Anyone up to go to iran. Â
There are currently no plans to release the film in Iran, but bootleg DVD copies of the movie are already in the marketplace there.
They have it on DVD!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Anyone up to go to iran. Â
There are currently no plans to release the film in Iran, but bootleg DVD copies of the movie are already in the marketplace there.
They have it on DVD!
I dont see how there could be a sequel.[QUOTE="princemarth23"][QUOTE="Alex8"]300 was good i never like fantasy movie but this one was a great one. The story was awsome and just hope to see a second one.SaintLeonidas
The Battle of Platea ( battle at the end of 300) or The Battle of Salamis (large naval battle,athenians vs. persians).
Don't worry, next year we'll have  Hannibal the Conqueror with Vin Diesel http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382731/ and  2  LOTR  movies.:D[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I dont see how there could be a sequel.[QUOTE="princemarth23"][QUOTE="Alex8"]300 was good i never like fantasy movie but this one was a great one. The story was awsome and just hope to see a second one.gs_gear
The Battle of Platea ( battle at the end of 300) or The Battle of Salamis (large naval battle,athenians vs. persians).
Don't worry, next year we'll have  Hannibal the Conqueror with Vin Diesel http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382731/ and  2  LOTR  movies.:D[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I have it on my PC. :DAnyone up to go to iran.
There are currently no plans to release the film in Iran, but bootleg DVD copies of the movie are already in the marketplace there.
They have it on DVD!
gs_gear
[QUOTE="gs_gear"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I have it on my PC. :DAnyone up to go to iran.
There are currently no plans to release the film in Iran, but bootleg DVD copies of the movie are already in the marketplace there.
They have it on DVD!
6icks_tea_4hoar
[QUOTE="gs_gear"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I dont see how there could be a sequel.[QUOTE="princemarth23"][QUOTE="Alex8"]300 was good i never like fantasy movie but this one was a great one. The story was awsome and just hope to see a second one.6icks_tea_4hoar
The Battle of Platea ( battle at the end of 300) or The Battle of Salamis (large naval battle,athenians vs. persians).
Don't worry, next year we'll have Hannibal the Conqueror with Vin Diesel http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382731/ and 2 LOTR movies.:D[QUOTE="6icks_tea_4hoar"][QUOTE="gs_gear"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I dont see how there could be a sequel.[QUOTE="princemarth23"][QUOTE="Alex8"]300 was good i never like fantasy movie but this one was a great one. The story was awsome and just hope to see a second one.gs_gear
The Battle of Platea ( battle at the end of 300) or The Battle of Salamis (large naval battle,athenians vs. persians).
Don't worry, next year we'll have Hannibal the Conqueror with Vin Diesel http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382731/ and 2 LOTR movies.:D[QUOTE="gs_gear"][QUOTE="6icks_tea_4hoar"][QUOTE="gs_gear"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I dont see how there could be a sequel.[QUOTE="princemarth23"][QUOTE="Alex8"]300 was good i never like fantasy movie but this one was a great one. The story was awsome and just hope to see a second one.6icks_tea_4hoar
The Battle of Platea ( battle at the end of 300) or The Battle of Salamis (large naval battle,athenians vs. persians).
Don't worry, next year we'll have Hannibal the Conqueror with Vin Diesel http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382731/ and 2 LOTR movies.:Dhave you read it, it has a big story, they couls seperate it.
[QUOTE="gs_gear"][QUOTE="6icks_tea_4hoar"][QUOTE="gs_gear"][QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]I dont see how there could be a sequel.[QUOTE="princemarth23"][QUOTE="Alex8"]300 was good i never like fantasy movie but this one was a great one. The story was awsome and just hope to see a second one.6icks_tea_4hoar
The Battle of Platea ( battle at the end of 300) or The Battle of Salamis (large naval battle,athenians vs. persians).
Don't worry, next year we'll have Hannibal the Conqueror with Vin Diesel http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0382731/ and 2 LOTR movies.:DWhat is the content like in 300? I mean like the sexual content, is it appropriate for a 13 year old (brother). Skiramdoogorgo and leonidas did it in like 4 positions.
What is the content like in 300? I mean like the sexual content, is it appropriate for a 13 year old (brother). SkiramdooDude you worry about the sexual content in a movie like 300?:| You should worry about the fight scenes. Anyway this movie is Rated R,  but I don't think that seeing a few boobs will harm your brother.:P
[QUOTE="Aramand"]I think the movie was horrible. Specifically the camera work. Did they have to go into slow motion every freakin' time someone died? I want to slap everyone who was in the editing room. The angle on alot of the shots was bugging me too.IT... IS... BASED ON A COMIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and it in a comic book - it had all this bs... i didn't like how they showed Persians too, but it is not the point of the movie it's a holywood movie - they don't care about history - it's action that makes people spend their money on.
And who's idea was it to make all the Persians look hideous? I don't think people are dumb enough to need stuff like that to identify the villains of the story.
Also...leather speedos? A bit too fruity for me.
Davidhye
No, it tells me that you have no pride, no integrity, and due to the sad insults you post, no creativity. Oh noes, I have 2000+ posts, and that didn't give me some hidden insight into life? Your avi gave me a hint, but now It's clear that you have no clue. You found someone else's opinion of movie greatness unsatisfying, I, (in similar fashion) pointed out that clearly your movie pleasure can be none too amazing either, as no self respecting movie critic would touch a ND avi if you paid them. I also wanted to find out if you were any fun to play with, like so many of your fellow boradmates, but alas, no. In conclusion, weak comebacks, weak judgements, and an overinflated sense of ego leads you to failure. *Insert some immature picture that discredits the entire vomit inducing ego trip that came before it*
ranger_waha
[QUOTE="Davidhye"][QUOTE="Aramand"]I think the movie was horrible. Specifically the camera work. Did they have to go into slow motion every freakin' time someone died? I want to slap everyone who was in the editing room. The angle on alot of the shots was bugging me too.IT... IS... BASED ON A COMIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and it in a comic book - it had all this bs... i didn't like how they showed Persians too, but it is not the point of the movie it's a holywood movie - they don't care about history - it's action that makes people spend their money on.
And who's idea was it to make all the Persians look hideous? I don't think people are dumb enough to need stuff like that to identify the villains of the story.
Also...leather speedos? A bit too fruity for me.
Aramand
the only ugly looking persians was the immortals and they explained why they looked the way they did. I didnt see anything wrong with the camera, plus is was a new thing they were doing, no director knows exactly how to make perfect camera angles when they are shooting nothing but green screens.
Movie made Persians look like a backward society
Persians as we all know together with Greeks had great influences on modern culture.They're the founders of many things and they one of the earliest advanced civilaztions
Persian were not slaves,actually Cyrus(a persian king) prepared the first(??)human rights
Women were equal to man in Persian society,there were even generals
And as I know there weren't any slavery in that society
The army was large and yes pretty badly organised when compared to Greeks
Movie made Persians look like a backward society
Persians as we all know together with Greeks had great influences on modern culture.They're the founders of many things and they one of the earliest advanced civilaztions
Persian were not slaves,actually Cyrus(a persian king) prepared the first(??)human rights
Women were equal to man in Persian society,there were even generals
And as I know there weren't any slavery in that society
The army was large and yes pretty badly organised when compared to Greeks
sentencedogu
how the hell did they look like a backward society?
[QUOTE="sentencedogu"]Movie made Persians look like a backward society
Persians as we all know together with Greeks had great influences on modern culture.They're the founders of many things and they one of the earliest advanced civilaztions
Persian were not slaves,actually Cyrus(a persian king) prepared the first(??)human rights
Women were equal to man in Persian society,there were even generals
And as I know there weren't any slavery in that society
The army was large and yes pretty badly organised when compared to Greeks
SaintLeonidas
how the hell did they look like a backward society?
Leonidas always said things like"they're coming to destory free man,good people...etc
[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="sentencedogu"]Movie made Persians look like a backward society
Persians as we all know together with Greeks had great influences on modern culture.They're the founders of many things and they one of the earliest advanced civilaztions
Persian were not slaves,actually Cyrus(a persian king) prepared the first(??)human rights
Women were equal to man in Persian society,there were even generals
And as I know there weren't any slavery in that society
The army was large and yes pretty badly organised when compared to Greeks
sentencedogu
how the hell did they look like a backward society?
Leonidas always said things like"they're coming to destory free man,good people...etc
well the persians intentions was to destroy greece. Plus no matter how the govenrment of persia was they were conquerors. They were the biggest empire at the time, and they didnt get it by being nice freedom lovers, they had to fight ,pillage, kill and conqueror to gain the land they had, and there next stop was greece, however greece wouldnt go down with out a fight, and in the end greece was able to stop the persians.
I just saw 300 in IMAX. I really don't see what the hype is all about. Sure, it was cool looking and all but that's about all there was to the movie. Fairly average movie.NearTheEnd
wow nice waste on money, word to the wise go see a movie in a regular theather before you waste time and money on imax.
[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]I just saw 300 in IMAX. I really don't see what the hype is all about. Sure, it was cool looking and all but that's about all there was to the movie. Fairly average movie.SaintLeonidas
wow nice waste on money, word to the wise go see a movie in a regular theather before you waste time and money on imax.
:| Wouldn't it be a "waste on money" to see a mediocre movie twice? It looked like a cool movie to see in imax and it was. Worth the extra dollar or two I paid for it.[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]I just saw 300 in IMAX. I really don't see what the hype is all about. Sure, it was cool looking and all but that's about all there was to the movie. Fairly average movie.NearTheEnd
wow nice waste on money, word to the wise go see a movie in a regular theather before you waste time and money on imax.
:| Wouldn't it be a "waste on money" to see a mediocre movie twice? It looked like a cool movie to see in imax and it was. Worth the extra dollar or two I paid for it.but it was only mediocore to you. i loved it so i would go see it in imax, and iam in a week. But if yeah havent seen it before yeah should of went to see it at a regular theather.
By the way, does anyone know the music that plays in the 300 trailers? That music that usually kicks in, well, after Leonidas kicks the Persian emmisary down the abyss?CaptHawkeye
nine inch nails "just like you imagined", http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdmvml1J9UY
the king returns is before that part when he kicks the guy.
why in the world would you make 2 movies based on one book?6icks_tea_4hoar
[QUOTE="6icks_tea_4hoar"]why in the world would you make 2 movies based on one book?metalmonkey268
no cause there is three lotr books so they made three movies, there is only one hobbit book and they want to make 2 movies.
The Lord of the Rings is one book.
It's split up into three now for the sake of the consumer, but it was originally one book.
metalmonkey268
one book but it had three different volumes in it, they made a movie for each.
is this movie historically accurate? i know the battle really happened and it was one of hte greatest. but was it really 300 vs a million or it was made up by the graphic novel? thnxmixedplanet
anceint historians say it was 2mil-5mil, historians now think it wass more like 250,000, but no one really knows. Its not historically accurate, most of it actually happened, but its based off the graphic novel.
is this movie historically accurate? i know the battle really happened and it was one of hte greatest. but was it really 300 vs a million or it was made up by the graphic novel? thnxmixedplanetIt was vs 7,000 but the whole big army was 1/2 a million people.
[QUOTE="mixedplanet"]is this movie historically accurate? i know the battle really happened and it was one of hte greatest. but was it really 300 vs a million or it was made up by the graphic novel? thnxirunongamesIt was vs 7,000 but the whole big army was 1/2 a million people.
yeah it was 300 spartans, 700 thespains, and a bunch of other greeks.
but did sparta really win in the battle? i heard it was a distraction to maintain the main sparta army.mixedplanet
the 300 spartans lost that battle but there kill death ratio really made it a vistory for them, there fight cause moral to grow in greece. A year later the greeks beat the persians at the battle of platea, were it was 10000 spartans and 30,000 greeks vs the persians.
so, the spartans and the greeks are different? i thought greek army called themselves spartans.mixedplanet
greece at the time was seperated into a bunch of small city states, like sparta and athens.
[QUOTE="mixedplanet"]but did sparta really win in the battle? i heard it was a distraction to maintain the main sparta army.SaintLeonidas
the 300 spartans lost that battle but there kill death ratio really made it a vistory for them, there fight cause moral to grow in greece. A year later the greeks beat the persians at the battle of platea, were it was 10000 spartans and 30,000 greeks vs the persians.
Seems pretty close, although this Wiki says a bit different, appears that the Greeks/ Spartans were still out numbered.[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="mixedplanet"]but did sparta really win in the battle? i heard it was a distraction to maintain the main sparta army.jd7-03
the 300 spartans lost that battle but there kill death ratio really made it a vistory for them, there fight cause moral to grow in greece. A year later the greeks beat the persians at the battle of platea, were it was 10000 spartans and 30,000 greeks vs the persians.
Seems pretty close, although this Wiki says a bit different, appears that the Greeks/ Spartans were still out numbered.yeah they were still outnumbered, but not as much as the 300 were. At the time of platea xerxes had gone back home and left one of his generals in charge with the army, and they were defeated. Athens had a big role in the whole war. there navy played a big role.
[QUOTE="6icks_tea_4hoar"]why in the world would you make 2 movies based on one book?metalmonkey268
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment