http://www.gallup.com/poll/123854/Conservatives-Maintain-Edge-Top-Ideological-Group.aspx
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab8f9/ab8f940e964e98a5c30029f6c0d9687604a63a73" alt=""
These poll numbers give me some solace in hopes that the US forge a different path. With the publics disgust with both parties, maybe sometime in the future the conservative for anti imperialism and war can reigned in the interventionist. As a person who despises US imperialism and warmongering, anything that can stop or limit it gets my attention.majwill24
Unfortunately, you're taking conservative to mean something very different to what poll respondents mean. While you're ideal conservative may be anti-Imperialist and isolation, the respondents to these polls do not appear to feel the same way. Examples:Moderates, Liberals are currently more likely to support diplomacy with Iran, conservatives are amongst the groups least likely to support diplomacy with Iran.
Republicans (which your own source claims 72% of the time identify themselves as conservative) outnumber Democrats (which your own source claims 37% of the time identify themselves as Liberals) in belief that North Korea, Iraq, Pakistan, Israel and Palestine, Russia and Mexico represent direct threats to US security.
Two years ago; self identified conservatives consistently outranked liberals on US military involvement in Afghanistan, Pakistan.
There just isn't evidence to support what you perceive as 'conservative', is what these respondents envisage for themselves. On the contrary, self identifying conservatives appear more belligerent than liberals.
Liberals in my view may not be as militant on the surface as conservatives, but they do sow the seeds for conflict with relentless promotion of "human rights" and interference. By creating an atmosphere of moral guilt , they compel others to take action via isolation of said nations and economic sanctions that result in the deaths of thousands. Anyone who opposes such meddling as blasted as evil and immoral for not wanting to take actions.
majwill24
This view seems rather ridiculous honestly. To claim a clandestine liberal movement under the banner of human rights is precipitating foreign interventionism is extremely far-fetched.
Genuinely imperialistic ideologies like the Bush Doctrine, Reagan's Soviet Confrontation or even as far back as Eisenhower's Domino Theory are far more responsible for accusations of US empire. Although I'd guess you consider these liberal policies.
This manipulation by liberals on all fronts, media, academic and government preys on the conservatives, especially those with religious backgrounds. Whipping up the conservatives into a frenzy by appealing to christian values and jesus, they can not only get popular support for sanctions, but even military action in the name of "human rights" and alleged atrocities. Of course once war begins, many reluctant conservatives become fanatical in support for the conflict.Americans need to rise up and reject the liberal policies of intervention and interference that is so common in the 2 major parties.
majwill24
To be honest, I don't agree with your interpretation of Liberalism's stance on international relations. I suspect you see US Liberalism as a distinct beast from its European counterpart.
Log in to comment