Obama shutting down Guatanamo Bay

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nintendofreak_2
nintendofreak_2

25896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#151 nintendofreak_2
Member since 2005 • 25896 Posts

I'm not exactly sure of what all happened with Guantanamo, but what I do know is that he suspected terrorists were tortured and that the place is getting shut down and the people who are being held there are not wanted by their own countries, so they'll be moved to the US and gain Constitutional protection.

Personally, I support Obama to move them out and close the place down. Torture is immoral, and doing it isn't going to stop terrorists from doing it to our troops.

Avatar image for thardus317
thardus317

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 thardus317
Member since 2004 • 6400 Posts
Ah I didn't know that thank u. But they should change that. Definitely. Don't you reckon?!biggest_loser
No I don't as a matter of fact. The Geneva Convention are "Rules for War" so to speak. Un-uniformed combatants "hiding" in civilian garb put non-combatants in danger. Just as you could be charged for murder for causing someone to die of a heart-attack wile committing a crime (eg. bank robbery) Un-uniformed combatants are responsible for any civilian deaths.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#153 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="NZgamer007"]Do people in this thread care about their safety? People in Guatanamo Bay have done something to be put there they don't just get chucked in there for looking like they are terriosts, little more logic please people.NZgamer007
Little more knowing what you're talking about? A british citizen (i forget his name) was quite literally chucked in there for looking like a terrorist. He was held for years and eventually released thanks to Amnesty International. He has a nice house and a family in london and had literally done nothing wrong whatsoever. He looked like somebody on the CIA's watch list, was arrested without trial and sent to Guantanamo.

And you believe everything you read/hear about?

....so he wasn't really arrested and imprisoned without charge, and the whole amnesty international campaign to have him released (which was successful) was a big con? :lol:
Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts
While it seems the American and most Western people agree that this was the right decision, I still see some people in the middle East marching down the road shouting Death to Obama. Would have thought they would be grateful for having their fellow people no longer sufferring in Gitmo anymore, obviously not.
Avatar image for XD4NTESINF3RNOX
XD4NTESINF3RNOX

7438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#155 XD4NTESINF3RNOX
Member since 2008 • 7438 Posts
[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="willtsherman"]he's a dummy, he's letting the terrorists go free.willtsherman
:lol: Please, go read up on the living conditions many prisoners face there. Regardless of what horrid crimes they've committed (I don't support what they've done), no human being should be subjected to this. Nocoolnamejim, the poster a few posts above me, posted a link that I completely agree with. If you make these people seem like they're some sort of "special" prisoner, it only fuels the problem.

ok the terrorists that caused 9/11, russian school massacre, munich, etc. deserve a nice comfy home, with tea time and getting set free. they are not bad people:roll:

i know right..... they need to come to the us and shoot more people hooray!!
Avatar image for XD4NTESINF3RNOX
XD4NTESINF3RNOX

7438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#156 XD4NTESINF3RNOX
Member since 2008 • 7438 Posts

I'm not exactly sure of what all happened with Guantanamo, but what I do know is that he suspected terrorists were tortured and that the place is getting shut down and the people who are being held there are not wanted by their own countries, so they'll be moved to the US and gain Constitutional protection.

Personally, I support Obama to move them out and close the place down. Torture is immoral, and doing it isn't going to stop terrorists from doing it to our troops.

nintendofreak_2
wait isn't killing innocent people immoral too wtf.... :? so we should treat them super nice and become great friends with them
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
Whether or not I support this depends entirely on what Obama plans to do with the released prisoners.
Avatar image for thardus317
thardus317

6400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 thardus317
Member since 2004 • 6400 Posts

i know right..... they need to come to the us and shoot more people hooray!!XD4NTESINF3RNOX
Mertha (Sp?), Pennsylvania Senator, said that he would happily take the detainees into a minimum security prision in his district. Unfortunately, I live near there.

o_o

Avatar image for False_Reality
False_Reality

1949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#159 False_Reality
Member since 2006 • 1949 Posts

I have to say, we should definitely end the torture at Guantanamo, but he should not let the prisoners go free.

I seriously hope he at least keeps them detained somewhere because of the horrors they have done.

Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

d the

guess you hav[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="willtsherman"]he's a dummy, he's letting the terrorists go free.NZgamer007
:lol: Please, go read up on the living conditions many prisoners face there. Regardless of what horrid crimes they've committed (I don't support what they've done), no human being should be subjected to this. Nocoolnamejim, the poster a few posts above me, posted a link that I completely agree with. If you make these people seem like they're some sort of "special" prisoner, it only fuels the problem.

I guess you have been there or maybe you just believe every single thing you read from media outlets just trying to sell papers. Plus prove they are not terrorists. I would rather be safe then sorry.

Those last two sentences are very dumb. Imagine you were near a group of people in your home town and a fight broke out. One guy got killed. The cops arrest you and the rest of the group, saying "He may have participated. Better safe than sorry". They don't have any eveidence though, so they just hold you indefinately. You ask when you would be let go, and they say "When you can prove you didn't kill him".

You would hate that, wouldn't you? If you were traveling in another country when it happened, you would expect The U.S. to fight for your release, right?

Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#161 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts

d the[QUOTE="NZgamer007"]guess you hav[QUOTE="chrisrooR"] :lol: Please, go read up on the living conditions many prisoners face there. Regardless of what horrid crimes they've committed (I don't support what they've done), no human being should be subjected to this. Nocoolnamejim, the poster a few posts above me, posted a link that I completely agree with. If you make these people seem like they're some sort of "special" prisoner, it only fuels the problem.TBoogy

I guess you have been there or maybe you just believe every single thing you read from media outlets just trying to sell papers. Plus prove they are not terrorists. I would rather be safe then sorry.

Those last two sentences are very dumb. Imagine you were near a group of people in your home town and a fight broke out. One guy got killed. The cops arrest you and the rest of the group, saying "He may have participated. Better safe than sorry". They don't have any eveidence though, so they just hold you indefinately. You ask when you would be let go, and they say "When you can prove you didn't kill him".

You would hate that, wouldn't you? If you were traveling in another country when it happened, you would expect The U.S. to fight for your release, right?

The only difference would be that in reality, in Guantanamo Bay, the "cops" wouldn't allow you to ask questions. They wouldn't allow proof, even if it exists. They would just simply assume you're a big bad terrorist and torture you.
Avatar image for Mario2007
Mario2007

2520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#162 Mario2007
Member since 2005 • 2520 Posts
I hope they get a worse punishment than they already have.
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#163 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
I hope they get a worse punishment than they already have. Mario2007
Who, the yet-to-be-allowed-a-fair-trial prisoners?
Avatar image for NZgamer007
NZgamer007

287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 NZgamer007
Member since 2007 • 287 Posts
[QUOTE="TBoogy"]

d the[QUOTE="NZgamer007"] I guess you have been there or maybe you just believe every single thing you read from media outlets just trying to sell papers. Plus prove they are not terrorists. I would rather be safe then sorry.chrisrooR

Those last two sentences are very dumb. Imagine you were near a group of people in your home town and a fight broke out. One guy got killed. The cops arrest you and the rest of the group, saying "He may have participated. Better safe than sorry". They don't have any eveidence though, so they just hold you indefinately. You ask when you would be let go, and they say "When you can prove you didn't kill him".

You would hate that, wouldn't you? If you were traveling in another country when it happened, you would expect The U.S. to fight for your release, right?

The only difference would be that in reality, in Guantanamo Bay, the "cops" wouldn't allow you to ask questions. They wouldn't allow proof, even if it exists. They would just simply assume you're a big bad terrorist and torture you.

Hmm really so you guys think that they actually chuck people in there for no reason what-so-ever. Mis-informed is what I would call it.
Avatar image for OdysseyMofo
OdysseyMofo

596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 OdysseyMofo
Member since 2008 • 596 Posts
Open it again and put George Bush detained in its darkest facilities.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#166 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="chrisrooR"][QUOTE="TBoogy"] Those last two sentences are very dumb. Imagine you were near a group of people in your home town and a fight broke out. One guy got killed. The cops arrest you and the rest of the group, saying "He may have participated. Better safe than sorry". They don't have any eveidence though, so they just hold you indefinately. You ask when you would be let go, and they say "When you can prove you didn't kill him".

You would hate that, wouldn't you? If you were traveling in another country when it happened, you would expect The U.S. to fight for your release, right?

NZgamer007
The only difference would be that in reality, in Guantanamo Bay, the "cops" wouldn't allow you to ask questions. They wouldn't allow proof, even if it exists. They would just simply assume you're a big bad terrorist and torture you.

Hmm really so you guys think that they actually chuck people in there for no reason what-so-ever. Mis-informed is what I would call it.

That was the entire point of Guantanamo, though. It wasn't that they put them there for "no reason", it's that they had nothing to back up the reasons they had.
Avatar image for FantasyShooter7
FantasyShooter7

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#167 FantasyShooter7
Member since 2007 • 118 Posts
about time the centre was closed off..
Avatar image for hamzaBZ
hamzaBZ

94

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#168 hamzaBZ
Member since 2008 • 94 Posts

The problem I have with the prison is that I don't really care about what they do to them, but due to the policy America's had, they are probably a lot of innocent people there suffering for crimes they never committed.

Not being able to have a proper trial makes it very possible that a vast number of the prisoners in guantanamo bay are actually not guilty of committing any terrorist acts. One example is this reporter for al jazeera tv who was sent to prison without any evidence that he did anything, just because in the wrong place in the wrong time.

What I would love is if he changed that whole policy as a whole, thus providing innocent people with their freedom and putting the persons who committed terrorist acts to a trial in which a judge decides their future after looking at all the evidence.

PS: sorry for my bad english.

Avatar image for OdysseyMofo
OdysseyMofo

596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 OdysseyMofo
Member since 2008 • 596 Posts
Better yet, open it up and see if you can decrease the surplus population by getting rid of the McDonalds in Texas.
Avatar image for links136
links136

2400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 links136
Member since 2004 • 2400 Posts
it kinda wows me how many posters think that by closing down the prison all the prisoners will be let out scott free.
Avatar image for IamHush
IamHush

284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 IamHush
Member since 2004 • 284 Posts
The thing that worries me the most is the fact that some released prisoners are appearing in terrorist videos...we need to find a better solution
Avatar image for mysterylobster
mysterylobster

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 mysterylobster
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts
It's incredibly ironic that you have a bible in your avatar yet...Ninja-Hippo
This discussion has nothing to do with my religion, so please trying to bait me into a religious discussion when this is about protecting America. Also, I suggest you read the Bible before making comments like this.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]It's incredibly ironic that you have a bible in your avatar yet...mysterylobster
This discussion has nothing to do with my religion, so please trying to bait me into a religious discussion when this is about protecting America. Also, I suggest you read the Bible before making comments like this.

I think he's pointing out the irony of the "religious" guy supporting torture.
Avatar image for freshgman
freshgman

12241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#174 freshgman
Member since 2005 • 12241 Posts
good. its about time. i believe everyone deserves a fair tial.
Avatar image for Big_Bad_Sad
Big_Bad_Sad

18243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 Big_Bad_Sad
Member since 2005 • 18243 Posts

If they are 'secret' prisons, then how will we know if he has closed them?

Avatar image for Tazzmission187
Tazzmission187

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 Tazzmission187
Member since 2008 • 804 Posts
i like the idea but the billion dollar question is where they gona go? im glad obama is actually kicking this into gear because we had alot of captives for what 9 years? and not a single one was tried when bush was in office.
Avatar image for YouAmStupid
YouAmStupid

343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 YouAmStupid
Member since 2009 • 343 Posts
he's a dummy, he's letting the terrorists go free.willtsherman
Why do you think that he's letting them go free?
Avatar image for freshgman
freshgman

12241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#178 freshgman
Member since 2005 • 12241 Posts
[QUOTE="willtsherman"]he's a dummy, he's letting the terrorists go free.YouAmStupid
Why do you think that he's letting them go free?

yeah he never said he was letting them go free. he said they wont be at guantanamo anymore. and they wont be tortured anymore.
Avatar image for mysterylobster
mysterylobster

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 mysterylobster
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]It's incredibly ironic that you have a bible in your avatar yet...Engrish_Major
This discussion has nothing to do with my religion, so please trying to bait me into a religious discussion when this is about protecting America. Also, I suggest you read the Bible before making comments like this.

I think he's pointing out the irony of the "religious" guy supporting torture.

This debate has nothing to do with me personally or my religion. If that's all he's got, then I suggest he rethink his argument. Also, it's kind of a dopey comment, since he didn't say why it's ironic. You could say anything is ironic for a religious person to say if they don't know the first thing about the religion. Picking on my religion just seems like a crutch for a bad argument.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"] This discussion has nothing to do with my religion, so please trying to bait me into a religious discussion when this is about protecting America. Also, I suggest you read the Bible before making comments like this. mysterylobster
I think he's pointing out the irony of the "religious" guy supporting torture.

This debate has nothing to do with me personally or my religion. If that's all he's got, then I suggest he rethink his argument. Also, it's kind of a dopey comment, since he didn't say why it's ironic. You could say anything is ironic for a religious person to say if they don't know the first thing about the religion. Picking on my religion just seems like a crutch for a bad argument.

It's ironic because a Christian (one who follows the teachings of Christ) would support something that Jesus would obviously not support.
Avatar image for Dalo12345
Dalo12345

800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 Dalo12345
Member since 2007 • 800 Posts
I hope you all realize most of the prisoners at Gitmo will be moving to a handful of military bases TBD. This move was symbolic, and nothing more. In other news, Obama has already ordered the bombing of Pakistan, killing several civilians. HOORAY FOR CHANGE!
Avatar image for mysterylobster
mysterylobster

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 mysterylobster
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"] I think he's pointing out the irony of the "religious" guy supporting torture.Engrish_Major
This debate has nothing to do with me personally or my religion. If that's all he's got, then I suggest he rethink his argument. Also, it's kind of a dopey comment, since he didn't say why it's ironic. You could say anything is ironic for a religious person to say if they don't know the first thing about the religion. Picking on my religion just seems like a crutch for a bad argument.

It's ironic because a Christian (one who follows the teachings of Christ) would support something that Jesus would obviously not support.

Don't use the word "obviously" if you don't know what you're talking about. Jesus knew about torture, and used it as an example of what would happen to unbelievers during Judgment. Nowhere did Jesus say "don't dunk an enemy's head in the water."
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Don't use the word "obviously" if you don't know what you're talking about. Jesus knew about torture, and used it as an example of what would happen to unbelievers during Judgment. Nowhere did Jesus say "don't dunk an enemy's head in the water." mysterylobster
It's ridiculous that anyone would believe that Jesus would condone torture. There's absolutely no way. You're just manipulating things to apply to your political beliefs, just like most "religious" conservatives seem to do.
Avatar image for mysterylobster
mysterylobster

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 mysterylobster
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"] Don't use the word "obviously" if you don't know what you're talking about. Jesus knew about torture, and used it as an example of what would happen to unbelievers during Judgment. Nowhere did Jesus say "don't dunk an enemy's head in the water." Engrish_Major
It's ridiculous that anyone would believe that Jesus would condone torture. There's absolutely no way. You're just manipulating things to apply to your political beliefs, just like most "religious" conservatives seem to do.

You're projecting your modern sensibilities onto Jesus Christ. Don't worry, it's a common mistake.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#187 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

You're projecting your modern sensibilities onto Jesus Christ. Don't worry, it's a common mistake. mysterylobster

Not a mistake at all. From Jesus himself:

"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Matthew 5:38-44

Avatar image for mysterylobster
mysterylobster

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 mysterylobster
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"] You're projecting your modern sensibilities onto Jesus Christ. Don't worry, it's a common mistake. Engrish_Major

Not a mistake at all. From Jesus himself:

"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Matthew 5:38-44

We are doing good to those who hate us. They wish to destroy our way of life, and we could respond by doing the same to them. We're only doing what's best to keep the peace.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#189 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"] You're projecting your modern sensibilities onto Jesus Christ. Don't worry, it's a common mistake. mysterylobster

Not a mistake at all. From Jesus himself:

"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Matthew 5:38-44

We are doing good to those who hate us. They wish to destroy our way of life, and we could respond by doing the same to them. We're only doing what's best to keep the peace.

The exact same argument can be applied to their point of view. Assuming they ARE actually terrorists, mind.

Avatar image for links136
links136

2400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 links136
Member since 2004 • 2400 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"] You're projecting your modern sensibilities onto Jesus Christ. Don't worry, it's a common mistake. mysterylobster

Not a mistake at all. From Jesus himself:

"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Matthew 5:38-44

We are doing good to those who hate us. They wish to destroy our way of life, and we could respond by doing the same to them. We're only doing what's best to keep the peace.

.....sounds like something a terrorist would say. SEND HIM TO GUATANAMO. Its worse than I thought, muslims and christians working together.
Avatar image for mysterylobster
mysterylobster

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 mysterylobster
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]

Not a mistake at all. From Jesus himself:

"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.

Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you." Matthew 5:38-44

links136
We are doing good to those who hate us. They wish to destroy our way of life, and we could respond by doing the same to them. We're only doing what's best to keep the peace.

.....sounds like something a terrorist would say. SEND HIM TO GUATANAMO. Its worse than I thought, muslims and christians working together.

I don't think you understood what I said. These extremists want to kill all Christians, and if they obtain nuclear weapons, the results would be catastrophic. We as Christians will not respond to this with such violence, but we do have a moral obligation to protect the innocent. Torture is an effective means of ending this conflict in a way that won't end with the destruction of both sides.
Avatar image for links136
links136

2400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 links136
Member since 2004 • 2400 Posts
[QUOTE="links136"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"] We are doing good to those who hate us. They wish to destroy our way of life, and we could respond by doing the same to them. We're only doing what's best to keep the peace. mysterylobster
.....sounds like something a terrorist would say. SEND HIM TO GUATANAMO. Its worse than I thought, muslims and christians working together.

I don't think you understood what I said. These extremists want to kill all Christians, and if they obtain nuclear weapons, the results would be catastrophic. We as Christians will not respond to this with such violence, but we do have a moral obligation to protect the innocent. Torture is an effective means of ending this conflict in a way that won't end with the destruction of both sides.

i'm sure glad there's a separation of church and state. How do you know these prisoners are terrorists?

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#194 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
[QUOTE="links136"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"] We are doing good to those who hate us. They wish to destroy our way of life, and we could respond by doing the same to them. We're only doing what's best to keep the peace. mysterylobster
.....sounds like something a terrorist would say. SEND HIM TO GUATANAMO. Its worse than I thought, muslims and christians working together.

I don't think you understood what I said. These extremists want to kill all Christians, and if they obtain nuclear weapons, the results would be catastrophic. We as Christians will not respond to this with such violence, but we do have a moral obligation to protect the innocent. Torture is an effective means of ending this conflict in a way that won't end with the destruction of both sides.

Killing people, no matter what they've done, is not Christian. The Bible pretty much makes it clear that as a Christian you're not supposed to attack another person. Even if they want to kill you you're pretty much supposed to just stand there and let them do it and hope that God intervenes or that you lived a moral enough life to get into heaven. Sadly, most Christians seem to have long forgotten that part of the religion and instead think that Jesus wants them to spread His message at any cost.

The Old Testament God certainly would advocate wholesale slaughter of an entire region's people if it meant His followers would get even the slightest marginal benefit out of it, but Jesus was quite a bit different from that guy.

Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#195 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
I don't think you understood what I said. These extremists want to kill all Christians, and if they obtain nuclear weapons, the results would be catastrophic. We as Christians will not respond to this with such violence, but we do have a moral obligation to protect the innocent. Torture is an effective means of ending this conflict in a way that won't end with the destruction of both sides. mysterylobster
With all due respect, you have a very twisted view of this world. What you're essentially proposing is launching a pre-emptive strike based off something that could hypothetically happen, with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Let's switch everything you've said in that statement, let's switch Christians with Muslims. Now, you're seeing things from the point of view of the opposition. Your views of who is right and wrong is very fixed and very narrow. From the point of view of these people, they're freedom fighters. The Americans have, again with no evidence to base their decision on, invaded their country and practically levelled it. They then install their own beliefs and political agendas into the government system. They oppose this, but voicing their actions lands them in Guantanamo "in case" they "launch a nuclear weapon", as you put it. Can you see it from that viewpoint?
Avatar image for mysterylobster
mysterylobster

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 mysterylobster
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts
[QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"] What you're essentially proposing is launching a pre-emptive strike based off something that could hypothetically happen, with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Let's switch everything you've said in that statement, let's switch Christians with Muslims. Now, you're seeing things from the point of view of the opposition. Your views of who is right and wrong is very fixed and very narrow. From the point of view of these people, they're freedom fighters. The Americans have, again with no evidence to base their decision on, invaded their country and practically levelled it. They then install their own beliefs and political agendas into the government system. They oppose this, but voicing their actions lands them in Guantanamo "in case" they "launch a nuclear weapon", as you put it. Can you see it from that viewpoint?

Their actions have nothing to do with our invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, so don't give me this "freedom fighters defending their homeland" crap. In case you've forgotten, we were attacked before the war started by maniacs whose ultimate goal is the destruction of those who don't follow Muhammad, even innocent civilians. We can either sit back and let them destroy us (and themselves), or we can take some measures to protect ourselves. If we can stop an attack which could kill thousands on both sides by dunking some guy's head in the water, we should do it. It sure beats responding with the sort of carnage they've delivered to us.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#197 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Torture is an effective means of ending this conflict in a way that won't end with the destruction of both sides. mysterylobster
You are wrong. Tell me a time when this has EVER happened. Torture apologists conveniently fall back upon this "ticking time bomb" scenario where torture will somehow get useful information from some magical captured suspect that will help to stop the attack. This is a dream, and a BS story with absolutely no evidence to back it up.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#198 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"][QUOTE="AirGuitarist87"] What you're essentially proposing is launching a pre-emptive strike based off something that could hypothetically happen, with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Let's switch everything you've said in that statement, let's switch Christians with Muslims. Now, you're seeing things from the point of view of the opposition. Your views of who is right and wrong is very fixed and very narrow. From the point of view of these people, they're freedom fighters. The Americans have, again with no evidence to base their decision on, invaded their country and practically levelled it. They then install their own beliefs and political agendas into the government system. They oppose this, but voicing their actions lands them in Guantanamo "in case" they "launch a nuclear weapon", as you put it. Can you see it from that viewpoint?

Their actions have nothing to do with our invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, so don't give me this "freedom fighters defending their homeland" crap. In case you've forgotten, we were attacked before the war started by maniacs whose ultimate goal is the destruction of those who don't follow Muhammad, even innocent civilians. We can either sit back and let them destroy us (and themselves), or we can take some measures to protect ourselves. If we can stop an attack which could kill thousands on both sides by dunking some guy's head in the water, we should do it. It sure beats responding with the sort of carnage they've delivered to us.

So it's basically come down to grown ups acting like children? "He started it?" It's a very narrow viewpoint to assume that the Iraq/Afghan invasion had no effect on the increase of so-called "terrorist activities". Who would have thought that going into a country armed to the teeth, shouting in a language they don't understand, would have any impact on their opinion of America. I never knew that the spectrum for anti-terrorist measures only included "do nothing" and "torture". I guess when my country was being bombed by the IRA we did the same. I'm not sure where you're leading this discussion, if you can call it that. It's evident that your view on this is very twisted and very rigid. I'd wager that half the stuff you're proclaiming is simply due to your anti-Obama agenda. If you really believe that torture is a humane, rational choice in a land that proclaims freedom to be essential and a faith that teaches to "turn the other cheek", then there's really not much else to be said. If you honestly feel that the "just in case" factor is sufficient enough evidence to "protect" your country, then you best pray your out-spoken overly patriotic and anti-Presidential views don't land you in a similar place.
Avatar image for mysterylobster
mysterylobster

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#199 mysterylobster
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]Torture is an effective means of ending this conflict in a way that won't end with the destruction of both sides. Engrish_Major
You are wrong. Tell me a time when this has EVER happened. Torture apologists conveniently fall back upon this "ticking time bomb" scenario where torture will somehow get useful information from some magical captured suspect that will help to stop the attack. This is a dream, and a BS story with absolutely no evidence to back it up.

Water-boarding has already saved lives. The CIA says that information gathered from Abu Zubaydah prevented numerous attacks on coalition forces. This is not a magic bullet, but it is a valuable tool in our anti-terrorism arsenal, which doesn't involve bombing populated areas.
So it's basically come down to grown ups acting like children? "He started it?" AirGuitarist87
No, I'm only showing you how naive your vision of these terrorists is. If you're going to ask me to see the conflict from their perspective, at least have some basic grasp of their reasons for fighting us.
Avatar image for Electus_Unus
Electus_Unus

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#200 Electus_Unus
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Lol at the irony that some people think that Jesus wouldn't support the torture of people yet it is often successful in saving lives. Thank You for reading :)