Obama supports LIFTING the global ban on whaling for countries that still whale.

  • 127 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/05/obama-backing-deal-lift-global-ban-commercial-whaling/

http://www.change.org/petitions/view/dont_let_president_obama_lift_the_whaling_ban_not_on_earth_day_not_ever

"The Obama administration is leading an effort within the International Whaling Commission to lift a 24-year international ban on commercial whaling for Japan, Norway and Iceland, the remaining three countries in the 88-member commission that still hunt whales.

The administration argues that the new deal will save thousands of whales over the next decade by stopping the three countries from illegally exploiting loopholes in the moratorium...

Several environmental groups have joined forces to pressure Obama to withdraw his support for the deal before the whaling commission votes June 20 in Morocco on whether to lift the ban that was championed by President Reagan."

...Wow, yet another idiotic position taken by this joke of an administration. Now they're sanctioning the killing of an endangered species and attempting to spin it as a move that will reduce the killing of that species. So instead of killing them "illegally," Japan, Norway, and Iceland can kill them "legally." Yea, Barack...that will sure fix the problem.

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

Did you know that NASA uses whale oil for lubricant?

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

Did you know that NASA uses whale oil for lubricant?

topgunmv

So, that makes killing an endangered species acceptable...how?

Avatar image for alexside1
alexside1

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 alexside1
Member since 2006 • 4412 Posts

Did you know that NASA uses whale oil for lubricant?

topgunmv
They won't be any oil left if the animal went extinct.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

Did you know that NASA uses whale oil for lubricant?

Communistik

So, that makes killing an endangered species acceptable...how?

I didn't say it did. It's just interesting that publicly we as a country cry foul, and then reap the benefits behind closed doors.

Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

If there are loopholes wouldn't you want to fix it?

Avatar image for Atheos-Arkhaios
Atheos-Arkhaios

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Atheos-Arkhaios
Member since 2008 • 880 Posts

I would fully research the issue before heaping condemnation on the administration. I'm not a fan of Obama either, but I also know little about the research that is being used to explain how this will affect whale populations.

Avatar image for Pirate700
Pirate700

46465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Pirate700
Member since 2008 • 46465 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

Did you know that NASA uses whale oil for lubricant?

topgunmv

So, that makes killing an endangered species acceptable...how?

I didn't say it did. It's just interesting that publicly we as a country cry foul, and then reap the benefits behind closed doors.

If what you say is true, I'm sure they could use a different, synthetic grease.

Avatar image for enix165
enix165

1848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 enix165
Member since 2007 • 1848 Posts

Some people hunt whales to survive, just putting that out there.

Avatar image for Ryir554
Ryir554

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 Ryir554
Member since 2005 • 1061 Posts

...Wow, yet another idiotic position taken by this joke of an administration. Now they're sanctioning the killing of an endangered species and attempting to spin it as a move that will reduce the killing of that species. So instead of killing them "illegally," Japan, Norway, and Iceland can kill them "legally." Yea, Barack...that will sure fix the problem.

Communistik

haha, joke of an administration, Barack is doing a hell of a lot better than bush, I agree the whale issue is the ONE idiotic thing he has done, but joke of an administration? you have been watching too much fox news my friend

Avatar image for Jfisch93
Jfisch93

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#11 Jfisch93
Member since 2008 • 3557 Posts

Some people hunt whales to survive, just putting that out there.

enix165

Time to get a new job, then.

Avatar image for enix165
enix165

1848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 enix165
Member since 2007 • 1848 Posts
[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]

[QUOTE="enix165"]

Some people hunt whales to survive, just putting that out there.

Time to get a new job, then.

And what if they can't?
Avatar image for gamedude2020
gamedude2020

3795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 gamedude2020
Member since 2004 • 3795 Posts

all it does is stop illegal whaling, which is faaaar worse. if they do it legally, they can be controlled about when, where and how much they do it...

Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts

Critics of the administration will have a whale of a time due to this.

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

Did you know that NASA uses whale oil for lubricant?

topgunmv

So, that makes killing an endangered species acceptable...how?

I didn't say it did. It's just interesting that publicly we as a country cry foul, and then reap the benefits behind closed doors.

So, even if we don't support whaling, we are somehow all hypocrites because NASA chooses to kill whales? It's not as if we have a say in the matter.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c
deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c

6504

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 deactivated-5a84f3399aa1c
Member since 2005 • 6504 Posts
Seems like the rational is that whaling is going to happen either way, so by keeping it above board and trying to regulate it in new ways, it will eventually lead to less whaling. Meh, this is probably some sort of diplomatic ploy. I don't like it.
Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts
Oh please, like the right suddenly cares about the whales. :roll: Anyway, I disagree with him. Hope he changes his mind or something.
Avatar image for Got_to_go
Got_to_go

2036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Got_to_go
Member since 2009 • 2036 Posts

Critics of the administration will have a whale of a time due to this.

T_P_O
Whale others sit back and try to figure out the meaning behind this.
Avatar image for Jfisch93
Jfisch93

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#19 Jfisch93
Member since 2008 • 3557 Posts

all it does is stop illegal whaling, which is faaaar worse. if they do it legally, they can be controlled about when, where and how much they do it...

gamedude2020

If they are willing to do it illegally, why would they follow regulations on when, where, and how much they can do it?

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

If there are loopholes wouldn't you want to fix it?

SgtKevali

This is akin to making, say, rape legal for people who are already rapists. How does making rape legal for rapists stop them from raping people? It doesn't. And if those three countries completely ignored a moratorium on whaling for the past 24 years, what in god's name makes the administration think they will suddenly start complying with regulations on whaling just because it's technically "legal"? (of course, it's already legal in those three countries and always has been; the international whaling commission has no weight, sort of like the UN). It fixes the loopholes in the moratorum by removing them. This is going to do nothing, and it's a terrible message.

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

So, that makes killing an endangered species acceptable...how?

Communistik

I didn't say it did. It's just interesting that publicly we as a country cry foul, and then reap the benefits behind closed doors.

So, even if we don't support whaling, we are somehow all hypocrites because NASA chooses to kill whales? It's not as if we have a say in the matter.

The government is hypocritical for not supporting whaling and then using whale oil in government funded programs.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
Norway already have their own set of rules and procedures to prevent the whale population from being reduced to the point of extinction, one can only kill a certain amount of whales a year, breaking those rules and procedures have really severe consequences. We don't want to put them to the extinction list, it wouldn't benefit anyone if they got extinct and we know it. That said, I do think we should let the whales live and let their numbers grow until they are far beyond the endangered list before we can continue hunting, basically the same way we do with deer, fish and rabbits.
Avatar image for gamedude2020
gamedude2020

3795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 gamedude2020
Member since 2004 • 3795 Posts

[QUOTE="gamedude2020"]

all it does is stop illegal whaling, which is faaaar worse. if they do it legally, they can be controlled about when, where and how much they do it...

Jfisch93

If they are willing to do it illegally, why would they follow regulations on when, where, and how much they can do it?

i don't know, but i'm assuming this is Obama's intention...

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

Oh please, like the right suddenly cares about the whales. :roll: Anyway, I disagree with him. Hope he changes his mind or something.Tauruslink

Oh yes, because the "evil right" wants to destroy the entire planet along with all of the animals on it. Give me a ****ing break.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
I don't get this, I do not see how this will save any whales, if anything it means they will do more whaling than they do now. Fix the loopholes and be more agreesive when it comes to these countries killing whales. Can't understand why Obama would agree with this.
Avatar image for T_REX305
T_REX305

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 T_REX305
Member since 2010 • 11304 Posts

If what you say is true, I'm sure they could use a different, synthetic grease.

Pirate700

yeah probably this guy produces a lot of grease we can use.

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

I didn't say it did. It's just interesting that publicly we as a country cry foul, and then reap the benefits behind closed doors.

topgunmv

So, even if we don't support whaling, we are somehow all hypocrites because NASA chooses to kill whales? It's not as if we have a say in the matter.

The government is hypocritical for not supporting whaling and then using whale oil in government funded programs.

Yes, the government is. Most people don't support whaling.

But anyways...they apparently support it now. I guess they are no longer hypocrites.

Avatar image for tachikoma679
tachikoma679

81

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 tachikoma679
Member since 2010 • 81 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

...Wow, yet another idiotic position taken by this joke of an administration. Now they're sanctioning the killing of an endangered species and attempting to spin it as a move that will reduce the killing of that species. So instead of killing them "illegally," Japan, Norway, and Iceland can kill them "legally." Yea, Barack...that will sure fix the problem.

Ryir554

haha, joke of an administration, Barack is doing a hell of a lot better than bush, I agree the whale issue is the ONE idiotic thing he has done, but joke of an administration? you have been watching too much fox news my friend

somebody hasnt been watching enough fox news
Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

[QUOTE="SgtKevali"]

If there are loopholes wouldn't you want to fix it?

Communistik

This is akin to making, say, rape legal for people who are already rapists. How does making rape legal for rapists stop them from raping people? It doesn't. And if those three countries completely ignored a moratorium on whaling for the past 24 years, what in god's name makes the administration think they will suddenly start complying with regulations on whaling just because it's technically "legal"? (of course, it's already legal in those three countries and always has been; the international whaling commission has no weight, sort of like the UN). It fixes the loopholes in the moratorum by removing them. This is going to do nothing, and it's a terrible message.

I think there's probably more to this story. Whether it's in a positive or negative way, I'm not sure.

I doubt the Obama admin. is doing this for the sake of doing it.

Avatar image for Communistik
Communistik

774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Communistik
Member since 2010 • 774 Posts

[QUOTE="Ryir554"]

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

...Wow, yet another idiotic position taken by this joke of an administration. Now they're sanctioning the killing of an endangered species and attempting to spin it as a move that will reduce the killing of that species. So instead of killing them "illegally," Japan, Norway, and Iceland can kill them "legally." Yea, Barack...that will sure fix the problem.

tachikoma679

haha, joke of an administration, Barack is doing a hell of a lot better than bush, I agree the whale issue is the ONE idiotic thing he has done, but joke of an administration? you have been watching too much fox news my friend

somebody hasnt been watching enough fox news

It's not even about Fox News, which I don't even watch. Nor do I watch any TV news. It's about common sense, and this the latest of many signs that Barack Obama has none.

Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts

[QUOTE="Tauruslink"]Oh please, like the right suddenly cares about the whales. :roll: Anyway, I disagree with him. Hope he changes his mind or something.Communistik

Oh yes, because the "evil right" wants to destroy the entire planet along with all of the animals on it. Give me a ****ing break.

Yup, because that's exactly what I said. Thanks for quoting me when I said "evil right" because I totally said that.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

So, even if we don't support whaling, we are somehow all hypocrites because NASA chooses to kill whales? It's not as if we have a say in the matter.

Communistik

The government is hypocritical for not supporting whaling and then using whale oil in government funded programs.

Yes, the government is. Most people don't support whaling.

But anyways...they apparently support it now. I guess they are no longer hypocrites.

Whale oil also makes space operations possible, as it's currently the only lubricant that works properly in the cold temperature in space. Assuming you use products that can have their origins traced back to NASA, then you're benefiting off whaling.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

[QUOTE="topgunmv"]

The government is hypocritical for not supporting whaling and then using whale oil in government funded programs.

topgunmv

Yes, the government is. Most people don't support whaling.

But anyways...they apparently support it now. I guess they are no longer hypocrites.

Whale oil also makes space operations possible, as it's currently the only lubricant that works properly in the cold temperature in space. Assuming you use products that can have their origins traced back to NASA, then you're benefiting off whaling.

Nasa isnt going to space anymore anyway, they have no more space voyages
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

I lol'd.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

Not a good decision...again...

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

I'm for it.. much easier to regulate people...

Avatar image for Ryir554
Ryir554

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 Ryir554
Member since 2005 • 1061 Posts

[QUOTE="tachikoma679"][QUOTE="Ryir554"]

haha, joke of an administration, Barack is doing a hell of a lot better than bush, I agree the whale issue is the ONE idiotic thing he has done, but joke of an administration? you have been watching too much fox news my friend

Communistik

somebody hasnt been watching enough fox news

It's not even about Fox News, which I don't even watch. Nor do I watch any TV news. It's about common sense, and this the latest of many signs that Barack Obama has none.

what are the other signs the Obama has "no sense"? seriously this is the one issue of his that I can honestly disagree with and I dont consider myself a liberal. are you talking about health care? really I want to know if you have legitamate reasons for hating Obama or if your just ranting because you finally have a real reason to not like his administrations policies

Avatar image for LastCaveMan
LastCaveMan

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 LastCaveMan
Member since 2010 • 300 Posts

i don't know.... but just because something is illegal, doesn't mean people don't do it. Theirs no point i sticking your head in the sand and hoping it won't happen, they might as well do something about it. It's supposed to be the 21st century but we still have pirates floating around and thousands of people get kidnapped every day, so it would be impossible to enforce a ban on illegal whaling

maybe they are doing to trying control whaling, but like someone else said that could be just political talk

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="Communistik"]

[QUOTE="tachikoma679"] somebody hasnt been watching enough fox newsRyir554

It's not even about Fox News, which I don't even watch. Nor do I watch any TV news. It's about common sense, and this the latest of many signs that Barack Obama has none.

what are the other signs the Obama has "no sense"? seriously this is the one issue of his that I can honestly disagree with and I dont consider myself a liberal. are you talking about health care? really I want to know if you have legitamate reasons for hating Obama or if your just ranting because you finally have a real reason to not like his administrations policies

If you're a conservative/libertarian then there's plenty of reason's to disagree with Obama's policies and actions...

If you hated Bush, then you should also hate Obama considering he's continuing many of his policies. Bush wasn't a true conservative at all.

Avatar image for Loco_Live
Loco_Live

3147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Loco_Live
Member since 2010 • 3147 Posts

What an idiot. Instead of inforcing the laws that will protect a species, he'll just take the easy way out and let them get killed. He's worse than Bush...

Avatar image for CrimzonTide
CrimzonTide

12187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#42 CrimzonTide
Member since 2007 • 12187 Posts
It's kind of like legalizing marijuana. If you make it legal it will be far easier to control, and the government can make money off of it. Think outside the box here people. Maybe, just maybe Obama doesn't want to go on a whale genocide. Maybe he understands that whales are being hunted, cruelly and illegally. One way to curtail that issue is to legalize it cause it's sure as hell impossible to regulate as it is,
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction.
Avatar image for Loco_Live
Loco_Live

3147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Loco_Live
Member since 2010 • 3147 Posts

This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. Ninja-Hippo

So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.

Avatar image for gamedude2020
gamedude2020

3795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 gamedude2020
Member since 2004 • 3795 Posts

So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.

Loco_Live

no matter how many ships you put out their, it would be near impossible to stop every whaler... do you know how many ships get hijacked in Somalia every day? And the us-uk patrol those waters all the time

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#46 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
I think Obama has the right objective in mind but isn't necessarily going about it in the right way. Why not attempt to fix the loopholes rather than legalizing and regulating?
Avatar image for Shadowhawk000
Shadowhawk000

3453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Shadowhawk000
Member since 2007 • 3453 Posts
Good,hopefully they are able to pass it.
Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

Good. We have no business telling those countries how to run their economies.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]This is a good idea. :| If you legalize it and impose limits on it and actually police whaling it's better than just saying 'it's illegal' and leaving it at that, leaving people to illegally whale all they like with no restriction. Loco_Live

So you'd rather have him enforce meaningless wars in the middle east instead of inforcing a law to protect an entire species? If the US put as much effort into stopping whaling as they do killing in the middle east, this wouldn't be an issue. The president is WEAK in so many ways.

Yep. That's where all of our money should be put into. Stopping whaling. Because that's obviously the only and most important purpose of government...

Avatar image for DarKre
DarKre

9529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 DarKre
Member since 2003 • 9529 Posts
The whaling ban has severely affected the local economies of hundreds of small communities in such countries as Iceland that depend on the trade for their livelihood. Sustainable whaling is alot smarter when it is regulated, rather then outright banned., but of course uninformed environmentalists will jump on the "whale wagon" and start screaming rape.