Prop 8 set to Pass (Samesex Marriage Ban)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LittleHands134
LittleHands134

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LittleHands134
Member since 2008 • 1176 Posts

So how does OT feel about it? Looks like Prop 8 (Ban on gay marriage in California) is about to win with a 52% victory.

Edit: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/individual/#CAI01

Avatar image for dracula_16
dracula_16

16538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#2 dracula_16
Member since 2005 • 16538 Posts
So much for land of the free.
Avatar image for cousin_eddy
cousin_eddy

74681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#3 cousin_eddy
Member since 2004 • 74681 Posts

So much for land of the free.dracula_16

Indeed.

Avatar image for LittleHands134
LittleHands134

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LittleHands134
Member since 2008 • 1176 Posts

So much for land of the free.dracula_16

I don't know if that's fair to say. People were free to vote against it, but the majority voted for it. It's not like the Government is forcing this on California.

Avatar image for jubino
jubino

6265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 jubino
Member since 2005 • 6265 Posts

[QUOTE="dracula_16"]So much for land of the free.LittleHands134

I don't know if that's fair to say. People were free to vote against it, but the majority voted for it. It's not like the Government is forcing this on California.

That's true. It's not the land of the free, but rather the land of the majority rules. So sorry if it's not in your favor. Perhaps people in the future will be more understanding. I am a bit shocked that it is being passed, though.

Avatar image for Jaforbe
Jaforbe

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Jaforbe
Member since 2008 • 817 Posts

Land of the free? You still have to protect values and such. Free doesnt mean just doing whatever you feel like. We vote on things like this for a reason.

Avatar image for blasted_panties
blasted_panties

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 blasted_panties
Member since 2008 • 127 Posts
It seems so ironic that the very same states that voted Obama in should choose to vote against gay marriage. It makes you wonder just where their motives are at.
Avatar image for Jaforbe
Jaforbe

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Jaforbe
Member since 2008 • 817 Posts

It seems so ironic that the very same states that voted Obama in should choose to vote against gay marriage. It makes you wonder just where their motives are at.blasted_panties

I thought Obama himself was against gay marriage. I could be wrong though.

Avatar image for leviathan91
leviathan91

7763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 leviathan91
Member since 2007 • 7763 Posts

[QUOTE="blasted_panties"]It seems so ironic that the very same states that voted Obama in should choose to vote against gay marriage. It makes you wonder just where their motives are at.Jaforbe

I thought Obama himself was against gay marriage. I could be wrong though.

He's morally against it and believes that the states should decide this. But he was against Proposition 8.

Avatar image for LittleHands134
LittleHands134

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LittleHands134
Member since 2008 • 1176 Posts

[QUOTE="blasted_panties"]It seems so ironic that the very same states that voted Obama in should choose to vote against gay marriage. It makes you wonder just where their motives are at.Jaforbe

I thought Obama himself was against gay marriage. I could be wrong though.

I'm pretty sure he supports it.

Avatar image for DJ_Novakain
DJ_Novakain

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 DJ_Novakain
Member since 2008 • 2147 Posts

I don't understand the whole voting on civil rights deal. Of course it won't get passed, because gays are the minority. Had we voted on abolishing slavery, we would probably have voted no. Had we voted on giving women the right to vote, they would have most likely lost. It simply isn't fair to decide weather or not to grant a MINORITY a right in a election based on amount of votes.

The fact that this would even pass is disgusting. It is more or less saying "WE don't like it, so YOU can't do it." Whatever happened to civil rights.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180096 Posts
So much for land of the free.dracula_16
Freedom...the most misunderstood concept in existence...
Avatar image for DJ_Novakain
DJ_Novakain

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 DJ_Novakain
Member since 2008 • 2147 Posts

Land of the free? You still have to protect values and such. Free doesnt mean just doing whatever you feel like. We vote on things like this for a reason.

Jaforbe
Free implies that you aren't bound by others twisted sense of morality. And it sure as hell isn't equal, which the US also loves to go on about.
Avatar image for ThePlothole
ThePlothole

11515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ThePlothole
Member since 2007 • 11515 Posts
Angry. I see these state bans as nothing less than the 21st century's answer to the Jim Crow laws. Bigotry in legal form.
Avatar image for LittleHands134
LittleHands134

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 LittleHands134
Member since 2008 • 1176 Posts
One thing that concerns me is that this could probably pass in any state now. I never would have thought California would have banned it.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180096 Posts
Angry. I see these state bans as nothing less than the 21st century's answer to the Jim Crow laws. Bigotry in legal form.ThePlothole
The definition of marriage is rather specific to people. Again.....that agenda shouldn't have been pushed. Try civil unions....like the UK.
Avatar image for Jaforbe
Jaforbe

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Jaforbe
Member since 2008 • 817 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaforbe"]

Land of the free? You still have to protect values and such. Free doesnt mean just doing whatever you feel like. We vote on things like this for a reason.

DJ_Novakain

Free implies that you aren't bound by others twisted sense of morality. And it sure as hell isn't equal, which the US also loves to go on about.

Who are you to say whats twisted and what isnt? And nothing is equal, everyone knows that. Theres just things that arent socially acceptable, like inbreeding, beastiality, and same-sex-marriage. Im so sick of everyone telling me I have to be ok with it.

Avatar image for DJ_Novakain
DJ_Novakain

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 DJ_Novakain
Member since 2008 • 2147 Posts
[QUOTE="DJ_Novakain"][QUOTE="Jaforbe"]

Land of the free? You still have to protect values and such. Free doesnt mean just doing whatever you feel like. We vote on things like this for a reason.

Jaforbe

Free implies that you aren't bound by others twisted sense of morality. And it sure as hell isn't equal, which the US also loves to go on about.

Who are you to say whats twisted and what isnt? And nothing is equal, everyone knows that. Theres just things that arent socially acceptable, like inbreeding, beastiality, and same-sex-marriage. Im so sick of everyone telling me I have to be ok with it.

You don't have to be okay with it. But that doesn't make it your place to tell them they can't do it. I hate alcohol, but Im not gonna make you stop drinking it.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180096 Posts
You don't have to be okay with it. But that doesn't make it your place to tell them they can't do it. I hate alcohol, but Im not gonna make you stop drinking it. DJ_Novakain
To be fair both sides are doing the same.
Avatar image for Jaforbe
Jaforbe

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Jaforbe
Member since 2008 • 817 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaforbe"][QUOTE="DJ_Novakain"][QUOTE="Jaforbe"]

Land of the free? You still have to protect values and such. Free doesnt mean just doing whatever you feel like. We vote on things like this for a reason.

DJ_Novakain

Free implies that you aren't bound by others twisted sense of morality. And it sure as hell isn't equal, which the US also loves to go on about.

Who are you to say whats twisted and what isnt? And nothing is equal, everyone knows that. Theres just things that arent socially acceptable, like inbreeding, beastiality, and same-sex-marriage. Im so sick of everyone telling me I have to be ok with it.

You don't have to be okay with it. But that doesn't make it your place to tell them they can't do it. I hate alcohol, but Im not gonna make you stop drinking it.

Well, its force fed down our throats here in California. Everywhere I go its "look at me, im gay and so proud of it!". I dont go around saying "Hey everyone, Im straight and I love it!". They make such an effort to get accepted that it seems like an infringement most of the time.

Avatar image for _Tobli_
_Tobli_

5733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 _Tobli_
Member since 2007 • 5733 Posts

Well, its force fed down our throats here in California. Everywhere I go its "look at me, im gay and so proud of it!". I dont go around saying "Hey everyone, Im straight and I love it!". They make such an effort to get accepted that it seems like an infringement most of the time.Jaforbe

That is because everyone assumes that you are straight until you correct them. Not to mention the ammount of hatred that is aimed towards them for no good reason. How many people that are assaulted just because they are homosexual, etc.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180096 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaforbe"]Well, its force fed down our throats here in California. Everywhere I go its "look at me, im gay and so proud of it!". I dont go around saying "Hey everyone, Im straight and I love it!". They make such an effort to get accepted that it seems like an infringement most of the time._Tobli_

That is because everyone assumes that you are straight until you correct them. Not to mention the ammount of hatred that is aimed towards them for no good reason. How many people that are assaulted just because they are homosexual, etc.

Bit of an exaggeration. I haven't heard much of that in the news for years. Sure an occurance may happen but it's not common.
Avatar image for Jaforbe
Jaforbe

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Jaforbe
Member since 2008 • 817 Posts
Well, if people want to preach tolerance, you should tolerate others opinions as well. I dont accept it and I should not have to defend myself, neither should anyone else who is not ok with it. My beliefs are my own.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180096 Posts
Most individuals are only tolerant to what they believe.;)
Avatar image for DJ_Novakain
DJ_Novakain

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 DJ_Novakain
Member since 2008 • 2147 Posts
Well, if people want to preach tolerance, you should tolerate others opinions as well. I dont accept it and I should not have to defend myself, neither should anyone else who is not ok with it. My beliefs are my own.Jaforbe
No one is asking you to change your beliefs. They are just asking for the same rights as everyone else. I don't get why that is so much to ask.
Avatar image for _Tobli_
_Tobli_

5733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 _Tobli_
Member since 2007 • 5733 Posts

Well, if people want to preach tolerance, you should tolerate others opinions as well. I dont accept it and I should not have to defend myself, neither should anyone else who is not ok with it. My beliefs are my own.Jaforbe

Tolerance=intolerance, war=peace, freedom=slavery .

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180096 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaforbe"]Well, if people want to preach tolerance, you should tolerate others opinions as well. I dont accept it and I should not have to defend myself, neither should anyone else who is not ok with it. My beliefs are my own.DJ_Novakain
No one is asking you to change your beliefs. They are just asking for the same rights as everyone else. I don't get why that is so much to ask.

Rights in marriage? Everyone would turned down for the same reasons. I think you might want to reword that....
Avatar image for Jaforbe
Jaforbe

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Jaforbe
Member since 2008 • 817 Posts

[QUOTE="Jaforbe"]Well, if people want to preach tolerance, you should tolerate others opinions as well. I dont accept it and I should not have to defend myself, neither should anyone else who is not ok with it. My beliefs are my own._Tobli_

Tolerance=intolerance, war=peace, freedom=slavery .

Really, putting 2 opposites on each side with a = sign in the middle isnt an argument. And there is basic human rights and rights given by the society you chose to live in. Marriage is something invented by people, and it is also regulated by those same people. If you live in California at this time, Gay marriage isnt a allowed. Thats how it works.

Avatar image for DJ_Novakain
DJ_Novakain

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DJ_Novakain
Member since 2008 • 2147 Posts
[QUOTE="DJ_Novakain"][QUOTE="Jaforbe"]Well, if people want to preach tolerance, you should tolerate others opinions as well. I dont accept it and I should not have to defend myself, neither should anyone else who is not ok with it. My beliefs are my own.LJS9502_basic
No one is asking you to change your beliefs. They are just asking for the same rights as everyone else. I don't get why that is so much to ask.

Rights in marriage? Everyone would turned down for the same reasons. I think you might want to reword that....

You understand the point. Why can't we just give homosexuals the same marriage rights as stright couples?
Avatar image for LittleHands134
LittleHands134

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 LittleHands134
Member since 2008 • 1176 Posts

Kind of unrelated to the topic, but here's something I've never understood. In the gay pride parades, why do they dance around in a vulgar, flashy way? If it wasn't for those kinds of things I don't think there would be such a strong, negative stereotype against homosexuals.

Most people know there's plenty of normal people who are gay but it's sometimes hard to realize that when you see people in purple tights pelvic thrusting on a float.

Avatar image for bsman00
bsman00

6038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 bsman00
Member since 2008 • 6038 Posts
I will never understand why people don't allow gay marriage. It does not affect anyone except the party's involved. You wont turn gay for allowing gays to marry.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180096 Posts
You understand the point. Why can't we just give homosexuals the same marriage rights as stright couples?DJ_Novakain
Apparently people aren't ready for it. That's why they should use the UK word civil union. Then there should be no argument. It would be a government sanctioned union for same sex couples to receive the same benefits.....and the same divorces. Sorry...anti marriage here...(for everyone).
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="DJ_Novakain"] You understand the point. Why can't we just give homosexuals the same marriage rights as stright couples?LJS9502_basic
Apparently people aren't ready for it. That's why they should use the UK word civil union. Then there should be no argument. It would be a government sanctioned union for same sex couples to receive the same benefits.....and the same divorces. Sorry...anti marriage here...(for everyone).

I agree with this.
Avatar image for deactivated-5df4e79c309ad
deactivated-5df4e79c309ad

6045

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-5df4e79c309ad
Member since 2005 • 6045 Posts

So how does OT feel about it? Looks like Prop 8 (Ban on gay marriage in California) is about to win with a 52% victory.

Edit: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/individual/#CAI01

LittleHands134

This is very good news. Praise God!:D

Avatar image for omfg_its_dally
omfg_its_dally

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 omfg_its_dally
Member since 2006 • 8068 Posts
I'm not gay so I don't really care if this was passed or not. But what I can't understand is why it is such a big issue for gay people to get married and why so many people would vote to take their right away to do so.
Avatar image for Archon_
Archon_

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Archon_
Member since 2003 • 110 Posts

Look, its simple. Marriage = (equals) the union of a MAN and a WOMAN. Nothing else. That is marriage by definition and by tradition. Man/Man can never and will never be equal to that because they arent. Its very easy. Men cant reproduce together. It simply doesnt work that way.

In other words, it has nothing to do with people opposing the union of two men or two women. It is all to do with terminology. DONT CALL IT MARRIAGE. That is wrong.

Now, if they called it something else (ie civil union) than it wouldnt be a problem, because that is what it is. Get it through ya minds, please.

thx

Avatar image for bsman00
bsman00

6038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 bsman00
Member since 2008 • 6038 Posts

Look, its simple. Marriage = (equals) the union of a MAN and a WOMAN. Nothing else. That is marriage by definition and by tradition. Man/Man can never and will never be equal to that because they arent. Its very easy. Men cant reproduce together. It simply doesnt work that way.

Now, if they called it something else (ie civil union) than it wouldnt be a problem, because that is what it is. Get it through ya minds, please.

thx

Archon_

Yes but if two men get married does that affect you as a person? Just admit it you dont like the idea of two guys kissing... thats why people wont let them have the same benefits as a marriage between a man and a woman

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
thats why people wont let them have the same benefits as a marriage between a man and a womanbsman00
I never understood. People are just arguing for benefits, right? Who cares about a religious marriage? :x Of course, I'm not religious, so what do I know :lol:
Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts

America is a semi-Christian country (with all the "God Bless America", "God help us" thrown around).

Most Christians view gay marriage as immoral (i think even Obama does).

It's therefore easy to conclude that some people/Christians would want that ban.

Avatar image for omfg_its_dally
omfg_its_dally

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 omfg_its_dally
Member since 2006 • 8068 Posts

Look, its simple. Marriage = (equals) the union of a MAN and a WOMAN. Nothing else. That is marriage by definition and by tradition. Man/Man can never and will never be equal to that because they arent. Its very easy. Men cant reproduce together. It simply doesnt work that way.

In other words, it has nothing to do with people opposing the union of two men or two women. It is all to do with terminology. DONT CALL IT MARRIAGE. That is wrong.

Now, if they called it something else (ie civil union) than it wouldnt be a problem, because that is what it is. Get it through ya minds, please.

thx

Archon_

Meh...The word "Marriage" to me means an official union between two life partners. All this fuss over a word?

Avatar image for North-North
North-North

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 North-North
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

So much for land of the free.dracula_16

My thoughts exactly. But the people do get to vote on wheter to ban someone's civil right.

Avatar image for ragek1ll589
ragek1ll589

8650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 ragek1ll589
Member since 2007 • 8650 Posts

That's a shame, I think gay couples should be allowed to marry and have the same rights as married heterosexuals. It just goes to show you the bigotry that still exists in this country. Honestly, how does allowing a gay couple to marry hurt you?

Avatar image for ragek1ll589
ragek1ll589

8650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 ragek1ll589
Member since 2007 • 8650 Posts
[QUOTE="Archon_"]

Look, its simple. Marriage = (equals) the union of a MAN and a WOMAN. Nothing else. That is marriage by definition and by tradition. Man/Man can never and will never be equal to that because they arent. Its very easy. Men cant reproduce together. It simply doesnt work that way.

In other words, it has nothing to do with people opposing the union of two men or two women. It is all to do with terminology. DONT CALL IT MARRIAGE. That is wrong.

Now, if they called it something else (ie civil union) than it wouldnt be a problem, because that is what it is. Get it through ya minds, please.

thx

omfg_its_dally

Meh...The word "Marriage" to me means an official union between two life partners. All this fuss over a word?

Thats the thing, the Church defines marriage as between a man and a woman. But since seperation of church and state clearly doesn't exist, that definition was adopted by the states.

By the way, I'm Catholic.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
finally something good happening to this country.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180096 Posts
finally something good happening to this country. Hopefully they'll ban being homosexual altogether next. Silenthps
Wow dude. Banning people....somwhat like what happened in WW2?
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Hopefully they'll ban being homosexual altogether next. Silenthps
:lol: :| Lame. What an atrocious thing to say.
Avatar image for MrLions
MrLions

9833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#48 MrLions
Member since 2007 • 9833 Posts
Dosn't affect me,can't vote,don't care. :P
Avatar image for stevenk4k5
stevenk4k5

5608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 stevenk4k5
Member since 2005 • 5608 Posts
Well that's a shame. California was the first state to even allow gay marriage and now it's about to be overturned because some crackpots disagree with it. Not much anyone can do though as it was a vote... And to the person speaking about the Gay Pride Parades: I agree, lol. If gays want to be respected I believe they should present themselves in a way as to gain that respect. Don't march through Cali, New York, and D.C. wearing pink leather chaps, feather boas, while dancing to "It's Raining Men"; it really is an embarassment to all parties involved and only reinforces gay stereotypes (which is the reason many people look down on gays in the first place).
Avatar image for jubino
jubino

6265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#50 jubino
Member since 2005 • 6265 Posts

Well that's a shame. California was the first state to even allow gay marriage and now it's about to be overturned because some crackpots disagree with it. Not much anyone can do though as it was a vote... And to the person speaking about the Gay Pride Parades: I agree, lol. If gays want to be respected I believe they should present themselves in a way as to gain that respect. Don't march through Cali, New York, and D.C. wearing pink leather chaps, feather boas, while dancing to "It's Raining Men"; it really is an embarassment to all parties involved and only reinforces gay stereotypes (which is the reason many people look down on gays in the first place).stevenk4k5

Some crackpots? So 52% of the entire population of California are crackpots? That's silly. As for the gay pride comments, I couldn't agree more. If they ever want to be taken seriously as part of the community, they shouldn't try to be as "out there" as possible. Those people need to show some class.