Police Search Cell Phones During Routine Traffic Stops

  • 121 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"][QUOTE="dave123321"] Depends on the justification and reason for the search. Have nothing to hide , but still value privacy. It all depends on rather or not it is justifiable. MushroomWig
The question isn't supposed to be asked in the first place because it is nobodies business. The sentence 'if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear' is a very old mental trick. The person stating it always has things to hide, and demands that you don't, because you are 'lesser'. Hence the word 'fear'.

I just think it'll create more problems by refusing. If someone of the law requests to look at something then it doesn't look good if you refuse, it just makes you look guilty of something. So much easier (and quicker) to just them look and move on.

Couldn't the same thing be said for searching someone's house? Where do we draw the line?
Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"][QUOTE="dave123321"] Depends on the justification and reason for the search. Have nothing to hide , but still value privacy. It all depends on rather or not it is justifiable. MushroomWig
The question isn't supposed to be asked in the first place because it is nobodies business. The sentence 'if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear' is a very old mental trick. The person stating it always has things to hide, and demands that you don't, because you are 'lesser'. Hence the word 'fear'.

I just think it'll create more problems by refusing. If someone of the law requests to look at something then it doesn't look good if you refuse, it just makes you look guilty of something. So much easier (and quicker) to just them look and move on.

Which is exactly the mindset they want the people to have.

Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

[QUOTE="Buttons1990"]2) Teenage idiots who have nude pics of their also teenage boy or girlfriend (child porn)MushroomWig
Oh you've got to be kidding me, how the hell can it be considered child porn if you're not even considered an adult? Talk about grasping at straws. xD xD

Ask the kids who have been busted for it already and have been given sex offender status.

Teen Nabbed For Naked MySpace Photos

News Flash: Teens Arrested For Sexting

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts
[QUOTE="Buttons1990"]2) Teenage idiots who have nude pics of their also teenage boy or girlfriend (child porn)MushroomWig
Oh you've got to be kidding me, how the hell can it be considered child porn if you're not even considered an adult? Talk about grasping at straws. xD xD

It's true. Think the law should change in these cases.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#55 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"][QUOTE="dave123321"] Depends on the justification and reason for the search. Have nothing to hide , but still value privacy. It all depends on rather or not it is justifiable. MushroomWig
The question isn't supposed to be asked in the first place because it is nobodies business. The sentence 'if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear' is a very old mental trick. The person stating it always has things to hide, and demands that you don't, because you are 'lesser'. Hence the word 'fear'.

I just think it'll create more problems by refusing. If someone of the law requests to look at something then it doesn't look good if you refuse, it just makes you look guilty of something. So much easier (and quicker) to just them look and move on.

It is and I recommend people to obey. The only problem I have with all this privacy stuff is that it is always one sided. Government, companies, police, and citizens should all give some of their privacy away. Not just citizens. Because that seriously hinders the possibilities for citizens to unite and protest (violently if necessary). Which is imo a must in any form of government, because no form of government has ever worked forever. A government that remains positive for its citizens forever, is a delusion. This is also why I am against the militarization of police. (There are police departments who have tanks at their disposal. Says enough I think.)
Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="KungfuKitten"] The question isn't supposed to be asked in the first place because it is nobodies business. The sentence 'if you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear' is a very old mental trick. The person stating it always has things to hide, and demands that you don't, because you are 'lesser'. Hence the word 'fear'.racer8dan

I just think it'll create more problems by refusing. If someone of the law requests to look at something then it doesn't look good if you refuse, it just makes you look guilty of something. So much easier (and quicker) to just them look and move on.

Which is exactly the mindset they want the people to have.

What's wrong with that? Would you rather 5 minutes of your time being taken up or 10+ hours at a police station by refusing?
Avatar image for jeremiah06
jeremiah06

7217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 jeremiah06
Member since 2004 • 7217 Posts

Here is a little bit about the device in question:

Cellebrite UFED system Real time mobile forensics

The Cellebrite UFED Forensic System is the ultimate standalone mobile forensic device, ready for use out in the field or in the lab.

The UFED system extracts vital information from 95% of all cellular phones on the market today, including smartphones and PDA devices (Palm OS, Microsoft, Blackberry, Symbian, iPhone, and Google Android). Simple to use even in the field with no PC required, the UFED can easily store hundreds of phonebooks and content items onto an SD card or USB flash drive.

Cellebrite UFED supports all known cellular device interfaces, including serial, USB, infrared, and Bluetooth. Extractions can then be brought back to the forensic lab for review and verification using the reporting/analysis tool. Cellebrite works exclusively with most major carriers worldwide including Verizon Wireless, AT&T, Sprint/Nextel, T-Mobile, Rogers Wireless - Canada, Orange France and Telstra Australia, as well as 140 others. This ensures that future devices are supported prior to retail launch.

SECURE EXTRACTION, COMPLETE CONTENT

The UFED allows you to extract a wide variety of data types including:

  • Contacts
  • SMS text messages
  • Deleted text messages (SIM/USIM)
  • Call history (Received, Dialed, Missed)
  • Audio
  • Video
  • Pictures and images
  • Ringtones
  • Phone details (IMEI / ESN, phone number)

REPORTING CAPABILITIES

The Cellebrite UFED system comes complete with a user-friendly PC reporting and analysis software application. Concise, easy to analyze report logs can be generated in HTML, XLS, CSV, and XML formats, providing organized print-outs for use as a reference and in the courtroom.

PROVEN, USER-FRIENDLY INTERFACE

The Cellebrite UFED system is extremely user friendly, with an intuitive interface that has been proven and field tested for over 11 years with hundreds of thousands of users.

YellowOneKinobi
I saw something like that on burn notice... It got everything from the phones Bluetooth...
Avatar image for jshaas
jshaas

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#58 jshaas
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

While I'm not typically a fan of the ACLU, this time I have to give them credit. I can't think of anything that is incriminating on my phone (and no off-color photographs either). However, I have to admit the thought that being pulled over for a broken tail light and having my entire phone scanned creeps me out a little. Any thoughts?

Link to article HERE

From the Article:

A US Department of Justice test of the CelleBrite UFED used by Michigan police found the device could grab all of the photos and video off of an iPhone within one-and-a-half minutes. The device works with 3000 different phone models and can even defeat password protections.

"Complete extraction of existing, hidden, and deleted phone data, including call history, text messages, contacts, images, and geotags," a CelleBrite brochure explains regarding the device's capabilities. "The Physical Analyzer allows visualization of both existing and deleted locations on Google Earth. In addition, location information from GPS devices and image geotags can be mapped on Google Maps."

The ACLU is concerned that these powerful capabilities are being quietly used to bypass Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches

YellowOneKinobi

I'm definitely not a fan of the ACLU either, but they actually got it right this time. I could understand cops looking at your phone to see if you've been texting or talking on it as these are illegal activities in some states. In Georgia it's illegal to text while you're driving. Funny thing is almost everytime I pass a cop they're texting!! But, the ability to scan and retrieve any/all information that's stored on your phone is about as unconstitutional as it gets.

Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] I just think it'll create more problems by refusing. If someone of the law requests to look at something then it doesn't look good if you refuse, it just makes you look guilty of something. So much easier (and quicker) to just them look and move on.MushroomWig

Which is exactly the mindset they want the people to have.

What's wrong with that? Would you rather 5 minutes of your time being taken up or 10+ hours at a police station by refusing?

I understand what you are saying, and the following comment is NOT geared specifically towards you............

It saddens me that people appear to give up their rights so willingly.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#60 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="racer8dan"]Which is exactly the mindset they want the people to have.

YellowOneKinobi

What's wrong with that? Would you rather 5 minutes of your time being taken up or 10+ hours at a police station by refusing?

I understand what you are saying, and the following comment is NOT geared specifically towards you............

It saddens me that people appear to give up their rights so willingly.

There is little else you can do. Yelling at people to wake up is not going to work. The best course of action is logically, the opposite.
Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Buttons1990"]2) Teenage idiots who have nude pics of their also teenage boy or girlfriend (child porn)WhiteKnight77

Oh you've got to be kidding me, how the hell can it be considered child porn if you're not even considered an adult? Talk about grasping at straws. xD xD

Ask the kids who have been busted for it already and have been given sex offender status.

Teen Nabbed For Naked MySpace Photos

News Flash: Teens Arrested For Sexting

That's just stupid, only in America...amiright?
Avatar image for jeremiah06
jeremiah06

7217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 jeremiah06
Member since 2004 • 7217 Posts

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

[QUOTE="Buttons1990"]

Don't have illegal **** on your phone, problem solved.

Or better yet, don't break the law, problem solved before you ever even encounter police.

I love when everyone is up in arms about things the police do... You don't like it, move to Mexico, gtfo out of our country then.

Buttons1990

Who decides what is the law when you have no choice but to obey it in every minute and every facet of your life? I doubt that they feel any different about you.

And? I could care less if the police look at what is on my phone... What are they going to do? Steal my videos? Sell my information to telemarketers? Come on? Really? The only people who have a problem with this are 1) Idiots who overreact about everything. 2) Teenage idiots who have nude pics of their also teenage boy or girlfriend (child porn). 3) Idiots with illegal/illicit images/information on their phones...

Did you even read the article?

""""With certain exceptions that do not apply here, a search cannot occur without a warrant in which a judicial officer determines that there is probable cause to believe that the search will yield evidence of criminal activity...."""

You people are acting like they just pull up and with no cause at all rip everything off your phone... No, they don't do that... You people are all insane.

Complete hogwash... Do you know how many times a police officer has tried to conduct an illegal search on me? They just say "Do you have keys?" Or they just take them after the pat down... I don't do illegal stuff... However I don't just let that crap fly...

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Oh you've got to be kidding me, how the hell can it be considered child porn if you're not even considered an adult? Talk about grasping at straws. xD xDMushroomWig

Ask the kids who have been busted for it already and have been given sex offender status.

Teen Nabbed For Naked MySpace Photos

News Flash: Teens Arrested For Sexting

That's just stupid, only in America...amiright?

Teenagers these days are so addicted to technology that they forget whats legal and whats illegal. Teens feel a sense of self-entitlement and its growing into arrogance. Look at me, i sound old.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] I just think it'll create more problems by refusing. If someone of the law requests to look at something then it doesn't look good if you refuse, it just makes you look guilty of something. So much easier (and quicker) to just them look and move on.MushroomWig

Which is exactly the mindset they want the people to have.

What's wrong with that? Would you rather 5 minutes of your time being taken up or 10+ hours at a police station by refusing?

Everything is wrong with that. People are too pre-occupied with their distractions that they don't care that their children's country is going to hell.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#65 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

Ask the kids who have been busted for it already and have been given sex offender status.

Teen Nabbed For Naked MySpace Photos

News Flash: Teens Arrested For Sexting

DroidPhysX

That's just stupid, only in America...amiright?

Teenagers these days are so addicted to technology that they forget whats legal and whats illegal. Teens feel a sense of self-entitlement and its growing into arrogance. Look at me, i sound old.

Just a question as I'm interested in the way you think. You seem to have very strong opinions. Isn't this a vicious circle? Should the law be adjusted to the new peoples' self entitlement, for right now the new generation is growing up as criminals, without any respect for the law? I'm the Y generation so I only have this feeling a little bit. To them, the law is less about protection of the people, than it is about taking our money. My sister (14 years old) told me about the police (translated): "The law is there to let people take our money if they want to, and the police help them." Even I am noticing that dramatic change in law enforcement though that might have to do with me growing up. When I see police the first thought in my mind is "Is there something I'm doing that could cost me money?" That used to be very different.
Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

Ask the kids who have been busted for it already and have been given sex offender status.

Teen Nabbed For Naked MySpace Photos

News Flash: Teens Arrested For Sexting

DroidPhysX

That's just stupid, only in America...amiright?

Teenagers these days are so addicted to technology that they forget whats legal and whats illegal. Teens feel a sense of self-entitlement and its growing into arrogance. Look at me, i sound old.

So what you're saying is teenagers have no right to explore their sexuality with their girlfriends/boyfriends if they're not together?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] That's just stupid, only in America...amiright?MushroomWig

Teenagers these days are so addicted to technology that they forget whats legal and whats illegal. Teens feel a sense of self-entitlement and its growing into arrogance. Look at me, i sound old.

So what you're saying is teenagers have no right to explore their sexuality with their girlfriends/boyfriends if they're not together?

they should only explore their sexuality on school grounds within a structured and monitored environment

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Teenagers these days are so addicted to technology that they forget whats legal and whats illegal. Teens feel a sense of self-entitlement and its growing into arrogance. Look at me, i sound old.

surrealnumber5

So what you're saying is teenagers have no right to explore their sexuality with their girlfriends/boyfriends if they're not together?

they should only explore their sexuality on school grounds within a structured and monitored environment

Heh, I hope you're kidding.
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
Welp, looks like I'll be encrypting my phone now too. I don't have anything even remotely illegal on there, but I'm fiercely protective of my privacy. And while that device can get past password protection there's no way it can get past AES-256 bit encryption.
Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#70 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] That's just stupid, only in America...amiright?KungfuKitten

Teenagers these days are so addicted to technology that they forget whats legal and whats illegal. Teens feel a sense of self-entitlement and its growing into arrogance. Look at me, i sound old.

Just a question as I'm interested in the way you think. You seem to have very strong opinions. Isn't this a vicious circle? Should the law be adjusted to the new peoples' self entitlement, for right now the new generation is growing up as criminals, without any respect for the law? I'm the Y generation so I only have this feeling a little bit. To them, the law is less about protection of the people, than it is about taking our money. My sister (14 years old) told me about the police (translated): "The law is there to let people take our money if they want to, and the police help them." Even I am noticing that dramatic change in law enforcement though that might have to do with me growing up. When I see police the first thought in my mind is "Is there something I'm doing that could cost me money?" That used to be very different.

I mean, to me, the law shouldn't be adjusted to new peoples' self entitlement. We'd be just catering to newer and newer attitudes of self entitlements as each generation comes along if we did adjust the law. It's the slippery slope theory in action. My philosophy goes like this: The law doesn't adjust to you, you adjust to the law. Now this creates problems if people introduce morality issues such as abortion. But for most laws, it still stands.
Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#71 ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts
That could tell the cops whether or not you were being an idiot and texting while driving. Then they can fine you like you deserve. I think if the cop suspects you were using your phone while driving he can scan it. If he doesn't suspect it or didn't see you doing so they should just let it be.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] So what you're saying is teenagers have no right to explore their sexuality with their girlfriends/boyfriends if they're not together?MushroomWig

they should only explore their sexuality on school grounds within a structured and monitored environment

Heh, I hope you're kidding.

oh let me guess you hate the fire dept, police, army and old people too. typical ultra right wing tea party sarah palin glen beck supporter.

Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts
I'd laugh and hand it to them.
Avatar image for Dawq902
Dawq902

6796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#74 Dawq902
Member since 2007 • 6796 Posts

No cop will EVER touch my cell phone.

Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts
Actually, now that I think about it, if a cop came to my door unprovoked and asked if he could step inside and take a look around I'd let him. Am I a bad person?
Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

Teenagers these days are so addicted to technology that they forget whats legal and whats illegal. Teens feel a sense of self-entitlement and its growing into arrogance. Look at me, i sound old.

DroidPhysX

Just a question as I'm interested in the way you think. You seem to have very strong opinions. Isn't this a vicious circle? Should the law be adjusted to the new peoples' self entitlement, for right now the new generation is growing up as criminals, without any respect for the law? I'm the Y generation so I only have this feeling a little bit. To them, the law is less about protection of the people, than it is about taking our money. My sister (14 years old) told me about the police (translated): "The law is there to let people take our money if they want to, and the police help them." Even I am noticing that dramatic change in law enforcement though that might have to do with me growing up. When I see police the first thought in my mind is "Is there something I'm doing that could cost me money?" That used to be very different.

I mean, to me, the law shouldn't be adjusted to new peoples' self entitlement. We'd be just catering to newer and newer attitudes of self entitlements as each generation comes along if we did adjust the law. It's the slippery slope theory in action. My philosophy goes like this: The law doesn't adjust to you, you adjust to the law. Now this creates problems if people introduce morality issues such as abortion. But for most laws, it still stands.

I think there is a tendency nowadays to stoop to the lowest common denominator. Sort of like how some schools will advance a failing student to the next grade so he doesn't FEEL bad. Kids start dipping into daddy's liquor cabinet, so some parents say, "You can drink even though you're under age, as long as you do it at home."

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

No cop will EVER touch my cell phone.

Dawq902
See now I think you've got something to hide.
Avatar image for skinny_man_69
skinny_man_69

5147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 94

User Lists: 0

#78 skinny_man_69
Member since 2005 • 5147 Posts

I would have a few...ahem, risque properties on my phone. Nothing illegal just....I would prefer if a cop (or anyone for that matter) didn't look through it >.>

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
[QUOTE="Dawq902"]

No cop will EVER touch my cell phone.

MushroomWig
See now I think you've got something to hide.

Right, because if someone doesn't want their entire private life exposed they obviously have something to hide. Why not make it so that everyone has to have their home searched by the police once every month, at random? If you've got nothing to hide then there's really no reason to be against it. Hey, why don't we just install cameras in every room of people's houses and make it illegal to tamper with them? I mean, you've got nothing to hide, right?
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts

Don't have illegal **** on your phone, problem solved.

Or better yet, don't break the law, problem solved before you ever even encounter police.

I love when everyone is up in arms about things the police do... You don't like it, move to Mexico, gtfo out of our country then.

Buttons1990
Nah i think we'll go back to England..............ironically.
Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts
[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Dawq902"]

No cop will EVER touch my cell phone.

gameguy6700
See now I think you've got something to hide.

Right, because if someone doesn't want their entire private life exposed they obviously have something to hide. Why not make it so that everyone has to have their home searched by the police once every month, at random? If you've got nothing to hide then there's really no reason to be against it. Hey, why don't we just install cameras in every room of people's houses and make it illegal to tamper with them? I mean, you've got nothing to hide, right?

That would provide police plenty of evidence for domestic disturbances and other illegal activities people do in their home. Wouldn't be a 'he said, she said' issue anymore.
Avatar image for WhiteKnight77
WhiteKnight77

12605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 WhiteKnight77
Member since 2003 • 12605 Posts

[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]

Ask the kids who have been busted for it already and have been given sex offender status.

Teen Nabbed For Naked MySpace Photos

News Flash: Teens Arrested For Sexting

MushroomWig

That's just stupid, only in America...amiright?

No, not stupid. I actually agree with it. Kids have no idea what can happen once a pic of them gets sent to someone else. There are many stories of kids getting busted for child porn as they posted the pics on Facebook, Myspace or other places or sent it on to other people which in turns gets sent on to even others. Girls run on emotion in a relationship. Guys don't. Guys play on that to get said pictures and when something happens, those pics are posted by the pissed off ex. Neither are thinking about right or wrong, but getting busted for child porn is a wake up call. Kids want rights (and do have some), but they fail to take the responsibility that goes with said right.

Should child porn laws take into account someones age? No. There is no need. Kids should know right from wrong and that pictures of someone that is underage is illegal.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

if it's a routines traffic stop then all you have to say is "i do not consent to any searches." and then, "am i free to go or am i being detained?".

at that point the police either have to let you go, give you the ticket or place you under arrest.

any promises to go easy on you if you cooperate are lies.

when i am stopped i do not consent for a pile of reasons, your property can be damaged and by consenting and you have no legal recourse for fixingdamage, the previous owner of the car or your friends could have left something there, my personal views about what i allow the state to do to me.

refusing consent also sets up some legal defenses that you never get by voluntarily giving up your rights.

p.s. always be polite and helpful.

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts
[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="Dawq902"]

No cop will EVER touch my cell phone.

gameguy6700
See now I think you've got something to hide.

Right, because if someone doesn't want their entire private life exposed they obviously have something to hide. Why not make it so that everyone has to have their home searched by the police once every month, at random? If you've got nothing to hide then there's really no reason to be against it. Hey, why don't we just install cameras in every room of people's houses and make it illegal to tamper with them? I mean, you've got nothing to hide, right?

Fine by me, if there's a chance that it would stop crime then it's worth it.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"][QUOTE="MushroomWig"] See now I think you've got something to hide.MushroomWig
Right, because if someone doesn't want their entire private life exposed they obviously have something to hide. Why not make it so that everyone has to have their home searched by the police once every month, at random? If you've got nothing to hide then there's really no reason to be against it. Hey, why don't we just install cameras in every room of people's houses and make it illegal to tamper with them? I mean, you've got nothing to hide, right?

Fine by me, if there's a chance that it would stop crime then it's worth it.

I believe Thomas Jefferson just rolled over in his grave.

Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts
Our society as a whole makes Thomas Jefferson roll over in his grave. And I couldn't care less what TJ thinks.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="gameguy6700"] Right, because if someone doesn't want their entire private life exposed they obviously have something to hide. Why not make it so that everyone has to have their home searched by the police once every month, at random? If you've got nothing to hide then there's really no reason to be against it. Hey, why don't we just install cameras in every room of people's houses and make it illegal to tamper with them? I mean, you've got nothing to hide, right?racer8dan

Fine by me, if there's a chance that it would stop crime then it's worth it.

I believe Thomas Jefferson just rolled over in his grave.

this site caused him to disintegrate vie centrifugal force long ago

Avatar image for deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
deactivated-5cacc9e03b460

6976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-5cacc9e03b460
Member since 2005 • 6976 Posts

[QUOTE="racer8dan"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Fine by me, if there's a chance that it would stop crime then it's worth it.surrealnumber5

I believe Thomas Jefferson just rolled over in his grave.

this site caused him to disintegrate vie centrifugal force long ago

:lol: I don't doubt it.

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"][QUOTE="gameguy6700"] Right, because if someone doesn't want their entire private life exposed they obviously have something to hide. Why not make it so that everyone has to have their home searched by the police once every month, at random? If you've got nothing to hide then there's really no reason to be against it. Hey, why don't we just install cameras in every room of people's houses and make it illegal to tamper with them? I mean, you've got nothing to hide, right?racer8dan

Fine by me, if there's a chance that it would stop crime then it's worth it.

I believe Thomas Jefferson just rolled over in his grave.

Thomas Jefferson didn't live in our times, it's a different world now.
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#90 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts

Geez -- between this news and learning that Your iphone Is Secretly Tracking Everywhere You've Been I am starting to get really creeped out...

Avatar image for kayoticdreamz
kayoticdreamz

3347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 kayoticdreamz
Member since 2010 • 3347 Posts
i too am like TC. i rarely agree with the ACLU....but for once i agree with them. i hope they stop the lousy government from allowing this stupid law to pass. i mean does no politician anywhere give a crap about the constitution and freedom anymore?
Avatar image for AL_GREEN
AL_GREEN

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 AL_GREEN
Member since 2010 • 953 Posts

Don't have illegal **** on your phone, problem solved.

Or better yet, don't break the law, problem solved before you ever even encounter police.

I love when everyone is up in arms about things the police do... You don't like it, move to Mexico, gtfo out of our country then.

Buttons1990
Lol sheep
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#93 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

The device works with 3000 different phone models and can even defeat password protections.YellowOneKinobi

O_O

Not something anyone should be capable of wielding. Ever.

This goes beyond "invasion of privacy."

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] The device works with 3000 different phone models and can even defeat password protections.foxhound_fox


O_O

Not something anyone should be capable of wielding. Ever.

This goes beyond "invasion of privacy."

i wonder how much one of those things would sell for on the black market to an ID thief

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

That's some creepy f***ing s***.

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] The device works with 3000 different phone models and can even defeat password protections.foxhound_fox


O_O

Not something anyone should be capable of wielding. Ever.

This goes beyond "invasion of privacy."

Really? So what about in a situation where you need the information to save someones life?

"Quick, use the device so we can get the address to where little Jimmy is being held!"

"We can't.....foxhound_fox doesn't want us to use it"

"...damn."

You killed little Jimmy, I hope you're happy!

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#97 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"] The device works with 3000 different phone models and can even defeat password protections.MushroomWig


O_O

Not something anyone should be capable of wielding. Ever.

This goes beyond "invasion of privacy."

Really? So what about in a situation where you need the information to save someones life?

"Quick, use the device so we can get the address to where little Jimmy is being held!"

"We can't.....foxhound_fox doesn't want us to use it"

"...damn."

You killed little Jimmy, I hope you're happy!

I do approve of full transparency though I think most people would value everyone's privacy more than someones life.
Nowadays all they need to do to find Jimmy's location is to text his image to everyone in the area or to look at the kidnappers googlemaps history.
If parents are concerned that their kid might be kidnapped you can chip him/her so that you can always request information on his/her location when necessary. The chips are very small and the kid doesn't even have to know.

Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
O_O

Not something anyone should be capable of wielding. Ever.

This goes beyond "invasion of privacy."

KungfuKitten

Really? So what about in a situation where you need the information to save someones life?

"Quick, use the device so we can get the address to where little Jimmy is being held!"

"We can't.....foxhound_fox doesn't want us to use it"

"...damn."

You killed little Jimmy, I hope you're happy!

I do approve of full transparency though I think most people would value everyone's privacy more than someones life.
Nowadays all they need to do to find Jimmy's location is to text his image to everyone in the area or to look at the kidnappers googlemaps history.
If parents are concerned that their kid might be kidnapped you can chip him/her so that you can always request information on his/her location when necessary. The chips are very small and the kid doesn't even have to know.

Wait, so you're okay with children being chipped?

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#99 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"]

[QUOTE="MushroomWig"] Really? So what about in a situation where you need the information to save someones life?

"Quick, use the device so we can get the address to where little Jimmy is being held!"

"We can't.....foxhound_fox doesn't want us to use it"

"...damn."

You killed little Jimmy, I hope you're happy!

MushroomWig

I do approve of full transparency though I think most people would value everyone's privacy more than someones life.
Nowadays all they need to do to find Jimmy's location is to text his image to everyone in the area or to look at the kidnappers googlemaps history.
If parents are concerned that their kid might be kidnapped you can chip him/her so that you can always request information on his/her location when necessary. The chips are very small and the kid doesn't even have to know.

Wait, so you're okay with children being chipped?

You're not ok with that? It sounds kind of useful.

Avatar image for SouL-Tak3R
SouL-Tak3R

4024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#100 SouL-Tak3R
Member since 2005 • 4024 Posts

It should most definitely be illegal to search through someones phone for a traffic stop.