Pure communism or Pure capitalism??

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

Assume for a second that Marx's theory was perfect in practice and that pure capitalism was to be applied as well (privatisation of everything). They both work like they say they do on paper. Which one would you prefer? In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living with your quality in life moving up as the society progresses as a whole. In pure capitalism you are not guaranteed anything, but you have the chance to move forward and backwards as well (alone, however). Which society would you prefer?

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Pure capitalism
Avatar image for TwoFace-BS
TwoFace-BS

9531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TwoFace-BS
Member since 2011 • 9531 Posts
Capitalism Pure Communism hasnt actually worked for a country yet
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts
[QUOTE="TwoFace-BS"]Capitalism Pure Communism hasnt actually worked for a country yet

Read the OP. Assume that it did work perfectly. Pure capitalism has never really been applied either.
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
[QUOTE="TwoFace-BS"]Capitalism Pure Communism hasnt actually worked for a country yet

Neither has pure Capitalism. Ideally, they're both nice on paper, I kinda like pure Communism better I guess.
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12873 Posts

Neither. Pure capitalism isn't very great because it doesn't address market failures, nor the need for public goods. Pure communism isn't great because it does't address private goods efficiently nor does it facilitate competition or progression. Capitalism is more efficient but more destructive while Communism is less efficient and non progressive.

EDIT - Considering if they worked perfectly, I would choose Capitalism because it ensures progression.

Avatar image for Communist_Soul
Communist_Soul

3080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Communist_Soul
Member since 2009 • 3080 Posts

Pure capitalism, just as evolution kill off the weak so that the strong can build a better future.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

Pure capitalism, just as evolution kill off the weak so that the strong can build a better future.

Communist_Soul
Whats with the name?
Avatar image for TwoFace-BS
TwoFace-BS

9531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TwoFace-BS
Member since 2011 • 9531 Posts

[QUOTE="TwoFace-BS"]Capitalism Pure Communism hasnt actually worked for a country yetBossPerson
Read the OP. Assume that it did work perfectly. Pure capitalism has never really been applied either.

If I assumed both worked perfectly,it would be a question of whether I considered myself rich or poor then

If rich = capitalism so Id be richer

If poor = communism so I wouldnt be poor compared to everyone else

If you can have a proper answer for this,you have to take both ideas at face value

Avatar image for RushKing
RushKing

1785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 RushKing
Member since 2009 • 1785 Posts

Pure capitalism, just as evolution kill off the weak so that the strong can build a better future.

Communist_Soul
Nope, Its people with the most resources stomping over everyone else.
Avatar image for Socijalisticka
Socijalisticka

1555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Socijalisticka
Member since 2011 • 1555 Posts

"In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living but no chance to move forward."

So you have absolutely no understanding of what communists aims to achieve?

Avatar image for cd_rom
cd_rom

13951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 cd_rom
Member since 2003 • 13951 Posts
Capitalism. Communism rewards incompetence. You either progress or fall.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

"In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living but no chance to move forward."

So you have absolutely no understanding of what communists aims to achieve?

Socijalisticka
fixed
Avatar image for Banjo_Kongfooie
Banjo_Kongfooie

3838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Banjo_Kongfooie
Member since 2007 • 3838 Posts
Way to try and frame people. Most Democrats are against communism.
Avatar image for Xx_Socrates_xX
Xx_Socrates_xX

3604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Xx_Socrates_xX
Member since 2012 • 3604 Posts

In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living with your quality in life moving up as the society progresses as a whole.

BossPerson

That's funny.

Avatar image for Communist_Soul
Communist_Soul

3080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Communist_Soul
Member since 2009 • 3080 Posts

[QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

Pure capitalism, just as evolution kill off the weak so that the strong can build a better future.

RushKing

Nope, Its people with the most resources stomping over everyone else.

You either adapt, over come them, or die. If they had the most resources they clearly were better then the rest.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"][QUOTE="TwoFace-BS"]Capitalism Pure Communism hasnt actually worked for a country yet

Neither has pure Capitalism. Ideally, they're both nice on paper, I kinda like pure Communism better I guess.

This
Avatar image for muller39
muller39

14953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 muller39
Member since 2008 • 14953 Posts

Pure capitalism I guess.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
Capitalism. Communism rewards incompetence. You either progress or fall.cd_rom
Ironic since Marx intended communism to be the last stage of capitalism...
Avatar image for RushKing
RushKing

1785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 RushKing
Member since 2009 • 1785 Posts

"In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living but no chance to move forward."

So you have absolutely no understanding of what communists aims to achieve?

Socijalisticka
Real communism is about liberating the working class. Without socialist ideals, no one would have breaks and would get paid pennies.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living with your quality in life moving up as the society progresses as a whole.

Xx_Socrates_xX

That's funny.

Lol, because China is totally a communist country, right?
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living with your quality in life moving up as the society progresses as a whole.

Xx_Socrates_xX

That's funny.

China isn't a pure communist country.

Avatar image for Communist_Soul
Communist_Soul

3080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Communist_Soul
Member since 2009 • 3080 Posts

[QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

Pure capitalism, just as evolution kill off the weak so that the strong can build a better future.

BossPerson

Whats with the name?

I was a communist when I made this account a couple years ago.

Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="RushKing"][QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

Pure capitalism, just as evolution kill off the weak so that the strong can build a better future.

Communist_Soul

Nope, Its people with the most resources stomping over everyone else.

You either adapt, over come them, or die. If they had the most resources they clearly were better then the rest.

You can have the most resources by being deceiving and such, or other characteristics that we wouldnt associate with being a 'good' person. Pure capitalism is almost like a jungle.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

Pure capitalism, just as evolution kill off the weak so that the strong can build a better future.

Communist_Soul

Whats with the name?

I was a communist when I made this account a couple years ago.

Damn, quite a change
Avatar image for Xx_Socrates_xX
Xx_Socrates_xX

3604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Xx_Socrates_xX
Member since 2012 • 3604 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Socrates_xX"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living with your quality in life moving up as the society progresses as a whole.

BossPerson

That's funny.

Lol, because China is totally a communist country, right?

No, this just reminded me of that article.
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12873 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living with your quality in life moving up as the society progresses as a whole.

Xx_Socrates_xX

That's funny.

China isn't communist. Its an authoritarian capitalist nation.
Avatar image for Communist_Soul
Communist_Soul

3080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Communist_Soul
Member since 2009 • 3080 Posts

[QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

[QUOTE="RushKing"] Nope, Its people with the most resources stomping over everyone else.BossPerson

You either adapt, over come them, or die. If they had the most resources they clearly were better then the rest.

You can have the most resources by being deceiving and such, or other characteristics that we wouldnt associate with being a 'good' person. Pure capitalism is almost like a jungle.

I consider those great characteristics. You have to be smart to be able to deceive, which is a great characteristic to have in a jungle.

Avatar image for Xx_Socrates_xX
Xx_Socrates_xX

3604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Xx_Socrates_xX
Member since 2012 • 3604 Posts
[QUOTE="Xx_Socrates_xX"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]

In communism, you are guaranteed a decent standard of living with your quality in life moving up as the society progresses as a whole.

Nonstop-Madness

That's funny.

China isn't communist. Its an authoritarian capitalist nation.

Huh, I thought it was more communist.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Pure capitalism, because I'm not lazy.*

*amended due to the poster below me.

Avatar image for ZumaJones07
ZumaJones07

16457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 ZumaJones07
Member since 2005 • 16457 Posts
pure communism because i'm lazy
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

You either adapt, over come them, or die. If they had the most resources they clearly were better then the rest.

Communist_Soul

You can have the most resources by being deceiving and such, or other characteristics that we wouldnt associate with being a 'good' person. Pure capitalism is almost like a jungle.

I consider those great characteristics. You have to be smart to be able to deceive, which is a great characteristic to have in a jungle.

You also have to cooperate to survive in the jungle. Cooperation was the feature that allowed our ancestors to overcome other hominids and not get extinct, it wasn't deception.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

You either adapt, over come them, or die. If they had the most resources they clearly were better then the rest.

Communist_Soul

You can have the most resources by being deceiving and such, or other characteristics that we wouldnt associate with being a 'good' person. Pure capitalism is almost like a jungle.

I consider those great characteristics. You have to be smart to be able to deceive, which is a great characteristic to have in a jungle.

How did you go from a communist to a social darwinist?
Avatar image for brickdoctor
brickdoctor

9746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 156

User Lists: 0

#35 brickdoctor
Member since 2008 • 9746 Posts

If I had to chose, pure capitalism. Better dead than red. But a mixed-market economy is the preferable choice, which is why almost every country in the modern world is now one.

Avatar image for cd_rom
cd_rom

13951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 cd_rom
Member since 2003 • 13951 Posts
[QUOTE="cd_rom"]Capitalism. Communism rewards incompetence. You either progress or fall.kuraimen
Ironic since Marx intended communism to be the last stage of capitalism...

If you believe it in a social Darwinistic way, then by the time that happened everyone would be the "strongest part of society" because all the weak "died out". In that case, there is no incompetence, but that doesn't mean Communism doesn't reward it. If everyone is on level social status, then those that benefit society are on the same level of wellness as those that drag society down. Also, if there was ever a "final stage" of a social structure, then that means humanity as a whole has advanced as far as it could which will never be the case.
Avatar image for one_plum
one_plum

6825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 one_plum
Member since 2009 • 6825 Posts

You're either screwed by the government or by monopolies.

Choice withheld.

Avatar image for imaps3fanboy
imaps3fanboy

11169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 imaps3fanboy
Member since 2009 • 11169 Posts
pure communism
Avatar image for Communist_Soul
Communist_Soul

3080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Communist_Soul
Member since 2009 • 3080 Posts

[QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]You can have the most resources by being deceiving and such, or other characteristics that we wouldnt associate with being a 'good' person. Pure capitalism is almost like a jungle.kuraimen

I consider those great characteristics. You have to be smart to be able to deceive, which is a great characteristic to have in a jungle.

You also have to cooperate to survive in the jungle. Cooperation was the feature that allowed our ancestors to overcome other hominids and not get extinct, it wasn't deception.

Look at Hitler he legions of followers.

I agree we have to work together but you shouldn't help out a competing tribe which communism essentially is.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12873 Posts

[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"][QUOTE="Xx_Socrates_xX"]

That's funny.

Xx_Socrates_xX

China isn't communist. Its an authoritarian capitalist nation.

Huh, I thought it was more communist.

Communism is suppose to be the least oppressive form of social ideology. China is oppressive as hell and against full competition but they are still for private property, for profits, wages etc. China's much more capitalist than most people think. Not to mention Hong Kong itself is fairly free market capitalism.

Avatar image for battalionwars13
battalionwars13

1264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 battalionwars13
Member since 2007 • 1264 Posts

If I had to choose, it would be pure capitalism.

Avatar image for wellbigd
wellbigd

240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 wellbigd
Member since 2007 • 240 Posts

An ideal system would be a mix between socialism and captialism.

socalism safeguards the poor and human rights.

While captailsm provides choice, competion, and innovation.

Avatar image for Xx_Socrates_xX
Xx_Socrates_xX

3604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Xx_Socrates_xX
Member since 2012 • 3604 Posts

[QUOTE="Xx_Socrates_xX"][QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"] China isn't communist. Its an authoritarian capitalist nation.Nonstop-Madness

Huh, I thought it was more communist.

Communism is suppose to be the least oppressive form of social ideology. China is oppressive as hell and against full competition but they are still for private property, for profits, wages etc. China's much more capitalist than most people think. Not to mention Hong Kong itself is fairly free market capitalism.

Yeah, explain to me how Hong Kong is some what seperate from China. Always wondered about that.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="cd_rom"]Capitalism. Communism rewards incompetence. You either progress or fall.cd_rom
Ironic since Marx intended communism to be the last stage of capitalism...

If you believe it in a social Darwinistic way, then by the time that happened everyone would be the "strongest part of society" because all the weak "died out". In that case, there is no incompetence, but that doesn't mean Communism doesn't reward it. If everyone is on level social status, then those that benefit society are on the same level of wellness as those that drag society down. Also, if there was ever a "final stage" of a social structure, then that means humanity as a whole has advanced as far as it could which will never be the case.

Pure communism is the products of capitalism as Marx intended. So the weak would have "died out" like you said before reaching communism. Cooperation needs all the parties to be valuable in some way or another so a cooperative environment also weeds out the weakest links.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

I consider those great characteristics. You have to be smart to be able to deceive, which is a great characteristic to have in a jungle.

Communist_Soul

You also have to cooperate to survive in the jungle. Cooperation was the feature that allowed our ancestors to overcome other hominids and not get extinct, it wasn't deception.

Look at Hitler he legions of followers.

I agree we have to work together but you shouldn't help out a competing tribe which communism essentially is.

On the contrary helping out the other tribes gave even more advantage. If our ancestors didn't cooperate between tribes inbreeding would have killed them a long time ago.
Avatar image for wellbigd
wellbigd

240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 wellbigd
Member since 2007 • 240 Posts
[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Socrates_xX"] Huh, I thought it was more communist. Xx_Socrates_xX

Communism is suppose to be the least oppressive form of social ideology. China is oppressive as hell and against full competition but they are still for private property, for profits, wages etc. China's much more capitalist than most people think. Not to mention Hong Kong itself is fairly free market capitalism.

Yeah, explain to me how Hong Kong is some what seperate from China. Always wondered about that.

Hong Kong's Basic Law, as agreed between China and Britain, means Hong Kong will retain its own currency (the Hong Kong dollar), legal system, and parliamentary system for fifty years. This means, for all practical purposes, Hong Kong is actually a separate country to China.
Avatar image for Communist_Soul
Communist_Soul

3080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Communist_Soul
Member since 2009 • 3080 Posts

[QUOTE="Communist_Soul"]

[QUOTE="kuraimen"] You also have to cooperate to survive in the jungle. Cooperation was the feature that allowed our ancestors to overcome other hominids and not get extinct, it wasn't deception.kuraimen

Look at Hitler he legions of followers.

I agree we have to work together but you shouldn't help out a competing tribe which communism essentially is.

On the contrary helping out the other tribes gave even more advantage. If our ancestors didn't cooperate between tribes inbreeding would have killed them a long time ago.

Well as a tribe grows stronger it would pull in other tribes and assimilate them ensuring there is enough new blood. Like risk you start out with allies but as you grow you eventually turn on them.

Avatar image for genfactor
genfactor

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#48 genfactor
Member since 2004 • 1472 Posts
The best would be an equal mix of capitalism an socialism, but if I had to choose it would be capitalism. But really, what's the difference between pure capitalism and pure communism besides which small group of people has all of the power to oppress the majority?
Avatar image for wellbigd
wellbigd

240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 wellbigd
Member since 2007 • 240 Posts
[QUOTE="genfactor"]The best would be an equal mix of capitalism an socialism, but if I had to choose it would be capitalism. But really, what's the difference between pure capitalism and pure communism besides which small group of people has all of the power to oppress the majority?

+1
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#50 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12873 Posts
[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]

[QUOTE="Xx_Socrates_xX"] Huh, I thought it was more communist. Xx_Socrates_xX

Communism is suppose to be the least oppressive form of social ideology. China is oppressive as hell and against full competition but they are still for private property, for profits, wages etc. China's much more capitalist than most people think. Not to mention Hong Kong itself is fairly free market capitalism.

Yeah, explain to me how Hong Kong is some what seperate from China. Always wondered about that.

Well, I don't know much about Hong Kong but its basically a free market jewel and not only in China but the world. Its actually the world freest economy. It has its own currency and economic policies because its a city state so it doesn't follow China's policies.