This topic is locked from further discussion.
While this probably didn't come from the President himself the fact is it's his administration, thus he gets the blame. That's how it is with any president. It's kinda like with the captian of a ship. He may not make every decision, and things may happen that he's not directly in control of, but it's still his ship and he gets the credit/blame for whatever happens with that ship.
And marijuana absolutely should be legalized. And yes, it does have theraputic qualities, but the health benefits of it are greatly exaggerated. If it were really the miraculous drug that many of its supporters like to claim believe me, "Big Pharma" would be all over it.
This is so stupid. Marijuana has a ton of health benefits, is impossible to OD on if you smoke it, and isn't physically addictive unlike nicotine and alcohol, and yet we make it illegal. Why the government wastes billions of dollars in tax payer money going after such a harmless drug and then blows billions more investigating, arresting, and imprisoning everyone associated with it is beyond me.gameguy6700
I think people would cringe if they knew how much of our national debt was contributed to, by the war on drugs. Yet we have a multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry! A certain level of hypocrisy that cannot be ignored!
Sure you can die from (spelling isn't great on these here, but bare with me) Oxycontin, Riddlen, Prosac, plenty of heroine and opium based pharmaceutical drugs, but oh my if you smoke that demon weed.... :roll:
This will not stop people from smoking, just like the prohibition didn't stop people from Drinking! Yet which is the more dangerous out of the two in every way?!!?!?!?!?!?
We can die from breathing in the aftermath of industrialized societies, but we can't soothe ourselves while breathing in some marijuana smoke.
Hopefully it will be decriminalized. IT never should have been made illegal in the first place, there is not a single logical reason why it is illegal, when so many other drugs (that are far worse) are not!
It's illegal because the first prohibition was such a good idea, they wanted to do that again.Hopefully it will be decriminalized. IT never should have been made illegal in the first place, there is not a single logical reason why it is illegal, when so many other drugs (that are far worse) are not!
Lach0121
It's illegal because the first prohibition was such a good idea, they wanted to do that again.[QUOTE="Lach0121"]
Hopefully it will be decriminalized. IT never should have been made illegal in the first place, there is not a single logical reason why it is illegal, when so many other drugs (that are far worse) are not!
GrudHeap
That probably makes sense to the leaders of this country, political and corporate, that have their heads so far up their A$$es. :P
they have already tried with marinolWhile this probably didn't come from the President himself the fact is it's his administration, thus he gets the blame. That's how it is with any president. It's kinda like with the captian of a ship. He may not make every decision, and things may happen that he's not directly in control of, but it's still his ship and he gets the credit/blame for whatever happens with that ship.
And marijuana absolutely should be legalized. And yes, it does have theraputic qualities, but the health benefits of it are greatly exaggerated. If it were really the miraculous drug that many of its supporters like to claim believe me, "Big Pharma" would be all over it.
worlock77
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"] It has lots of medical benefits. You would know this if you did your research. Don't let the government spoon feed you your info unless your want to grow up ignorant to the truth.AmazonTreeBoait has no medical potential according to its scheduling... duh... which is of coursr why Sanofi-Aventis, Merck, BMS, Pfizer, and others are lining up to make drugs based on it. Wait... what? ;) I couldn't care less about all the bullcrap spin put on it. I only care about the fact. I also couldn't care less whether you do or do not except those facts. You seem also not to understand a joke, or sarcasm. My point, that I would have guessed ANYONE would get, is that while it's scheduled to have no medical potential, it's a hotbed of research, meaning it CLEARLY has medical potential. Get it?
didn't canada recently allow more herion centers to open..? if mexico did that!...no im not racist i wont go there lol I was skeptical about who actually executed the order. "Obama administration" oh ok. I had no desire to vote until now. i dont care who the republican is im voting for them. why cant we make marijuana based drinks and ban alchohol? marijuana would make people too lazy to kill and rape, i guess thats why alchohol is legal?playmynutz
Let me play devils advocate. (personally, if Mary Jane was legal, I don't think I'd have a problem with it)
Maybe it has to do with public intoxication being illegal. (is it illegal everywhere in the US?)
Assuming what I said above is true, everytime you drink you don't get drunk. Plus you can cook with alcohol for flavor.
Does everytime you smoke pot don't you get high? (I never smoked, so I don't know).
Maybe that's why alcohol is legal but MJ is not. Just a stab.
[QUOTE="gameguy6700"][QUOTE="GrudHeap"]
Health benefits... :roll:
It's a well known fact that marijuana is virtually a cure-all and it's well supported by science.Except that it doesn't cure anything. It alleviates pain and nausea. Well... it does that... and other elements that are the subject of a drug-candidate by Sanofi-Aventis manage blood insulin, and others have anticarcinogenic effects for a start. Mind you, I don't know that using it as a recreational drug has any of those effects, but the cannabinoids in marijuana do. It's a fairly complex set of molecules which mix being relatively harmless with potential medical benefits. The research by companies into those benefits by using more than one compound at a time however is hindered by its scheduling. So you know, other countries are picking up where we're slacking off... which is great because we can really afford to cede medical discoveries at this point, along with tax money from sales of marijuana, etc. We're a smart country... smart like a concussed bee.I have to state that marijuana for medical use is EXTREMELY helpful though, and in my past it was the only thing to really help. The fact is, you do not need these shops or even to smoke the drug at all. They can produce perfectly great substitutes in a pill form which I have had before (this is in Canada mind you).Ringx55You're thinking of Marinol, and there are some rather serious issues with dosing and efficacy compared to controls with Marinol.
My thoughts exactly, they're loosing money on this deal not gaining much...What is he trying to accomplish by doing this?
JoeJoeLaker
[QUOTE="playmynutz"]didn't canada recently allow more herion centers to open..? if mexico did that!...no im not racist i wont go there lol I was skeptical about who actually executed the order. "Obama administration" oh ok. I had no desire to vote until now. i dont care who the republican is im voting for them. why cant we make marijuana based drinks and ban alchohol? marijuana would make people too lazy to kill and rape, i guess thats why alchohol is legal?flazzle
Let me play devils advocate. (personally, if Mary Jane was legal, I don't think I'd have a problem with it)
Maybe it has to do with public intoxication being illegal. (is it illegal everywhere in the US?)
Assuming what I said above is true, everytime you drink you don't get drunk. Plus you can cook with alcohol for flavor.
Does everytime you smoke pot don't you get high? (I never smoked, so I don't know).
Maybe that's why alcohol is legal but MJ is not. Just a stab.
Yet what about all these prescription drugs, Oxycontin, Methadone, Loratab, etc. You are on them, in public, that is public intoxication... The difference is the pharmacutical industry gets a cut!
[QUOTE="Ringx55"]I have to state that marijuana for medical use is EXTREMELY helpful though, and in my past it was the only thing to really help. The fact is, you do not need these shops or even to smoke the drug at all. They can produce perfectly great substitutes in a pill form which I have had before (this is in Canada mind you).Frame_DraggerYou're thinking of Marinol, and there are some rather serious issues with dosing and efficacy compared to controls with Marinol. not sure if serious? marinol was a failed attempt at bringing the medical marijuana within the pharm companies control
[QUOTE="playmynutz"]didn't canada recently allow more herion centers to open..? if mexico did that!...no im not racist i wont go there lol I was skeptical about who actually executed the order. "Obama administration" oh ok. I had no desire to vote until now. i dont care who the republican is im voting for them. why cant we make marijuana based drinks and ban alchohol? marijuana would make people too lazy to kill and rape, i guess thats why alchohol is legal?flazzle
Let me play devils advocate. (personally, if Mary Jane was legal, I don't think I'd have a problem with it)
Maybe it has to do with public intoxication being illegal. (is it illegal everywhere in the US?)
Assuming what I said above is true, everytime you drink you don't get drunk. Plus you can cook with alcohol for flavor.
Does everytime you smoke pot don't you get high? (I never smoked, so I don't know).
Maybe that's why alcohol is legal but MJ is not. Just a stab.
The same thing you said for alcohol applies for marijuana. When you drink a little you get "buzzed" not full on drunk.
When you smoke a little yes you get high, but there's a big difference between high and completely stoned. You can also cook with mj but that's a different story :P
While this probably didn't come from the President himself the fact is it's his administration, thus he gets the blame. That's how it is with any president. It's kinda like with the captian of a ship. He may not make every decision, and things may happen that he's not directly in control of, but it's still his ship and he gets the credit/blame for whatever happens with that ship.
And marijuana absolutely should be legalized. And yes, it does have theraputic qualities, but the health benefits of it are greatly exaggerated. If it were really the miraculous drug that many of its supporters like to claim believe me, "Big Pharma" would be all over it.
Indeed, "the buck stops here", is not a new concept. If Obama didn't do this, fair enough, and if he thinks it's a bad idea all he has to do is send a memo and it's undone. Barring that, he's signing off on this, de facto. Still, people are being hysterical; the IRS or DEA does this every few years, shuts down a bunch of dispenseries, the state refuses to uphold the law, and the exponential increase in dispenseries continues. I mean.... wow... 16 whole dispenseries, huh? Out of HOW many hundreds/thousands in Cali alone? rofl.[QUOTE="BranKetra"]Was there even a vote?Ace6301Federal law over writes state even if it was voted on. Yeah, but the states still refuse to uphold the law, and the fed has been innefective with these moves. Soo... yeah.
Yet what about all these prescription drugs, Oxycontin, Methadone, Loratab, etc. You are on them, in public, that is public intoxication... The difference is the pharmacutical industry gets a cut!
Lach0121
Are you actually intoxicated with the above or are they just pain killers? (and reading up on them, horribly addictive with dreadful withdrawal. I'd rather do MJ anyday than those).
Is taking them like being drunk or high? Again, haven't taken either.
[QUOTE="Ringx55"]I have to state that marijuana for medical use is EXTREMELY helpful though, and in my past it was the only thing to really help. The fact is, you do not need these shops or even to smoke the drug at all. They can produce perfectly great substitutes in a pill form which I have had before (this is in Canada mind you).Frame_DraggerYou're thinking of Marinol, and there are some rather serious issues with dosing and efficacy compared to controls with Marinol. At the same time I think it does lead to less abuse of the drug all while maintain control and regulating it better. Yes it is harder to know what dosage but usually in long term aspects where it's used you have a lot of room to go for that.
[QUOTE="Lach0121"]
Yet what about all these prescription drugs, Oxycontin, Methadone, Loratab, etc. You are on them, in public, that is public intoxication... The difference is the pharmacutical industry gets a cut!
flazzle
Are you actually intoxicated with the above or are they just pain killers? (and reading up on them, horribly addictive with dreadful withdrawal. I'd rather do MJ anyday than those).
Is taking them like being drunk or high? Again, haven't taken either.
Actually taking some of these perscription drugs will intoxicate you further than being high can.. I mean I have been extremely high on pot, but always in control.
I cannot say the same for Alcohol, or these perscription drugs, they can, and often do remove one's self control. A friend took several Loratabs, and he was so messed up tried to jump out of a moving vehicle down the interstate! This is no isolated incident either.
[QUOTE="Lach0121"]
Yet what about all these prescription drugs, Oxycontin, Methadone, Loratab, etc. You are on them, in public, that is public intoxication... The difference is the pharmacutical industry gets a cut!
flazzle
Are you actually intoxicated with the above or are they just pain killers? (and reading up on them, horribly addictive with dreadful withdrawal. I'd rather do MJ anyday than those).
Is taking them like being drunk or high? Again, haven't taken either.
yea oxycontin is essentially legal heroin. not exactly the same, but very similar. strong painkillers like that are very addictive[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="Ringx55"]I have to state that marijuana for medical use is EXTREMELY helpful though, and in my past it was the only thing to really help. The fact is, you do not need these shops or even to smoke the drug at all. They can produce perfectly great substitutes in a pill form which I have had before (this is in Canada mind you).Ringx55You're thinking of Marinol, and there are some rather serious issues with dosing and efficacy compared to controls with Marinol. At the same time I think it does lead to less abuse of the drug all while maintain control and regulating it better. Yes it is harder to know what dosage but usually in long term aspects where it's used you have a lot of room to go for that. That's your opinion... Marinol is generally considered to be a difficult drug to titrate and is not tolerated well by a large number of people. In addition, it doesn't seem to have the full range of analgesic and anti-nausea effects, so it is in short a less effective drug. If you have a condition which necessitats the use of marijuana, abuse really isn't an issue in the near-term. Abuse away cancer pateints, and people with HIV/AIDS; given that smoking marijuana isn't the only option (or even best option) there is little to recommend Marinol. @flazzle: Opiates do lead to opiate intoxication; it's not like being drunk, or stoned, yet you surely wouldn't want anyone operating heavy machinery (like a toaster) on them. Generally they have a strong sedative effect, but it's more complex than that. Of course, if you drive on these and are found by field sobriety test to be impaired, you're going down for DUI... it's D U I, not Driving While Drunk. If you're drunk, stoned, high, impaired, etc... in theory you should not be driving and it's illegal. If a cop suspects that you're intoxicated, you'll have your blood drawn in most states to test for illegal/legal intoxicants where a breathalyzer would obviouly be useless.
[QUOTE="Lach0121"]
Yet what about all these prescription drugs, Oxycontin, Methadone, Loratab, etc. You are on them, in public, that is public intoxication... The difference is the pharmacutical industry gets a cut!
Are you actually intoxicated with the above or are they just pain killers? (and reading up on them, horribly addictive with dreadful withdrawal. I'd rather do MJ anyday than those).
Is taking them like being drunk or high? Again, haven't taken either.
yea oxycontin is essentially legal heroin. not exactly the same, but very similar. strong painkillers like that are very addictive True... it's very similar in its opioid profile to heroin, just synthesized rather than derived from Morphine. - I'd add... forget oxycontinin, if you take vicodin (and I recently did for a dental procedure) you're not supposed to be driving. That the law in many states is ill equipped to catch you, doesn't change that it's both stupid to drive, and against the law. That said, don't smoke marijuana and drive either; people have this idea that because you don't have a general CNS depressent or soporific effect, you're "in control". In fact, your reaction time and attention are shot at pretty low levels of exposure. If you're impaired by a drug (i.e. using one) legal or otherwise... DON'T... DRIVE. I'd add... get into an accident and find out just how seriously courts take it when your blood is full of something legal or otherwise that may have led to you being responsible.[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="flazzle"]yea oxycontin is essentially legal heroin. not exactly the same, but very similar. strong painkillers like that are very addictive True... it's very similar in its opioid profile to heroin, just synthesized rather than derived from Morphine. - I'd add... forget oxycontinin, if you take vicodin (and I recently did for a dental procedure) you're not supposed to be driving. That the law in many states is ill equipped to catch you, doesn't change that it's both stupid to drive, and against the law. That said, don't smoke marijuana and drive either; people have this idea that because you don't have a general CNS depressent or soporific effect, you're "in control". In fact, your reaction time and attention are shot at pretty low levels of exposure. If you're impaired by a drug (i.e. using one) legal or otherwise... DON'T... DRIVE. I'd add... get into an accident and find out just how seriously courts take it when your blood is full of something legal or otherwise that may have led to you being responsible.Are you actually intoxicated with the above or are they just pain killers? (and reading up on them, horribly addictive with dreadful withdrawal. I'd rather do MJ anyday than those).
Is taking them like being drunk or high? Again, haven't taken either.
Frame_Dragger
I agree, people DO NOT know how to drive as it is, no need to impare it further!
I cannot wait until it is mostly automated transportation, if we don't then we will not only have more wrecks, but traffic jams that will create total gridlock where the economy crashes even further than it has, because no one can get to work, or get to where they need to spend the money!
True... it's very similar in its opioid profile to heroin, just synthesized rather than derived from Morphine. - I'd add... forget oxycontinin, if you take vicodin (and I recently did for a dental procedure) you're not supposed to be driving. That the law in many states is ill equipped to catch you, doesn't change that it's both stupid to drive, and against the law. That said, don't smoke marijuana and drive either; people have this idea that because you don't have a general CNS depressent or soporific effect, you're "in control". In fact, your reaction time and attention are shot at pretty low levels of exposure. If you're impaired by a drug (i.e. using one) legal or otherwise... DON'T... DRIVE. I'd add... get into an accident and find out just how seriously courts take it when your blood is full of something legal or otherwise that may have led to you being responsible.[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"] yea oxycontin is essentially legal heroin. not exactly the same, but very similar. strong painkillers like that are very addictive Lach0121
I agree, people DO NOT know how to drive as it is, no need to impare it further!
I cannot wait until it is mostly automated transportation, if we don't then we will not only have more wrecks, but traffic jams that will create total gridlock where the economy crashes even further than it has, because no one can get to work, or get to where they need to spend the money!
Yeah, I just agree 100% on this, and cellphones have just made me even more adamant about this issue.[QUOTE="Lach0121"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] True... it's very similar in its opioid profile to heroin, just synthesized rather than derived from Morphine. - I'd add... forget oxycontinin, if you take vicodin (and I recently did for a dental procedure) you're not supposed to be driving. That the law in many states is ill equipped to catch you, doesn't change that it's both stupid to drive, and against the law. That said, don't smoke marijuana and drive either; people have this idea that because you don't have a general CNS depressent or soporific effect, you're "in control". In fact, your reaction time and attention are shot at pretty low levels of exposure. If you're impaired by a drug (i.e. using one) legal or otherwise... DON'T... DRIVE. I'd add... get into an accident and find out just how seriously courts take it when your blood is full of something legal or otherwise that may have led to you being responsible. Frame_Dragger
I agree, people DO NOT know how to drive as it is, no need to impare it further!
I cannot wait until it is mostly automated transportation, if we don't then we will not only have more wrecks, but traffic jams that will create total gridlock where the economy crashes even further than it has, because no one can get to work, or get to where they need to spend the money!
Yeah, I just agree 100% on this, and cellphones have just made me even more adamant about this issue.Oh yes, my GF and I are seriously thinking of having a custom Bumper sticker made to say: Get off the phone, and maybe you can learn to drive.
[QUOTE="Lach0121"]
Yeah, I just agree 100% on this, and cellphones have just made me even more adamant about this issue.Frame_Dragger
Oh yes, my GF and I are seriously thinking of having a custom Bumper sticker made to say: Get off the phone, and maybe you can drive.
cellphone is outdated already. I see people driving and tableting.
Had a friend who somehow brought back the EWP from a decomissioned Navy jet years ago, and would zap phones with it. Then... he caused an accident with it, got caught... turns out that using military EWP you essentially stole is something of a federal crime so that ended badly. Still, the basic idea appeals to me.[QUOTE="Ringx55"][QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] You're thinking of Marinol, and there are some rather serious issues with dosing and efficacy compared to controls with Marinol. Frame_DraggerAt the same time I think it does lead to less abuse of the drug all while maintain control and regulating it better. Yes it is harder to know what dosage but usually in long term aspects where it's used you have a lot of room to go for that. That's your opinion... Marinol is generally considered to be a difficult drug to titrate and is not tolerated well by a large number of people. In addition, it doesn't seem to have the full range of analgesic and anti-nausea effects, so it is in short a less effective drug. If you have a condition which necessitats the use of marijuana, abuse really isn't an issue in the near-term. Abuse away cancer pateints, and people with HIV/AIDS; given that smoking marijuana isn't the only option (or even best option) there is little to recommend Marinol. I can agree that smoking pot is easier to determine the dosage as the patient does it itself, but I bring another argument into this, it's certainly less healthy to do so. From what I've read it has the full capabilities and anti-nausea effects I can agree with the analgesic though. It's a less effective drug with better health benefits... I think it's fairly ignorant to say there isn't any abuse with medical marijuana cards in the states that allow it. There have been many studies showing there is a amount who do. There is a lot to recommend Marinol, would you rather see a Child cancer patient smoking pot which is very detrimental to the lungs at that stage or taking it? I'm fairly certain medical professionals and parents would rather have them take the pill.
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="Ringx55"] At the same time I think it does lead to less abuse of the drug all while maintain control and regulating it better. Yes it is harder to know what dosage but usually in long term aspects where it's used you have a lot of room to go for that.Ringx55That's your opinion... Marinol is generally considered to be a difficult drug to titrate and is not tolerated well by a large number of people. In addition, it doesn't seem to have the full range of analgesic and anti-nausea effects, so it is in short a less effective drug. If you have a condition which necessitats the use of marijuana, abuse really isn't an issue in the near-term. Abuse away cancer pateints, and people with HIV/AIDS; given that smoking marijuana isn't the only option (or even best option) there is little to recommend Marinol. I can agree that smoking pot is easier to determine the dosage as the patient does it itself, but I bring another argument into this, it's certainly less healthy to do so. From what I've read it has the full capabilities and anti-nausea effects I can agree with the analgesic though. It's a less effective drug with better health benefits... I think it's fairly ignorant to say there isn't any abuse with medical marijuana cards in the states that allow it. There have been many studies showing there is a amount who do. There is a lot to recommend Marinol, would you rather see a Child cancer patient smoking pot which is very detrimental to the lungs at that stage or taking it? I'm fairly certain medical professionals and parents would rather have them take the pill. Without treading on GS' toes, there are a lot of ways to use marijuana that have nothing to do with combusting material, which is unlikely to be healthy. All of those methods are easier to titrate than Marinol. As for saying there is no abuse with cards.. it probably would be ignorant, but then I didn't say that. Read what you posted, and what I said... from what I read your abuse concern was with actual medical patients, and I disagreed. The "medical marijuana" movement in Cali no longer has much to do with ACTUAL medical use, and I'm not talking about that in the context of Marinol. As for a child cancer patient, I would say give them a marijunana lollipop that has the full range of cannibinoids for maximum effect and use it as you woudl a Fentanyl lollipop. No downsides to health, and easy titration. A cancer patient shouldn't also have access to a medical volitalizer, although oral administration would likely be preferred by the kid.
[QUOTE="Lach0121"]
[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] Yeah, I just agree 100% on this, and cellphones have just made me even more adamant about this issue.magicalclick
Oh yes, my GF and I are seriously thinking of having a custom Bumper sticker made to say: Get off the phone, and maybe you can drive.
cellphone is outdated already. I see people driving and tableting.
Just worsens the problem.
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"]considering people that are getting medical marijuana prescriptions who don't need it. I'd say this is the right decision considering what the law is. if pot heads didn't go out of the way to falsify claims of medical problems then they probably would have left this alone, but since they don't...DroidPhysX*implies everyone who has medical marijuana prescription is a pot head* Not at all. I don't believe that marijauna should be illegal, but it is, so the government has to uphold that law, or change it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment