This topic is locked from further discussion.
Still meets him? That's bull..I want to see your sources.
GreatDecay
He named Jeremiah Wright as his mentor. Mentors teach. it's obvious that Obama holds those same core beliefs. He is his mentor of 20 years after all. For you to blindly ignore this is self imposed ignorance. As far as Ayers, it goes far beyond just knowing him. He is a friend of 20 years. That entire inner Chicago circle are an activist machine as a whole.
[QUOTE="supercubedude64"]Since experience doesn't matter and I'm pro-choice, I'll go with Obama.Trashface
Experience doesn't matter in leadership positions? Every business school on the planet would argue that. I think some people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
I prefer judgement over experience.
[QUOTE="videokidandrew"]A vote for Barack Hussein Obama is a vote for terrorism
McCain/Palin '08
Tjeremiah1988
FoxNews is proud of you. I dont remember what reporter on Fox but he always saids "Barack Hussein Obama" when mentoning Obama.
You know Obama himself said that his middle name would be good for diplomacy with Islamic nations because they could relate better, right? It's kind of a double standard to complain about journalists bringing it up when he did.
[QUOTE="videokidandrew"][QUOTE="tman93"][QUOTE="videokidandrew"]Ignorance. Simply ignorance. Prove me wrong.A vote for Barack Hussein Obama is a vote for terrorism
McCain/Palin '08
Tjeremiah1988
I could prove you wrong all day but lets start simple, why does Obama have a self declared friendly relationship with Bill Ayers the pentagon bomber an actual terrorist who isnt remorceful of his deeds and he even serves on a board with him?
McCain is evil and thinks just like Bush because they hang out and is friends with each other for years...
Hmmm I dismiss this as recycled democratic propaganda. McCain has stood up against his own party before.
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="supercubedude64"]Since experience doesn't matter and I'm pro-choice, I'll go with Obama.supercubedude64
Experience doesn't matter in leadership positions? Every business school on the planet would argue that. I think some people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
I prefer judgement over experience.
The judgement he has shown is poor. He named the hateful and racist Jeremiah Wright his mentor of 20 years. He was invloved in voter fraud. As far as abortion, he condones killing babies AFTER THEY'RE BORN.
Obama and the rest of the Democrats love to tax me to death. Capital gains tax, inheritance tax, and every other tax you can think of will be implemented under Obama. Apparently all it takes for Obama to rally supporters is to overuse the word "Change" and the Lemmings come out from underneath their rocks and throw their hands in the air like they are going to change the world. I'd rather vote for an AIDS INFESTED LLAMA than NO-BAMA.
4 more years!!!!!
Seriously though, I'd be shocked if Americans voted the Republicans in again after 8 years of failure. Record unemployment, 8 billion dollars of national debt, the most unpopular and compeltely unjustified war so far this century, an economy in crisis
It'd be pretty funny if they did though
The judgement he has shown is poor. He named the hateful and racist Jeremiah Wright his mentor of 20 years. He was invloved in voter fraud. As far as abortion, he condones killing babies AFTER THEY'RE BORN.
Trashface
Mccain voted a hockey mom with a pregnant teenage daughter and negative views of sex education as his vice president. A woman who is being investigated by a bipartisan state legislative body.
I've never heard of Obama being a baby killer though, that's a new even for the republicansObama and the rest of the Democrats love to tax me to death. Capital gains tax, inheritance tax, and every other tax you can think of will be implemented under Obama. Apparently all it takes for Obama to rally supporters is to overuse the word "Change" and the Lemmings come out from underneath their rocks and throw their hands in the air like they are going to change the world. I'd rather vote for an AIDS INFESTED LLAMA than NO-BAMA.
Ultimator777
I know I don't understand why people wanna pay higher taxes under Obama. Taxes is one thing that is going to DIRECTLY affect each and every one of us. Other things won't affect us as much in our daily lives
[QUOTE="supercubedude64"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="supercubedude64"]Since experience doesn't matter and I'm pro-choice, I'll go with Obama.Trashface
Experience doesn't matter in leadership positions? Every business school on the planet would argue that. I think some people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
I prefer judgement over experience.
he condones killing babies AFTER THEY'RE BORN.
Thanks for reminding me that I'm on the internet.
4 more years!!!!!
Seriously though, I'd be shocked if Americans voted the Republicans in again after 8 years of failure. Record unemployment, 8 billion dollars of national debt, the most unpopular and compeltely unjustified war so far this century, an economy in crisis
It'd be pretty funny if they did though
blushield
psst... congress is democratic. It's not all on the president. National debt is high because we are at war. The economy is not in a "crisis".. and unemployment is not at a "record high". It's the higest since 1981, yes, but how does the president control unemployment?
psst... congress is democratic. It's not all on the president. National debt is high because we are at war. The economy is not in a "crisis".. and unemployment is not at a "record high". It's the higest since 1981, yes, but how does the president control unemployment?
The_Mac_Daddy
Thanks for reminding me that I'm on the internet.
supercubedude64
In the mind of a Republican Obama not only supports baby killing, he actively partakes in it
OMG wot a monstah!did you watch mccain's speech? he clearly states the differences between him and obama in a nonconfrontational way. he says obama will do this, and he'll do this etc. etc. i dont feel like finding the exact thing but i recall quite clearlyZcrimson07
Yep, certainly did, it's step in the right direction but he's still forking out the negative ads more than the positive ads.
4 more years!!!!!
Seriously though, I'd be shocked if Americans voted the Republicans in again after 8 years of failure. Record unemployment, 8 billion dollars of national debt, the most unpopular and compeltely unjustified war so far this century, an economy in crisis
It'd be pretty funny if they did though
[QUOTE="Trashface"]
The judgement he has shown is poor. He named the hateful and racist Jeremiah Wright his mentor of 20 years. He was invloved in voter fraud. As far as abortion, he condones killing babies AFTER THEY'RE BORN.
blushield
Mccain voted a hockey mom with a pregnant teenage daughter and negative views of sex education as his vice president. A woman who is being investigated by a bipartisan state legislative body.
I've never heard of Obama being a baby killer though, that's a new even for the republicansA new low? It's true. He condones abortion after birth. THAT'S the new low.
It's sickening that you try to make her daughter an issue. She has stood up against and defeated corruption and she has cut out much firvalous spending at the expense of her own luxuries. Her neing a "hockey mom" is a good thing because she can relate to the average person. Obama himself was speaking of the importance of a washington outside, yet selected the very much washington insider Biden. Your very poor gripes are a sign that you really don't care about the best candidate for the country. you just care about politics.
[QUOTE="blushield"]4 more years!!!!!
Seriously though, I'd be shocked if Americans voted the Republicans in again after 8 years of failure. Record unemployment, 8 billion dollars of national debt, the most unpopular and compeltely unjustified war so far this century, an economy in crisis
It'd be pretty funny if they did though
The_Mac_Daddy
psst... congress is democratic. It's not all on the president. National debt is high because we are at war. The economy is not in a "crisis".. and unemployment is not at a "record high". It's the higest since 1981, yes, but how does the president control unemployment?
Also, dems want to further tax business. that's going to raise the price of retail goods and neccesities. We'll really see a bad economy then.
[QUOTE="Zcrimson07"]did you watch mccain's speech? he clearly states the differences between him and obama in a nonconfrontational way. he says obama will do this, and he'll do this etc. etc. i dont feel like finding the exact thing but i recall quite clearlyTenP
Yep, certainly did, it's step in the right direction but he's still forking out the negative ads more than the positive ads.
They aren't negative ads. They are reasons that Obama is not a good candidate. I for one want to know the danger of voting for candidates. It's more of a warning in my book.
[QUOTE="The_Mac_Daddy"]
psst... congress is democratic. It's not all on the president. National debt is high because we are at war. The economy is not in a "crisis".. and unemployment is not at a "record high". It's the higest since 1981, yes, but how does the president control unemployment?
blushield
Thanks for reminding me that I'm on the internet.
supercubedude64
In the mind of a Republican Obama not only supports baby killing, he actively partakes in it
OMG wot a monstah!Your immaturity and lack of valid arguments pretty much render your opinions irrelevant.
[QUOTE="The_Mac_Daddy"]
psst... congress is democratic. It's not all on the president. National debt is high because we are at war. The economy is not in a "crisis".. and unemployment is not at a "record high". It's the higest since 1981, yes, but how does the president control unemployment?
blushield
Thanks for reminding me that I'm on the internet.
supercubedude64
In the mind of a Republican Obama not only supports baby killing, he actively partakes in it
OMG wot a monstah!Um sorry to burst your ignorant bubble but he's right.
I'm not voting for either of these clowns.
Neither addresses the issue of spending and our monetary system.
And the way Obama wants to expand the Federal Government, holy crap!
obama gets my vote we need a change trick6952
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
[QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change Trashface
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change -Austin-
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
Yeah and the Obama ticket is essentially another term for Hitler
[QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change Trashface
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
Yeah because Obama has never talked about wasteful spending and corruption within different Federal programs.:roll:
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change -Austin-
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
The Obama ticket is not change. Obama is essentially a third term for the Clinton administration.
Now do you see what you sound like?
[QUOTE="-Austin-"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change GetEnTheKitchen
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
The Obama ticket is not change. Obama is essentially a third term for the Clinton administration.
Now do you see what you sound like?
The difference is Clinton did a good job as President whereas Bush is the worst President in history.
[QUOTE="supercubedude64"]Since experience doesn't matter and I'm pro-choice, I'll go with Obama.Trashface
Experience doesn't matter in leadership positions? Every business school on the planet would argue that. I think some people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
cough palin cough
[QUOTE="-Austin-"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change videokidandrew
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
Yeah and the Obama ticket is essentially another term for Hitler
what, why are you comparing obama to hitler agin,
hitler was a far right political, so reallyMcCain is closer to hitler (he is nothing like hitler but im just saying)
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="supercubedude64"]Since experience doesn't matter and I'm pro-choice, I'll go with Obama.alexmurray
Experience doesn't matter in leadership positions? Every business school on the planet would argue that. I think some people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
cough palin cough
LOL exactly
[QUOTE="-Austin-"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change videokidandrew
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
Yeah and the Obama ticket is essentially another term for Hitler
Seriously, are you people just trying to erode what little faith I have left in mankind?
[QUOTE="TenP"][QUOTE="Zcrimson07"]did you watch mccain's speech? he clearly states the differences between him and obama in a nonconfrontational way. he says obama will do this, and he'll do this etc. etc. i dont feel like finding the exact thing but i recall quite clearlyTrashface
Yep, certainly did, it's step in the right direction but he's still forking out the negative ads more than the positive ads.
They aren't negative ads. They are reasons that Obama is not a good candidate. I for one want to know the danger of voting for candidates. It's more of a warning in my book.
You wouldn't believe the amount of dirt that there is on John McCain that Obama isn't spewing all over the press. If you're for negative ads, check here.
Funny thing is, these people were used against John Kerry in 2004, and McCain was in the same POW/MIA committee scandal that brought Kerry down.
[QUOTE="-Austin-"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change GetEnTheKitchen
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
The Obama ticket is not change. Obama is essentially a third term for the Clinton administration.
Now do you see what you sound like?
Obama is far more liberal.
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change tccavey2
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
Yeah because Obama has never talked about wasteful spending and corruption within different Federal programs.:roll:
Palin has acted against them. Obama has done nothing.
The difference is Clinton did a good job as President whereas Bush is the worst President in history.
Zero5000X
Worst President in history? You haven't studied history much, have you? Clinton's main praise is the economy. It was actually Newt Gengrich's economic package that did so well. Clinton originally fought against that proposal.
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="supercubedude64"]Since experience doesn't matter and I'm pro-choice, I'll go with Obama.alexmurray
Experience doesn't matter in leadership positions? Every business school on the planet would argue that. I think some people shouldn't be allowed to vote.
cough palin cough
Care to explain? Once more, she has actually accomplished things.
[QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="TenP"][QUOTE="Zcrimson07"]did you watch mccain's speech? he clearly states the differences between him and obama in a nonconfrontational way. he says obama will do this, and he'll do this etc. etc. i dont feel like finding the exact thing but i recall quite clearlyTenP
Yep, certainly did, it's step in the right direction but he's still forking out the negative ads more than the positive ads.
They aren't negative ads. They are reasons that Obama is not a good candidate. I for one want to know the danger of voting for candidates. It's more of a warning in my book.
You wouldn't believe the amount of dirt that there is on John McCain that Obama isn't spewing all over the press. If you're for negative ads, check here.
Funny thing is, these people were used against John Kerry in 2004, and McCain was in the same POW/MIA committee scandal that brought Kerry down.
If Obama had dirt, it would have/ will be used. As far as Kerry, there were actual questions to his time in the military. Actual soldiers that served with him had issues with his service. that hasn't been the case with McCain.
[QUOTE="-Austin-"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change GetEnTheKitchen
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
The Obama ticket is not change. Obama is essentially a third term for the Clinton administration.
Now do you see what you sound like?
Clinton didn't drive the country into the ground though. You post has no relevence.
[QUOTE="tccavey2"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change Trashface
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
Yeah because Obama has never talked about wasteful spending and corruption within different Federal programs.:roll:
Palin has acted against them. Obama has done nothing.
palin supported the bridge to nowhere, then withdrew support but kept the money,
when palin started as mayor the city had no debt at the end of her term it was in $20,000,000 of debt
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="-Austin-"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change -Austin-
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
The Obama ticket is not change. Obama is essentially a third term for the Clinton administration.
Now do you see what you sound like?
Clinton didn't drive the country into the ground though. You post has no relevence.
The country has not been ran into the ground. Since 2000, I've had to find a job twice, and both times, it was very easy. Also, the country has seen far worse financial times. Looking back, the primary tactic liberals have taken to try and get elected is to convince everyone that the country is in horrible shape. Obama even had such a lack of respect to go and proclaim that garbage to other countries.
[QUOTE="Trashface"]
[QUOTE="tccavey2"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change alexmurray
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
Yeah because Obama has never talked about wasteful spending and corruption within different Federal programs.:roll:
Palin has acted against them. Obama has done nothing.
palin supported the bridge to nowhere, then withdrew support but kept the money,
when palin started as mayor the city had no debt at the end of her term it was in $20,000,000 of debt
Do you have any idea of the infrastructure she was left with? Since when is spending to correct such a horrible predecessor a bad thing? She used the bridge money for better things. You need to do research before posting biased non sense out of context.
[QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="Trashface"]
[QUOTE="tccavey2"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change Trashface
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
Yeah because Obama has never talked about wasteful spending and corruption within different Federal programs.:roll:
Palin has acted against them. Obama has done nothing.
palin supported the bridge to nowhere, then withdrew support but kept the money,
when palin started as mayor the city had no debt at the end of her term it was in $20,000,000 of debt
Do you have any idea of the infrastructure she was left with? Since when is spending to correct such a horrible predecessor a bad thing? She used the bridge money for better things. You need to do research before posting biased non sense out of context.
I dont care she should have given the FEDERAL MONEY back and use STATE MONEY for those projects
Your immaturity and lack of valid arguments pretty much render your opinions irrelevant.
Trashface
I would call the laughable state of the economy, the unemployment rate and the involvement in an unpopular and completely illegal war a pretty great argument.
But hey, I know it can be hard for a Republican to take. No amount of failure is too much for you amirite?
Fighting corruption?Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
Trashface
to quote the washington post "Palin is under investigation by a bipartisan state legislative body. … Palin had promised to cooperate with the legislative inquiry, but this week she hired a lawyer to fight to move the case to the jurisdiction of the state personnel board, which Palin appoints."
Clean as a whistle!
I don't see how you don't get the change thing. Obama is from a different, far more liberal party and has completely different policies. Mccain is from the same party as bush and by his own accounts "voted with him 90% of the time". If you cant see how voting for OBama would cause a change then I cant help you my Republican apologist friend,
pity you cant vote for bush again. I bet you'd rationalise it somehow
[QUOTE="kingyotoX"]Obama = hitler + tan
It'as simple math here people.
Chargeagles1
kingyotoX= Ignorant+Racist
I would love to know how that's racist. People love to throw that word around yet they have no way to back it up, btw
Chargeagles1= no sense of humor.
[QUOTE="kingyotoX"]I would love to know how that's racist. People love to throw that word around yet they have no way to back it up, btw
Chargeagles1= no sense of humor.
blushield
Do you actually know who hitler was?
Yes and it is wrong to compare hitler to Obama, at least hitler did positve things for the country. What has Obama ever done?
[QUOTE="GetEnTheKitchen"][QUOTE="-Austin-"][QUOTE="Trashface"][QUOTE="trick6952"]obama gets my vote we need a change Trashface
Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
The McCain ticket is not change. McCain is essentially a third term for the Bush administration.
The Obama ticket is not change. Obama is essentially a third term for the Clinton administration.
Now do you see what you sound like?
Obama is far more liberal.
And that's supposed to be a good thing?
[QUOTE="kingyotoX"]Yes and it is wrong to compare hitler to Obama, at least hitler did positve things for the country. What has Obama ever done?
blushield
so now hitler is better than obama?
what has this world come too,
we are on the verge on having the first black president and people compair him to hitler
[QUOTE="Trashface"]Your immaturity and lack of valid arguments pretty much render your opinions irrelevant.
blushield
I would call the laughable state of the economy, the unemployment rate and the involvement in an unpopular and completely illegal war a pretty great argument.
But hey, I know it can be hard for a Republican to take. No amount of failure is too much for you amirite?
Fighting corruption?Palin has proven by her standing up to corruption and wasteful spending that she is a much larger change. Obama has proven nothing. If change was what you really wanted, you would vote for that ticket. The change thing is empty words in Obama's case. I think you just wanna vote democrat.
Trashface
to quote the washington post "Palin is under investigation by a bipartisan state legislative body. … Palin had promised to cooperate with the legislative inquiry, but this week she hired a lawyer to fight to move the case to the jurisdiction of the state personnel board, which Palin appoints."
Clean as a whistle!
I don't see how you don't get the change thing. Obama is from a different, far more liberal party and has completely different policies. Mccain is from the same party as bush and by his own accounts "voted with him 90% of the time". If you cant see how voting for OBama would cause a change then I cant help you my Republican apologist friend,
pity you cant vote for bush again. I bet you'd rationalise it somehow
Illegal war? That's just stupidity. iraq broke sanction after sanction and kicked out inspectors. I guess we should have just kept saying "don't do that!". Wow the liberal party is weak. Also, Bush believed the same intelligence that everyon eelse believed (including other countries and the democrats that gave him permission). Also, they found many weapon components. You just regurgitated mindless propaganda.
Yes, she has fought corruption. She cleaned up a lot when she got in office. If the republican candidate was nearly as inexperienced as Obama with such a questionable past and questionable "mentors" as Obama, I would be an idiot to vote for him.
[QUOTE="blushield"][QUOTE="kingyotoX"]Yes and it is wrong to compare hitler to Obama, at least hitler did positve things for the country. What has Obama ever done?
alexmurray
so now hitler is better than obama?
what has this world come too,
we are on the verge on having the first black president and people compair him to hitler
Whats it matter if he's black? that's the only reason he got nominated. A white man with such inexperience, such questionable mentors who kept his past hidden from the public as Obama has would have been laughed out of the primaries.
[QUOTE="blushield"][QUOTE="kingyotoX"]Yes and it is wrong to compare hitler to Obama, at least hitler did positve things for the country. What has Obama ever done?
alexmurray
so now hitler is better than obama?
what has this world come too,
we are on the verge on having the first black president and people compair him to hitler
What does his race have to do with anything? If he was well qualified and didn't spew crap out of his mouth, I would vote for him. But I'm voting for McCain for safety and because he won't get us into nearly as much debt as Obama. Also alexmurray you don't live in the US (If I remember right) so why the hell are you posting in these threads?
[QUOTE="alexmurray"][QUOTE="blushield"][QUOTE="kingyotoX"]Yes and it is wrong to compare hitler to Obama, at least hitler did positve things for the country. What has Obama ever done?
battlefront23
so now hitler is better than obama?
what has this world come too,
we are on the verge on having the first black president and people compair him to hitler
What does his race have to do with anything? If he was well qualified and didn't spew crap out of his mouth, I would vote for him. But I'm voting for McCain for safety and because he won't get us into nearly as much debt as Obama. Also alexmurray you don't live in the US (If I remember right) so why the hell are you posting in these threads?
because I am a US citizen and I am going to return to the US next year
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment