Ok Jenna Rose - new song is basically child pornography

13=Teenager, not child.X360PS3AMD05

This is really, really distressing. I hope that the parents are just genuinely unaware, rather than actively exploiting their child's sexuality, but I fear it's the latter. I've never understood how America as a nation can be so fear-mongering and foster a witch hunt atmosphere against pedophiles with one had, while with the other glorifying displays like this. That's some deep moral dissonance there.

I'll admit that I didnt watch even thirty seconds of that video since Im in school and im not susposed to be watching videos, but I didnt really see anything too horibly wrong with her outfit, but then again i guess it gets worse as the video goes on.

On a side note that is not really related, their outfits remind me of the crazy outfits that you find on imvu...

[QUOTE="X360PS3AMD05"]13=Teenager, not child.XxxExtremeNJBXx

Those girls are considered "jailbait" not children outside of a courtroom. It's funny how people like to twist things thoughX360PS3AMD05

Legal definitions of child pornography generally include sexual images involving prepubescents and pubescent or post-pubescent minors and computer-generated images that appear to involve them.Wikipedia

Man, that's disgusting, specially because of the possible effect on other 13 year old girls.

Child pornography is taking it a bit too far. I wouldn't want my daughter to do such a thing at that age tho. killerfist

Exactly. What where the parents thinking.

I still am so confused as to how this has anything to do with child pornography. She's 13 and has a music video where she is dancing in it. That's it. What makes this video so wrong in your opinions, I have no idea. The dancing isn't even sexual at all.

I still am so confused as to how this has anything to do with child pornography. She's 13 and has a music video where she is dancing in it. That's it. What makes this video so wrong in your opinions, I have no idea. The dancing isn't even sexual at all.

BMD004

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

I still am so confused as to how this has anything to do with child pornography. She's 13 and has a music video where she is dancing in it. That's it. What makes this video so wrong in your opinions, I have no idea. The dancing isn't even sexual at all.

Memberino

I dont think some washed up 13 year old singer wishing someone around her age would do her would be considered child porn i see it as some underage girl just wrighting in her diary about getting laid all day. as for the dancing in this video yes she is underage and i beilive her parents shouldent let her dance like that on camera...

Horrible, horrible, horrible song. But what you said about child pornography is kind of true. Parts of the song would fall between 4 and 6 on the COPINE scale. Although, that is basically standard in modern music videos whether children or adults anyways.

And... TC, why do you have a gif in the OP? If it is so disgusting, why search for a gif of it? :P Also to the people arguing about the age of dancing, everyone knows that this is the American thought of female suggestive dancing:

< 17 - Not appropriate/and apparently pornography now

18+ - dirty or nasty

Either way, she could have been 40 and the dancing will still be wrong by majority standards so no use for arguing here. :P

And... TC, why do you have a gif in the OP? If it is so disgusting, why search for a gif of it? :P Also to the people arguing about the age of dancing, everyone knows that this is the American thought of female suggestive dancing:

< 17 - Not appropriate/and apparently pornography now

18+ - dirty or nasty

Either way, she could have been 40 and the dancing will still be wrong by majority standards so no use for arguing here. :P

MistressMinako

Also to the people saying she isnt dancing provocatively, she thrusting her "boobs" out in several shots, that's provocative to me

[QUOTE="MistressMinako"]

And... TC, why do you have a gif in the OP? If it is so disgusting, why search for a gif of it? :P Also to the people arguing about the age of dancing, everyone knows that this is the American thought of female suggestive dancing:

< 17 - Not appropriate/and apparently pornography now

18+ - dirty or nasty

Either way, she could have been 40 and the dancing will still be wrong by majority standards so no use for arguing here. :P

Memberino

Also to the people saying she isnt dancing provocatively, she thrusting her "boobs" out in several shots, that's provocative to me

Thats not pornography last I checked.

[QUOTE="MistressMinako"]

And... TC, why do you have a gif in the OP? If it is so disgusting, why search for a gif of it? :P Also to the people arguing about the age of dancing, everyone knows that this is the American thought of female suggestive dancing:

< 17 - Not appropriate/and apparently pornography now

18+ - dirty or nasty

Either way, she could have been 40 and the dancing will still be wrong by majority standards so no use for arguing here. :P

Memberino

Also to the people saying she isnt dancing provocatively, she thrusting her "boobs" out in several shots, that's provocative to me

[QUOTE="MistressMinako"]

And... TC, why do you have a gif in the OP? If it is so disgusting, why search for a gif of it? :P Also to the people arguing about the age of dancing, everyone knows that this is the American thought of female suggestive dancing:

< 17 - Not appropriate/and apparently pornography now

18+ - dirty or nasty

Either way, she could have been 40 and the dancing will still be wrong by majority standards so no use for arguing here. :P

Memberino

Also to the people saying she isnt dancing provocatively, she thrusting her "boobs" out in several shots, that's provocative to me

[QUOTE="Memberino"]

[QUOTE="MistressMinako"]

And... TC, why do you have a gif in the OP? If it is so disgusting, why search for a gif of it? :P Also to the people arguing about the age of dancing, everyone knows that this is the American thought of female suggestive dancing:

< 17 - Not appropriate/and apparently pornography now

18+ - dirty or nasty

Either way, she could have been 40 and the dancing will still be wrong by majority standards so no use for arguing here. :P

sSubZerOo

Also to the people saying she isnt dancing provocatively, she thrusting her "boobs" out in several shots, that's provocative to me

Thats not pornography last I checked.

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Memberino"]

I love making GIFs recently, bwahah

Also to the people saying she isnt dancing provocatively, she thrusting her "boobs" out in several shots, that's provocative to me

Memberino

Thats not pornography last I checked.

And that music video would fall under NONE of those.

And that music video would fall under NONE of those.

BMD004

The point of this post is to say that the song is not appropriate for a 13 year old. Some people are so easily distracted...

First, this is old.

Second, that is no where NEAR child pornography. Quit being so dramatic.

I do agree it is inappropriate for her age (or really any age, dancing like that is slutty and stupid, IMO) and shows what uncaring, idiotic parents she has.

First, this is old.

Second, that is no where NEAR child pornography. Quit being so dramatic.

I do agree it is inappropriate for her age (or really any age, dancing like that is slutty and stupid, IMO) and shows what uncaring, idiotic parents she has.

howlrunner13

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

And that music video would fall under NONE of those.

foxhound_fox

There are men out there who get pleasure from watching middle school volleyball. That doesn't mean volleyball is child pornography.

Seriously, this is what some of you guys are getting worked up about:

Eww man she's only 12.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

And that music video would fall under NONE of those.

BMD004

There are men out there who get pleasure from watching middle school volleyball. That doesn't mean volleyball is child pornography.

Yes, the term child pornography may be out of place, but he lyrics and the dancing is definetely suggestive and it a very, very bad way.

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
"Pornography" is a misleading, and an incorrect term. It is usually referred to now as "child abuse" or "child abuse photography." Any piece of media that depicts a minor doing something sexual (whether clothed or not) is considered "child abuse photography." Which is what that scale outlines in terms of severity. She may have wanted to doing such things on video, but she technically isn't allowed to consent (because she is a minor) to do them.

It doesn't contain nudity or any abuse per se, but it still falls within the same realm. Generally, officials searching for abusers usually don't consider the first couple levels of the scale worth pursuing. It is when they start to become overtly sexual, non-consensual, abusive and most importantly, collected and organized, when they begin to care and pursue litigation.

Technically, this could be labelled hebephilic material, since the girls involved are being quite sexual and are pubescent. Sure, its "just" a music video, but there could be men out there deriving pleasure from watching her doing these things. The whole issue is extraordinarily complex, and can't really be addressed properly in a thread on a forum.

madsnakehhh

There are men out there who get pleasure from watching middle school volleyball. That doesn't mean volleyball is child pornography.

Yes, the term child pornography may be out of place, but he lyrics and the dancing is definetely suggestive and it a very, very bad way.

If that is your idea of suggestive.. Than the Macarana Dance is lewd as well..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlzwuFkn88U

I still am so confused as to how this has anything to do with child pornography. She's 13 and has a music video where she is dancing in it. That's it. What makes this video so wrong in your opinions, I have no idea. The dancing isn't even sexual at all.

BMD004

First Jeans now this ! :(

Its not that surprising, she was most likely inspired by watching the 1000s of sexually themed music videos on mtv, bet, and online. Everywhere you turn you see two common themes in media; 1) A woman's worth is based on her looks and ability to be attractive to others; 2) A man's worth is based on his ability to charm/catch as many attractive females as possible. Why would anyone be shocked that 12 y/o have the same value systems as everyone else around them.

PS. If you werent aware tweenage kids think and do sexual things constantly nowadays. When im on the bus heading to evening classes I often hear 10-14 y/o kids, coming home from school, talking about preforming sex, oral and sexting constantlyDiablo-B

She looks like she talks like Craig from Craig vs. Wild.

I didn't watch the full song (couldn't bear it), but I didn't hear anything about her saying we wish we could do her :?. "You wish you could" was talking about wishing you could look like her, or something. Anyway, still, the way she dances is bad enough for her age.

it wasnt that bad, calling that child pornography is a huuge exaggeration. :?

I didn't watch the full song (couldn't bear it), but I didn't hear anything about her saying we wish we could do her :?. "You wish you could" was talking about wishing you could look like her, or something. Anyway, still, the way she dances is bad enough for her age.jamejame

The companies making these videos should be ashamed. :?Ninja-Hippo

it wasnt that bad, calling that child pornography is a huuge exaggeration. :?dragonfly110

This smiley is awesome :?.

I didn't watch the full song (couldn't bear it), but I didn't hear anything about her saying we wish we could do her :?. "You wish you could" was talking about wishing you could look like her, or something. Anyway, still, the way she dances is bad enough for her age.jamejame

The companies making these videos should be ashamed. :?Ninja-Hippo

it wasnt that bad, calling that child pornography is a huuge exaggeration. :?dragonfly110

:?

This smiley is awesome :?

[QUOTE="Memberino"][QUOTE="BMD004"]

I still am so confused as to how this has anything to do with child pornography. She's 13 and has a music video where she is dancing in it. That's it. What makes this video so wrong in your opinions, I have no idea. The dancing isn't even sexual at all.

BMD004

I agree with you that people are overreacting, and this is far from child porn.

but the simple fact is that its not exactly appropriate for a 13 year old to be dancing provactively (yes, thats appropriate, I've seen strippers do the same moves...my friend who pole dances, for exercise, does a lot of the same moves). She is gyrating her hips, and bringing attention to all the female parts of the body men are turned on by.

As for the lyrics, lets take a look:

Just take a picture, baby, Look at what I'm wearing,
Just take a picture baby, No need for staring.
You know that you want to, you know that you need to,
It will last longer for you. Baby say it now,

Obviously this part is not about how pretty her face is; its about how she is dressed and it is turning the opposite sex on. Pretty provocative considering the majority of people her age arent even able to reproduce/mature enough (mentally and physically) for sex.

Oh, come on by the crib,
The girls start looking dib
Just shaking that boom boom.
Going all around and around and back again.
All the way around and around and back again
All the way around and around and back again,(what) again,(what),again

Obviously an invitation to the opposite sex to visit her house and watch a bunch of mostly prepubescent girls shake their non-existent asses. Not just shake, but shake and rotate and twirl it around and show it off to all who want to see.

Child pornography? No, not by a long shot. Appropriate? Definately not.

And be honest, dude, if your 13 year old daughter was performing a song basically meant to flirt with the opposite sex, would you really be entirely ok with it?

Well, I suppose I would, she problably would make like 10 million bucks. But still...

Pedo bear is appeased...