New born baby rescued from a dirty sewage pipe in China

This made me cringe so bad >.<

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmUURvBXoqw

they need to find the co** sucking fvcker who did this....

Really glad they found the baby still alive.JasonDarksavior

Indeed. 

The poor baby :( Why would anyone do this?

[QUOTE="JasonDarksavior"]Really glad they found the baby still alive.PiscesChick93

Indeed.

The poor baby :( Why would anyone do this?

Only in Asiahippiesanta

China's treatment of children, babies and i guess people in general is so disgusting. FrostyPhantasm

[QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"]China's treatment of children, babies and i guess people in general is so disgusting. kuraimen

How could you possibly be this stupid and uninformed?

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"]China's treatment of children, babies and i guess people in general is so disgusting. frannkzappa

How could you possibly be this stupid and uninformed?

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] So you base this on one instance? I guess the US is even worse since a guy kidnapped some girls, kept them trapped in a basement for years while raping them continually right?kuraimen

How could you possibly be this stupid and uninformed?

1. Nowhere in his statement did he say he based his assertion on this one instance.

2. China has history of human rights violations.

3. The one child policy created a culture in which multiple children are undesirable.

4. This sort of thing has happened in china before, leading to high rates of abortions and child abandonment

5. You're argument is just a random comparison with no real bearing.

6. Do some research on the subject at hand before blindly disagreeing with someone.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="FrostyPhantasm"]China's treatment of children, babies and i guess people in general is so disgusting. frannkzappa

How could you possibly be this stupid and uninformed?

1. Nowhere in his statement did he say he based his assertion on this one instance.frannkzappa

[QUOTE="frannkzappa"]1. Nowhere in his statement did he say he based his assertion on this one instance./QUOTE] Well then he shouldn't have posted it on a thread about THIS ONE INSTANCE. :roll:kuraimen

I will now ask you to refer to my first post.

was it a girl?

was it a girl?

lostrib

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

was it a girl?

The_Lipscomb

Really glad they found the baby still alive.JasonDarksavior

i just saw it on the news and I was pretty shocked. How can anyone do such a thing? 
Poor little child, I hope he/she will get new loving parents. 

Parents do this out of fear of poverty. It's disgusting.

i just saw it on the news and I was pretty shocked. How can anyone do such a thing? 
Poor little child, I hope he/she will get new loving parents. 

TheFlush

probably didn't want a girl

what the hell, did she think she had to take a bad shit, gave birth instead?lamprey263

Hmm maybe he/she will get superpowers.

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="frannkzappa"]

How could you possibly be this stupid and uninformed?

frannkzappa

1. Nowhere in his statement did he say he based his assertion on this one instance.

2. China has history of human rights violations.

3. The one child policy created a culture in which multiple children are undesirable.

4. This sort of thing has happened in china before, leading to high rates of abortions and child abandonment

5. You're argument is just a random comparison with no real bearing.

6. Do some research on the subject at hand before blindly disagreeing with someone.

I would have the baby DNA tested and would look for their parents to take respective action..lightleggy

and test the baby's DNA against what?

[QUOTE="lightleggy"]I would have the baby DNA tested and would look for their parents to take respective action..lostrib

and test the baby's DNA against what?

Only in Asiahippiesanta

was it a girl?

lostrib

Really glad they found the baby still alive.JasonDarksavior

China comits gendercide all the time.

[QUOTE="lamprey263"]what the hell, did she think she had to take a bad shit, gave birth instead?BossPerson

China comits gendercide all the time.

Iffy350

I don't know what's worse: the fact that this happened or that my brain has started categorizing this as normal human behavior.

[QUOTE="Iffy350"]

China comits gendercide all the time.

BranKetra

I think we should cull the whole lot. The earth needs to have a population of around 3 billion and no more. The world population was at 3.75 billion people in 1968.

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="Iffy350"]

China comits gendercide all the time.

Iffy350

I think we should cull the whole lot. The earth needs to have a population of around 3 billion and no more. The world population was at 3.75 billion people in 1968.

[QUOTE="Iffy350"]

[QUOTE="BranKetra"] China is deplorable for doing that even if it is done for the population control of one billion people.BranKetra

I think we should cull the whole lot. The earth needs to have a population of around 3 billion and no more. The world population was at 3.75 billion people in 1968.

Base delta zero mf'er.

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="Iffy350"]

I think we should cull the whole lot. The earth needs to have a population of around 3 billion and no more. The world population was at 3.75 billion people in 1968.

Iffy350

Base delta zero mf'er.

[QUOTE="Iffy350"]

[QUOTE="BranKetra"] I am glad you are not in charge of earth.BranKetra

Base delta zero mf'er.

It doesn't really matter because our species will go extinct within one hundred years. Which fate would you rather suffer, being vaporized in an instant or suffering from malnourishment, disease, dehydration, and unending war for a few decades.

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="Iffy350"]

Base delta zero mf'er.

Iffy350

It doesn't really matter because our species will go extinct within one hundred years. Which fate would you rather suffer, being vaporized in an instant or suffering from malnourishment, disease, dehydration, and unending war for a few decades.

[QUOTE="Iffy350"]

[QUOTE="BranKetra"] That would be a terrible idea for the only planet we know we can live in.BranKetra

It doesn't really matter because our species will go extinct within one hundred years. Which fate would you rather suffer, being vaporized in an instant or suffering from malnourishment, disease, dehydration, and unending war for a few decades.

We MIGHT survive but that is highly unlikely given the current status of the worlds ecosystems and the rate of environmental degradation. The extinction of wildlife on earth will threaten us with extinction soon enough. The oceans are becoming increasingly acidic and killing off the oceans creatures. If 70% of the earths surface is toxic and we manage to somehow survive without resorting to soylent green then good for the humans.

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="Iffy350"]

It doesn't really matter because our species will go extinct within one hundred years. Which fate would you rather suffer, being vaporized in an instant or suffering from malnourishment, disease, dehydration, and unending war for a few decades.

Iffy350

We MIGHT survive but that is highly unlikely given the current status of the worlds ecosystems and the rate of environmental degradation. The extinction of wildlife on earth will threaten us with extinction soon enough. The oceans are becoming increasingly acidic and killing off the oceans creatures. If 70% of the earths surface is toxic and we manage to somehow survive without resorting to soylent green then good for the humans.

[QUOTE="Iffy350"]

[QUOTE="BranKetra"] Humans are innovative, so we will survive. BranKetra

We MIGHT survive but that is highly unlikely given the current status of the worlds ecosystems and the rate of environmental degradation. The extinction of wildlife on earth will threaten us with extinction soon enough. The oceans are becoming increasingly acidic and killing off the oceans creatures. If 70% of the earths surface is toxic and we manage to somehow survive without resorting to soylent green then good for the humans.

So young and so naive. In a few decades you might turnout to be just like me. Quick fixes like technology won't fix the human problem.

[QUOTE="BranKetra"][QUOTE="Iffy350"]

We MIGHT survive but that is highly unlikely given the current status of the worlds ecosystems and the rate of environmental degradation. The extinction of wildlife on earth will threaten us with extinction soon enough. The oceans are becoming increasingly acidic and killing off the oceans creatures. If 70% of the earths surface is toxic and we manage to somehow survive without resorting to soylent green then good for the humans.

Iffy350

So young and so naive. In a few decades you might turnout to be just like me. Quick fixes like technology won't fix the human problem.