frankly i'm so against gay marriage i'll edit your whole post.
I've got a very large list of reasons to be against it:
1. Being gay is not natural. Real Americans always reject unnatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, birth control and air conditioning. there's a large difference between not the way it is living outdoors and not the way instinct tells us we should be...
2. Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay in the same way that hanging around tall people will make you tall. more like gay marriage will encourage people to be gay in the same way that hanging around christians will encourage you to be christian.
3. Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract. dog's can't write......
4. Marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all: women are property, matches are arranged in childhood, blacks can't marry whites, Catholics can't marry Jews, divorce is illegal, and adultery is punishable by death that's the typical noble system of marriages, before the dark ages and in other parts of the world it was the same way it is now.
5. Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Britany Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed. using britany in an argument...
6. Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children. oh no! save the orphans descended of likely not all to bright people if they created an orphan in the first place.
7. Obviously gay parents will raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children. meh, hardly a common argument.
8. Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America. it's not supported by any of our government documents either.
9. If we look to the word of God, His punishment for sexual immorality is equal to that of murder. Therefore, teaching kids to tolerate homosexuality is equal to teaching them to tolerate murder. well it is if we were forced to teach it at theological institutions...
10. Children can never succeed without a male and a female role model at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children.
we highly discourage it....
11. Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy (insurance, government, tourism, banking, retail, education, and social services), suburban malls, or longer life spans. difference between material and moral changes....
12. Gay marriage should be decided by people not the courts, because the majority-elected legislatures, not courts, have historically protected the rights of the minorities. valid point.
13. Civil unions, providing most of the same benefits as marriage with a different name are better, because a "seperate but equal" institution is always constitutional. Seperate schools for African-Americans worked just as well as seperate marriages for gays and lesbians will. i think this one is in here twice, but there weren't black words for marriages, and there aren't gay schools. and i'd be fine with everybody in the us not being married but being in a civil union, it just offends me that a word used primarily by a straight institution would be used to describe gay union....
14. There is no separation between religious marriage and legal marriage, because there is no separation of church and state. i don't particularly care about religious marriage...
15. Devout, faithful Anglicans should never accept same-sex marriage, because it is an affront to the traditional family values upheld by Henry VIII and his wife, Catherine of Aragon, and his wife, Anne Boleyn, and his wife, Jane Seymour, and his wife, Anne of Cleves, and his wife, Catherine Howard, and his wife, Catherine Parr. They all knew the meaning of marriage and none of them lost their heads over the matter. lmao's.... unfortunately athiest here.
16. Married gay people will encourage others to be gay in a way that unmarried gay people do not. you don't state that way which leaves my argument far to broad for a quick edit....
17. Legalizing gay marriage will lead to legalizing dog marriage. This can be inferred from the history of other political initiatives for gender equality. For example, when American women got the right to vote in 1920, it led to terriers voting in 1925, and when Title IX was passed in 1972 to prevent sex discrimination in any federally-funded school, resulting in the creation of athletic opportunities for girls, it led to Bichon Frises on the basketball court during the Reagan administration. lmao.... again with the nobody uses this point.
18. Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to legislative change in general, which could possibly include the legalization of polygamy, incest, medical marijuana, and unmuzzled pit bulls. Because we don't know what might come down the next slippery slope, we should never change any law. lol, nobody ever used that argument... well maybe in the 50's....
19. Legal marriage will inspire gays to mimic straight traditions, such as spiritual commitment ceremonies and celebratory parties, which is currently impermissible for them to do and which they have never done before. because people totally argue this point...
20. Marriage is designed to protect the well-being of children. Gay people do not need marriage because they never have children from prior relationships, artificial insemination, surrogacy, or adoption. they rarely have it, and most of what you mentioned doesn't apply to gay guys, whom i'm primarily against....
21. Civil unions are a good option because "separate but equal" institutions are always constitutional. In fact, compared with marriage, civil unions are so attractive that straight people are calling dibs on them. marriage effectively is civil union, what's your point? so you continually mock christianity yet want to be married, a term mainly related to the "eyes of god" instead of a legal institution granting you the exact same rights? makes sense... not.
22. A man should not be able to marry whomever a woman can marry, and a woman should not be able to marry whomever a man can marry, because in this country we do not believe in gender equality. frankly i'm somewhat against feminism as well since they aren't actually working towards equality they are working towards female superiority (ever so kindly eliminating all the things we had they didn't yet keeping "ladies first" and all the other kind things society suggests we do for them)
23. If gays marry, some of straight people's tax dollars would end up supporting families whose structure they may find morally objectionable. Clearly, it is more just to continue taking gay people's tax dollars to support straight families, who are going to heaven regardless of what anyone else thinks of them. yes, because gay's are paying so many taxes when being unmarried they likely aren't homeowners.....and not being married their household income isn't over 200k putting them in the poor section of obama's tax set-up, giving them hundreds of benefits. meanwhile because i did good in life and make lots of money i have to pay for those that smoked pot through highschool....
24. Gays should hold off on the marriage question until society is more accepting of them, because they are not part of society. intelligent people against gays tend to use the term general public instead of society.....
25. The people's voice must be heard on this issue. Therefore, we must have a vote on a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, because we can't think of any other way to discuss the issue. this is an argument for how healthy our legislative system is, not the morality of gay marriage.
26. Each state should decide for itself whether gay marriage will be recognized, because there is no "full faith and credit" clause that requires states to recognize each other's institutions. by your logic the full fauth and credit law states that everybody must allow smoking in public since not everybody's banned it yet....
27. Gay marriage attempts to replace natural heterosexual instinct with a cultural institution. Morality demands that we subordinate institutionalized commitment to raw, unfettered, biological impulse. humans naturally chose a single mate for life.... it's why our numbers are so low compared to other species.
28. Gay marriages could very well suffer maladies like domestic violence and substance abuse. That's why we invented the Quality Control department to pre-approve the righteousness of all marriage applicants. because domestic violence and substance abuse are all or nothing chances..... gay marriages can't have higher chances.....
29. Those who support gay marriage aim to overthrow the dominant culture, as evidenced by their enthusiasm to participate in it. if your talking mainstream music i would happily see you overthrow that... no replacing it with single ladies though.
30. If the state performs gay marriages, Christians might become more liberal and divide into more mutually opposed parties. Since the government is an arm of the church and is responsible for keeping the peace in Christian leadership councils, it should not get involved with gay marriage. it's charged with keeping the peace everywhere....
31. After gay marriage was legalized in Scandinavian countries in 2004, more heterosexual couples realized they wanted to live together and bear children without marrying first. Banning gay marriage is a good way to prevent this practice, as is banning independent thought and mandating straight marriage by age mute point
21. wait what put this here.....?
32. Heterosexual marriage was invented in the Biblical book of Genesis. Written somewhere between 1500 and 500 BCE, Genesis came as a great relief to people in many cultures, such as China, who, prior to 1500 BCE, sat around waiting for the Mesopotamians to invent the family unit. lol. not sure where the argument is but it gave me a funny mental image.... bunch of cavepeople sitting in a circle wondering who takes care of the kid....
33. Gay marriage would allow more partners and children to sign onto the family breadwinner's healthcare plan. Given that 44 million Americans do not have health insurance, it is safe to say that health insurance is not an American value. valid point.... 2 out of 30 so far...
34. The possibility of getting a gay marriage might encourage some married heterosexuals to divorce and seek a gay union instead. These marriages were obviously happy and successful, and the justices who provide gay second marriages should be charged with alienation of affection. generalization...
35. Gay marriage may hurl the populace into existential crisis and cause spontaneous divorces. Divorce triggers our moral hemorrhaging, but we will keep it legal. It is easier to seek the criminalization of gay marriage than the criminalization of divorce, particularly because most of us have had a few divorces. generalization of all people opposed to gay marriage being overly righteous christian crusaders...
36. Gay marriage is tainted because some of the applicants might be divorcees marrying for the second time. We oppose remarriage, and would like to ensure that no one marries more than once; therefore we will oppose the entire institution of marriage, to ensure that no one ever marries at all. That casts the net wide enough to catch all the would-be second-timers. i'm sure somebody has used this argument before, but generalizations?
37. The people have the right to demand to vote on a Massachusetts constitutional amendment against gay marriage. There is no reason for proposed amendments to go through the state Legislature first, as is constitutionally required, because the Legislature doesn't spend all that many paid hours sitting around discussing the legal ramifications on behalf of ordinary citizens who are too busy with their own jobs to figure out everything at stake.
wait, what? your defending an amendment against gay marriage? i would strongly support that....
38. The arguments for gay marriage are flawed because Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry has made inconsistent statements about gay marriage, and he is known for his consistency on other issues. wait what?
39. Married gay couples will find it easier to adopt children, who might then be bullied and teased by other children for who their parents are. This reflects poorly on the judgment of gays who adopt children with the risk that their child could possibly be teased. It does not, of course, imply anything about the responsibilities of heterosexual parents, whose children only pick up rocks for geological interest and couldn't have been listening when their parents made those comments about their neighbors. so it's the straight people's fault that a child's instinct tells him he's supposed to like girls not boys?
40. Children of married gay couples might suffer bullying and teasing more often than children of unmarried gay couples, because playground bullies are sensitive to the nuances of contract law. the children wouldn't be in the care of gays if gays can't be married, as they are rarely allowed to adopt outside wedlock.
41. It is reasonable and fair to institute "civil unions" that provide all the rights and responsibilities of marriage, but we cannot apply the holy, mystical word "marriage" to this contract. Deriving from the Latin maritare, "marriage" evokes the dignity of the typical Roman man who engaged in licentious sex with both sexes until he reached middle age, at which time he maritared a teenage girl to bear his children. rome was also strongly opposed to christianity, so mute point, and athiest here...
42. According to the three proposed "compromise" Massachusetts constitutional amendments defeated by the Legislature on Feb. 11 and 12, 2004, the best way to "protect the unique relationship of [heterosexual] marriage" is to institute civil unions that are in every way identical to it.
43. God created the institution of marriage, just after he created 2.9% APR automobile financing, student loans, HMOs, and divorce.
athiest.
44. We must defer to the President's opinion on gay marriage, since the Republican party was given its authority by God. As it is written: "Republican and Democrat created He them." Paul elaborated: "Democrats, submit to the Republican." i'm athiest and still against gays.
45. In San Francisco, where renegade officials have married same-sex couples for the past several weeks, experts suggest that the city may suffer an earthquake in about ten years. Geological experts, that is. But good Christians don't recognize the opinion of Earth scientists, who falsely claim the Earth is 4.5 billion years old; they get their seismic information from their preachers, who say the earthquake's coming next week. wait, how is this an argument?
46. Allowing same-sex marriage could increase gay public displays of affection, because marriage has historically been proven to stimulate couples' interest in sex. it has been proven to stimulate couples' feeling of safety in displaying said interests however.
47. Making civil marriage available to same-sex couples could spur the wedding industry, and businesses would sure hate to pay taxes on all that profit.
weddings hardly make any money, what is your point?
48. Straight men are opposed to gay marriage because they would prefer that gay men try to be straight and compete with them for access to women, trimming down the pool of eligible dates to make courtship more challenging and exciting. no, we would like them to be straight so gym lockerrooms don't force the straight guys to hide in corners....
49. The country can't afford to provide benefits for any more married couples. That's why President Bush would never consider spending $150 million on programs that encourage more straight people to get married. nobody has ever used this point
50. Gay marriage is wrong because children might be led to think that it is right and that would clearly be wrong. well in my oppinion it is somewhat wrong, so valid.
Log in to comment