SPOILERS KIND OF
do you guys think that if they didn't film the 2nd and 3rd ones back to back, the 3rd one would of been better? think about it, if "at worlds end" had come out 3-4 years later than the 2nd one, it would have gone through many changes, because the writers, producers, director, etc. would have had so much more time to think about how to make the movie better... if you think of it that way, the movie everyone saw could of been a 4th or 5th or 6th draft of what if could of been... maybe it would of taken them 10 or 12 drafts to perfect the story, or the scene selection, or for them to decide that elizabeth had way too much screen time...
i know spiderman 3 had all the time in the world to be a kick-ass movie and it didn't do so well, so one can argue that the layoff couldn't of made a difference, but pirates 3 had so much more potential than the 3rd spiderman... i really think a 3 or 4 year layoff would of spawned a pirates movie that would of been a fitting end to the trilogy that everyone would be happy with.
Log in to comment