http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/soldiers-protest-war-syria-facebook-article-1.1444535
Good to see they aren't brainwashed. Hopefully more and more servicemen will begin to see.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/soldiers-protest-war-syria-facebook-article-1.1444535
Good to see they aren't brainwashed. Hopefully more and more servicemen will begin to see.
Yeah they didn't join the military to fight a war.
First off, lol brainwashing?
Second, there's no invasion. It's a surgical strike using missles. We're going to bomb them, notinvade with ground forces.
Some wars aren't worth fighting for. 1. Brainwashing probably wasn't the way to put it. I mean that at least they don't think that everything the US does in justified. 2. Very aware.Yeah they didn't join the military to fight a war.
First off, lol brainwashing?
Second, there's no invasion. It's a surgical strike using missles. We're going to bomb them, notinvade with ground forces.
leviathan91
Like in all current wars, ground forces need to be there. Missile strikes can only do so much.Yeah they didn't join the military to fight a war.
First off, lol brainwashing?
Second, there's no invasion. It's a surgical strike using missles. We're going to bomb them, notinvade with ground forces.
leviathan91
Using the term "Brainwash" is a little bit over the top. Trust me, I'm not thrilled about the whole idea either, but it's not a mass invasion. To me it seems like more of a threat. The big bad US will use these missiles if you don't chill, Syria, haha. It's good to hear differents points of view, I guess.
Hiding like a bunch of pansies.Hope they get a dishonorable discharge and get mocked for the rest of their lives.killzowned24You realise most of America doesn't want this either right? You're "hope" is irrelevant when most support their opinion.
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]Hiding like a bunch of pansies.Hope they get a dishonorable discharge and get mocked for the rest of their lives.Innovazero2000You realise most of America doesn't want this either right? You're "hope" is irrelevant when most support their opinion. nobody wants war,doesn't mean we can just let them get away with this.
[QUOTE="Innovazero2000"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]Hiding like a bunch of pansies.Hope they get a dishonorable discharge and get mocked for the rest of their lives.killzowned24You realise most of America doesn't want this either right? You're "hope" is irrelevant when most support their opinion. nobody wants war,doesn't mean we can just let them get away with this. So it is automatically the job of America to stop them?
They're only expressing the same opinion that most Americans already share. A military fights for its people not someone else's people. The American people do not want a war. Syria is lost, both the Syrian Government and the Rebels are guilty of killing thousands of innocent civilians.
How do you that those people are actually serving military members?
I would so laugh if they turned out to be Syrian gov't propaganda vids.
On the otherhand, there seems to be an astonishing number of people who actually believe that the US is going to deploy ground forces in Syria, so I guess I can believe that there actually are military members that are this stupid.
If we get involved this whole thing escalates. Then it will take hundreds if not thousands of troops to secure all of Syria's chemical weapons after the regime falls.How do you that those people are actually serving military members?
I would so laugh if they turned out to be Syrian gov't propaganda vids.
On the otherhand, there seems to be an astonishing number of people who actually believe that the US is going to deploy ground forces in Syria, so I guess I can believe that there actually are military members that are this stupid.
SUD123456
Good thing this is the US Military we are talking about and not the Syrian Military so their home is being protected. ;)now days
you join the military to fight politics, not protect your home...
k2theswiss
Kerry showed a picture of the atrocities Assad was committing -
"Photographer Marco di Lauro said he nearly fell off his chair when he saw
the image being used, and said he was astonished at the failure of the
corporation to check their sources.
The picture, which was actually taken on March 27, 2003, shows a young Iraqi
child jumping over dozens of white body bags containing skeletons found in a
desert south of Baghdad.
It was posted on the BBC news website under the heading Syria massacre
in Houla condemned as outrage grows. - The Guardian
People didn't join the military to be lied to by obama and kerry.
If they're going to cause mass murder through depleted uranium and ...
Let me stop myself right there. If you call for WAR, there will be hell. So. I don't know what's wise. If the USA or the EU gets involved there will be mass civilian casualties for decades to come.
Either that, or this slaughter in Syria goes on and on.
Maybe, more than anything, we need to hear the people of Syria. Are they willing to let it come to a war on their territory with all ruination and horror that comes with it? It's their country.
If you don't want to die in a senseless war you shouldn't join the military. Fighting wars is what the military does, especially in the US.famicommanderyup
don't you mean the BBC? and in 2012?Kerry showed a picture of the atrocities Assad was committing -
"Photographer Marco di Lauro said he nearly fell off his chair when he saw
the image being used, and said he was astonished at the failure of the
corporation to check their sources.The picture, which was actually taken on March 27, 2003, shows a young Iraqi
child jumping over dozens of white body bags containing skeletons found in a
desert south of Baghdad.It was posted on the BBC news website under the heading Syria massacre
in Houla condemned as outrage grows. - The Guardian
People didn't join the military to be lied to by obama and kerry.
Born_Lucky
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9293620/BBC-News-uses-Iraq-photo-to-illustrate-Syrian-massacre.html
I had a talk with my cousin, who's in the USAF... kid is severely brainwashed. He wants us to go to war with Syria and NK. I'm glad there are soldiers who are standing for peace.
President Peace Prize needs to listen to the people and not special interest groups.
Luckily for me and a lot of other servicemen/women there's pretty much no chance of us having to do anything that actually supports either side in Syria.
[QUOTE="00-Riddick-00"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] nobody wants war,doesn't mean we can just let them get away with this.killzowned24So it is automatically the job of America to stop them? America is not alone in it. lolol you mean jordan.. or maybe you mean turkey XD hardly an army. really their only hope in getting any serious military backbone into a surgical involvement would be france and france is in such political turmoil at the moment that they would probably fall into batsh!t lunacy if they so much as gave the US a dingy with one dude piloting it and gave him a famas.
America is not alone in it. lolol you mean jordan.. or maybe you mean turkey XD hardly an army. really their only hope in getting any serious military backbone into a surgical involvement would be france and france is in such political turmoil at the moment that they would probably fall into batsh!t lunacy if they so much as gave the US a dingy with one dude piloting it and gave him a famas. France went into Libya and Mali in the last year. They have been pretty hawkish.[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="00-Riddick-00"] So it is automatically the job of America to stop them?ionusX
[QUOTE="SUD123456"]If we get involved this whole thing escalates. Then it will take hundreds if not thousands of troops to secure all of Syria's chemical weapons after the regime falls. furthermore if this "precision strike" fails miserably (and it very well could) the US government would recieved some "come at me bro; cause i aint even mad" guage PR from the syrian government. then the US wouldnt just be guilty of being a sh!t distruber they would be also a disgrace politically on the global scale and a laughing stock at the UN security council meetings (let alone NATO and the UN generally assembly). their only hope of saving face is puting boots on the ground and when they do that well..How do you that those people are actually serving military members?
I would so laugh if they turned out to be Syrian gov't propaganda vids.
On the otherhand, there seems to be an astonishing number of people who actually believe that the US is going to deploy ground forces in Syria, so I guess I can believe that there actually are military members that are this stupid.
KC_Hokie
lets just say public opinion of a third middle east war wont be the first problem they will need to sort out.
que the CIA getting contacts in syria to stand in front of a camera with some memorized que cards..If they're going to cause mass murder through depleted uranium and ...
Let me stop myself right there. If you call for WAR, there will be hell. So. I don't know what's wise. If the USA or the EU gets involved there will be mass civilian casualties for decades to come.
Either that, or this slaughter in Syria goes on and on.
Maybe, more than anything, we need to hear the people of Syria. Are they willing to let it come to a war on their territory with all ruination and horror that comes with it? It's their country.KungfuKitten
If we get involved this whole thing escalates. Then it will take hundreds if not thousands of troops to secure all of Syria's chemical weapons after the regime falls. furthermore if this "precision strike" fails miserably (and it very well could) the US government would recieved some "come at me bro; cause i aint even mad" guage PR from the syrian government. then the US wouldnt just be guilty of being a sh!t distruber they would be also a disgrace politically on the global scale and a laughing stock at the UN security council meetings (let alone NATO and the UN generally assembly). their only hope of saving face is puting boots on the ground and when they do that well..[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="SUD123456"]
How do you that those people are actually serving military members?
I would so laugh if they turned out to be Syrian gov't propaganda vids.
On the otherhand, there seems to be an astonishing number of people who actually believe that the US is going to deploy ground forces in Syria, so I guess I can believe that there actually are military members that are this stupid.
ionusX
lets just say public opinion of a third middle east war wont be the first problem they will need to sort out.
Or since the war is in a stalemate right now, they'll say oh shit Nato can tip the balance to the rebels.The country is already at war and has been for two years. US precision strikes are no where near the horror and ruination brought by Assad's indiscriminate bombing of rebel held town and contested areas.If they're going to cause mass murder through depleted uranium and ...
KungfuKitten
Let me stop myself right there. If you call for WAR, there will be hell. So. I don't know what's wise. If the USA or the EU gets involved there will be mass civilian casualties for decades to come.
Either that, or this slaughter in Syria goes on and on.
Maybe, more than anything, we need to hear the people of Syria. Are they willing to let it come to a war on their territory with all ruination and horror that comes with it? It's their country.
The country is already at war and has been for two years. US precision strikes are no where near the horror and ruination brought by Assad's indiscriminate bombing of rebel held town and contested areas.
Person0
... every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, every regurgitator of rote propaganda, every vile apologist for military aggression, every perpetuator of government lies, every shill for dishonest leaders, every gullible twit in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
-- Carl Sagan
[QUOTE="Person0"]
The country is already at war and has been for two years. US precision strikes are no where near the horror and ruination brought by Assad's indiscriminate bombing of rebel held town and contested areas.
Stesilaus
... every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, every regurgitator of rote propaganda, every vile apologist for military aggression, every perpetuator of government lies, every shill for dishonest leaders, every gullible twit in the history of our species lived there - on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
-- Carl Sagan
What propaganda? Sometimes military aggression is justified. What lies? How am I shilling for dishonest leaders? How am I gullible?[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]The country is already at war and has been for two years. US precision strikes are no where near the horror and ruination brought by Assad's indiscriminate bombing of rebel held town and contested areas.Sure, but only targeting one side could tip the balance. The regime could fall and then hundreds or thousands of troops would be needed just to secure all the chemical weapons.If they're going to cause mass murder through depleted uranium and ...
Person0
Let me stop myself right there. If you call for WAR, there will be hell. So. I don't know what's wise. If the USA or the EU gets involved there will be mass civilian casualties for decades to come.
Either that, or this slaughter in Syria goes on and on.
Maybe, more than anything, we need to hear the people of Syria. Are they willing to let it come to a war on their territory with all ruination and horror that comes with it? It's their country.
[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]The country is already at war and has been for two years. US precision strikes are no where near the horror and ruination brought by Assad's indiscriminate bombing of rebel held town and contested areas.Sure, but only targeting one side could tip the balance. The regime could fall and then hundreds or thousands of troops would be needed just to secure all the chemical weapons. So theres a chance that someone that might use them can get some compared to a certainty of someone that has used them from keeping them. The Arab league could secure the weapons, the FSA could, NATO could.If they're going to cause mass murder through depleted uranium and ...
KC_Hokie
Let me stop myself right there. If you call for WAR, there will be hell. So. I don't know what's wise. If the USA or the EU gets involved there will be mass civilian casualties for decades to come.
Either that, or this slaughter in Syria goes on and on.
Maybe, more than anything, we need to hear the people of Syria. Are they willing to let it come to a war on their territory with all ruination and horror that comes with it? It's their country.
[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Sure, but only targeting one side could tip the balance. The regime could fall and then hundreds or thousands of troops would be needed just to secure all the chemical weapons.KC_HokieSo theres a chance that someone that might use them can get some compared to a certainty of someone that has used them from keeping them. The Arab league could secure the weapons, the FSA could, NATO could. No one else is joining us in this attack. If the regime falls everyone will just look to the U.S. to secure the weapons. Pretty sure Israel, Saudi Arabia and turkey won't like free chemical weapons so close to them.
Where have I heard before "we are using a surgical strike against, not an invasion" before? Irak? Afganistan? The gulf? Vietnam? I'm so very confused... You could make a bingo of presidents who have said that. There is no reason to go to Sirya. Really. Staph!!!Yeah they didn't join the military to fight a war.
First off, lol brainwashing?
Second, there's no invasion. It's a surgical strike using missles. We're going to bomb them, notinvade with ground forces.
leviathan91
[QUOTE="leviathan91"]Where have I heard before "we are using a surgical strike against, not an invasion" before? Irak? Afganistan? The gulf? Vietnam? I'm so very confused... You could make a bingo of presidents who have said that. There is no reason to go to Sirya. Really. Staph!!!oh maybe obama will drop more love bombs and love missles. cause ya know that what loving people do.. they blow up total strangers homes and kill their loved ones so he can sleep better at night knowning you got his love -.-Yeah they didn't join the military to fight a war.
First off, lol brainwashing?
Second, there's no invasion. It's a surgical strike using missles. We're going to bomb them, notinvade with ground forces.
curono
Where have I heard before "we are using a surgical strike against, not an invasion" before? Irak? Afganistan? The gulf? Vietnam? I'm so very confused... You could make a bingo of presidents who have said that. There is no reason to go to Sirya. Really. Staph!!!oh maybe obama will drop more love bombs and love missles. cause ya know that what loving people do.. they blow up total strangers homes and kill their loved ones so he can sleep better at night knowning you got his love -.- lol[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="leviathan91"]
Yeah they didn't join the military to fight a war.
First off, lol brainwashing?
Second, there's no invasion. It's a surgical strike using missles. We're going to bomb them, notinvade with ground forces.
ionusX
[QUOTE="ionusX"]oh maybe obama will drop more love bombs and love missles. cause ya know that what loving people do.. they blow up total strangers homes and kill their loved ones so he can sleep better at night knowning you got his love -.- lol dont laugh its loving! obama loves you so much he wants to kill you. you should be cheering him on /sarcasm[QUOTE="curono"] Where have I heard before "we are using a surgical strike against, not an invasion" before? Irak? Afganistan? The gulf? Vietnam? I'm so very confused... You could make a bingo of presidents who have said that. There is no reason to go to Sirya. Really. Staph!!!The_Lipscomb
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment