Obama wants control of the internet.

  • 157 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts

A Senate bill would offer President Obama emergency control of the Internet and may give him a "kill switch" to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks -- a move cybersecurity experts worry will choke off industry and civil liberties.

Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 emerged late Thursday, months after an initial version authored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., was blasted in Silicon Valley as dangerousgovernment intrusion.

"In the original bill they empowered the president to essentially turn off the Internet in the case of a 'cyber-emergency,' which they didn't define," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry.

"We think it's a very bad idea ... to put in legislation," he told FOXNews.com.

Clinton said the new version of the bill that surfaced this week is improved from its first draft, but troubling language that was removed was replaced by vague language that could still offer the same powers to the president in case of an emergency.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/

Thats right, your elected president wants to take the internet, a freedom if you will, away from you. This could happen when ever he considers something a cyber attack. What is with the Government control of the Obama administration? I enjoy all my freedoms and i feel like everyday Obama and his admin take one away. 2012 cant come sooner...


Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
Welcome to last year's news. Literally.
Avatar image for xromad01
xromad01

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 xromad01
Member since 2010 • 522 Posts
jessie the body was saying while back that the internet was after health care.
Avatar image for warownslife
warownslife

5289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 warownslife
Member since 2010 • 5289 Posts

Hes not going to get it.

Avatar image for Laserwolf65
Laserwolf65

6701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Laserwolf65
Member since 2003 • 6701 Posts

A Senate bill would offer President Obama emergency control of the Internet and may give him a "kill switch" to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks -- a move cybersecurity experts worry will choke off industry and civil liberties.

Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 emerged late Thursday, months after an initial version authored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., was blasted in Silicon Valley as dangerousgovernment intrusion.

"In the original bill they empowered the president to essentially turn off the Internet in the case of a 'cyber-emergency,' which they didn't define," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry.

"We think it's a very bad idea ... to put in legislation," he told FOXNews.com.

Clinton said the new version of the bill that surfaced this week is improved from its first draft, but troubling language that was removed was replaced by vague language that could still offer the same powers to the president in case of an emergency.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/

Thats right, your elected president wants to take the internet, a freedom if you will, away from you. This could happen when ever he considers something a cyber attack. What is with the Government control of the Obama administration? I enjoy all my freedoms and i feel like everyday Obama and his admin take one away. 2012 cant come sooner...


Kokuro_Kun

Hmm... something in this post makes me distrust it... what could it be?

Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
I realise but this should still be adressed. Its on the news right now in Chicago.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

Old news. Still creepy as hell.

Avatar image for CRS98
CRS98

9036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 CRS98
Member since 2004 • 9036 Posts
Welcome to last year's news. Literally.Theokhoth
Heh, I saw the '2009/8/28' as well.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
I realise but this should still be adressed. Its on the news right now in Chicago. Kokuro_Kun
It's the cyber equivalent of marshal law. If there's an emergency, the Internet can be shut down. Just as if there's an emergency, the army can come in and tell you when you can leave your house.
Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

Well, that's Obama for you..we have only ourselves to blame..

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts
Remember when Bush was president, and the left was in a tizzy about how he'd become a dictator and we'd enter a police state? Remember when that didn't happen?
Avatar image for The_Gaming_Baby
The_Gaming_Baby

6425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 117

User Lists: 52

#14 The_Gaming_Baby
Member since 2010 • 6425 Posts

Can't stop the internet baby.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#15 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
The bill was introduced in April of last year with bipartisan support and was debated before Obama even took office. The 'Obama is the devil' reports are becoming tiresome.
Avatar image for xromad01
xromad01

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 xromad01
Member since 2010 • 522 Posts
it is only a matter of time.the gov already "runs the economy" and has bases in most of the world.taking our internet can be done at any time.
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]I realise but this should still be adressed. Its on the news right now in Chicago. Theokhoth
It's the cyber equivalent of marshal law. If there's an emergency, the Internet can be shut down. Just as if there's an emergency, the army can come in and tell you when you can leave your house.

I thought about that too. Maybe its just me but i enjoy my freedoms.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]I realise but this should still be adressed. Its on the news right now in Chicago. Kokuro_Kun
It's the cyber equivalent of marshal law. If there's an emergency, the Internet can be shut down. Just as if there's an emergency, the army can come in and tell you when you can leave your house.

I thought about that too. Maybe its just me but i enjoy my freedoms.

1. There's no established "freedom" to use the Internet. 2. A freedom can be suspended in an emergency. Again: Marshal law.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#19 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
I'd love to see that list of freedoms Obama has taken away from you on a daily basis by the way.
Avatar image for Laserwolf65
Laserwolf65

6701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 Laserwolf65
Member since 2003 • 6701 Posts

[QUOTE="Laserwolf65"]

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]

A Senate bill would offer President Obama emergency control of the Internet and may give him a "kill switch" to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks -- a move cybersecurity experts worry will choke off industry and civil liberties.

Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 emerged late Thursday, months after an initial version authored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., was blasted in Silicon Valley as dangerousgovernment intrusion.

"In the original bill they empowered the president to essentially turn off the Internet in the case of a 'cyber-emergency,' which they didn't define," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry.

"We think it's a very bad idea ... to put in legislation," he told FOXNews.com.

Clinton said the new version of the bill that surfaced this week is improved from its first draft, but troubling language that was removed was replaced by vague language that could still offer the same powers to the president in case of an emergency.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/

Thats right, your elected president wants to take the internet, a freedom if you will, away from you. This could happen when ever he considers something a cyber attack. What is with the Government control of the Obama administration? I enjoy all my freedoms and i feel like everyday Obama and his admin take one away. 2012 cant come sooner...


Kokuro_Kun

Hmm... something in this post makes me distrust it... what could it be?

Oh hi, you must be a liberal? Or maybe just a radical Obama follower? Please tell me which. No one ever told me Fox was 100% lying. You know, like all the time. thats news to me.

More libertarian than anything. I don't particularly like President Obama, but he's not the anti-christ that some make him out to be. Also, I like to watch Fox news for entertainment value (the other stations are so boring, and that's why they lose so bad in the ratings) but I wouldn'tever trust its reporting.

Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
Welcome to last year's news. Literally.Theokhoth
I noticed that as well. =P
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN UNDERSTAND THE BASIS TO WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT?? YOUR FREEDOMS! Their being stripped away and most of you dont even care. Some of you are just watching them go, expecting the government to spoon feed you. I wondered how this kinda stuff was happening but now i understand, theirs just so many of you that are misinformed.
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]

A Senate bill would offer President Obama emergency control of the Internet and may give him a "kill switch" to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks -- a move cybersecurity experts worry will choke off industry and civil liberties.

Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 emerged late Thursday, months after an initial version authored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., was blasted in Silicon Valley as dangerousgovernment intrusion.

"In the original bill they empowered the president to essentially turn off the Internet in the case of a 'cyber-emergency,' which they didn't define," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry.

"We think it's a very bad idea ... to put in legislation," he told FOXNews.com.

Clinton said the new version of the bill that surfaced this week is improved from its first draft, but troubling language that was removed was replaced by vague language that could still offer the same powers to the president in case of an emergency.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/

Thats right, your elected president wants to take the internet, a freedom if you will, away from you. This could happen when ever he considers something a cyber attack. What is with the Government control of the Obama administration? I enjoy all my freedoms and i feel like everyday Obama and his admin take one away. 2012 cant come sooner...


Laserwolf65

Hmm... something in this post makes me distrust it... what could it be?

How's this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts

[QUOTE="Laserwolf65"]

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]

A Senate bill would offer President Obama emergency control of the Internet and may give him a "kill switch" to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks -- a move cybersecurity experts worry will choke off industry and civil liberties.

Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 emerged late Thursday, months after an initial version authored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., was blasted in Silicon Valley as dangerousgovernment intrusion.

"In the original bill they empowered the president to essentially turn off the Internet in the case of a 'cyber-emergency,' which they didn't define," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry.

"We think it's a very bad idea ... to put in legislation," he told FOXNews.com.

Clinton said the new version of the bill that surfaced this week is improved from its first draft, but troubling language that was removed was replaced by vague language that could still offer the same powers to the president in case of an emergency.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/

Thats right, your elected president wants to take the internet, a freedom if you will, away from you. This could happen when ever he considers something a cyber attack. What is with the Government control of the Obama administration? I enjoy all my freedoms and i feel like everyday Obama and his admin take one away. 2012 cant come sooner...


Snipes_2

Hmm... something in this post makes me distrust it... what could it be?

How's this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

I've made a lot of threads lately, and your always their to support me :)

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
I thought that Lieberman was behind this absurd and unworkable bill
Avatar image for scorch-62
scorch-62

29763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 scorch-62
Member since 2006 • 29763 Posts
DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN UNDERSTAND THE BASIS TO WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT?? YOUR FREEDOMS! Their being stripped away and most of you dont even care. Some of you are just watching them go, expecting the government to spoon feed you. I wondered how this kinda stuff was happening but now i understand, theirs just so many of you that are misinformed. Kokuro_Kun
Then where were you to complain when the ability to declare Marshal Law was first established? That's all the bill is, and even then, this is incredibly old news.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#27 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
theirs just so many of you that are misinformed. Kokuro_Kun
Thread title: 'Obama wants control of the internet' Facts thread is based upon: Bill introduced by two senators; one democrat, one republican, debated before Obama even took office. Conclusion: Irony.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#28 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I don't know whether it's the writer of that article or the writer of the bill, but someone along the line there appears to have no idea what "the Internet" is, and I find that much more irksome than this bill, which unsurprisingly comes from Lieberman, the resident Senatorial troll.

Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="Laserwolf65"]

Hmm... something in this post makes me distrust it... what could it be?

Kokuro_Kun

How's this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

I've made a lot of threads lately, and your always their to support me :)

Nah, Not always. Try to help out when I can :)
Avatar image for hkmp5a2
hkmp5a2

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 hkmp5a2
Member since 2003 • 1315 Posts

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]

[QUOTE="Laserwolf65"]

Hmm... something in this post makes me distrust it... what could it be?

Laserwolf65

Oh hi, you must be a liberal? Or maybe just a radical Obama follower? Please tell me which. No one ever told me Fox was 100% lying. You know, like all the time. thats news to me.

More libertarian than anything. I don't particularly like President Obama, but he's not the anti-christ that some make him out to be. Also, I like to watch Fox news for entertainment value (the other stations are so boring, and that's why they lose so bad in the ratings) but I wouldn'tever trust its reporting.

underhanded insults are fun:) Fox news is just as reliable as any other news network, which isn't saying that much in regards to the other networks.
Avatar image for T_P_O
T_P_O

5388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 T_P_O
Member since 2008 • 5388 Posts
[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"] theirs just so many of you that are misinformed. Ninja-Hippo
Thread title: 'Obama wants control of the internet' Facts thread is based upon: Bill introduced by two senators; one democrat, one republican, debated before Obama even took office. Conclusion: Irony.

I lol'd.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

How's this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

Snipes_2
To be honest that one is more accurate than the Fox News one in that it includes this pivotal sentence: 'To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a "government shutdown or takeover of the Internet" and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. '
Avatar image for wstfld
wstfld

6375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 wstfld
Member since 2008 • 6375 Posts
Guys, I heard Obama wants to eat your first born child. I saw it on Fox News somewhere. I'll try and find the article.
Avatar image for Laserwolf65
Laserwolf65

6701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Laserwolf65
Member since 2003 • 6701 Posts
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

[QUOTE="Laserwolf65"]

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]

A Senate bill would offer President Obama emergency control of the Internet and may give him a "kill switch" to shut down online traffic by seizing private networks -- a move cybersecurity experts worry will choke off industry and civil liberties.

Details of a revamped version of the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 emerged late Thursday, months after an initial version authored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.V., was blasted in Silicon Valley as dangerousgovernment intrusion.

"In the original bill they empowered the president to essentially turn off the Internet in the case of a 'cyber-emergency,' which they didn't define," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which represents the telecommunications industry.

"We think it's a very bad idea ... to put in legislation," he told FOXNews.com.

Clinton said the new version of the bill that surfaced this week is improved from its first draft, but troubling language that was removed was replaced by vague language that could still offer the same powers to the president in case of an emergency.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/28/senate-president-emergency-control-internet/

Thats right, your elected president wants to take the internet, a freedom if you will, away from you. This could happen when ever he considers something a cyber attack. What is with the Government control of the Obama administration? I enjoy all my freedoms and i feel like everyday Obama and his admin take one away. 2012 cant come sooner...


Hmm... something in this post makes me distrust it... what could it be?

How's this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

touche.
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN UNDERSTAND THE BASIS TO WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT?? YOUR FREEDOMS! Their being stripped away and most of you dont even care. Some of you are just watching them go, expecting the government to spoon feed you. I wondered how this kinda stuff was happening but now i understand, theirs just so many of you that are misinformed. scorch-62
Then where were you to complain when the ability to declare Marshal Law was first established? That's all the bill is, and even then, this is incredibly old news.

Where was i to complain you say? Where was i to defend my self as an American Citizen enjoying the laws the founding fathers handed us so that we may enjoy a life without control by the government. Marshall Law wouldn't come into effect unless we got into a war on our grounds. I would gladly let people offering their lifes for me to use my home. I'm proud to have such people fight for me.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#36 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Where was i to complain you say? Where was i to defend my self as an American Citizen enjoying the laws the founding fathers handed us so that we may enjoy a life without control by the government. Marshall Law wouldn't come into effect unless we got into a war on our grounds. I would gladly let people offering their lifes for me to use my home. I'm proud to have such people fight for me.Kokuro_Kun
Er you realise that Marshall law isn't just about letting people use your home yes? And it is by no means just about war on American soil. It can be implemented during any time of national emergency.

Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"] theirs just so many of you that are misinformed. Ninja-Hippo
Thread title: 'Obama wants control of the internet' Facts thread is based upon: Bill introduced by two senators; one democrat, one republican, debated before Obama even took office. Conclusion: Irony.

Fail. Obama still wants control of the internet, this is just as far as he can get with our laws standing today.
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

How's this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

Ninja-Hippo
To be honest that one is more accurate than the Fox News one in that it includes this pivotal sentence: 'To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a "government shutdown or takeover of the Internet" and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. '

Also says this :"The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license. Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to "direct the national response to the cyber threat" if necessary for "the national defense and security." The White House is supposed to engage in "periodic mapping" of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies "shall share" requested information with the federal government. ("Cyber" is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)" And that line was from Jena Longo. Of course she won't say anything negative about the bill.
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"] Where was i to complain you say? Where was i to defend my self as an American Citizen enjoying the laws the founding fathers handed us so that we may enjoy a life without control by the government. Marshall Law wouldn't come into effect unless we got into a war on our grounds. I would gladly let people offering their lifes for me to use my home. I'm proud to have such people fight for me.Ninja-Hippo

Er you realise that Marshall law isn't just about letting people use your home yes? And it is by no means just about war on American soil. It can be implemented during any time of national emergency.

What do you think that could happen that they would want my home?

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#40 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"] theirs just so many of you that are misinformed. Kokuro_Kun
Thread title: 'Obama wants control of the internet' Facts thread is based upon: Bill introduced by two senators; one democrat, one republican, debated before Obama even took office. Conclusion: Irony.

Fail. Obama still wants control of the internet, this is just as far as he can get with our laws standing today.

So you're just ignoring the fact that it was debated before he even took office and co-drafted by republicans? That's cool...
Avatar image for smc91352
smc91352

7786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 smc91352
Member since 2009 • 7786 Posts
DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN UNDERSTAND THE BASIS TO WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT?? YOUR FREEDOMS! Their being stripped away and most of you dont even care. Some of you are just watching them go, expecting the government to spoon feed you. I wondered how this kinda stuff was happening but now i understand, theirs just so many of you that are misinformed. Kokuro_Kun
you people?
.

:P
Avatar image for Snipes_2
Snipes_2

17126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 Snipes_2
Member since 2009 • 17126 Posts

Guys, I heard Obama wants to eat your first born child. I saw it on Fox News somewhere. I'll try and find the article. wstfld
Could this be it? :o

http://barackobamaeatsbabies.com/

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
What do you think that could happen that they would want my home? A purse getting stolen?Kokuro_Kun
Terrorism. A natural disaster. A nation-wide blackout. :| That enough?
Avatar image for hkmp5a2
hkmp5a2

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 hkmp5a2
Member since 2003 • 1315 Posts

[QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"]DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN UNDERSTAND THE BASIS TO WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT?? YOUR FREEDOMS! Their being stripped away and most of you dont even care. Some of you are just watching them go, expecting the government to spoon feed you. I wondered how this kinda stuff was happening but now i understand, theirs just so many of you that are misinformed. smc91352
you people?
.

:P

What do you mean "you people?"

Avatar image for Vennligsinnet
Vennligsinnet

529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Vennligsinnet
Member since 2010 • 529 Posts

Well, that's Obama for you..we have only ourselves to blame..

Xx_Hopeless_xX

It's not just Obama. I can pretty well damn guarantee McCain would be doing the same thing if he was elected. Stuff like this is just enacted by our government in general. Nothing to do with what side they're on.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#46 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"]

How's this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

Snipes_2
To be honest that one is more accurate than the Fox News one in that it includes this pivotal sentence: 'To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a "government shutdown or takeover of the Internet" and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. '

Also says this :"The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license. Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to "direct the national response to the cyber threat" if necessary for "the national defense and security." The White House is supposed to engage in "periodic mapping" of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies "shall share" requested information with the federal government. ("Cyber" is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)" And that line was from Jena Longo. Of course she won't say anything negative about the bill.

And how does that in any way refute the fact that the bill in no way grants the President the ability to 'turn off' the internet as both Fox News and the TC say it does?
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Kokuro_Kun"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] Thread title: 'Obama wants control of the internet' Facts thread is based upon: Bill introduced by two senators; one democrat, one republican, debated before Obama even took office. Conclusion: Irony.

Fail. Obama still wants control of the internet, this is just as far as he can get with our laws standing today.

So you're just ignoring the fact that it was debated before he even took office and co-drafted by republicans? That's cool...

I like how you mention republicans like you automatically refer to me as a republican for not liking Obama :lol: The Obama administration is the only one pushing for this bill. No one else, as far i know.
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] To be honest that one is more accurate than the Fox News one in that it includes this pivotal sentence: 'To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a "government shutdown or takeover of the Internet" and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. '

Also says this :"The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license. Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to "direct the national response to the cyber threat" if necessary for "the national defense and security." The White House is supposed to engage in "periodic mapping" of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies "shall share" requested information with the federal government. ("Cyber" is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)" And that line was from Jena Longo. Of course she won't say anything negative about the bill.

And how does that in any way refute the fact that the bill in no way grants the President the ability to 'turn off' the internet as both Fox News and the TC say it does?

He cant simply turn it off at will, but whatever it is he considers a cyber attack, which since its under his opinion, could in fact be anything.
Avatar image for McJugga
McJugga

9453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 McJugga
Member since 2007 • 9453 Posts
Don't worry, I doubt Xaos would let it go without a fight.