Noah's Ark - Do You Accept it as Fact?

  • 146 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#51 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

I don't think there's anyone here that's stupid enough to believe that crap.Lonelynight

80% of Americans do

Avatar image for muller39
muller39

14953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 muller39
Member since 2008 • 14953 Posts

[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]I don't think there's anyone here that's stupid enough to believe that crap.Blue-Sky

80% of Americans do

Where did you get that percentage from?
Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

7 Day Creation

Blue-Sky

Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts
[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

7 Day Creation

Wow... as counter-creation pondering goes, that's truly inane. Don't get me wrong, I don't believe in Genesis, but time passes with or without any single benchmark like a star.
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#55 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

[QUOTE="Lonelynight"]I don't think there's anyone here that's stupid enough to believe that crap.muller39

80% of Americans do

Where did you get that percentage from?

I assumed because 80% of Americans are Christians.

I can't imagine a christian claiming any portion of the Bible to be "invalid" or not credible. That would put their entire belief system into queston, especially with other scriptures out there, like the Quran also claiming to be the word of God. If anyone does claim to be "Christian" and still doesn't believe in the Bible as the word of God, then they're most likely Closet-Agnostics.

Out of that 80% I do firmly believe there's a large portion of Christians who are agnostic but simply claim to be christian because of the environment they grew up in.

Avatar image for muller39
muller39

14953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 muller39
Member since 2008 • 14953 Posts

[QUOTE="muller39"][QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

80% of Americans do

Blue-Sky

Where did you get that percentage from?

I assumed because 80% of Americans are Christians.

I can't imagine a christian claiming any portion of the Bible to be "invalid" or not credible. That would put their entire belief system into queston, especially with other scriptures out there, like the Quran also claiming to be the word of God. If anyone does claim to be "Christian" and still doesn't believe in the Bible as the word of God, then they're most likely Closet-Agnostics.

Out of that 80% I do firmly believe there's a large portion of Christians who are agnostic but simply claim to be christian because of the environment they grew up in.

Valid point. I wouldn't think a Christian would discount anything in the Bible.

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]

7 Day Creation

Frame_Dragger

Wow... as counter-creation pondering goes, that's truly inane. Don't get me wrong, I don't believe in Genesis, but time passes with or without any single benchmark like a star.

Units of time are based on the the Earth's rotation and interaction with the Sun.

Avatar image for ad1x2
ad1x2

8430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 ad1x2
Member since 2005 • 8430 Posts

It's one thing to be an Atheist and use that as your reason to say the Bible is false. That makes perfect sense since you doubt the existance of God as a whole. But to use science as a reason to prove it as false?

Doesn't make a lot of sense considering that the Bible claims such things as a bush was on fire without burning up, a man turned water into wine, and about a thousand other things that would be scientifically impossible.

Even nonbelievers playing Devil's Advocate can just claim that if the story was true the God had the power to make it happen. Just like if Superman was real his Kryptonian DNA is what makes the Sun give him his powers.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#59 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I assumed because 80% of Americans are Christians. I can't imagine a christian claiming any portion of the Bible to be "invalid" or not credible. That would put their entire belief system into queston, especially with other scriptures out there, like the Quran also claiming to be the word of God. If anyone does claim to be "Christian" and still doesn't believe in the Bible as the word of God, then they're most likely Closet-Agnostics. Out of that 80% I do firmly believe there's a large portion of Christians who are agnostic but simply claim to be christian because of the environment they grew up in.Blue-Sky
Well, you failed. Belief that the Bible, and all it contains, is literal, historically and scientifically true is a modern, 20th century movement that was started during the Protestant Reformation (it only became a wide-spread view when science became a more predominant view means of explaining things without God). "If the Bible isn't taken as literal fact, then the whole belief system falls apart" is a logically incoherent assumption. You clearly have no idea what Christians believe, or posit as "true." For the longest time, God, and the Bible, were not literal truths... merely truths people accepted out of faith (which was not am intellectual assent to dogma, but trust in a deity or teaching to be right and lead one to salvation/enlightenment/peace). They, like the Greeks they based a lot of their philosophy off of, understood the difference between "logos" or "truth that is sensed (by the senses and the faculty of reasoning)" and "mythos" or "truth that is hidden or mysterious (that is, only found through "religious experience," also known as "exstasis")."
Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts
[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

Wow... as counter-creation pondering goes, that's truly inane. Don't get me wrong, I don't believe in Genesis, but time passes with or without any single benchmark like a star.

Units of time are based on the the Earth's rotation and interaction with the Sun.

Units of time are many and varied, of which the earth's rotation in relation to Sol is just one. The decay of a cesium atom is currently the best measure. You don't need Sol to measure 24 hours, i.e. a day; the very notion of time in a dynamic universe being bound to a single reference is frankly offensive.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I think it is complete horsedung, but then I think that of most things.

Avatar image for Shadow4020
Shadow4020

2097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Shadow4020
Member since 2007 • 2097 Posts

No, but I don't think it was ever supposed to be taken literally.

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#64 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

No, but I don't think it was ever supposed to be taken literally.

Shadow4020

I think the men who it wrote it, meant for others to take it literary.

I think it was taken literary

I think it's still taken literary

I think it's legitimacy was only challenged until people became more educated.

Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#66 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] Wow... as counter-creation pondering goes, that's truly inane. Don't get me wrong, I don't believe in Genesis, but time passes with or without any single benchmark like a star.Frame_Dragger

Units of time are based on the the Earth's rotation and interaction with the Sun.

Units of time are many and varied, of which the earth's rotation in relation to Sol is just one. The decay of a cesium atom is currently the best measure. You don't need Sol to measure 24 hours, i.e. a day; the very notion of time in a dynamic universe being bound to a single reference is frankly offensive.

I'm sure the guy who wrote the story of Genesis, 2000 years ago knew this. :roll:

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] Wow... as counter-creation pondering goes, that's truly inane. Don't get me wrong, I don't believe in Genesis, but time passes with or without any single benchmark like a star.Frame_Dragger

Units of time are based on the the Earth's rotation and interaction with the Sun.

Units of time are many and varied, of which the earth's rotation in relation to Sol is just one. The decay of a cesium atom is currently the best measure. You don't need Sol to measure 24 hours, i.e. a day; the very notion of time in a dynamic universe being bound to a single reference is frankly offensive.

I'm just saying that the units of time we use today have historically been based on the movement of the Sun and Moon, not radiation cycles of the cesium atom.

Avatar image for Frame_Dragger
Frame_Dragger

9581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Frame_Dragger
Member since 2009 • 9581 Posts

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"] Units of time are based on the the Earth's rotation and interaction with the Sun.

Blue-Sky

Units of time are many and varied, of which the earth's rotation in relation to Sol is just one. The decay of a cesium atom is currently the best measure. You don't need Sol to measure 24 hours, i.e. a day; the very notion of time in a dynamic universe being bound to a single reference is frankly offensive.

I'm sure the guy who wrote the story of Genesis, 2000 years ago knew this. :roll:

I think you've missed the entire point, which is... normal I suppose.

@Rikusaki: Nosh!t but since we're not living in caves or mud huts, that pic sucks at communicating your point.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

yeah, I'm not a, "Everything the bible says is straight fact," kinda guy.

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

@Rikusaki: Nosh!t but since we're not living in caves or mud huts, that pic sucks at communicating your point.

Frame_Dragger

It made sense to God when he created the Sun on the fourth day. :P Maybe he did all the math beforehand! :o

He measured the precise mass, volume and distance from the Earth the Sun needed to be so that when the Earth rotated on its axis one time, it matched 1/4 the duration of time the Earth has existed before the Sun was created.

Did he have an atomic clock? :P

Avatar image for Tokugawa77
Tokugawa77

1554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#79 Tokugawa77
Member since 2009 • 1554 Posts
It's a mythical story as perceived by the Israelite culture. It was used as a method to teach and show their understanding of God as they knew him. It's etiological, meaning it is meant to teach some theological point. Like most myth it may or may not have been based on some sort of true event, (such as a local flood). It may not be historically factual but it surely mythically factual and it teaches us a lot about the cultural understanding of Yahweh. ferrari2001
Well put.
Avatar image for wiifan001
wiifan001

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#80 wiifan001
Member since 2007 • 18660 Posts
God can make supernatural events happen. He can make a supernatural event for a man to build an ark. A supernatural force for 2 of every animal to board an ark. A supernatural event to flood the world, which in some Christian religions, symbolizes "this terrestrial planet being baptized by water." This isn't science or nature. This is God. This is supernatural forces, supernatural power, breaking the laws of physics and science. God can do it. Yes, I do accept it as fact.
Avatar image for Tokugawa77
Tokugawa77

1554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#81 Tokugawa77
Member since 2009 • 1554 Posts
[QUOTE="wiifan001"]God can make supernatural events happen. He can make a supernatural event for a man to build an ark. A supernatural force for 2 of every animal to board an ark. A supernatural event to flood the world, which in some Christian religions, symbolizes "this terrestrial planet being baptized by water." This isn't science or nature. This is God. This is supernatural forces, supernatural power, breaking the laws of physics and science. God can do it. Yes, I do accept it as fact.

What the hell was the point of humanity spending the last two milenuim figuring out the laws of nature and the universe if they could be broken just like that? I'm sorry, but I have trouble wrapping my mind around your position.
Avatar image for black_cat19
black_cat19

8212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 black_cat19
Member since 2006 • 8212 Posts

:lol:

No.

Avatar image for Shadow4020
Shadow4020

2097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Shadow4020
Member since 2007 • 2097 Posts

God can make supernatural events happen. He can make a supernatural event for a man to build an ark. A supernatural force for 2 of every animal to board an ark. A supernatural event to flood the world, which in some Christian religions, symbolizes "this terrestrial planet being baptized by water." This isn't science or nature. This is God. This is supernatural forces, supernatural power, breaking the laws of physics and science. God can do it. Yes, I do accept it as fact.wiifan001

Just for clarification:

You believe it is possible to fit hundreds and thousands of animals onto an ark and all of the food that each is required to eat?

And that all animals derive from one pair of each?

And that sea creatures didn't become extinct from the dilution of salt water?

Just curious, I've never met someone that believed in it.

Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#84 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts

If there is anyone out there who does... uh... nevermind. I'm not going to bother.

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts
Funnily enough, I was just watching this.Jazz_Fan
Haha. That was great. Thanks for sharing. :)
Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#86 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
Better yet, who needed this thread as an explanation :?
Avatar image for RisethNameless
RisethNameless

922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 RisethNameless
Member since 2011 • 922 Posts
I don't have anything to add, but I'd like to comment that religious debates on this site are thoroughly interesting. If I'd gotten in earlier I could have joined, but most of the things I would have said have been covered.
Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
It's one thing to express skepticism of some parts of evolution by natural selection, but to propose the Bible as an alternative hypothesis is completely ridiculous. It completely flies in the face of physical laws.
Avatar image for Mcspanky37
Mcspanky37

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Mcspanky37
Member since 2010 • 1693 Posts
Why are most religions the same? And why do all think their branch is the true branch? Every time I think about it, it becomes more and more asburd.
Avatar image for metallica_fan42
metallica_fan42

21143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#90 metallica_fan42
Member since 2006 • 21143 Posts
Maybe he killed the Flood, saving humanity and all it's creatures as a whole.
Avatar image for NodakJo2010
NodakJo2010

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#91 NodakJo2010
Member since 2010 • 1061 Posts

Why are most religions the same? And why do all think their branch is the true branch? Every time I think about it, it becomes more and more asburd.Mcspanky37

Same said about anything...A person always believes something...and that person will always believe their way is the right way.

Its not only people that believe in religions that do...science, athiesm, egocentrism, religion, nothing....

Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#92 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts

[QUOTE="Mcspanky37"]Why are most religions the same? And why do all think their branch is the true branch? Every time I think about it, it becomes more and more asburd.NodakJo2010

Same said about anything...A person always believes something...and that person will always believe their way is the right way.

Its not only people that believe in religions that do...science, athiesm, egocentrism, religion, nothing....

What you said is stupid. A scientist who believes their right won't believe that way if another scientist proves him wrong. Unlike the religious, scientists use evidence for and against something. They don't have to "believe" that what they're saying is true. They prove it with empirical evidence.

Avatar image for NodakJo2010
NodakJo2010

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 NodakJo2010
Member since 2010 • 1061 Posts

[QUOTE="NodakJo2010"]

[QUOTE="Mcspanky37"]Why are most religions the same? And why do all think their branch is the true branch? Every time I think about it, it becomes more and more asburd.Diophage

Same said about anything...A person always believes something...and that person will always believe their way is the right way.

Its not only people that believe in religions that do...science, athiesm, egocentrism, religion, nothing....

What you said is stupid. A scientist who believes their right won't believe that way if another scientist proves him wrong. Unlike the religious, scientists use evidence for and against something. They don't have to "believe" that what they're saying is true. They prove it with empirical evidence.



I'm stupid because your belief is the right way...I don't care you use science or not...You just proved my point.

Avatar image for deactivated-597bb01c846a2
deactivated-597bb01c846a2

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -3

#94 deactivated-597bb01c846a2
Member since 2011 • 1495 Posts

[QUOTE="Diophage"]

[QUOTE="NodakJo2010"]

Same said about anything...A person always believes something...and that person will always believe their way is the right way.

Its not only people that believe in religions that do...science, athiesm, egocentrism, religion, nothing....

NodakJo2010

What you said is stupid. A scientist who believes their right won't believe that way if another scientist proves him wrong. Unlike the religious, scientists use evidence for and against something. They don't have to "believe" that what they're saying is true. They prove it with empirical evidence.



I'm stupid because your belief is the right way...I don't care you use science or not...You just proved my point.

I didn't prove your point at all. I just proved how full of holes your point is.

Avatar image for NodakJo2010
NodakJo2010

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 NodakJo2010
Member since 2010 • 1061 Posts

[QUOTE="NodakJo2010"]

[QUOTE="Diophage"] What you said is stupid. A scientist who believes their right won't believe that way if another scientist proves him wrong. Unlike the religious, scientists use evidence for and against something. They don't have to "believe" that what they're saying is true. They prove it with empirical evidence.

Diophage



I'm stupid because your belief is the right way...I don't care you use science or not...You just proved my point.

I didn't prove your point at all. I just proved how full of holes your point is.

Anybody can change their belief system...it happens all the time...I guess I figured most people took it as common sense that people can change, but if you want a point for pointing a hole in my argument fine. +1 to you.

Avatar image for black_cat19
black_cat19

8212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 black_cat19
Member since 2006 • 8212 Posts

[QUOTE="Diophage"]

[QUOTE="NodakJo2010"]

I'm stupid because your belief is the right way...I don't care you use science or not...You just proved my point.

NodakJo2010

I didn't prove your point at all. I just proved how full of holes your point is.

Anybody can change their belief system...it happens all the time...I guess I figured most people took it as common sense that people can change, but if you want a point for pointing a hole in my argument fine. +1 to you.

Except science is not a belief system.

Avatar image for NodakJo2010
NodakJo2010

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#97 NodakJo2010
Member since 2010 • 1061 Posts

[QUOTE="NodakJo2010"]

[QUOTE="Diophage"]I didn't prove your point at all. I just proved how full of holes your point is.

black_cat19

Anybody can change their belief system...it happens all the time...I guess I figured most people took it as common sense that people can change, but if you want a point for pointing a hole in my argument fine. +1 to you.

Except science is not a belief system.

Do you believe it?

Avatar image for black_cat19
black_cat19

8212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 black_cat19
Member since 2006 • 8212 Posts

[QUOTE="black_cat19"]

[QUOTE="NodakJo2010"]

Anybody can change their belief system...it happens all the time...I guess I figured most people took it as common sense that people can change, but if you want a point for pointing a hole in my argument fine. +1 to you.

NodakJo2010

Except science is not a belief system.

Do you believe it?

You're missing the point. Because it's factual, I don't have to.

Avatar image for NodakJo2010
NodakJo2010

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#99 NodakJo2010
Member since 2010 • 1061 Posts

Well...it was fun putting my two cents in....Good night all

Avatar image for NodakJo2010
NodakJo2010

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#100 NodakJo2010
Member since 2010 • 1061 Posts

[QUOTE="NodakJo2010"]

[QUOTE="black_cat19"]

Except science is not a belief system.

black_cat19

Do you believe it?

You're missing the point. Because it's factual, I don't have to.

Lol I don't care whats right or wrong...again...Obviously you believe science is right...you're just being defensive about it because you know I'm right that you are right.

And again to you sir good night lol.