Obama will seek congressional approval to go to war with Syria.

  • 183 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#51 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

I don't think he would have had to bother with this Syria nonsense if he hadn't gone off and run his mouth off about Assad "crossing the red line". Now he's got to try and back down from a war that is probably going to be expensive, highly unpopular and strategically pointless. Let's hope that he gets what he actually wants and congress votes against a war.

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

for ****'s sake, let someone else do it for once.

I don't know the specifics about chemical weapons use, but I imagine using them are internationally condemned by a multitude of nations.  So, again, I say...let someone else clean up someone else's mess for once.

France was really gung-ho about it early on, let them lead it.  We can toss in some air support and station a carrier near there, but let it be their fight.

mrbojangles25

France doesn't have the forces.

well, if France goes, so does the EU.  Maybe I should have just said EU.

France does have a sizeable military force, though, don't they?



The E.U. has no obligation to join in any offensive wars that a member state conducts. France's military, while being fairly powerful in absolute terms, doesn't have the force projection to reach Syria and topple the government. It can't really handle large scale overseas operations without U.S. support.
Avatar image for limpbizkit818
limpbizkit818

15044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 limpbizkit818
Member since 2004 • 15044 Posts

Obama tried to use the threat of force to stop Syria from using chemical weapons and Assad called his bluff. Russia and China in the UN don't support him and then the UK voted against a strike. Pretty embarrassing, but it's about on par for my expectations of Obama.

Avatar image for SwagSurf
SwagSurf

3022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 SwagSurf
Member since 2009 • 3022 Posts
Can't wait to hear from the left-wing dickriders
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#54 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Hey, I have an idea.  Don't do it.  

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#55 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="NationProtector"] Because it was not a war, thus it was not a war crime.NationProtector

 

No matter what you want to call it, when you invade another country, it's a war.  

No it's not.

 

Yes, it is.  Look up "war" and "act of war."

Avatar image for mmwmwmmwmwmm
mmwmwmmwmwmm

620

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 mmwmwmmwmwmm
Member since 2008 • 620 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

Probably so he can blame Republicans for anything that goes wrong over there.

Aljosa23

Yeah lol that's why it's awesome.

never understood why you're such a partisan hack for the democrats when you don't even live in the US.
Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
Scary stuff. This could actually pull all kinds of countries into the conflict on both sides. It's unlikely, but possible, that it becomes another world war.
Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts
Scary stuff. This could actually pull all kinds of countries into the conflict on both sides. It's unlikely, but possible, that it becomes another world war.chrisrooR
Nukes = no. Russia ain't gonna start a war over Syria.
Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#59 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts
Surprise nobody has mention that Congress doesn't meet until September 9 at the earliest, plus whatever time they take to have a vote. Obama is such a joke, where is the urgency?

I really don't understand how it's any of Americas business to intervene.

 

HyperWarlock
Because Obama is a moron who "made" a red line and now has to back it up or will whatever credibility he has left.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

I don't want another war. 

You'd think we'd learned from Iraq, but no. 

MakeMeaSammitch

 

Muslims are crazy? We've been known that.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

Surprise nobody has mention that Congress doesn't meet until September 9 at the earliest, plus whatever time they take to have a vote. Obama is such a joke, where is the urgency? [QUOTE="HyperWarlock"]

I really don't understand how it's any of Americas business to intervene.

 

Master_Live

Because Obama is a moron who "made" a red line and now has to back it up or will whatever credibility he has left.

I had forgotten this, but even better. I was fairly sure they were gearing up to start bombing as early as tomorrow. Nine days while only slight given that we are talking about lots of inevitable death is quite preferable.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

Can't wait to hear from the left-wing dickriders SwagSurf

 

You forgot about about the tinfoil hat ones:

 

Mr. Obama, that was not "the worst chemical attack of the 21st century"... The "worst chemical attack of the 21st century" was carried out in Iraq by your predecessor, the Bush administration, which used white phosphurus and nuclear depleted uranium, not only killing countless thousands of Iraqis, but with countless more Iraqis still suffering from the after-effects to this day... Why haven't Dick Cheney and the Bush administration been punished yet for their war crimes?

Jag85

Avatar image for Kevlar101
Kevlar101

6316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#63 Kevlar101
Member since 2011 • 6316 Posts
And the North Korea will declare war on the U.S., and then South Korea will declare war on North Korea, and then China will declare war on South Korea, and then The British will try and warn China, China will declare War on Britain, U.S. will Declare War on China, Germany will Declare War on China, Russia Will declare War on China, North Korea will declare war on Germany, Germany will try to invade North Korea, South Korea will say to stop, A German rouge kills South Koreans in mass for no reason, South Korea will blame it on Germany and declare War on South Korea, Italy will help Germany, The British will try to stop Germany, Italy will declare war on Britain, Germany will send troops and back-up, Britain will declare War on Germany, Germany will put South and North Korean under Military control or attempt it, The U.S. Will declare war on Germany, Japan will be trying to stop China, China will start attacking Japanese ships, Japan will declare war on China, Japan will try and take control of Hong Kong, to gain a foothold, the U.S. will try to intervene, Japan will try to go through Vietnam as a foothold, Vietnam declares war on Japan, The U.N. warns Japan of the consequences, Japanese soldiers that are angry blow up a U.S. Embassy, the French will eat some popcorn, UN troops are sent in, for some reason all the UN troops killed by the Japanese soldiers are french, France Declares war on Japan, U.S. sends troops and messages to Japanese administration, The British declare war on japan, Japan declares war on the French, Finland declares war on Japan, Japanese troops Try to force a foothold in Russia, Russia declares war on Japan, Japan declares war on Russia, Russian, U.S., British, and Chinese troops separate Japanese with Military control, Germany starts exterminating North Koreans in the labor camps, Jordan, Iran think that it's just and join Germany and declare war on everyone, The British throw some airplanes and bomb Jordan and Iran, The U.S. Troops with French Soldiers take back south Korea, Russia, U.S. and British takes North Korea, Chinese backs off and changes government, and helps invade Germany, Germany's remaining allies back off, war is over.NationProtector
My head hurts
Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#64 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

And the North Korea will declare war on the U.S., and then South Korea will declare war on North Korea, and then China will declare war on South Korea, and then The British will try and warn China, China will declare War on Britain, U.S. will Declare War on China, Germany will Declare War on China, Russia Will declare War on China, North Korea will declare war on Germany, Germany will try to invade North Korea, South Korea will say to stop, A German rouge kills South Koreans in mass for no reason, South Korea will blame it on Germany and declare War on South Korea, Italy will help Germany, The British will try to stop Germany, Italy will declare war on Britain, Germany will send troops and back-up, Britain will declare War on Germany, Germany will put South and North Korean under Military control or attempt it, The U.S. Will declare war on Germany, Japan will be trying to stop China, China will start attacking Japanese ships, Japan will declare war on China, Japan will try and take control of Hong Kong, to gain a foothold, the U.S. will try to intervene, Japan will try to go through Vietnam as a foothold, Vietnam declares war on Japan, The U.N. warns Japan of the consequences, Japanese soldiers that are angry blow up a U.S. Embassy, the French will eat some popcorn, UN troops are sent in, for some reason all the UN troops killed by the Japanese soldiers are french, France Declares war on Japan, U.S. sends troops and messages to Japanese administration, The British declare war on japan, Japan declares war on the French, Finland declares war on Japan, Japanese troops Try to force a foothold in Russia, Russia declares war on Japan, Japan declares war on Russia, Russian, U.S., British, and Chinese troops separate Japanese with Military control, Germany starts exterminating North Koreans in the labor camps, Jordan, Iran think that it's just and join Germany and declare war on everyone, The British throw some airplanes and bomb Jordan and Iran, The U.S. Troops with French Soldiers take back south Korea, Russia, U.S. and British takes North Korea, Chinese backs off and changes government, and helps invade Germany, Germany's remaining allies back off, war is over.NationProtector

The best part is that this actually makes sense when you read the whole thing!

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="NationProtector"]And the North Korea will declare war on the U.S., and then South Korea will declare war on North Korea, and then China will declare war on South Korea, and then The British will try and warn China, China will declare War on Britain, U.S. will Declare War on China, Germany will Declare War on China, Russia Will declare War on China, North Korea will declare war on Germany, Germany will try to invade North Korea, South Korea will say to stop, A German rouge kills South Koreans in mass for no reason, South Korea will blame it on Germany and declare War on South Korea, Italy will help Germany, The British will try to stop Germany, Italy will declare war on Britain, Germany will send troops and back-up, Britain will declare War on Germany, Germany will put South and North Korean under Military control or attempt it, The U.S. Will declare war on Germany, Japan will be trying to stop China, China will start attacking Japanese ships, Japan will declare war on China, Japan will try and take control of Hong Kong, to gain a foothold, the U.S. will try to intervene, Japan will try to go through Vietnam as a foothold, Vietnam declares war on Japan, The U.N. warns Japan of the consequences, Japanese soldiers that are angry blow up a U.S. Embassy, the French will eat some popcorn, UN troops are sent in, for some reason all the UN troops killed by the Japanese soldiers are french, France Declares war on Japan, U.S. sends troops and messages to Japanese administration, The British declare war on japan, Japan declares war on the French, Finland declares war on Japan, Japanese troops Try to force a foothold in Russia, Russia declares war on Japan, Japan declares war on Russia, Russian, U.S., British, and Chinese troops separate Japanese with Military control, Germany starts exterminating North Koreans in the labor camps, Jordan, Iran think that it's just and join Germany and declare war on everyone, The British throw some airplanes and bomb Jordan and Iran, The U.S. Troops with French Soldiers take back south Korea, Russia, U.S. and British takes North Korea, Chinese backs off and changes government, and helps invade Germany, Germany's remaining allies back off, war is over.THE_DRUGGIE

The best part is that this actually makes sense when you read the whole thing!

living up to your name tonight?

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#66 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

[QUOTE="NationProtector"]And the North Korea will declare war on the U.S., and then South Korea will declare war on North Korea, and then China will declare war on South Korea, and then The British will try and warn China, China will declare War on Britain, U.S. will Declare War on China, Germany will Declare War on China, Russia Will declare War on China, North Korea will declare war on Germany, Germany will try to invade North Korea, South Korea will say to stop, A German rouge kills South Koreans in mass for no reason, South Korea will blame it on Germany and declare War on South Korea, Italy will help Germany, The British will try to stop Germany, Italy will declare war on Britain, Germany will send troops and back-up, Britain will declare War on Germany, Germany will put South and North Korean under Military control or attempt it, The U.S. Will declare war on Germany, Japan will be trying to stop China, China will start attacking Japanese ships, Japan will declare war on China, Japan will try and take control of Hong Kong, to gain a foothold, the U.S. will try to intervene, Japan will try to go through Vietnam as a foothold, Vietnam declares war on Japan, The U.N. warns Japan of the consequences, Japanese soldiers that are angry blow up a U.S. Embassy, the French will eat some popcorn, UN troops are sent in, for some reason all the UN troops killed by the Japanese soldiers are french, France Declares war on Japan, U.S. sends troops and messages to Japanese administration, The British declare war on japan, Japan declares war on the French, Finland declares war on Japan, Japanese troops Try to force a foothold in Russia, Russia declares war on Japan, Japan declares war on Russia, Russian, U.S., British, and Chinese troops separate Japanese with Military control, Germany starts exterminating North Koreans in the labor camps, Jordan, Iran think that it's just and join Germany and declare war on everyone, The British throw some airplanes and bomb Jordan and Iran, The U.S. Troops with French Soldiers take back south Korea, Russia, U.S. and British takes North Korea, Chinese backs off and changes government, and helps invade Germany, Germany's remaining allies back off, war is over.Serraph105

The best part is that this actually makes sense when you read the whole thing!

lving up to your name tonight?

I'm as sober as your avatar is invisible.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

Good. Regardless of the result, Congress can be blamed now. 

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

The best part is that this actually makes sense when you read the whole thing!

THE_DRUGGIE

lving up to your name tonight?

I'm as sober as your avatar is invisible.

I can avoid being seen if I wish.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

Probably so he can blame Republicans for anything that goes wrong over there.

mmwmwmmwmwmm

Yeah lol that's why it's awesome.

never understood why you're such a partisan hack for the democrats when you don't even live in the US.

Just because I think the current GOP are scum doesn't mean I'm a Democrat you fool. smh

Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#70 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

lving up to your name tonight?

Serraph105

I'm as sober as your avatar is invisible.

I can avoid being seen if I wish.

Wait, I can see it again.

Hahaha, clever. Ha. Haha. I'm not crazy, YOU'RE CRAZY!

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="mmwmwmmwmwmm"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]Yeah lol that's why it's awesome.

Aljosa23

never understood why you're such a partisan hack for the democrats when you don't even live in the US.

Just because I think the current GOP are scum doesn't mean I'm a Democrat you fool. smh

really? I'm a democrat precisely because I think the current GOP are scum.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#72 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

Good. Regardless of the result, Congress can be blamed now.

jimkabrhel

So Congress is blamed for the Iraq War and not Bush? It seems most Americans blame Bush for that, so why wouldn't they blame Obama for any action that may occur in Syria?

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#73 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts
Maybe they should finish one war before starting the next.. since there are already multiple wars going on.
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#74 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

really? I'm a democrat precisely because I think the current GOP are scum.

Serraph105

I don't really fit in to any American party. If anything the closest political party I align with are the NDP (Canada).

Avatar image for YoshiYogurt
YoshiYogurt

6008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 YoshiYogurt
Member since 2010 • 6008 Posts
Why does he want to go. There is absolutely no reason to get involved in any war unless the U.S in danger(which it hasn't been in a LONG LONG time.)
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#76 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]

lving up to your name tonight?

Serraph105

I'm as sober as your avatar is invisible.

I can avoid being seen if I wish.

but can you disappear entirely, or is that a different thing, Strider?

p.s. Sauron the Great will help you regain your throne from Denethor if you conduct the halfling prisoners to him unspoilt.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#77 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

Good. Regardless of the result, Congress can be blamed now. 

jimkabrhel
Man, how bankrupt some people can be.
Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="mmwmwmmwmwmm"] never understood why you're such a partisan hack for the democrats when you don't even live in the US.Serraph105

Just because I think the current GOP are scum doesn't mean I'm a Democrat you fool. smh

really? I'm a democrat precisely because I think the current GOP are scum.

You don't have to be one or the other... I will never identify with either party. They both suck.
Avatar image for th3warr1or
th3warr1or

20637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#79 th3warr1or
Member since 2007 • 20637 Posts
Serious question. What is going on with the US government? Why are you looking to get yourself into another war?
Avatar image for THE_DRUGGIE
THE_DRUGGIE

25110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 140

User Lists: 0

#80 THE_DRUGGIE
Member since 2006 • 25110 Posts

Serious question. What is going on with the US government? Why are you looking to get yourself into another war? th3warr1or

Distracts us from all the domestic poverty.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

[QUOTE="Master_Live"]Surprise nobody has mention that Congress doesn't meet until September 9 at the earliest, plus whatever time they take to have a vote. Obama is such a joke, where is the urgency? [QUOTE="HyperWarlock"]

I really don't understand how it's any of Americas business to intervene.

 

Serraph105

Because Obama is a moron who "made" a red line and now has to back it up or will whatever credibility he has left.

I had forgotten this, but even better. I was fairly sure they were gearing up to start bombing as early as tomorrow. Nine days while only slight given that we are talking about lots of inevitable death is quite preferable.

it absolutely appears you are correct. Boehner and friends don't appear to be making any effort to call an emergency session of congress. And yes I'm cool with it.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

Congressional approval, France is supporting our cause (and is willing to help us), Britain isn't going to help us, wtf is going on here?

Avatar image for Gibsonsg527
Gibsonsg527

3313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Gibsonsg527
Member since 2010 • 3313 Posts

Oh great another war we have no business being in, fantastic! 

Avatar image for The_Lipscomb
The_Lipscomb

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 The_Lipscomb
Member since 2013 • 2603 Posts

Uh.. Can we not?

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#85 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="Pirate700"]

Probably so he can blame Republicans for anything that goes wrong over there.

Aljosa23

Yeah lol that's why it's awesome.

I hardly see why that would be "awesome". Quite frankly it would be irresponsible and reckless of Obama if we're to make these type of decisions in order to blame Republicans or any other group.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#86 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

This is gonna be interesting. Gop hawks vs themselves over actually agreeing with Obama.Person0
Are the GOP really as Hawkish as they are portrayed? Afterall didn't the U.S. get involved in Vietnam under Democrats and bring those forces home under a Republican President? The Afghan war and the Iraq War were both given Congressional approval with bipartisan support. Obama intervened in Libya without Congressional approval.

Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts

[QUOTE="Person0"]This is gonna be interesting. Gop hawks vs themselves over actually agreeing with Obama.whipassmt

Are the GOP really as Hawkish as they are portrayed? Afterall didn't the U.S. get involved in Vietnam under Democrats and bring those forces home under a Republican President? The Afghan war and the Iraq War were both given Congressional approval with bipartisan support. Obama intervened in Libya without Congressional approval.

vietnam was a long time ago. Iraq Republicans 215 for 6 against Democrats- 82 for 126 against
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#88 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

I'm very torn on this situation. International Law says that the use of chemical weapons is a terrible act and is banned for use against people, either military or civilian. A law becomes useless if it is unenforced. So on one hand the United States or some other international power has an obligation to go in and enforce this law, or else every other country would then know that it is perfectly acceptable to use chemical weapons because it becomes a completely unenforceable international agreement. But at the same time we have enough on our plate with Afghanistan and Iraq. We don't really need another war. I hope that our congressional leaders make the right decision. I certainly wouldn't want to be put in their position to make this decision.

Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts

I'm very torn on this situation. International Law says that the use of chemical weapons is a terrible act and is banned for use against people, either military or civilian. A law becomes useless if it is unenforced. So on one hand the United States or some other international power has an obligation to go in and enforce this law, or else every other country would then know that it is perfectly acceptable to use chemical weapons because it becomes a completely unenforceable international agreement. But at the same time we have enough on our plate with Afghanistan and Iraq. We don't really need another war. I hope that our congressional leaders make the right decision. I certainly wouldn't want to be put in their position to make this decision.

ferrari2001
The main problem is that we don't really know who used the chemical weapons. We can't hand out punishment if we don't know who did it. Er, we can, and Obama wants to, but that's ridiculous.
Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#90 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts
[QUOTE="ferrari2001"]

I'm very torn on this situation. International Law says that the use of chemical weapons is a terrible act and is banned for use against people, either military or civilian. A law becomes useless if it is unenforced. So on one hand the United States or some other international power has an obligation to go in and enforce this law, or else every other country would then know that it is perfectly acceptable to use chemical weapons because it becomes a completely unenforceable international agreement. But at the same time we have enough on our plate with Afghanistan and Iraq. We don't really need another war. I hope that our congressional leaders make the right decision. I certainly wouldn't want to be put in their position to make this decision.

Toxic-Seahorse
The main problem is that we don't really know who used the chemical weapons. We can't hand out punishment if we don't know who did it. Er, we can, and Obama wants to, but that's ridiculous.

But how can you say that "we don't really know"? Obama administration says high confidence intel says Assad regime did it.
Avatar image for nomsayin
nomsayin

1346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 nomsayin
Member since 2013 • 1346 Posts

[QUOTE="SwagSurf"]Can't wait to hear from the left-wing dickriders Jebus213

 

You forgot about about the tinfoil hat ones:

 

Mr. Obama, that was not "the worst chemical attack of the 21st century"... The "worst chemical attack of the 21st century" was carried out in Iraq by your predecessor, the Bush administration, which used white phosphurus and nuclear depleted uranium, not only killing countless thousands of Iraqis, but with countless more Iraqis still suffering from the after-effects to this day... Why haven't Dick Cheney and the Bush administration been punished yet for their war crimes?

Jag85

What exactly is "tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist" about that statement? Are you really this big of a dumb***? The suffering of Iraqis due to the U.S. invasion is well documented. But keep on blindly riding America's d*ck, jingoist ignoramus. 

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#92 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Person0"]This is gonna be interesting. Gop hawks vs themselves over actually agreeing with Obama.Person0

Are the GOP really as Hawkish as they are portrayed? Afterall didn't the U.S. get involved in Vietnam under Democrats and bring those forces home under a Republican President? The Afghan war and the Iraq War were both given Congressional approval with bipartisan support. Obama intervened in Libya without Congressional approval.

vietnam was a long time ago. Iraq Republicans 215 for 6 against Democrats- 82 for 126 against

Interesting. It seems like Democrats in the House were more opposed to the resolution authorizing force against Iraq than Democrats in the Senate.

Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts
[QUOTE="ferrari2001"]

I'm very torn on this situation. International Law says that the use of chemical weapons is a terrible act and is banned for use against people, either military or civilian. A law becomes useless if it is unenforced. So on one hand the United States or some other international power has an obligation to go in and enforce this law, or else every other country would then know that it is perfectly acceptable to use chemical weapons because it becomes a completely unenforceable international agreement. But at the same time we have enough on our plate with Afghanistan and Iraq. We don't really need another war. I hope that our congressional leaders make the right decision. I certainly wouldn't want to be put in their position to make this decision.

Toxic-Seahorse
The main problem is that we don't really know who used the chemical weapons. We can't hand out punishment if we don't know who did it. Er, we can, and Obama wants to, but that's ridiculous.

We have a lot evidence pointing to the govt, and none pointing at the rebels so.... not to mention whatever classified intel the govts have
Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Are the GOP really as Hawkish as they are portrayed? Afterall didn't the U.S. get involved in Vietnam under Democrats and bring those forces home under a Republican President? The Afghan war and the Iraq War were both given Congressional approval with bipartisan support. Obama intervened in Libya without Congressional approval.

whipassmt

vietnam was a long time ago. Iraq Republicans 215 for 6 against Democrats- 82 for 126 against

Interesting. It seems like Democrats in the House were more opposed to the resolution authorizing force against Iraq than Democrats in the Senate.

Well it was still R 48-1 vs D 29-21 So the GOP has definitely been more hawkish in recent years.
Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#95 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

I'm very torn on this situation. International Law says that the use of chemical weapons is a terrible act and is banned for use against people, either military or civilian. A law becomes useless if it is unenforced. So on one hand the United States or some other international power has an obligation to go in and enforce this law, or else every other country would then know that it is perfectly acceptable to use chemical weapons because it becomes a completely unenforceable international agreement. But at the same time we have enough on our plate with Afghanistan and Iraq. We don't really need another war. I hope that our congressional leaders make the right decision. I certainly wouldn't want to be put in their position to make this decision.

ferrari2001
Agree.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#96 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Person0"] vietnam was a long time ago. Iraq Republicans 215 for 6 against Democrats- 82 for 126 against Person0

Interesting. It seems like Democrats in the House were more opposed to the resolution authorizing force against Iraq than Democrats in the Senate.

Well it was still R 48-1 vs D 29-21 So the GOP has definitely been more hawkish in recent years.

Perhaps on that one war. I don't know of any vote on Libya, and we'll see what happens with regard to Syria.

What was the vote like on the Afghan war?

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#97 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

He said any operation would be limited, ruling out a ground invasion. Congress is to reconvene on 9 September.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23918157 

So that means we're going to drone Syria back the stone age. Should be an intersting next couple of months, especially being so close to Creech AFB.

Avatar image for deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
deactivated-59f03d6ce656b

2944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 deactivated-59f03d6ce656b
Member since 2009 • 2944 Posts

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Interesting. It seems like Democrats in the House were more opposed to the resolution authorizing force against Iraq than Democrats in the Senate.

whipassmt

Well it was still R 48-1 vs D 29-21 So the GOP has definitely been more hawkish in recent years.

Perhaps on that one war. I don't know of any vote on Libya, and we'll see what happens with regard to Syria.

What was the vote like on the Afghan war?

No vote on Libya. Afghanistan wasn't voted on as a war either. and the resolution that allowed it was voted 3 days after 9-11 so can't blame any reps for voting for it.

Avatar image for EagleEyedOne
EagleEyedOne

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 EagleEyedOne
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

"Go to war"

 

Congress will make sure he won't be able to put boots on the groud.

Avatar image for Amvis
Amvis

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#100 Amvis
Member since 2007 • 510 Posts

Hurray! I don't want us to go to war with yet another country, and leaving it in the hands of people who can't seem to accomplish anything seems to me to be the perfect way to not do so.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/world/middleeast/syria.html

Serraph105

The crazy thing is that he also said he believes he doesn't need congressional approval in the same announcement. He's just doing it to "be nice." So I worry, that if even if Congress strikes down the idea of going to war that the president would do it anyways. It's kinda scary.

Also, everyone is complaining that Boehner isn't calling for a special session of Congress. If my civics class served me well in the 9th grade, if I recall when it comes to war it's the president's responsibility to summon a special session of Congress. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am. So blaming the speaker, no matter how much you dislike him, is really misplaced here.