedene"]I said it before (an old thread where I got seriously flamed because of) and I will say it again... I dont like or will I ever hook up with a man who is uncircumcised.Sajedene
Oh I'm sorry my standards dont include you.
:lol: Standard? Your exluding a person from dating you because of something they had no control over, forgetting all other potential great things about them.."Yeah hey, i don't date girls with outies"
I consider sex to be a very big, important part of a relationship, as any person who knows how to keep a relationship would. Why then would I be with someone who can not excite me or turn me on in that part of the relationship? So yes it is a deal breaker.
fail.
[QUOTE="Sajedene"][QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="Sajedene"]Gee thats not shallow at all[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"][QUOTE="Sajedene"]I said it before (an old thread where I got seriously flamed because of) and I will say it again... I dont like or will I ever hook up with a man who is uncircumcised.Tjeremiah1988
Oh I'm sorry my standards dont include you.
:lol: Standard? Your exluding a person from dating you because of something they had no control over, forgetting all other potential great things about them.."Yeah hey, i don't date girls with outies"
I consider sex to be a very big, important part of a relationship, as any person who knows how to keep a relationship would. Why then would I be with someone who can not excite me or turn me on in that part of the relationship? So yes it is a deal breaker.
fail.
So you're saying sex isnt important in a relationship? Have you ever been in a relationship?So you're saying sex isnt important in a relationship? Have you ever been in a relationship?SajedeneSounds like you're saying sex with someone who hasn't been altered is so terrible that it would affect your relationship. I'd like to think any relationships I have will be strong enough to remain unaffected by such little things.
[QUOTE="Sajedene"] So you're saying sex isnt important in a relationship? Have you ever been in a relationship?SolidSnake35Sounds like you're saying sex with someone who hasn't been altered is so terrible that it would affect your relationship. I'd like to think any relationships I have will be strong enough to remain unaffected by such little things.
It doesnt do anything for me -- I cant do it with someone who isnt uncircumcised. I've tried with an ex -- so yeah, he was all butt-hurt that I cant bring myself to overcome it and I cant overcome it. It just doesnt turn me on (I would say it another way but thats how I got flamed in the old thread). Is that enough explanation for you?
It doesnt do anything for me -- I cant do it with someone who isnt uncircumcised. I've tried with an ex -- so yeah, he was all butt-hurt that I cant bring myself to overcome it and I cant overcome it. It just doesnt turn me on (I would say it another way but thats how I got flamed in the old thread). Is that enough explanation for you? SajedeneI'd say that's fair enough but in no way should that be used as justification for circumcision. I'm guessing that if circumcision was not so commonly practiced where you live, you wouldn't have an issue here.
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]How much do you care about what your woman looks like?SolidSnake35If a woman cares about such a minute detail, it's pathetic. Honestly, if you find the perfect someone, such a thing wouldn't even be a problem. Everyone has flaws, but usually you take the good with the bad because that's what makes the person who they are.
I agree, of course, but he is acting like women aren't allowed standards.
brains aren't developed enough to remember it yet.AlphaRailIf I smack you in the face now, would you remember it forever? I can't remember what it felt like when I broke my nose but I'm pretty sure it was very painful. I think the initial pain is what's important anyway, and not the memory of it.
I don't think so. It was done to me as a baby and I don't even remember the procedure or the pain. I wasn't aware of it at all.
But if it were done to me much later, I'm pretty sure I'd be aware of everything. As for people who think majority of the world is uncircumcised, try coming to the Philippines. Circumcision is so common that some doctors even do it for free.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment