People Aren't Smart Enough for Democracy to Flourish, Scientists Say

  • 145 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#101 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

I'm a US citizen, gitmo doesn't affect me. Neither does the NDAA.

lordreaven

Obama changed the wording of the NDAA so it doesn't include American citizens.

Point still stands though. Look at Hungary and their governments reform of their constitution.and what if Obama did not change the wording? Hm? And why was such wording used in teh first place?Democracy is not the end all solution, despite the US always bragging about it.

Democracy seems to be the best system we've come up with so far. Many countries use different variations of democracy and thing seem to be going pretty good.

Don't let the media's hyperbole and exaggerations fool you, the world isn't on the verge of collapse. Our standard of living is the highest it's ever been and we are making rapid technological advances. If anything the world is experiance massive growing pains as it adapts to the changing technological times.

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

He is a lawyer. Lawyers are trained in debating and winning the argument at all cost. IMO, we need more engineers and scientists to run our country. But that really wasn't the point. DaBrainz
meh, half of them are atheists and agnostics.

That'd be a serious knock against them in polls.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#103 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38943 Posts

I'd say people aren't involved and knowledgeable enough. It's not a matter of intelligence, its a matter of effort and access to information.

sonicare
the article suggests the majority of people can't be knowledgeable enough on a wide enough swath of subjects to be really good evaluators of a candidates potential skill as a leader or his/her policies. it's not that people are stupid, just ignorant.
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

harvard graduate with honors who volunteered to help the poor is lower than average?

airshocker

Would you call President Bush lower than average? Just curious.

Pretty sure Bill O'Reilly went to Harvard as well.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#105 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

harvard graduate with honors who volunteered to help the poor is lower than average?

DaBrainz

Would you call President Bush lower than average? Just curious.

Pretty sure Bill O'Reilly went to Harvard as well.

What does that have to do with hat TopTeir was implying?

Avatar image for TopTierHustler
TopTierHustler

3894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 TopTierHustler
Member since 2012 • 3894 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

harvard graduate with honors who volunteered to help the poor is lower than average?

DaBrainz

Would you call President Bush lower than average? Just curious.

Pretty sure Bill O'Reilly went to Harvard as well.

really goes to show that smart hard working people can believe some really stupid things.

Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#107 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="TopTierHustler"]

harvard graduate with honors who volunteered to help the poor is lower than average?

TopTierHustler

Would you call President Bush lower than average? Just curious.

No, he graduated from yale and was a fighter pilot.

I still think his policies and beliefs were stupid though.

MBA from Harvard. Thats why you shouldn't judge a politician by where they went to school.
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

[QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="airshocker"]

Would you call President Bush lower than average? Just curious.

Wasdie

Pretty sure Bill O'Reilly went to Harvard as well.

What does that have to do with hat TopTeir was implying?

That going to Harvard does not help one to have the credentials to become a good president.
Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#109 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

I came here expecting an Onion article. I am disappointed.

The fact that there is a study reinforces that voters in a democracy can be stupid. Just look at the 2008 debate or any debate for that matter. So much misinformation, ridiculous claims, and barely any commitment to principles and ideals. It's ridiculous. The 2012 presidential election will be the same unfortunately.

Maybe we do need a dictatorship. A benevolent one.

Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts

I already knew that. Just look at America. 18 of 24 times they have voted for the tallest candidate.

Avatar image for Xx_Socrates_xX
Xx_Socrates_xX

3604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Xx_Socrates_xX
Member since 2012 • 3604 Posts
As ridiculous as this is, I actually agree with it.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Their advantage over dictatorships or other forms of governmentis merely that they "effectively prevent lower-than-average candidates from becoming leaders.DaBrainz
I 100% agree that our president is lower-than-average but what happens when you get a lower than average dictator?

Chavez? Well Venezuelans are not much worse now than they were before :P although Chavez is technically not a dictator.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#113 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

I came here expecting an Onion article. I am disappointed.

The fact that there is a study reinforces that voters in a democracy can be stupid. Just look at the 2008 debate or any debate for that matter. So much misinformation, ridiculous claims, and barely any commitment to principles and ideals. It's ridiculous. The 2012 presidential election will be the same unfortunately.

Maybe we do need a dictatorship. A benevolent one.

leviathan91
You forgot the very important fact that none of what you described is inevitable. None of what the STUDY yielded suggested inevitability of political incompetence. This is all the product of misinformation in society and political apathy, which can be changed. Therefore, for you to suggest benevolent dictatorship as an alternative is not only stupid but also profoundly asinine.
Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts
[QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]Their advantage over dictatorships or other forms of governmentis merely that they "effectively prevent lower-than-average candidates from becoming leaders.kuraimen
I 100% agree that our president is lower-than-average but what happens when you get a lower than average dictator?

Chavez? Well Venezuelans are not much worse now than they were before :P although Chavez is technically not a dictator.

I was thinking more along the lines of North Korea.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="DaBrainz"] I 100% agree that our president is lower-than-average but what happens when you get a lower than average dictator?

Chavez? Well Venezuelans are not much worse now than they were before :P although Chavez is technically not a dictator.

I was thinking more along the lines of North Korea.

Good choice, I think the examples of lower than average dictators are more common than not.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Obama changed the wording of the NDAA so it doesn't include American citizens.

Wasdie

Point still stands though. Look at Hungary and their governments reform of their constitution.and what if Obama did not change the wording? Hm? And why was such wording used in teh first place?Democracy is not the end all solution, despite the US always bragging about it.

Democracy seems to be the best system we've come up with so far. Many countries use different variations of democracy and thing seem to be going pretty good.

Don't let the media's hyperbole and exaggerations fool you, the world isn't on the verge of collapse. Our standard of living is the highest it's ever been and we are making rapid technological advances. If anything the world is experiance massive growing pains as it adapts to the changing technological times.

Oh, I understand, the world is not on imminent collapse. how ever, Democracy is not as great as most of us believe.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

Oh, I understand, the world is not on imminent collapse. how ever, Democracy is not as great as most of us believe.

lordreaven

If everyone has an equal voice, the people have political awareness, and they are adequately educated, then democracy is just fine.

Avatar image for Minishdriveby
Minishdriveby

10519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#118 Minishdriveby
Member since 2006 • 10519 Posts

[QUOTE="Minishdriveby"]"when a congress oversteps it's bounds. It gets shellacked in an election year." That's only if the majority is affected. If it was a minority group that lost their freedoms the majority wouldn't really care because they didn't lose anything. They would care even less if they benefitted from the others loss of freedom and would probably re-elect the same politicians. So now we're back to my original statement. As long as you as the majority says you have your freedoms you're safe. As soon as you become a minority that the majority dislikes you lose your freedoms.airshocker

And again, just because there's a majority in the house doesn't mean it can't be undone ie November 2010.

And again the it can only be undone if the majority of citizens want it undone. And so if the majority of representatives say hey let's lock up all Japanese-americans in concentration camps and the majority of civilians go "Yeah that sounds good," nothing stops the government from not eliminating the freedoms of the Japanese-americans. It's not like the japanese americans can undo the house majority. They have no rights. And the majority are either scared/dislike the japanese-americans so they're not going to vote for a senator that gives them rights. It may eventually be overruled, but if the majority always fears/hates a minority they will never have the same freedoms. See what I'm saying?
Avatar image for MattDistillery
MattDistillery

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#119 MattDistillery
Member since 2010 • 969 Posts

Looks at America, looks at the fact George Bush got elected twice.... Agrees with statement.

Avatar image for jetpower3
jetpower3

11631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 jetpower3
Member since 2005 • 11631 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="Minishdriveby"]"when a congress oversteps it's bounds. It gets shellacked in an election year." That's only if the majority is affected. If it was a minority group that lost their freedoms the majority wouldn't really care because they didn't lose anything. They would care even less if they benefitted from the others loss of freedom and would probably re-elect the same politicians. So now we're back to my original statement. As long as you as the majority says you have your freedoms you're safe. As soon as you become a minority that the majority dislikes you lose your freedoms.Minishdriveby

And again, just because there's a majority in the house doesn't mean it can't be undone ie November 2010.

And again the it can only be undone if the majority of citizens want it undone. And so if the majority of representatives say hey let's lock up all Japanese-americans in concentration camps and the majority of civilians go "Yeah that sounds good," nothing stops the government from not eliminating the freedoms of the Japanese-americans. It's not like the japanese americans can undo the house majority. They have no rights. And the majority are either scared/dislike the japanese-americans so they're not going to vote for a senator that gives them rights. It may eventually be overruled, but if the majority always fears/hates a minority they will never have the same freedoms. See what I'm saying?

Except when a minority has monopolized power ;).

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

Looks at America, looks at the fact George Bush got elected twice.... Agrees with statement.

MattDistillery
*nods in approval*
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#122 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
All right, that's enough. This thread has already made me livid. Goodbye.
Avatar image for Minishdriveby
Minishdriveby

10519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#123 Minishdriveby
Member since 2006 • 10519 Posts

[QUOTE="Minishdriveby"][QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="Minishdriveby"]"when a congress oversteps it's bounds. It gets shellacked in an election year." That's only if the majority is affected. If it was a minority group that lost their freedoms the majority wouldn't really care because they didn't lose anything. They would care even less if they benefitted from the others loss of freedom and would probably re-elect the same politicians. So now we're back to my original statement. As long as you as the majority says you have your freedoms you're safe. As soon as you become a minority that the majority dislikes you lose your freedoms.jetpower3

And again, just because there's a majority in the house doesn't mean it can't be undone ie November 2010.

And again the it can only be undone if the majority of citizens want it undone. And so if the majority of representatives say hey let's lock up all Japanese-americans in concentration camps and the majority of civilians go "Yeah that sounds good," nothing stops the government from not eliminating the freedoms of the Japanese-americans. It's not like the japanese americans can undo the house majority. They have no rights. And the majority are either scared/dislike the japanese-americans so they're not going to vote for a senator that gives them rights. It may eventually be overruled, but if the majority always fears/hates a minority they will never have the same freedoms. See what I'm saying?

Except when a minority has monopolized power ;).

In this case the minority with monopolized power could take away freedom from the majority.
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts

Looks at America, looks at the fact George Bush got elected once.... Agrees with statement.

MattDistillery
ftfy
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
All right, that's enough. This thread has already made me livid. Goodbye.ghoklebutter
The problem that I see to make democracy work is that the people in charge has an interest to make the population dumb so they can easily manipulate them.
Avatar image for Minishdriveby
Minishdriveby

10519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#126 Minishdriveby
Member since 2006 • 10519 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

Oh, I understand, the world is not on imminent collapse. how ever, Democracy is not as great as most of us believe.

ghoklebutter

If everyone has an equal voice, the people have political awareness, and they are adequately educated, then democracy is just fine.

So democracy doesn't work in 3rd world countries with low education rates?
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#127 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]All right, that's enough. This thread has already made me livid. Goodbye.kuraimen
The problem that I see to make democracy work is that the people in charge has an interest to make the population dumb so they can easily manipulate them.

That doesn't concern me as I'm an anarchist.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#128 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

Oh, I understand, the world is not on imminent collapse. how ever, Democracy is not as great as most of us believe.

Minishdriveby

If everyone has an equal voice, the people have political awareness, and they are adequately educated, then democracy is just fine.

So democracy doesn't work in 3rd world countries with low education rates?

Not necessarily, but a lack of education is very problematic for democracy.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#129 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

And again the it can only be undone if the majority of citizens want it undone. And so if the majority of representatives say hey let's lock up all Japanese-americans in concentration camps and the majority of civilians go "Yeah that sounds good," nothing stops the government from not eliminating the freedoms of the Japanese-americans. It's not like the japanese americans can undo the house majority. They have no rights. And the majority are either scared/dislike the japanese-americans so they're not going to vote for a senator that gives them rights. It may eventually be overruled, but if the majority always fears/hates a minority they will never have the same freedoms. See what I'm saying?Minishdriveby

That's not true. Just because there is a majority of a certain party in a legislature, doesn't mean the country as a whole adheres to the beliefs of that majority.

Avatar image for Socijalisticka
Socijalisticka

1555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Socijalisticka
Member since 2011 • 1555 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

Oh, I understand, the world is not on imminent collapse. how ever, Democracy is not as great as most of us believe.

Minishdriveby

If everyone has an equal voice, the people have political awareness, and they are adequately educated, then democracy is just fine.

So democracy doesn't work in any country, including developed nations?

ftfy

Avatar image for Minishdriveby
Minishdriveby

10519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#131 Minishdriveby
Member since 2006 • 10519 Posts

[QUOTE="Minishdriveby"] And again the it can only be undone if the majority of citizens want it undone. And so if the majority of representatives say hey let's lock up all Japanese-americans in concentration camps and the majority of civilians go "Yeah that sounds good," nothing stops the government from not eliminating the freedoms of the Japanese-americans. It's not like the japanese americans can undo the house majority. They have no rights. And the majority are either scared/dislike the japanese-americans so they're not going to vote for a senator that gives them rights. It may eventually be overruled, but if the majority always fears/hates a minority they will never have the same freedoms. See what I'm saying?airshocker

That's not true. Just because there is a majority of a certain party in a legislature, doesn't mean the country as a whole adheres to the beliefs of that majority.

How is that not true? how can a majority party be taken out of legislature if the majority of citizens want them there?
Avatar image for ChampionoChumps
ChampionoChumps

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 ChampionoChumps
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts
Hence why the U.S. was initially designed to be a republic. So the majority wouldn't rule the minority.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#134 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="Minishdriveby"][QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

If everyone has an equal voice, the people have political awareness, and they are adequately educated, then democracy is just fine.

Socijalisticka

So democracy doesn't work in any country, including developed nations?

ftfy

Too bad that's false because education is a solution to bad democracy.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

Oh, I understand, the world is not on imminent collapse. how ever, Democracy is not as great as most of us believe.

ghoklebutter

If everyone has an equal voice, the people have political awareness, and they are adequately educated, then democracy is just fine.

But is that case? And will it ever be the case? The answear for both is.... and I qoute "HELL NO".

Avatar image for dissonantblack
dissonantblack

34009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#136 dissonantblack
Member since 2005 • 34009 Posts

Well, i don't think people are smart enough to make communism work either.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#137 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

If everyone has an equal voice, the people have political awareness, and they are adequately educated, then democracy is just fine.

lordreaven

But is that case? And will it ever be the case? The answear for both is.... and I qoute "HELL NO".

No, it's not the case. But it can be the case. Your point is moot.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#138 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38943 Posts
the article doesn't say democracy doesn't work. it says people in general are bad and evaluating things they do not full understand, even when they think they're well informed they're usually not. the concept that we elect our own leaders is working just fine. this is just a statement on their quality.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
the article doesn't say democracy doesn't work. it says people in general are bad and evaluating things they do not full understand, even when they think they're well informed they're usually not. the concept that we elect our own leaders is working just fine. this is just a statement on their quality.comp_atkins
THANK YOU. Someone finally agrees with me here.
Avatar image for jetpower3
jetpower3

11631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 jetpower3
Member since 2005 • 11631 Posts

Well, i don't think people are smart enough to make communism work either.

dissonantblack

The groupthink involved would be unbelievable.

Avatar image for Minishdriveby
Minishdriveby

10519

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#141 Minishdriveby
Member since 2006 • 10519 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]the article doesn't say democracy doesn't work. it says people in general are bad and evaluating things they do not full understand, even when they think they're well informed they're usually not. the concept that we elect our own leaders is working just fine. this is just a statement on their quality.ghoklebutter
THANK YOU. Someone finally agrees with me here.

I'll agree that democracy works when the majority is rational and well informed.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

[QUOTE="lordreaven"]

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"]

If everyone has an equal voice, the people have political awareness, and they are adequately educated, then democracy is just fine.

ghoklebutter

But is that case? And will it ever be the case? The answear for both is.... and I qoute "HELL NO".

No, it's not the case. But it can be the case. Your point is moot.

The last time US voter turn out was atleast 70% was back in 1900. The last time voter turn out was even 60% was back in 1968. So who's point was moot?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout#Socio-economic_factors

And look at that chart to the right.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#143 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
This is a given.. Hence why we have a democratic republic.. Mob rule never works.
Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#144 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

This is a given.. Hence why we have a democratic republic.. Mob rule never works.sSubZerOo
It worked with Athens for a while, at least. That was most likely due to the size of the population and probably some other factors revolving around the culture. There's also revolution, but that's just a temporary thing.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
This is a given.. Hence why we have a democratic republic.. Mob rule never works.sSubZerOo
Yup, don't let the stupid majority rule, allow the stupid majority elect stupid Representitives!