Whats your point? I don't support Gay marriage. As I believe it is a sin.. So? Why don't you just go to Heaven and let sinners sin? It's a free country, right?
Apparently, being a "fiscal conservative" candidate is enough for many people to look the other way when it comes to pretty much everything else. "That candidate believes the universe is 6000 years old? That's ok! He/she is a fiscal conservative!" "What is that you're saying? That candidate believes Benjamin Franklin had a dinosaur farm? Irrelevant! He/she is a fiscal conservative!"
[QUOTE="egnaterrr1"][QUOTE="00-Riddick-00"] Whats your point? I don't support Gay marriage. As I believe it is a sin..Pikdum
But religion isnt real. There are no such things as sin.
Not sure if serious....
Hey I found a book about the the flying spaghetti monster, and he says being straight is a sin, it must be real! lets abolish straight marriage! The spaghetti book has the same amount of evidence as the bible
[QUOTE="egnaterrr1"] But religion isnt real. There are no such things as sin.egnaterrr1
Not sure if serious....
Hey I found a book about the the flying spaghetti monster, and he says being straight is a sin, it must be real! lets abolish straight marriage! The spaghetti book has the same amount of evidence as the bible
I understand where you are coming from, hell I agree with what you are saying. Im not religous. Sin may not be real to you and I, but it is to those who are religious.
And on topic wise: Ugh is usually the expression I use at any republican debate.
Hey I found a book about the the flying spaghetti monster, and he says being straight is a sin, it must be real! lets abolish straight marriage! The spaghetti book has the same amount of evidence as the bible
I understand where you are coming from, hell I agree with what you are saying. Im not religous. Sin may not be real to you and I, but it is to those who are religious.
Yes, but its a double standard with these republicans. The president is supposed to represent all people, and yet they force their religion on others and try to deny others equal human rights. Its utter BS.
[QUOTE="egnaterrr1"] Hey I found a book about the the flying spaghetti monster, and he says being straight is a sin, it must be real! lets abolish straight marriage! The spaghetti book has the same amount of evidence as the bibleegnaterrr1
I understand where you are coming from, hell I agree with what you are saying. Im not religous. Sin may not be real to you and I, but it is to those who are religious.
Yes, but its a double standard with these republicans. The president is supposed to represent all people, and yet they force their religion on others and try to deny others equal human rights. Its utter BS.
My God! (hehe) There just might be hypocrites in the world of politics!!!
Whats your point? I don't support Gay marriage. As I believe it is a sin..
lots of things are a "sin" from the point of view of religions, but which don't fall under issues of actual human suffering or violations of individual freedom.
Personally, I don't think the GOP has put forward a candidate worthy of election at all, yet. Any current candidate that is voted into office will for sure repeat the errors of the Bush presidency, because they all have the same ideals with the same level of intelligence. What's comforting is the fact that I don't know anyone with a degree higher than a college degree that feels any differently than I do.
Hopefully, Obama will get re-elected and he can continue to institute his policies, which by the way, without the ongoing problem of GOP intervention would have benefited the country immensely. Instead, the conservatives have blocked or seriously cut back on important legislation that would have improved the lives of us all. Luckily, the Tea Party is a joke, because that was definitely the wrong direction for the country.
What I don't understand is how like Perry, Bachmann, and Palin say that they're for the constitution but then support amendments banning gay marriage and abortion.
They love the consitution so much that they want to change it? Thank god the founding fathers put in the 3/4 state clause in the ratification process for clowns like them.
It seriously seems like Republicans have regressed rather than progressed the past 40 years.. Especially now when the Republican party has radicalized..
Obama just denies gays less than Michelle does. But fully supports? Lol, no.
He denies them less by repealing DADT and dropping the defense of DOMA?
Exactly, as I said, denies less. But he still doesn't fully support them. Do some research on his stance on gay marriage. Just because he took a stance against DOMA does not mean he favors gay marriage. He just doesn't think government needs to be wasting tax dollars on DOMA.
[QUOTE="Qixote"] Obama just denies gays less than Michelle does. But fully supports? Lol, no.
Qixote
He denies them less by repealing DADT and dropping the defense of DOMA?
Exactly, as I said, denies less. But he still doesn't fully support them. Do some research on his stance on gay marriage. Just because he took a stance against DOMA does not mean he favors gay marriage. He just doesn't think government needs to be wasting tax dollars on DOMA.
You know, William Brennan did not support abortion yet he was one of the key members to legalize it. Personal opinion =/= public stance.
Also please source your claim that he did it for financial reasons.
Also please source your claim that he did it for financial reasons.
DroidPhysX
Right after you source your claim that he fully supports gays to have all of the same rights that straights do, including marriage. Any source saying that "his views are evolving" on the subject doesn't cut it. You will find the fact is, he remains politically ambiguous about the subject. Ambiguity does not get things done.
Also please source your claim that he did it for financial reasons.
Qixote
Right after you source your claim that he fully supports gays to have all of the same rights that straights do, including marriage. Any source saying that "his views are evolving" on the subject doesn't cut it. You will find the fact is, he remains politically ambiguous about the subject. Ambiguity does not get things done.
When did I claim that he fully supports gays? :? It seems to me that you're grasping at straws.
Whats your point? I don't support Gay marriage. As I believe it is a sin..
I'm not going to mock or belittle you for your beliefs here, but I do have a question: Why is other people's sin any of your business? What skin is it off your back ether way? And would you, say, advocate legislation against a husband and wife who engage in anal sex?
I would never ever vote for Perry, Bachmann or Palin ..... and Im a Republican. They make me sick to my stomach. I hate the ultra conservative/religious republicans.
Log in to comment