[QUOTE="-Misanthropic-"]And they shouldn't be.They are "free" to enforce those rules.
Famiking
A private entity shouldn't be able to set policy on their own private property if another private entity doesn't like it?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="-Misanthropic-"]And they shouldn't be.They are "free" to enforce those rules.
Famiking
A private entity shouldn't be able to set policy on their own private property if another private entity doesn't like it?
And they shouldn't be.[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="-Misanthropic-"]
They are "free" to enforce those rules.
Oleg_Huzwog
A private entity shouldn't be able to set policy on their own private property if another private entity doesn't like it?
Depends on the policy, in this case yes.[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"][QUOTE="Famiking"] And they shouldn't be.Famiking
A private entity shouldn't be able to set policy on their own private property if another private entity doesn't like it?
Depends on the policy, in this case yes.That's an incredibly selfish thing for you to say.
Depends on the policy, in this case yes.[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]
A private entity shouldn't be able to set policy on their own private property if another private entity doesn't like it?
Oleg_Huzwog
That's an incredibly selfish thing for you to say.
I'm so selfish for not letting large companies rip me off for a bodily function. How selfish of me to not give rich people more money.[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="-Misanthropic-"]
They are "free" to enforce those rules.
And they shouldn't be.A private entity shouldn't be able to set policy on their own private property if another private entity doesn't like it?
Yes if its the other private property paying for it lol.[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"][QUOTE="Famiking"] And they shouldn't be.STAR_Admiral
A private entity shouldn't be able to set policy on their own private property if another private entity doesn't like it?
Yes if its the other private property paying for it lol. Since when does being a customer grant them the right to dictate policy on someone else's property?[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"][QUOTE="Famiking"] Depends on the policy, in this case yes.Famiking
That's an incredibly selfish thing for you to say.
I'm so selfish for not letting large companies rip me off for a bodily function. How selfish of me to not give rich people more money.It's not a rip off if you have reasonable alternatives...such as walking back to your car in the parking lot where you've got a cooler of food.
[QUOTE="duxup"][QUOTE="Famiking"] I'm so selfish for not letting large companies rip me off for a bodily function. How selfish of me to not give rich people more money.FamikingYou do that by not buying it. And starve?
Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
There is a difference between private property and public "private property" like theme parks. A house you pay for yourself. The theme park is payed for by the public, their money builds the rides and keeps em running. Its the public's park which has been entrusted to a company. Therefore it should follow the public's rules since they pay for it. Sinc when is something your property when someone else pays for it?STAR_AdmiralYou're choosing money for a service. Not ownership in the park.
It's not a rip off if you have reasonable alternatives...such as walking back to your car in the parking lot where you've got a cooler of food.If I have a reasonable alternatives then it's a rip off. I don't see why I have to walk back all the way to my car, in an amusement park like Wonderland where it will probably take 15-30 minutes to get to my car and another 15-30 minutes to get back to where I was just so I can have my lunch.Oleg_Huzwog
More examples of corruption.
[QUOTE="STAR_Admiral"][QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]Yes if its the other private property paying for it lol. Since when does being a customer grant them the right to dictate policy on someone else's property? lawl their propertyA private entity shouldn't be able to set policy on their own private property if another private entity doesn't like it?
duxup
There is a difference between private property and public "private property" like theme parks. A house you pay for yourself. The theme park is payed for by the public, their money builds the rides and keeps em running. Its the public's park which has been entrusted to a company. Therefore it should follow the public's rules since they pay for it. Sinc when is something your property when someone else pays for it?STAR_Admiral
By your line of reasoning, I DON'T pay for my house by myself. My employer does. It's my employer's money that goes towards the mortgage.
There is a difference between private property and public "private property" like theme parks. A house you pay for yourself. The theme park is payed for by the public, their money builds the rides and keeps em running. Its the public's park which has been entrusted to a company. Therefore it should follow the public's rules since they pay for it. Sinc when is something your property when someone else pays for it?STAR_AdmiralWiow, that is just so wrong. they are a private company that provides a service you CHOOSE to pay for. there are no taxes,there are no government funds,and they succeed and fail on people CHOOSING to go. Thsi is not a government forest or park,and if I reacll correctly even those have rules.
And starve?[QUOTE="Famiking"][QUOTE="duxup"] You do that by not buying it.Oleg_Huzwog
Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
Miss a meal, are you insane?[QUOTE="STAR_Admiral"]There is a difference between private property and public "private property" like theme parks. A house you pay for yourself. The theme park is payed for by the public, their money builds the rides and keeps em running. Its the public's park which has been entrusted to a company. Therefore it should follow the public's rules since they pay for it. Sinc when is something your property when someone else pays for it?Oleg_Huzwog
By your line of reasoning, I DON'T pay for my house by myself. My employer does. It's my employer's money that goes towards the mortgage.
Um no, you worked for that money. its now yours, you don't follow my reasnoning. Your employer gives you money in exchange for the product of your labour. its a trade. I pay money to a theme park, they take the money, and the product of that money belongs to those who gave the money, the public[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"][QUOTE="STAR_Admiral"]There is a difference between private property and public "private property" like theme parks. A house you pay for yourself. The theme park is payed for by the public, their money builds the rides and keeps em running. Its the public's park which has been entrusted to a company. Therefore it should follow the public's rules since they pay for it. Sinc when is something your property when someone else pays for it?STAR_Admiral
By your line of reasoning, I DON'T pay for my house by myself. My employer does. It's my employer's money that goes towards the mortgage.
Um no, you worked for that money. its now yours, you don't follow my reasnoningAnd the park ownership worked for their money by developing an environment people wish to pay admission for. Yes, I'm following your reasoning perfectly.
Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza? You have to pay for any food, unless you produce it yourself. Your argument doesn't make any sense.[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
Famiking
Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza?[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
Famiking
You don't have to. The choice is yours. Walk back to the car, pay $20, or skip lunch. It's all up to you.
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza? You have to pay for any food, unless you produce it yourself. Your argument doesn't make any sense. But the pizza only costs $7, why should i pay $20?Yeah, the owner must've worked so hard to get us hungry. And now he is working so hard to get us to pay to satisfy our hunger. My god, how laborious. FamikingWhat? You don't a single thing about how a business is run do you?
Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza?[QUOTE="Famiking"]
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
Oleg_Huzwog
You don't have to. The choice is yours. Walk back to the car, pay $20, or skip lunch. It's all up to you.
Tell me why I have to walk to the car, why can't I just eat there?Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza? I know being rebellious and all on the Internet is fun, but you have to think about what you're typing every once in a while. It's not like you're being forced to be at the park, you can choose to stay at home and eat food at your house, you can choose to go out to eat somewhere else. >_> Again, private property, you don't have to be there, it's not a necessary expense.[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
Famiking
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"][QUOTE="Famiking"] Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza?
Famiking
You don't have to. The choice is yours. Walk back to the car, pay $20, or skip lunch. It's all up to you.
Tell me why I have to walk to the car, why can't I just eat there? *facepalm* Because you're on their private property.... >_> What don't you understand about this? It's their rules...[QUOTE="Famiking"]Yeah, the owner must've worked so hard to get us hungry. And now he is working so hard to get us to pay to satisfy our hunger. My god, how laborious. Silent-HalWhat? You don't a single thing about how a business is run do you? And you got that from that post how?
[QUOTE="Famiking"]
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza?You don't have to. The choice is yours. Walk back to the car, pay $20, or skip lunch. It's all up to you.
Oh yes and its okay if i write the greatest book of all time and charge $2000 a copy for it. Oh yes its okay because i am not forcing anyone to buy it. I hate that 'not forced to' argument. If i write the greatest book everyone should be able to read it, and i should receive a decent payment for it. Not just charge whatever the hell i like.[QUOTE="Famiking"]Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza? I know being rebellious and all on the Internet is fun, but you have to think about what you're typing every once in a while. It's not like you're being forced to be at the park, you can choose to stay at home and eat food at your house, you can choose to go out to eat somewhere else. >_> Again, private property, you don't have to be there, it's not a necessary expense. If a product is being sold I buy it, simple. And even if it is private property, it doesn't mean you should be allowed to impose such arbitrary laws.[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]Missing one meal in the middle of the day isn't starvation. Don't be silly.
FishSquared
Oh yes and its okay if i write the greatest book of all time and charge $2000 a copy for it. Oh yes its okay because i am not forcing anyone to buy it. I hate that 'not forced to' argument. If i write the greatest book everyone should be able to read it, and i should receive a decent payment for it. Not just charge whatever the hell i like. STAR_Admiral
Yes, yes that is okay. I have no inherent right to read your book.
[QUOTE="Famiking"] Tell me why I should skip a meal because some greedy capitalist decided I should pay $20 for pizza?
You don't have to. The choice is yours. Walk back to the car, pay $20, or skip lunch. It's all up to you.
Oh yes and its okay if i write the greatest book of all time and charge $2000 a copy for it. Oh yes its okay because i am not forcing anyone to buy it. I hate that 'not forced to' argument. If i write the greatest book everyone should be able to read it, and i should receive a decent payment for it. Not just charge whatever the hell i like. You can charge whatever you like.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment