More Troubles for Obamacare

  • 158 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#101 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

@GazaAli said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

You have to change things because life and everything that's going on in it is of no static nature. If you're not moving forward then you necessarily moving backwards. The world changes radically by the day, the notion that you're not moving at all means you're moving backwards.

On the level of the state, if its not progressing, even if its institutions and policies are perceived to be beneficial and progressive enough, then stagnation and staleness are making their way on all level of public affairs and social order. It will be left behind while other states lead the way.

Who is to say that "forwards" is any better than "backwards"?

Avatar image for deeliman
deeliman

4027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102  Edited By deeliman
Member since 2013 • 4027 Posts

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#103 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

Just wait until the 5 to 7 million of young healthy individuals necessary to make the program viable don't sign up in time. Then it really is gonna be interesting

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#104  Edited By Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105  Edited By Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

No Republican votes? That's impressive, considering that it passed a Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#106 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

lmao this guy right here.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

You have to change things because life and everything that's going on in it is of no static nature. If you're not moving forward then you necessarily moving backwards. The world changes radically by the day, the notion that you're not moving at all means you're moving backwards.

On the level of the state, if its not progressing, even if its institutions and policies are perceived to be beneficial and progressive enough, then stagnation and staleness are making their way on all level of public affairs and social order. It will be left behind while other states lead the way.

Who is to say that "forwards" is any better than "backwards"?

Its like asking why a million dollars are necessarily better than a thousand, your question makes as much sense as this one.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#108 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

@Makhaidos said:

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

No Republican votes? That's impressive, considering that it passed a Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

Don't know WFT are you talking about, Obamacare passed without a single GOP vote in favor.

So yeah, you should had done whatever the hell you wanted.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109  Edited By WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@deeliman said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

You don't need first hand experience to know something is broken.

Avatar image for deeliman
deeliman

4027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 deeliman
Member since 2013 • 4027 Posts

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

Because every study on healthcare systems has come to that conclusion. Besides, are you really trying to argue that it wasn't?

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112  Edited By KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

The Obama administration lied to us. The government can't handle dealing with insurance involving 16% of the total economy.

Surprise, surprise!

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

Obama lol, such a terrible pos president. Other countries laugh at us.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@deeliman said:

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

Because every study on healthcare systems has come to that conclusion. Besides, are you really trying to argue that it wasn't?

I never said it wasn't but you commenting on it when you haven't used it would be my commenting on the health care a doctor from The Netherlands takes care of sick patients by prescribing sleeping pills when someone was sick. As it is, I can say that drug laws over your way are screwy when I can buy hydrocortisone over the counter here in the US while I couldn't over there.

Avatar image for deeliman
deeliman

4027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 deeliman
Member since 2013 • 4027 Posts

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

Because every study on healthcare systems has come to that conclusion. Besides, are you really trying to argue that it wasn't?

I never said it wasn't but you commenting on it when you haven't used it would be my commenting on the health care a doctor from The Netherlands takes care of sick patients by prescribing sleeping pills when someone was sick. As it is, I can say that drug laws over your way are screwy when I can buy hydrocortisone over the counter here in the US while I couldn't over there.

...can anyone make sense of what he's saying?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#116 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@sonicare said:

There are some good measures in the ACA, but there is also a lot of poorly thought out crap. The website debacle was just the result of poor planning. But the bigger issues are that some people are losing their insurance. They made the strong assertion that no one would lose their existing coverage, but that hasnt been the case. Lots of people have been dumped from their previous plans and are now finding their remaining options to be far more expensive. Wish they would have thought this out better. I like the idea of getting rid of the exclusion of pre-existing conditions and letting younger people stay on parents plans, but other stuff seemed rushed.

No one knew that this was going to happen due to people wanting to ramrod the legislation through the voting process without reading it. That is the problem with lots of the legislation that is getting passed nowadays. Big bulky bills with garbage that no one wants to read, but should and it is hard to understand most of what is put in those bills.

Yes, the big issue is that Obama spent the last four years telling people that if they already had insurance, they could keep it. Now we are seeing that those previous policies are not grandfathered in and those with those policies are being dropped. It really is shameful that it is happening. Now he is telling those very people to go to the website that is broken to see if they qualify for subsidized insurance (which is another way to say taxpayer supported) through the site.

Can you blame them? We basically have a major party in office that systematically wants to destroy the majority of government programs and who has called plans like this the break point to becoming a socialism.. This doesn't excuse the crap problem with many parts of the ACA plan, but some how suggest that "slow down to do this change" is just not realistic when we have a party that doesn't even want to do anything outside of dismantling and deregulating..

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@deeliman said:

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

Because every study on healthcare systems has come to that conclusion. Besides, are you really trying to argue that it wasn't?

I never said it wasn't but you commenting on it when you haven't used it would be my commenting on the health care a doctor from The Netherlands takes care of sick patients by prescribing sleeping pills when someone was sick. As it is, I can say that drug laws over your way are screwy when I can buy hydrocortisone over the counter here in the US while I couldn't over there.

...can anyone make sense of what he's saying?

Are you dense?

I spent 3 months in The Netherlands. A coworker went to the doctor while I was there due to being sick. The doctor prescribed sleeping pills. What gives me the right to comment on how stupid that is when I didn't use the health care system there? What I did do is try to buy some hydrocortisone ointment, but was told I needed a prescription for it. O_O I can buy that stuff here in the US right over the counter with no prescription. That is something I can comment on. I think it stupid that a 1% solution ointment needs a prescription for it due to The Netherlands stupid drug laws.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118  Edited By KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

@sSubZerOo said:

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@sonicare said:

There are some good measures in the ACA, but there is also a lot of poorly thought out crap. The website debacle was just the result of poor planning. But the bigger issues are that some people are losing their insurance. They made the strong assertion that no one would lose their existing coverage, but that hasnt been the case. Lots of people have been dumped from their previous plans and are now finding their remaining options to be far more expensive. Wish they would have thought this out better. I like the idea of getting rid of the exclusion of pre-existing conditions and letting younger people stay on parents plans, but other stuff seemed rushed.

No one knew that this was going to happen due to people wanting to ramrod the legislation through the voting process without reading it. That is the problem with lots of the legislation that is getting passed nowadays. Big bulky bills with garbage that no one wants to read, but should and it is hard to understand most of what is put in those bills.

Yes, the big issue is that Obama spent the last four years telling people that if they already had insurance, they could keep it. Now we are seeing that those previous policies are not grandfathered in and those with those policies are being dropped. It really is shameful that it is happening. Now he is telling those very people to go to the website that is broken to see if they qualify for subsidized insurance (which is another way to say taxpayer supported) through the site.

Can you blame them? We basically have a major party in office that systematically wants to destroy the majority of government programs and who has called plans like this the break point to becoming a socialism.. This doesn't excuse the crap problem with many parts of the ACA plan, but some how suggest that "slow down to do this change" is just not realistic when we have a party that doesn't even want to do anything outside of dismantling and deregulating..

Obamacare is an awful plan and will likely collapse on its own. Americans get to see the big government trainwreck in progress. $500 million for a website that doesn't even work? Lol!

And that's just the tip of the iceberg with this terrible idea.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119  Edited By mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23367 Posts

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

No Republican votes? That's impressive, considering that it passed a Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

Don't know WFT are you talking about, Obamacare passed without a single GOP vote in favor.

So yeah, you should had done whatever the hell you wanted.

I'm not sure you follow politics with any actual depth.

The Democratic party is, and was even more so at the time, fragmented. Think Tea Party Republicans and establishment Republicans, with a larger gradient between the two.

A number of conservative Democrats didn't want the reform you're referring to. The bill had to be watered down to what it is to get them on board, and some of them even required sweeteners to get on board.

Avatar image for deeliman
deeliman

4027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120  Edited By deeliman
Member since 2013 • 4027 Posts

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

@whipassmt said:

@GazaAli said:

@zpluffy said:

@GazaAli:

If a person is getting screwed heavily by these changes big time, he will oppose and complain about it, even if it's still standing. There is nothing pathetic about that.

I will not claim to be very knowledgeable on Obamacare, despite that I have a general idea about it and what people complain about. That's beside the point.

The idea is that Americans react to every little change this way. Obamacare, gun laws, gay marriage, tax policies and the list goes on and on. I think it has become practically impossible to change things or get anything done in the U.S.

Why you gotta change things? As the saying goes if it ain't broke don't fix it. If things are working fine, why bother changing?

As Agent Phil Coulson says "People tend to confuse the words 'new' and 'improved'".

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

Because every study on healthcare systems has come to that conclusion. Besides, are you really trying to argue that it wasn't?

I never said it wasn't but you commenting on it when you haven't used it would be my commenting on the health care a doctor from The Netherlands takes care of sick patients by prescribing sleeping pills when someone was sick. As it is, I can say that drug laws over your way are screwy when I can buy hydrocortisone over the counter here in the US while I couldn't over there.

...can anyone make sense of what he's saying?

Are you dense?

I spent 3 months in The Netherlands. A coworker went to the doctor while I was there due to being sick. The doctor prescribed sleeping pills. What gives me the right to comment on how stupid that is when I didn't use the health care system there? What I did do is try to buy some hydrocortisone ointment, but was told I needed a prescription for it. O_O I can buy that stuff here in the US right over the counter with no prescription. That is something I can comment on. I think it stupid that a 1% solution ointment needs a prescription for it due to The Netherlands stupid drug laws.

I'm not dense, but it always helps your argument if you can form a coherent sentence.

Free speech gives you the right to comment on it. Whether it was stupid or not all depends on what was wrong with your coworker. Not that what a doctor prescribes has that much to do with the healthcare system.

Again, i can comment on the US healthcare system without ever using it because I read multiple studies on it that all more or less came to the same conclusion.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@sSubZerOo said:

@WhiteKnight77 said:

@sonicare said:

There are some good measures in the ACA, but there is also a lot of poorly thought out crap. The website debacle was just the result of poor planning. But the bigger issues are that some people are losing their insurance. They made the strong assertion that no one would lose their existing coverage, but that hasnt been the case. Lots of people have been dumped from their previous plans and are now finding their remaining options to be far more expensive. Wish they would have thought this out better. I like the idea of getting rid of the exclusion of pre-existing conditions and letting younger people stay on parents plans, but other stuff seemed rushed.

No one knew that this was going to happen due to people wanting to ramrod the legislation through the voting process without reading it. That is the problem with lots of the legislation that is getting passed nowadays. Big bulky bills with garbage that no one wants to read, but should and it is hard to understand most of what is put in those bills.

Yes, the big issue is that Obama spent the last four years telling people that if they already had insurance, they could keep it. Now we are seeing that those previous policies are not grandfathered in and those with those policies are being dropped. It really is shameful that it is happening. Now he is telling those very people to go to the website that is broken to see if they qualify for subsidized insurance (which is another way to say taxpayer supported) through the site.

Can you blame them? We basically have a major party in office that systematically wants to destroy the majority of government programs and who has called plans like this the break point to becoming a socialism.. This doesn't excuse the crap problem with many parts of the ACA plan, but some how suggest that "slow down to do this change" is just not realistic when we have a party that doesn't even want to do anything outside of dismantling and deregulating..

Think about this, the AFA will increase the number of people on Medicaid rolls. Is there any wonder why a major party is objecting? Some state governors decided to not take part in that portion of the AFA. Is that any wonder since it will cost the taxpayer? We already know that the US government cannot manage health care or manage hospitals (VA says problems at medical centers are ‘not systemic’) for even a portion of population, yet everyone wants the government to provide it. They are also objecting due to major portions being put on hold while one portion cannot or will not be until everything is fixed (if it can be fixed).

The AFA needs 7 million people to actually buy insurance, but so far, even the White House cannot say that those who have been to the Healthcare.gov site actually bought insurance, which is what the AFA was supposed to do.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#122  Edited By Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

@mattbbpl said:

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

No Republican votes? That's impressive, considering that it passed a Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

Don't know WFT are you talking about, Obamacare passed without a single GOP vote in favor.

So yeah, you should had done whatever the hell you wanted.

I'm not sure you follow politics with any actual depth.

LOL, I doubt you follow politics closer than I do but lets leave that aside. I understand your point which is kind of my point: liberals keep bitching about the public option thing many times blaming Republicans, just like Makaidos did "That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out." yet that part was thrown because it was too radical for many Democrats let alone Republicans. And that is that.

Avatar image for mattbbpl
mattbbpl

23367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 mattbbpl
Member since 2006 • 23367 Posts

@Master_Live said:

@mattbbpl said:

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

No Republican votes? That's impressive, considering that it passed a Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

Don't know WFT are you talking about, Obamacare passed without a single GOP vote in favor.

So yeah, you should had done whatever the hell you wanted.

I'm not sure you follow politics with any actual depth.

LOL, I doubt you follow politics closer than I do but lets leave that aside. I understand your point which is kind of my point: liberals keep bitching about the public option thing many times blaming Republicans, just like Makaidos did "That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out." yet that part was thrown because it was too radical for many Democrats let alone Republicans. And that is that.

Yeah, Republicans were only part of the reason it didn't pass, to the extent that not a single one of them voted for it. A handful of Democrats in conservative regions didn't help either, as you said.

Republicans are held up as the standard bearers for being against these policies because, as you said, not a single one of them support them. They will similarly be held up as the party opposing immigration reform because the vast majority of them appose it. There will, of course, be the odd Democrats opposing it, but Republicans will shoulder the brunt of the blame because they compose the bulk of the opposition.

Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#124 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts

I already get health care through my Union at my job.

Obamacare is Obama's only legecy and if it were to fail he would be considered the worst two term president since Franklin Pierce.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#125 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

@GazaAli: forced purchase of a product at higher prices and with less benefit stands on its own?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319992

religion and math do not mix, and its no wonder so many ideologues are poor and forever will be, they are incapable of anything other than their own assumed conclusion.

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

@Jd1680a said:

Obamacare is Obama's only legecy

Well, that, and these couple other things.

It's spelled "legacy," by the way.

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127  Edited By Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

Words can't express how much of a joke Obamanation is.

Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#129  Edited By Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts
@Makhaidos said:

@Jd1680a said:

Obamacare is Obama's only legecy

Well, that, and these couple other things.

It's spelled "legacy," by the way.

Yeah Obama sure did a lot of good things in his tenure. I guess I misjudged the guy for the good he have done.

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130  Edited By GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts

@surrealnumber5 said:

@GazaAli: forced purchase of a product at higher prices and with less benefit stands on its own?

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2319992

religion and math do not mix, and its no wonder so many ideologues are poor and forever will be, they are incapable of anything other than their own assumed conclusion.

I'll be reading that paper later. But how does ACA force people to purchase healthcare plans with less benefits and higher prices? I'm asking seriously.

Long time no see!

Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

I think any healthcare system that sells healthcare as a commodity is beyond broken.

Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#132 The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

@Jd1680a said:
@Makhaidos said:

@Jd1680a said:

Obamacare is Obama's only legecy

Well, that, and these couple other things.

It's spelled "legacy," by the way.

Yeah Obama sure did a lot of good things in his tenure. I guess I misjudged the guy for the good he have done.

Name one good thing he's done.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#133 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

Wrong.. Moderate Republicans like Olympia Snowe voted for it.. Furthermore the democrat majority during that time included DINO's and Blue dogs.. Something the current Republican party does not have to deal with when it comes to their majority.. I wish people actually look up on this stuff before they do it, the bill had to be heavily modified and changed for the Blug Dogs and DINO's to agree with it.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#134 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

@The-Apostle said:

@Jd1680a said:
@Makhaidos said:

@Jd1680a said:

Obamacare is Obama's only legecy

Well, that, and these couple other things.

It's spelled "legacy," by the way.

Yeah Obama sure did a lot of good things in his tenure. I guess I misjudged the guy for the good he have done.

Name one good thing he's done.

Ended the use of torture.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#135  Edited By surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

@GazaAli: for most, yes, especially if you are young and male it is the worst. if you are old and sick it is better for you but this is hurting most for little, extremely little gain. this whole plan was designed from an actuarial perspective to help old people and middle aged women at the extreme detriment to to young people who have yet to make anything.

edit: i consider politics religion even more so than orgnized religion(barring politics :P )

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#136  Edited By Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

@sSubZerOo said:

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

Wrong.. Moderate Republicans like Olympia Snowe voted for it..

Except you are either an ignoramus or a liar. Here is the official final tally for the passage vote for Obamacare on the Senate.

Show me where Olympia Snowe voted for it. Show me where any Republican voted for it.

Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#137 The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

@Master_Live said:

@sSubZerOo said:

@Master_Live said:

@Makhaidos said:

@GazaAli said:

@coolbeans90 said:
@mattbbpl said:

@Makhaidos said:

Yeah, Obamacare has a lot of problems. It would be so much easier if they took down the website altogether and just implemented universal healthcare like the rest of the modern world.

QFT

^

Does that mean the U.S now has both a nationalized and a privatized healthcare systems at the same time? Like the government offers healthcare and so does the private sector?

No. That was going to be the public option, but Republicans threw a conniption fit and it was thrown out.

The law passed with no Republican votes, might as well done whatever you wanted so you have no excuses.

Wrong.. Moderate Republicans like Olympia Snowe voted for it..

Except you are either a ignoramus or a liar. Here is the official final tally for the passage vote for Obamacare on the Senate.

Show me where Olympia Snowe voted for it. Show me where any Republican voted for it.

I sure can't find any. And Snowe voted against it. We need more Republicans so there can be Nobamacare. >_>

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#138 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

@The-Apostle: how about more independents?

Avatar image for buccomatic
buccomatic

1941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 buccomatic
Member since 2005 • 1941 Posts

@WhiteKnight77 said:

Obama admin. knew millions could not keep their health insurance shows that the administration knew that millions would lose their insurance even though Obama kept telling the public that they would be able to keep the insurance that they already had. This is on top of the rollout problems that are continually plague the Healthcare.gov website that individuals can go to to find health insurance.

Doctor choice in Obamacare? Not so much shows that insurance companies are restricting hospitals and doctors that insurance that meets the AFA standards. In other words, your favorite doctor might not be in the network of your new provider as well as your favorite hospital. You might have to buy more expensive insurance in order to use both.

To make matters worse, the people that the AFA is meant to help purchase insurance are the ones who will apparently pay the fine instead of buying insurance. This will cause problems due to the lack of funds that will be used from young people's plans to help pay for medical costs of older people.

And Obamacare's Website Is Crashing Because It Doesn't Want You To Know How Costly Its Plans Are.

Political objectives trumped operational objectives

The answer is that Obamacare wasn’t designed to help healthy people with average incomes get health insurance. It was designed to force those people to pay more for coverage, in order to subsidize insurance for people with incomes near the poverty line, and those with chronic or costly medical conditions.

But the laws’ supporters and enforcers don’t want you to know that, because it would violate the President’s incessantly repeated promise that nothing would change for the people that Obamacare doesn’t directly help. If you shop for Obamacare-based coverage without knowing if you qualify for subsidies, you might be discouraged by the law’s steep costs.

So, by analyzing your income first, if you qualify for heavy subsidies, the website can advertise those subsidies to you instead of just hitting you with Obamacare’s steep premiums. For example, the site could advertise plans that cost “$0″ or “$30″ instead of explaining that the plan really costs $200, and that you’re getting a subsidy of $200 or $170. But you’ll have to be at or near the poverty line to gain subsidies of that size; most people will either not qualify for a subsidy, or qualify for a small one that, net-net, doesn’t make up for the law’s cost hikes.

Are people still enamored with Obamacare? Are you going to buy insurance through the Healthcare.gov website?

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#140  Edited By deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

@GazaAli said:
@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

I think any healthcare system that sells healthcare as a commodity is beyond broken.

He's going to reply with a long-winded post about how health care isn't a right.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142  Edited By WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

@Aljosa23 said:

@GazaAli said:
@WhiteKnight77 said:

@deeliman said:

The us healthcare system prior to the changes the ACA made, was very much broken. It was the worst system in the developed world.

Without ever using the US health care system ever, how can you say it was broken?

I think any healthcare system that sells healthcare as a commodity is beyond broken.

He's going to reply with a long-winded post about how health care isn't a right.

No, I wont. I think that there are some things a person should be responsible for him or her self.

Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#143 ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

@AmazonTreeBoa said:

@ristactionjakso said:

Bu, bu, but Obama can't do any wrong....

No, he just can't take the blame for anything he does wrong and always blames somebody else. When something good happens even if it wasn't him, he takes credit.

I was being sarcastic :) but yes, you nailed it. And why is he not "in the loop" when the bad sh!t goes down? He "never knew" about Benghazi, Fast and Furious ect. Isn't the president and should know about these things?

Bottom line he knows about everything that goes on, he just lies about it and people eat his lies up. Bunch of sheeple.

Avatar image for ristactionjakso
ristactionjakso

6118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#144  Edited By ristactionjakso
Member since 2011 • 6118 Posts

@Barbariser said:

@The-Apostle said:

@deeliman said:

@Jimn_tonic said:
@deeliman said:

@Laihendi said:

Ron Paul.

That really wasn't hard at all.

LOL

That guy wants the golden standard back. If he gets his way it will have catastrophic consequences for the world economy.

Well, he said he wouldn't forcefully dismantle the fed; that he would introduce gold as a competing currency, which would be ideal because the gold standard is laughable in a nation with 300+mil population, and people would just go back to the reserve currency.

Still, that isn't the only reason why his presidency would be a disaster.

As opposed to the current presidency? I'm not a Paul supporter but I'd rather have him than Obama.

Obama's performance so far has been vastly superior to anything Ron Paul could have achieved in practically every way. Of course, you're an irrational GOP fanatic who's basically wrong about everything so it's not surprising that you would prefer shitty candidates like Ron "Austerity and Gold" Paul.

O geez. I bet if Obama went live on tv and said sh!t tastes good, you would be the first person outside eating dog sh!t and loving it.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#145 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

My favorite part is when the cancellation notices features the prices the insurance companies are offering and not what's displayed in the ACA exchanges

Avatar image for buccomatic
buccomatic

1941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#146 buccomatic
Member since 2005 • 1941 Posts

@ristactionjakso said:

@AmazonTreeBoa said:

@ristactionjakso said:

Bu, bu, but Obama can't do any wrong....

No, he just can't take the blame for anything he does wrong and always blames somebody else. When something good happens even if it wasn't him, he takes credit.

I was being sarcastic :) but yes, you nailed it. And why is he not "in the loop" when the bad sh!t goes down? He "never knew" about Benghazi, Fast and Furious ect. Isn't the president and should know about these things?

Bottom line he knows about everything that goes on, he just lies about it and people eat his lies up. Bunch of sheeple.

"guns are bad. except when i'm giving them to mexican terrorists who are supposed to cross the borders with them and murder a bunch of innocent americans. this way i can have my propaganda... err i mean "news stations" like CBS terrorize the american public into giving up their right to bear arms." - barack obambi

Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#147  Edited By The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

@ristactionjakso said:

@Barbariser said:

@The-Apostle said:

@deeliman said:

@Jimn_tonic said:
@deeliman said:

@Laihendi said:

Ron Paul.

That really wasn't hard at all.

LOL

That guy wants the golden standard back. If he gets his way it will have catastrophic consequences for the world economy.

Well, he said he wouldn't forcefully dismantle the fed; that he would introduce gold as a competing currency, which would be ideal because the gold standard is laughable in a nation with 300+mil population, and people would just go back to the reserve currency.

Still, that isn't the only reason why his presidency would be a disaster.

As opposed to the current presidency? I'm not a Paul supporter but I'd rather have him than Obama.

Obama's performance so far has been vastly superior to anything Ron Paul could have achieved in practically every way. Of course, you're an irrational GOP fanatic who's basically wrong about everything so it's not surprising that you would prefer shitty candidates like Ron "Austerity and Gold" Paul.

O geez. I bet if Obama went live on tv and said sh!t tastes good, you would be the first person outside eating dog sh!t and loving it.

Got that right. I'd love to know how Obama has done anything remotely superior to what other presidents have done.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#148  Edited By Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

@ristactionjakso said:

@Barbariser said:

Obama's performance so far has been vastly superior to anything Ron Paul could have achieved in practically every way. Of course, you're an irrational GOP fanatic who's basically wrong about everything so it's not surprising that you would prefer shitty candidates like Ron "Austerity and Gold" Paul.

O geez. I bet if Obama went live on tv and said sh!t tastes good, you would be the first person outside eating dog sh!t and loving it.

Pointing out the simple fact that Obama is better than godawful candidates like Ron Paul =/= being an Obama fan. Of course you're just as stupid, ignorant and irrational as Apostle so I'm not surprised that your only reply is a pile of ad hominem bullshit with no substance to it.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#150 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

@ristactionjakso said:

@Barbariser said:

@ristactionjakso said:

@Barbariser said:

Obama's performance so far has been vastly superior to anything Ron Paul could have achieved in practically every way. Of course, you're an irrational GOP fanatic who's basically wrong about everything so it's not surprising that you would prefer shitty candidates like Ron "Austerity and Gold" Paul.

O geez. I bet if Obama went live on tv and said sh!t tastes good, you would be the first person outside eating dog sh!t and loving it.

Pointing out the simple fact that Obama is better than godawful candidates like Ron Paul =/= being an Obama fan. Of course you're just as stupid, ignorant and irrational as Apostle so I'm not surprised that your only reply is a pile of ad hominem bullshit with no substance to it.

Saying Obama is better than anyone is a lie. You lie like your false president. He lies about everything and you still think he's the bee's knees. It's like you would eat a mile of sh!t if it led to Obama's asz so you can kiss it.

Ahahah I didn't realize that even you were this deluded and extreme. Well you've made your point, everyone in the forum knows you're an idiot so you can **** off now and go back to whatever weird fantasy world you came from.