Man fights to fly the confederate flag in his dorm.

  • 157 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

Can someone explain why the Confederate flag is so controversial? From what I gather it's just the flag of the now defunct Southern States of America who tried to secede from the USA. The only argument I've heard is that the blacks were enslaved in the South therefore it is a symbol of racism which in my opinion is hypocritical since some Northern States had slavery not to mention that racism was rampant in the North as well as the South.

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

I find it absurd that he isnt allowed to hang it. That flag does not indicate the support of bigotry and racism. It supports the idea of states rights. Come down to south carolina and you will see how many confederate flags are on shirts, license plates, walls etc. It is not a big deal. TonyDanzaFan
states rights to support slavery?

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

[QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"]I find it absurd that he isnt allowed to hang it. That flag does not indicate the support of bigotry and racism. It supports the idea of states rights. Come down to south carolina and you will see how many confederate flags are on shirts, license plates, walls etc. It is not a big deal. CaveJohnson1

states rights to support slavery?

You do know Kentucky and Delaware also had slavery yet they were loyal to the Union? Slavery wasn't exclusive to the Southern States.

Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

Can someone explain why the Confederate flag is so controversial? From what I gather it's just the flag of the now defunct Southern States of America who tried to secede from the USA. The only argument I've heard is that the blacks were enslaved in the South therefore it is a symbol of racism which in my opinion is hypocritical since some Northern States had slavery not to mention that racism was rampant in the North as well as the South.

Vesica_Prime
I think it has something to do with many thinking the entire civil war was about slavery and people using the confederate flag out of pride for the many other reasons insults them. When it comes down to it.. most regardless of color dont care about slavery unless it is to whine about it effecting them as they suck on their polar pop from 7-11.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts
I would hang up a Union flag right next door for the lulz.MgamerBD
I bought both Union and CSA flags at Gettysburg's museum
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

Honestly I don't get people's fascination with the Confederate flag. What's to be proud of about a group of states who wrote a check their asses couldn't cash?

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"]I find it absurd that he isnt allowed to hang it. That flag does not indicate the support of bigotry and racism. It supports the idea of states rights. Come down to south carolina and you will see how many confederate flags are on shirts, license plates, walls etc. It is not a big deal. CaveJohnson1

states rights to support slavery?

"If I could end the war without freeing a single slave, I would" -abraham lincoln
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

Honestly I don't get people's fascination with the Confederate flag. What's to be proud of about a group of states who wrote a check their asses couldn't cash?

worlock77
the design of it is cool :)
Avatar image for CreasianDevaili
CreasianDevaili

4429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 CreasianDevaili
Member since 2005 • 4429 Posts

Honestly I don't get people's fascination with the Confederate flag. What's to be proud of about a group of states who wrote a check their asses couldn't cash?

worlock77
The same reason people put effort into their family tree. Or some take pride in where their family originally came from when coming to, say, the United States. Or how there is a little china town in New York. Or.. Same thing. Or when a wacky comedian straight up moves to Africa to discover his roots and The Comedy Channel is having a meltdown cause of it.
Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]

[QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"]I find it absurd that he isnt allowed to hang it. That flag does not indicate the support of bigotry and racism. It supports the idea of states rights. Come down to south carolina and you will see how many confederate flags are on shirts, license plates, walls etc. It is not a big deal. Vesica_Prime

states rights to support slavery?

You do know Kentucky and Delaware also had slavery yet they were loyal to the Union? Slavery wasn't exclusive to the Southern States.

Loop hole

Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]

[QUOTE="TonyDanzaFan"]I find it absurd that he isnt allowed to hang it. That flag does not indicate the support of bigotry and racism. It supports the idea of states rights. Come down to south carolina and you will see how many confederate flags are on shirts, license plates, walls etc. It is not a big deal. dkdk999

states rights to support slavery?

"If I could end the war without freeing a single slave, I would" -abraham lincoln

I'm sure there was no context to that statement lol.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]states rights to support slavery?

CaveJohnson1

"If I could end the war without freeing a single slave, I would" -abraham lincoln

I'm sure there was no context to that statement lol.

I'm kind of baffled by what you think the context could have been that changed what he meant. Explain?

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"] "If I could end the war without freeing a single slave, I would" -abraham lincoln dkdk999

I'm sure there was no context to that statement lol.

I'm kind of baffled by what you think the context could have been that changed what he meant. Explain?

The context was that Lincoln, as President of the United States, considered his first and foremost duty to be the preservation of the Union (by whatever means necessary).

Avatar image for the_plan_man
the_plan_man

1664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 the_plan_man
Member since 2011 • 1664 Posts
First Amendment protects his right to free speech. :?
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

First Amendment protects his right to free speech. :?the_plan_man

The 1st Amendment prohits the government from restricting speech. People and organizations, however, can decide what speech is or is not acceptable on their property (hence, for example, the Terms of Use here on Gamespot).

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"]

[QUOTE="CaveJohnson1"]I'm sure there was no context to that statement lol.

worlock77

I'm kind of baffled by what you think the context could have been that changed what he meant. Explain?

The context was that Lincoln, as President of the United States, considered his first and foremost duty to be the preservation of the Union (by whatever means necessary).

yes. I'm just saying the south could have gone back to the union without getting rid of slavery, but they wanted states rights and so on.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"] I'm kind of baffled by what you think the context could have been that changed what he meant. Explain?

dkdk999

The context was that Lincoln, as President of the United States, considered his first and foremost duty to be the preservation of the Union (by whatever means necessary).

yes. I'm just saying the south could have gone back to the union without getting rid of slavery, but they wanted states rights and so on.

I dunno. The "state's rights" claim kinda rings hollow considering the south were the ones who actually fired the first shots. They wanted slavery, were paranoid about the possibility of slavery being abolished and instigated a war that led to their utter ruin.

Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts

[QUOTE="dkdk999"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

The context was that Lincoln, as President of the United States, considered his first and foremost duty to be the preservation of the Union (by whatever means necessary).

worlock77

yes. I'm just saying the south could have gone back to the union without getting rid of slavery, but they wanted states rights and so on.

I dunno. The "state's rights" claim kinda rings hollow considering the south were the ones who actually fired the first shots. They wanted slavery, were paranoid about the possibility of slavery being abolished and instigated a war that led to their utter ruin.

it might not have even been that thought out.

maybe the guy that fired the first shot just got scared and popped one off, causing a chain reaction of bullet firing. but i could be completely wrong. in fact, i probably am.

Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"] yes. I'm just saying the south could have gone back to the union without getting rid of slavery, but they wanted states rights and so on. needled24-7

I dunno. The "state's rights" claim kinda rings hollow considering the south were the ones who actually fired the first shots. They wanted slavery, were paranoid about the possibility of slavery being abolished and instigated a war that led to their utter ruin.

it might not have even been that thought out.

maybe the guy that fired the first shot just got scared and popped one off, causing a chain reaction of bullet firing. but i could be completely wrong. in fact, i probably am.

Actually it was a beseigement and then bombardment of Ft. Sumter. That doesn't really sound accidental.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
Meh, people should be able to put up swastikas if they want to.
Avatar image for CaveJohnson1
CaveJohnson1

1714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 CaveJohnson1
Member since 2011 • 1714 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="dkdk999"] I'm kind of baffled by what you think the context could have been that changed what he meant. Explain?

dkdk999

The context was that Lincoln, as President of the United States, considered his first and foremost duty to be the preservation of the Union (by whatever means necessary).

yes. I'm just saying the south could have gone back to the union without getting rid of slavery, but they wanted states rights and so on.

I think the main issue was slavery, as much as they want to pretend they're not the bad guy.

Avatar image for lilasianwonder
lilasianwonder

5982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 lilasianwonder
Member since 2007 • 5982 Posts
I hope he wins this.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#73 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="the_plan_man"]First Amendment protects his right to free speech. :?worlock77

The 1st Amendment prohits the government from restricting speech. People and organizations, however, can decide what speech is or is not acceptable on their property (hence, for example, the Terms of Use here on Gamespot).

Exactly. He agreed to the rules when he entered the dorm, hence he should abide by them.
Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#74 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts

Someone must have reported him.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
his room he is paying for he should have free speech in that room.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="the_plan_man"]First Amendment protects his right to free speech. :?chessmaster1989

The 1st Amendment prohits the government from restricting speech. People and organizations, however, can decide what speech is or is not acceptable on their property (hence, for example, the Terms of Use here on Gamespot).

Exactly. He agreed to the rules when he entered the dorm, hence he should abide by them.

college gets government subsidies, if they stop taking them, then you have a point. public funds should not be spent to suppress speech.
Avatar image for Elraptor
Elraptor

30966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 Elraptor
Member since 2004 • 30966 Posts
Seems silly, but whatever. I guess if you want to be an ass in the privacy of your own room, you should be allowed.
Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

The 1st Amendment prohits the government from restricting speech. People and organizations, however, can decide what speech is or is not acceptable on their property (hence, for example, the Terms of Use here on Gamespot).

surrealnumber5

Exactly. He agreed to the rules when he entered the dorm, hence he should abide by them.

college gets government subsidies, if they stop taking them, then you have a point. public funds should not be spent to suppress speech.

If a school takes public funds they have to abide by certain laws they would otherwise be free from, but they can still ban things in their housing. They probably couldn't ban him from wearing a t-shirt of the flag on campus, but they don't even have to offer housing. Like any rental or condo agreement you have to abide by the rules.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] Exactly. He agreed to the rules when he entered the dorm, hence he should abide by them.Frame_Dragger

college gets government subsidies, if they stop taking them, then you have a point. public funds should not be spent to suppress speech.

If a school takes public funds they have to abide by certain laws they would otherwise be free from, but they can still ban things in their housing. They probably couldn't ban him from wearing a t-shirt of the flag on campus, but they don't even have to offer housing. Like any rental or condo agreement you have to abide by the rules.

do you have a citation for that? that people who live in government subsidized housing have no constitutional rights?
Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"]

college gets government subsidies, if they stop taking them, then you have a point. public funds should not be spent to suppress speech. surrealnumber5
If a school takes public funds they have to abide by certain laws they would otherwise be free from, but they can still ban things in their housing. They probably couldn't ban him from wearing a t-shirt of the flag on campus, but they don't even have to offer housing. Like any rental or condo agreement you have to abide by the rules.

do you have a citation for that? that people who live in government subsidized housing have no constitutional rights?

Section 8 housing and dorms on a campus are utterly different, with different laws applying naturally. A college has no burden to provide housing... it's just a sensible thing to do. On the other hand, the other is actually federal housing, period. Not clear where you see a connection at all really.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] If a school takes public funds they have to abide by certain laws they would otherwise be free from, but they can still ban things in their housing. They probably couldn't ban him from wearing a t-shirt of the flag on campus, but they don't even have to offer housing. Like any rental or condo agreement you have to abide by the rules.

Frame_Dragger

do you have a citation for that? that people who live in government subsidized housing have no constitutional rights?

Section 8 housing and dorms on a campus are utterly different, with different laws applying naturally. A college has no burden to provide housing... it's just a sensible thing to do. On the other hand, the other is actually federal housing, period. Not clear where you see a connection at all really.

if the school takes money from the federal government it cannot enact policies against the constitution because if it does that mean the government is sponsoring unconstitutional actions. the government cant use a third party to sponsor unconstitutional acts, and that would be this, i dont see how you can miss the connection. in order to get federal funds you need to play by federal rules, that does not mean you can pick and choose where you want to apply them to best fit your whims.

Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#82 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts
his room he is paying for he should have free speech in that room. surrealnumber5
DOOMED, SCROOGE! You're doomed for all time! Your future is a HORROR STORY written by your crime! Your chains are forged by what you say and do, So have your fun, When life is done a nightmare waits for you. (Excellent sig I love it :P)
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]his room he is paying for he should have free speech in that room. MissLibrarian
DOOMED, SCROOGE! You're doomed for all time! Your future is a HORROR STORY written by your crime! Your chains are forged by what you say and do, So have your fun, When life is done a nightmare waits for you. (Excellent sig I love it :P)

and now that i have your heart i can summon captain planet... removing all of my god like powers, but look there he is!

Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#84 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts
and now that i have your heart i can summon captain planet... removing all of my god like powers, but look there he is!surrealnumber5
Aww, that one went straight over my head, but I assume it might have something to Bill Murray's festive hat :( *goes back to feeling undeniably flawed and ill-informed*
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]and now that i have your heart i can summon captain planet... removing all of my god like powers, but look there he is!MissLibrarian
Aww, that one went straight over my head, but I assume it might have something to Bill Murray's festive hat :( *goes back to feeling undeniably flawed and ill-informed*

they did not have captain planet in the UK? WTH kind of environmental brain washing do yall have then? without captain planet where does your nations hate for business people come from?
Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#86 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts
they did not have captain planet in the UK? WTH kind of environmental brain washing do yall have then? without captain planet where does your nations hate for business people come from?surrealnumber5
The news.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#87 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38939 Posts

That's idiotic. There's no reason why he shouldn't be allowe to have it in his room.

Pirate700
/thread
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]they did not have captain planet in the UK? WTH kind of environmental brain washing do yall have then? without captain planet where does your nations hate for business people come from?MissLibrarian
The news.

cant say i know much about this "the news" but i am sure it is equally as terrifying
Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] do you have a citation for that? that people who live in government subsidized housing have no constitutional rights?surrealnumber5

Section 8 housing and dorms on a campus are utterly different, with different laws applying naturally. A college has no burden to provide housing... it's just a sensible thing to do. On the other hand, the other is actually federal housing, period. Not clear where you see a connection at all really.

if the school takes money from the federal government it cannot enact policies against the constitution because if it does that mean the government is sponsoring unconstitutional actions. the government cant use a third party to sponsor unconstitutional acts, and that would be this, i dont see how you can miss the connection. in order to get federal funds you need to play by federal rules, that does not mean you can pick and choose where you want to apply them to best fit your whims.

This is all very nice as wishful thinking goes, and as I said on campus you probably have a case for displaying the flag. In the housing portion however, it's just not the case. In point of fact, schools have pretty broad discretion in controlling what is and is not displayed whether or not they recieve funding on the grounds of safety.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

The 1st Amendment prohits the government from restricting speech. People and organizations, however, can decide what speech is or is not acceptable on their property (hence, for example, the Terms of Use here on Gamespot).

surrealnumber5

Exactly. He agreed to the rules when he entered the dorm, hence he should abide by them.

college gets government subsidies, if they stop taking them, then you have a point. public funds should not be spent to suppress speech.

So then should public schools not be allowed to institute dress codes?

Avatar image for CommanderShiro
CommanderShiro

21746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 CommanderShiro
Member since 2005 • 21746 Posts

He should be allowed to have the flag.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

while i am having trouble thinking why an african american would want to show off a confederate flag, and while i think flying the flag of a defeated former faction of the country is stupid, i think he should have the right to.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] Exactly. He agreed to the rules when he entered the dorm, hence he should abide by them.worlock77

college gets government subsidies, if they stop taking them, then you have a point. public funds should not be spent to suppress speech.

So then should public schools not be allowed to institute dress codes?

i dont think they should, but it takes an offended party to raise a case, and minor dont tend to know their rights.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] Section 8 housing and dorms on a campus are utterly different, with different laws applying naturally. A college has no burden to provide housing... it's just a sensible thing to do. On the other hand, the other is actually federal housing, period. Not clear where you see a connection at all really.Frame_Dragger

if the school takes money from the federal government it cannot enact policies against the constitution because if it does that mean the government is sponsoring unconstitutional actions. the government cant use a third party to sponsor unconstitutional acts, and that would be this, i dont see how you can miss the connection. in order to get federal funds you need to play by federal rules, that does not mean you can pick and choose where you want to apply them to best fit your whims.

This is all very nice as wishful thinking goes, and as I said on campus you probably have a case for displaying the flag. In the housing portion however, it's just not the case. In point of fact, schools have pretty broad discretion in controlling what is and is not displayed whether or not they recieve funding on the grounds of safety.

how do you ban a specific decoration on a wall in a specific students room in the name of safety?
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] college gets government subsidies, if they stop taking them, then you have a point. public funds should not be spent to suppress speech. surrealnumber5

So then should public schools not be allowed to institute dress codes?

i dont think they should.

Fair enough.

Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] if the school takes money from the federal government it cannot enact policies against the constitution because if it does that mean the government is sponsoring unconstitutional actions. the government cant use a third party to sponsor unconstitutional acts, and that would be this, i dont see how you can miss the connection. in order to get federal funds you need to play by federal rules, that does not mean you can pick and choose where you want to apply them to best fit your whims.

surrealnumber5

This is all very nice as wishful thinking goes, and as I said on campus you probably have a case for displaying the flag. In the housing portion however, it's just not the case. In point of fact, schools have pretty broad discretion in controlling what is and is not displayed whether or not they recieve funding on the grounds of safety.

how do you ban a specific decoration on a wall in a specific students room in the name of safety?

The safety of the student who put it there, preventing violence, etc. Beyond that, while students may or may not know their rights the cases HAVE been brought before with a variety of outcomes. Once again, schools have wide autonomy to restrict expression on their campus, and safety was just one example of why. Needless to say, for public schools in "mandatory" grades those restrictions can't be as intrusive as entirely elective schooling at higher grades. When you talk about how you can decorate housing that isn't a part of your education to begin with, the school could ban decorations entirely. On the other hand, they couldn't stop you from wearing a turban... so it's a bit of a pastiche of your person vs. their property.

Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

Can someone explain why the Confederate flag is so controversial? From what I gather it's just the flag of the now defunct Southern States of America who tried to secede from the USA. The only argument I've heard is that the blacks were enslaved in the South therefore it is a symbol of racism which in my opinion is hypocritical since some Northern States had slavery not to mention that racism was rampant in the North as well as the South.

Vesica_Prime
It's because the southern states seceded in order to protect the institution of slavery. Slavery was the cornerstone of the Confederacy.
Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#98 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts

[QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

Can someone explain why the Confederate flag is so controversial? From what I gather it's just the flag of the now defunct Southern States of America who tried to secede from the USA. The only argument I've heard is that the blacks were enslaved in the South therefore it is a symbol of racism which in my opinion is hypocritical since some Northern States had slavery not to mention that racism was rampant in the North as well as the South.

-Sun_Tzu-

It's because the southern states seceded in order to protect the institution of slavery. Slavery was the cornerstone of the Confederacy.


And I guess in a strange way understandably so since their entire economy depended on it.

I remember reading there was only one factory in the whole of the Confederacy when they went to war or something mental like that (it was in Atlanta).

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#99 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"][QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

Can someone explain why the Confederate flag is so controversial? From what I gather it's just the flag of the now defunct Southern States of America who tried to secede from the USA. The only argument I've heard is that the blacks were enslaved in the South therefore it is a symbol of racism which in my opinion is hypocritical since some Northern States had slavery not to mention that racism was rampant in the North as well as the South.

MissLibrarian

It's because the southern states seceded in order to protect the institution of slavery. Slavery was the cornerstone of the Confederacy.


And I guess in a strange way understandably so since their entire economy depended on it.

I remember reading there was only one factory in the whole of the Confederacy when they went to war or something mental like that (it was in Atlanta).

and thats why they didnt have a snowballs chance in hell of winning a war.

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#100 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

I don't see how a young American can have so much pride in the confederate flag. What is it about the confederate flag that represents you as a person? Why not the American flag? or your state flag? It seems like the people showing it are only interested in it's controversy.