sounds like you are still bitter he won. It's okay man, you'll get over it.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="remmbermytitans"]do you really think Barack Obama can do ANYTHING in 10 days? Not even Bush did anything in 10 days, not even Reagan did anything in 10 days. YOU couldn't do anything in 10 days. .mysterylobsterHe significantly weakened our country in 10 days by closing Gitmo. That's one promise he followed through on.
I agree.
I've been stockpiling guns just in case Al Qaeda decides to invade the USA. I just don't believe our military will be able to stop them after it happens.
Hey, it's not my fault he broke his own rule about lobbyists days after making it, or that his rule on bill signings was broken with the very first bill that passed his desk. I didn't expect to be making this thread so soon.The guy's been president for like 10 days and we already have people making lists on "broken promises"? I mean, I support holding politicians' feet to the fire and all that, but...
GabuEx
Hey, it's not my fault he broke his own rule about lobbyists days after making it, or that his rule on bill signings was broken with the very first bill that passed his desk. I didn't expect to be making this thread so soon. mysterylobster
No offense, but I never cease to be weirded out by the way in which Obama's detractors seem to have astronomically higher expectations for the guy than his supporters. Every time Obama does something, they're always like "See? He's not a Messiah!" and his supporters are just like "So? We kinda knew that."
Ah... partisanship at its very finest.
Here's the way I see it:
We had 8 years of Clinton's inaction in foreign affairs. The Republicans moaned and cried.
We had 8 years of Bush's inaction in domestic affairs. The Democrats moaned and cried.
This is the beginning of the Republican's turn to moan and cry. That's "change," right?
(It's also the reason I stay an independent. ;) )
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]Hey, it's not my fault he broke his own rule about lobbyists days after making it, or that his rule on bill signings was broken with the very first bill that passed his desk. I didn't expect to be making this thread so soon. GabuEx
No offense, but I never cease to be weirded out by the way in which Obama's detractors seem to have astronomically higher expectations for the guy than his supporters. Every time Obama does something, they're always like "See? He's not a Messiah!" and his supporters are just like "so?"
Nobody has lower expectations for Obama than I do, and still he finds ways to surprise me.In one example, it's not even a campaign promise that he failed to keep, but an executive order made while he was President that he turned around and broke days after issuing it. This is stunning, sub-George Bush stuff. It amazes me that Obama's supporters overlook these things so easily.
Nobody has lower expectations for Obama than I do, and still he finds ways to surprise me.mysterylobster
The problem with this thread is that it's basically one huge straw man argument. Contrary to belief among Obama's detractors, not everyone who voted for him expected him to be the return of Jesus; they expected him to be a decent president who would do a better job than Bush did. I don't even know what "rule on bill signings" you're talking about, and quite frankly I really don't care, and judging from the reaction on this thread, neither does anyone else. So, it seems like a logical conclusion to me that you're expecting something of Obama that none of his supporters do.
The guy's been president for like 10 days and we already have people making lists on "broken promises"? I mean, I support holding politicians' feet to the fire and all that, but...
Hey, it's not my fault he broke his own rule about lobbyists days after making it, or that his rule on bill signings was broken with the very first bill that passed his desk. I didn't expect to be making this thread so soon. So do you want him to fail too?[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]Hey, it's not my fault he broke his own rule about lobbyists days after making it, or that his rule on bill signings was broken with the very first bill that passed his desk. I didn't expect to be making this thread so soon. GabuEx
No offense, but I never cease to be weirded out by the way in which Obama's detractors seem to have astronomically higher expectations for the guy than his supporters. Every time Obama does something, they're always like "See? He's not a Messiah!" and his supporters are just like "So? We kinda knew that."
The implied expectations seem weird, but it fits the rhetoric pattern in a way. Even before the election you had a lot of news stories talking about how all the polls were wrong and McCain would win and electoral landslide! Claims that "OMG the election is over, Obama said X" or "Obama connections exposed! OCTOBER SUPRISE!" or the best "Obama is going to go to war with Iran!" and such. All were overblown and some approached the issue almost as if they were supporters and now horrified by the news they learned of.Maybe it is some sort of indirect straw man with an attempt to plant whatever sentiment they'd like their opponent supporters to feel. That or it all seems to be some weird attempt at prophecy, as if repeating such stuff enough times will make it true or create the outcome predicted. It is weird disconnected from the world in an odd sort of way.
It is kind of like the Pailin predictions where she supposedly would attract disillusioned Clinton voters. Who with any real understanding of who the Clinton supporters were and what they believe actually believed they'd vote for Palin just because she's a woman? If anything such claims hurt their own party, they believe their own smoke and it hurts them.
The problem with this thread is that it's basically one huge straw man argument. Contrary to belief among Obama's detractors, not everyone who voted for him expected him to be the return of Jesus; they expected him to be a decent president who would do a better job than Bush did.
This thread was never about Obama supporters; it's about Obama's broken promises. Obama should be held accountable for his actions regardless of what people expect from him.
I don't even know what "rule on bill signings" you're talking about, and quite frankly I really don't care, and judging from the reaction on this thread, neither does anyone else.
It's always a good idea to read the first post before responding.
GabuEx
Ah... partisanship at its very finest.
Here's the way I see it:
We had 8 years of Clinton's inaction in foreign affairs. The Republicans moaned and cried.
We had 8 years of Bush's inaction in domestic affairs. The Democrats moaned and cried.
This is the beginning of the Republican's turn to moan and cry. That's "change," right?
(It's also the reason I stay an independent. ;) )
OrkHammer007
At least someone here can see whats going on.
This thread was never about Obama supporters; it's about Obama's broken promises. Obama should be held accountable for his actions regardless of what people expect from him.
mysterylobster
For the entire campaign, Obama's detractors accused his supporters of thinking him a Messiah and jumped on every single thing he did in an attempt to prove that wrong. This thread is no different. It basically assumes that Obama's supporters care so deeply about the perfection of their savior that they would immediately become disenchanted by any minor nitpicks people might be able to find.
It's always a good idea to read the first post before responding.
mysterylobster
Having read the section that you're talking about, I really could not care less about that. I'd never even heard of this promise before today. Wait five days, sign it immediately, I don't see why it matters or why anyone would be jumping up and down saying that Obama changed his mind on such a complete triviality. Again, you're expecting more from Obama than his supporters expect.
The guy's been president for like 10 days and we already have people making lists on "broken promises"? I mean, I support holding politicians' feet to the fire and all that, but...
Hey, it's not my fault he broke his own rule about lobbyists days after making it, or that his rule on bill signings was broken with the very first bill that passed his desk. I didn't expect to be making this thread so soon. So do you want him to fail too? Absolutely not. I hope he succeeds, but I know he can only succeed by changing many of his positions. Luckily for us, he seems rather adept at this. I wish him the best and pray for America.[QUOTE="bsman00"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"] Hey, it's not my fault he broke his own rule about lobbyists days after making it, or that his rule on bill signings was broken with the very first bill that passed his desk. I didn't expect to be making this thread so soon. mysterylobsterSo do you want him to fail too? Absolutely not. I hope he succeeds, but I know he can only succeed by changing many of his positions. Luckily for us, he seems rather adept at this. I wish him the best and pray for America. Translation: He can only succeed by becoming a conservative Republican?
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]This thread was never about Obama supporters; it's about Obama's broken promises. Obama should be held accountable for his actions regardless of what people expect from him.
GabuEx
For the entire campaign, Obama's detractors accused his supporters of thinking him a Messiah and jumped on every single thing he did in an attempt to prove that wrong. This thread is no different. It basically assumes that Obama's supporters care so deeply about the perfection of their savior that they would immediately become disenchanted by any minor nitpicks people might be able to find.
I would hardly call nominating a defense lobbyist to the Pentagon a "minor nitpick" when days earlier he specifically said that would have no place in his administration. You can question my reasons for bringing up these issues, but that doesn't make them any less serious.You're doing exactly what others have done, which is to go after me and my reasons for posting this instead of commenting on Obama's broken promises. It's easier, I guess, to blame Obama's detractors instead of taking a hard look at your candidate.
He significantly weakened our country in 10 days by closing Gitmo. That's one promise he followed through on.[QUOTE="mysterylobster"][QUOTE="remmbermytitans"]do you really think Barack Obama can do ANYTHING in 10 days? Not even Bush did anything in 10 days, not even Reagan did anything in 10 days. YOU couldn't do anything in 10 days. .LosDaddie
I agree.
I've been stockpiling guns just in case Al Qaeda decides to invade the USA. I just don't believe our military will be able to stop them after it happens.
umm what would the attack us with rock, sticks maybe some hand guns... we kick there efffin butt if the stepped foot on our soil... they cant even make it over here[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]This thread was never about Obama supporters; it's about Obama's broken promises. Obama should be held accountable for his actions regardless of what people expect from him.
GabuEx
For the entire campaign, Obama's detractors accused his supporters of thinking him a Messiah and jumped on every single thing he did in an attempt to prove that wrong.
The "Messiah" line was just a Limbaugh talking point his listeners kept regurgitating. He was the only radio pundit to use the term.
You're being unreasonable if you expect all of Obama's promises to be fulfilled in his first few weeks of office.VandalvideoI don't expect all his promises to be fulfilled in a few weeks. This is about promises that have been hastily broken.
He's been in office for less than a month... :|Blu_Falcon37I know. The speed in which he broke his own promises amazes even me.
You shouldn't be judging him until he is atleast two years into the presidency.VandalvideoYou and some others seem to think this is a comment on Obama in general. It's not. As I said, if I was going to really criticize Obama, I'd go after the promises he did keep, since those are the ones that will damage America. This thread is just about broken promises, for those who care to keep score.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]You shouldn't be judging him until he is atleast two years into the presidency.mysterylobsterYou and some others seem to think this is a comment on Obama in general. It's not. As I said, if I was going to really criticize Obama, I'd go after the promises he did keep, since those are the ones that will damage America. This thread is just about broken promises, for those who care to keep score. Like I said, you cannot blame Obama for some actions that he has made in the first few weeks. There is exigency and expediency involved. In all due haste, he may still keep his promises. Give him time. And the Lilly Ledbetter thing was unfair. That bill has been in circulation for weeks. Heck I'VE read the entire dang thing.
And the Lilly Ledbetter thing was unfair. That bill has been in circulation for weeks. Heck I'VE read the entire dang thing.VandalvideoIt wasn't available on the White House website for review. Obama's promise specifically stated that he wouldn't sign a non-emergency bill without "giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days." You might think this is minor, but it's a part of Obama's plan for transparency, which he's made a lot of noise about.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]And the Lilly Ledbetter thing was unfair. That bill has been in circulation for weeks. Heck I'VE read the entire dang thing.mysterylobsterIt wasn't available on the White House website for review. Obama's promise specifically stated that he wouldn't sign a non-emergency bill without "giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days." You might think this is minor, but it's a part of Obama's plan for transparency, which he's made a lot of noise about. The dang thing is available through the webster senate services that all senate people have access to, and has been available for a month or so. As a senatorial intern I'VE seen the entire dang thing. If I had access, Obama had freaking access.
[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]Ah... partisanship at its very finest.
Here's the way I see it:
We had 8 years of Clinton's inaction in foreign affairs. The Republicans moaned and cried.
We had 8 years of Bush's inaction in domestic affairs. The Democrats moaned and cried.
This is the beginning of the Republican's turn to moan and cry. That's "change," right?
(It's also the reason I stay an independent. ;) )
DaBrainz
At least someone here can see whats going on.
It's hard to miss if you're paying attention. :lol:Here's the entire script for American political discourse in the years since I was born:
"OMG Watergate!!!" *everyone runs to the Democrats*... "OMG GAS PRICES AND SHORTAGES!!!" *everyone runs to the Republicans* "...OMG Somalia and NEW TAXES!!!" *everyone runs to the Democrats* ..."OMG Monica Lewinsky!!!" *everyone runs to the Republicans* ..."OMG Iraq and Gitmo!!!" *everyone runs to the Democrats*
In two years, it'll be "OMG *insert something insane here*!!!" and everyone will start running back to the Republicans... including many of you who have bashed them in just this thread alone. Guaranteed.
Meanwhile, several people have tried to start third parties to challenge the status quo. They've been marginalized and, in many cases, out-right flamed for even daring to challenge the Mighty Republicrat Monopoly (although, to be fair, both Ross Perot and Ralph Nader are certifiable nut-jobs).
Regardless of what he does/doesn't do in the Oval Office, Obama is still "business as usual," and won't make one shred of significant difference in the grand scheme of things, just because he's a Democrat. The only real change we need is a reliable third party that represents people, not empty ideology.
Speaking of broken promises... Mysterylobster promised to stop posting in OT if the McCain/Palin ticket didn't get elected.. I dont have time to search the topics to find that post, but why would anyone take one promise breakers words against another? I thought christianity frowned upon lying? Maybe thats just my assumption.. And yeah feel free to not acknowledge this post like you did last time I called you out on this ML...
On-topic, I honeslty wasn't expecting Obama to 100% redesign American politics in one month, and to be honest his efforts to change some flaws in our system is apparent.. There are steps being taken in the right direction, its just not a giant leap..
The Dems and Repubs are equal halves of the national lobotomy.
It wouldn't be much better under one of those neocons.
Do you even realize what kind of list Bush has?Considering the fact that I despise Bush for betraying conservatives, yes, I have some idea. There's really no point in going over those things again, while with Obama, you have various people in the media not doing their job. Many people in this thread had no idea about these betrayals before I posted this list, so it's worth something, at least.links136
Speaking of broken promises... Mysterylobster promised to stop posting in OT if the McCain/Palin ticket didn't get elected..warbmxjohn
Not quite. What I said was that I didn't think I'd have any reason to post here again if Obama won. Well, I found a reason. Several in fact.
If you guys don't like my political threads, blame the mods. I wouldn't post political discussions if they let me post "hot guys" threads. Would you rather have this or pics of ripped abs dripping with man sweat?
[QUOTE="links136"]Do you even realize what kind of list Bush has?Considering the fact that I despise Bush for betraying conservatives, yes, I have some idea. There's really no point in going over those things again, while with Obama, you have various people in the media not doing their job.mysterylobster
so you judge a 4 year long term after 10 days?
[QUOTE="mysterylobster"][QUOTE="links136"]Do you even realize what kind of list Bush has?Considering the fact that I despise Bush for betraying conservatives, yes, I have some idea. There's really no point in going over those things again, while with Obama, you have various people in the media not doing their job.links136
so you judge a 4 year long term after 10 days?
Once again, I'm not making any judgment on Obama in this thread, only providing a list of broken promises, which I think people should at least be aware of.You forgot about how during the campaign Obama said that we needed a better Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy than just bombing villages and killing innocent people, but on his second day in office, we bombed villages and killed 17 innocent people.fidosimThanks, I'll research this.
[QUOTE="fidosim"]You forgot about how during the campaign Obama said that we needed a better Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy than just bombing villages and killing innocent people, but on his second day in office, we bombed villages and killed 17 innocent people.mysterylobsterThanks, I'll research this. Happened in a Pakistani border province, I could be wrong about the specific day, but it was a few days after he took office.
This reads like the Sony failed promises thread. :PJandurini had the similar thoughts when i saw the thread's title
Not quite. What I said was that I didn't think I'd have any reason to post here again if Obama won. Well, I found a reason. Several in fact.You can post whatever you like this isn't warbmxjohnspot.com.. :PIf you guys don't like my political threads, blame the mods. I wouldn't post political discussions if they let me post "hot guys" threads. Would you rather have this or pics of ripped abs dripping with man sweat?
mysterylobster
But its really tiring to regularly see threads deeply aiming at attacking liberals or praising conservatives.. Or even vice versa, tbh it seems as though you (and some others) yearn to encourage separation of humans through ideals.. I may not agree with conservatives but I do not feel they are the enemy, they are Americans and besides some petty differences we are all much more alike than some people would like.. Becoming a more united America or even world is pretty difficult if we have individuals on a personal crusade of their beliefs so strongly they refuse to acknowledge any positive value in the "opposition"...
I post in these threads and argue to solely defend my rational and intentions, not to attack your ideals. Now, can you say the same?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment