One difference between Obama and Bush

Bush is always on time, Obama is always late. People disagree over why Obama is always late: Some say he is arrogant, some say disorganized, others say because he stops to accomodate average citizens. President Clinton used to be late a lot too, and Obama's press Secretary seems to be late a lot. Some have said that if Obama's popularity drops (which I think it has slightly) that eventually people on Capitol hill will leave if he's not on time. Obama used to be late as a senator, often apologizing for missing important meetings or for asking "repetitive" questions.

http://www.foxnews.com

I stopped reading right there.

And yet another difference is that oen is more level headed.

[QUOTE=""]http://www.foxnews.comaliblabla2007

I stopped reading right there.

[QUOTE=""]http://www.foxnews.comaliblabla2007

I stopped reading right there.

right on!

Obama has done nothing any more positive than bush so far. In fact his new stimulus has probably done more damage. If Bush pushed out a stimulus package with this many problems everybody would have wanted him impeached or something.

[QUOTE=""]http://www.foxnews.comaliblabla2007

I stopped reading right there.

Obama has done nothing any more positive than bush so far. In fact his new stimulus has probably done more damage. If Bush pushed out a stimulus package with this many problems everybody would have wanted him impeached or something.

magnax1

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

Obama has done nothing any more positive than bush so far. In fact his new stimulus has probably done more damage. If Bush pushed out a stimulus package with this many problems everybody would have wanted him impeached or something.

hamstergeddon

Well, saying it has done more damage has probably gone to far, but after Obama came into office and the stimulus was released was basically when the economy seemed to start sliding downwards(if i remember correctly). But what I was talking about with stimulus problems was that The CEOs still got there anual bonuses got to ride jets and the government basically has little control on what they spend the money on. If Bush did that people would freak out at him. But Obama seems to be immune to criticism for most people which really bugs me.

Obama has done nothing any more positive than bush so far. In fact his new stimulus has probably done more damage. If Bush pushed out a stimulus package with this many problems everybody would have wanted him impeached or something.

magnax1

[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"][QUOTE="magnax1"]

Obama has done nothing any more positive than bush so far. In fact his new stimulus has probably done more damage. If Bush pushed out a stimulus package with this many problems everybody would have wanted him impeached or something.

magnax1

Well, saying it has done more damage has probably gone to far, but after Obama came into office and the stimulus was released was basically when the economy seemed to start sliding downwards(if i remember correctly).

And yet another difference is that oen is more level headed.

BumFluff122

Another difference is that one is African American and one is Caucasian. Just saying. :|Razor-Lazor

[QUOTE=""]http://www.foxnews.comaliblabla2007

I stopped reading right there.

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

[QUOTE="hamstergeddon"] :| How has the stimulus done more damage? whipassmt

Well, saying it has done more damage has probably gone to far, but after Obama came into office and the stimulus was released was basically when the economy seemed to start sliding downwards(if i remember correctly).

Exactly, just a little while after the stimulus was released things started getting worse. Its hard to deny it, and people would freak out at Bush, but not Obama. I just cant understnad it.

I find it funny how everyone quits reading after seeing "Fox News", however if there was an article praising Obama from MSNBC, CNN, The Washington Post, New York Times, L.A. Times etc. etc. Everyone would listen in claiming how "unbiased" the article was.

As for the difference between Obama and Bush, you would think it would be obvious. One is a Fascist and the other was a Socialist.

Couldn't you think of something else to attack Obama on? You know, like something that actually matters? :| hamstergeddon

One is humble, one is arrogant.

One is humble, one is arrogant.

JoeRatz16

One started a war based on BS, one has not. I'll go with that difference for now.

[QUOTE="magnax1"]

Obama has done nothing any more positive than bush so far. In fact his new stimulus has probably done more damage. If Bush pushed out a stimulus package with this many problems everybody would have wanted him impeached or something.

hamstergeddon

The stimulus package was said to prevent Unemployment rate from going past 8%, while here we are with an Unemployment of 10% and Obama's Cabinet is already having discussions about taking out another Stimulus Package.

There was a deficit of 400 billion at the end of 2008. Now we are in debt of over 2 trillion dollars on top of the Health Care program Obama wants to put into effect as well as the Second Stimulus bill that is in the works.

Already every American tax payer is in debt to the Government of over $90,000.00 that is born today.

One is humble, one is arrogant.

JoeRatz16

:lol: I laughed at the Vatican while reading that

The stimulus package was said to prevent Unemployment rate from going past 8%, Delsage

wow so many people seem afraid to read fox news.

wow so many people seem afraid to read fox news.

whipassmt

One started a war based on BS, one has not. I'll go with that difference for now.

duxup

[QUOTE="JoeRatz16"]

One is humble, one is arrogant.

chessmaster1989

:lol: I laughed at the Vatican while reading that

[QUOTE="duxup"]

One started a war based on BS, one has not. I'll go with that difference for now.

whipassmt

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

wow so many people seem afraid to read fox news.

Engrish_Major

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="duxup"]

One started a war based on BS, one has not. I'll go with that difference for now.

duxup

In general the world is better off without Husseins being in power.

[QUOTE="Delsage"]The stimulus package was said to prevent Unemployment rate from going past 8%, duxup

Oh really? Why do I know more about the Stimulus Package than Obama supporters themselves?

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="whipassmt"]

wow so many people seem afraid to read fox news.

[QUOTE="duxup"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] So WMDs are BS. And don't say Saddam didn't have WMDs, he used Biological weapons against the Kurds and the Iranians. By the way Bush didn't start a war, according to a book about Bush by John Podhoretz the terms the "treaty" at the end of the Gulf War were a cease-fire, which means that technically the war never permanently ended. If Saddam failed to comply with the terms of the cease-fire, the U.S. president could re-engage Iraq. Clinton used these provision to bomb Iraq in the 1990s, Bush used these provisions as well as Congressional authorization (Supported among others by Sens. Kerry and Clinton) to liberate Iraq.

whipassmt

In general the world is better off without Husseins being in power.

wait a second, did Obama assemble his Cabinet yet or is it still incomplete?

Obama is a democrat and Bush is a republican.

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="duxup"] He didn't have them. The augment for the war was that Sadam had WMDs. We found none. It was in the news.Engrish_Major

In general the world is better off without Husseins being in power.

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"] Maybe because they suck at news?Engrish_Major

U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan don't counter Iran?whipassmt

[QUOTE="duxup"][QUOTE="Delsage"]The stimulus package was said to prevent Unemployment rate from going past 8%, Delsage

Oh really? Why do I know more about the Stimulus Package than Obama supporters themselves?

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] I think you misread my post, I wasn't talking about MSNBC

Delsage

What exactly do you make this basis on? What exactly has Fox news got wrong? Or is it because they don't support your views so you make these accusations. Delsage

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan don't counter Iran?Engrish_Major

[QUOTE="Delsage"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"] Nope, I read it correctly. I do check periodically to see if Fox starts to not suck, but that has yet to happen.whipassmt

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="whipassmt"]U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan don't counter Iran?whipassmt