Question about Islam.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

Absolute nonsense. Why do you think there are different schools of thought? Different people can have different interprations and opinions, which is why discussion is encouraged. The Qur'an clearly says there is no compulsion in religion which renders your whole point moot.

ghoklebutter

Of course there are different, valid interpretations of Islam. That doesn't refute my point, though.

All I'm saying is that Islam prohibits criticism of the established teachings. That means that if I have a problem with sexual slavery and wife-beating, I'm not a Muslim.

You are clearly confused. Different schools establish different teachings, there isn't a one rule fits all. The fact that it says there is no compulsion in religion is clear proof that people are not forced to agree. Slavery and wife beating? Really? Those are problems that occur in every part of the world and are human problems, what does that have to do with Islam.

The Prophet Muhammed freed thousands of slaves and never hit a woman. You are naive.

Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

Then I guess it's a good thing I'm not Muslim...Nuck81

But do you believe in the Prophet Mohammad, don't you, as part of your Bahai faith?

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]Then I guess it's a good thing I'm not Muslim...RationalAtheist

But do you believe in the Prophet Mohammad, don't you, as part of your Bahai faith?

yes
Avatar image for yanbuco2712
yanbuco2712

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 yanbuco2712
Member since 2006 • 456 Posts

[QUOTE="yanbuco2712"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] I take exception to this from a logic and common sense point of view. Rape is never the fault of the woman. I work in a High School and trust me I seen plenty of 16 year olds and plenty of non modest outfits yet I have never raped anyone or had sex with a 16 year old girl in my adulthood. I agree that girls should dress modestly from a self respect point of view, but to demand that women are modest because it will reduce rape is ludicrous.Nuck81

Huh?

Woman shows skin>sexual desire is awakend>desire to fulfill said desire>worst case scenario=rape crime

or to put it simply, heres an example: you're hungry, your wife/mom/whatever is still cooking and wont be finished for 30 minutes, and you walk around a street trying to pass the time, suddenly: you look at a restaurant where the finest foods are being served, and you see people enjoying it: you remember your hunger, and wish you were eating said food. If you hadn't seen the food, you wouldnt have remembered your hunger as quickley.

Likewise, if a man sees an unmodestly dressed woman: he, in most cases, remembers his sexual desires. Which CAN POSSIBELY, I say CAN POSSIBELY cause rape, Islam doesnt allow such a possibility.

And if I may speak for myself, I dont usually get aroused from seeing a woman's face, but from her other "assets".

I think that's a personal problem. I can see a womans cleavage and not get overcome with the desire to rape her...

Maybe you can, but not everyone does. Have you never read the comments on a "music video" like, for example, Shakira's "She Wolf", describing how so many viewers want to bang her? Like I said, the possibility of a disaster is dangerous, and eliminiating any chance of it is always preferable in any situation.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#105 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Community consensus is you didn't understand what you read. But I don't think trying again will help in your case.

RationalAtheist

LOL, you and one other guy? You're incorrect. Condom use in the Catholic Church is a Sin.

...aside from the justification the Pope gave for exceptional circumstances...

Incorrect. According to the Pope It's still a sin, just the lesser of two evils.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
[QUOTE="RationalAtheist"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] LOL, you and one other guy? You're incorrect. Condom use in the Catholic Church is a Sin.Nuck81

...aside from the justification the Pope gave for exceptional circumstances...

Incorrect. According to the Pope It's still a sin, just the lesser of two evils.

:lol: Stand tall and go down with that sinking ship....
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#107 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]Then I guess it's a good thing I'm not Muslim...RationalAtheist

But do you believe in the Prophet Mohammad, don't you, as part of your Bahai faith?

I believe that He was a manifestation of God's will for his time and Geography. I believe the same of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Zoroaster, Buddha, Krishna and the Bab, among others as well.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

You are clearly confused. Different schools establish different teachings, there isn't a one rule fits all. The fact that it says there is no compulsion in religion is clear proof that people are not forced to agree. Slavery and wife beating? Really? Those are problems that occur in every part of the world and are human problems, what does that have to do with Islam.

The Prophet Muhammed freed thousands of slaves and never hit a woman. You are naive.

Asim90
I said look that stuff up in the surat I mentioned. And just because Muhammad freed slaves, doesn't mean slavery was prohibited. Likewise, just because Muhammad probably didn't hit women (except, perhaps, Aisha) doesn't mean that the Qur'an has a verse clearly advising men to beat disobedient wives.
Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

[QUOTE="RationalAtheist"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] LOL, you and one other guy? You're incorrect. Condom use in the Catholic Church is a Sin.Nuck81

...aside from the justification the Pope gave for exceptional circumstances...

Incorrect. According to the Pope It's still a sin, just the lesser of two evils.

You don't appear to know what justification and exceptional mean, do you?

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#110 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

Have you never read the comments on a "music video" like, for example, Shakira's "She Wolf", describing how so many viewers want to bang her? Like I said, the possibility of a disaster is dangerous, and eliminiating any chance of it is always preferable in any situation.

yanbuco2712
There is a difference between wanting to have sex with someone and wanting to rape someone.
Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

I believe that He was a manifestation of God's will for his time and Geography. I believe the same of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Zoroaster, Buddha, Krishna and the Bab, among others as well.Nuck81

Why not include the Polytheistic religions too? Why would they be wrong?

Why believe the manifestations, yet feel free to criticise their legacies?

What about Jo Smith? Scientology? Where does faith end with you? Will you believe anything?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

Maybe you can, but not everyone does. Have you never read the comments on a "music video" like, for example, Shakira's "She Wolf", describing how so many viewers want to bang her? Like I said, the possibility of a disaster is dangerous, and eliminiating any chance of it is always preferable in any situation.

yanbuco2712

Sexual repression does not stop rape. Nor does seeing a woman without head to toe covering cause rape. Rape is about power....not lust..

Avatar image for yanbuco2712
yanbuco2712

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 yanbuco2712
Member since 2006 • 456 Posts
[QUOTE="yanbuco2712"]

Have you never read the comments on a "music video" like, for example, Shakira's "She Wolf", describing how so many viewers want to bang her? Like I said, the possibility of a disaster is dangerous, and eliminiating any chance of it is always preferable in any situation.

ghoklebutter
There is a difference between wanting to have sex with someone and wanting to rape someone.

1-Only a person who wants to have sex rapes. 2-I truly doubt those comments would have existed had shakira wore something that covered all but her face, and hadn't shaken her *** suggestively. Now I'm not saying everyone who wants to have sex is a rapist, I'm just saying that only when provoked, the unfortunate reaction happens.
Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

You are clearly confused. Different schools establish different teachings, there isn't a one rule fits all. The fact that it says there is no compulsion in religion is clear proof that people are not forced to agree. Slavery and wife beating? Really? Those are problems that occur in every part of the world and are human problems, what does that have to do with Islam.

The Prophet Muhammed freed thousands of slaves and never hit a woman. You are naive.

ghoklebutter

just because Muhammad probably didn't hit women (except, perhaps, Aisha)

So now a lack of proof constitutes proof? :lol: Oh you Islam bashers really have your own double standards you should be worrying about. "Just because..." you clearly want bad things to be true so you can revel in your ignorance. Good luck with that.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#115 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="RationalAtheist"]

...aside from the justification the Pope gave for exceptional circumstances...

LJS9502_basic

Incorrect. According to the Pope It's still a sin, just the lesser of two evils.

:lol: Stand tall and go down with that sinking ship....

I'll try this again. Maybe you will get it. Tell me at anytime is it stated that Condom use is not a sin.

Commentary on "Light of the World: The Pope, the Church and the Sign of the Times"

"The pope said that to prevent infection with HIV, for instance in the case of a male prostitute, a condom can be the first step in assuming moral responsibility. "

"The pope did not condone the use of condoms as birth control and he did not specifically mention female prostitutes. "

"The Vatican's position on contraception can be traced back more than 800 years when theologians argued against any form of sex not meant to produce children. "

"He's not changing church teaching," Fessio said. "What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality, but in itself the act is still immoral."

""I am sure we will not see a change either in this papacy or after this papacy," Fessio said. "The church's teaching is clear. The moral principles are quite solid and it's just a question of explaining it better to the people."

Does it say anywhere that Condom use is not a Sin?

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

easy one, kill them all.

i'm not 100% sure that is the answer but come-on it's religion, i have to at least be in the ballpark with kill them as the answer.

Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#117 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="yanbuco2712"]

Have you never read the comments on a "music video" like, for example, Shakira's "She Wolf", describing how so many viewers want to bang her? Like I said, the possibility of a disaster is dangerous, and eliminiating any chance of it is always preferable in any situation.

yanbuco2712
There is a difference between wanting to have sex with someone and wanting to rape someone.

1-Only a person who wants to have sex rapes. 2-I truly doubt those comments would have existed had shakira wore something that covered all but her face, and hadn't shaken her *** suggestively. Now I'm not saying everyone who wants to have sex is a rapist, I'm just saying that only when provoked, the unfortunate reaction happens.

Rape is mostly about power, not lust. It's coercive so it's chiefly based on overpowering someone else.
Avatar image for ghoklebutter
ghoklebutter

19327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#118 ghoklebutter
Member since 2007 • 19327 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="Asim90"]

You are clearly confused. Different schools establish different teachings, there isn't a one rule fits all. The fact that it says there is no compulsion in religion is clear proof that people are not forced to agree. Slavery and wife beating? Really? Those are problems that occur in every part of the world and are human problems, what does that have to do with Islam.

The Prophet Muhammed freed thousands of slaves and never hit a woman. You are naive.

Asim90

just because Muhammad probably didn't hit women (except, perhaps, Aisha)

So now a lack of proof constitutes proof? :lol: Oh you Islam bashers really have your own double standards you should be worrying about. "Just because..." you clearly want bad things to be true so you can revel in your ignorance. Good luck with that.

Either you continue to be an arrogant fool or actually see the verse in your "holy" book that sanctions wife-beating. I'm sure you'll keep doing the former, unfortunately.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Nuck81"] Incorrect. According to the Pope It's still a sin, just the lesser of two evils.Nuck81

:lol: Stand tall and go down with that sinking ship....

I'll try this again. Maybe you will get it. Tell me at anytime is it stated that Condom use is not a sin.

Commentary on "Light of the World: The Pope, the Church and the Sign of the Times"

"The pope said that to prevent infection with HIV, for instance in the case of a male prostitute, a condom can be the first step in assuming moral responsibility. "

"The pope did not condone the use of condoms as birth control and he did not specifically mention female prostitutes. "

"The Vatican's position on contraception can be traced back more than 800 years when theologians argued against any form of sex not meant to produce children. "

"He's not changing church teaching," Fessio said. "What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality, but in itself the act is still immoral."

""I am sure we will not see a change either in this papacy or after this papacy," Fessio said. "The church's teaching is clear. The moral principles are quite solid and it's just a question of explaining it better to the people."

Does it say anywhere that Condom use is not a Sin?

So you don't understand justification and exception? The Pope would NOT tell anyone at anytime to use a condom if it was sin. In the Catholic church...which you are not a member.....what the pope allows on earth is allowed in heaven...and the opposite. It comes from Scripture in the NT since you like that in religion threads where Jesus gives that authority. Matthew 18:18 "Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.

Avatar image for yanbuco2712
yanbuco2712

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 yanbuco2712
Member since 2006 • 456 Posts
[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="yanbuco2712"][QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] There is a difference between wanting to have sex with someone and wanting to rape someone.

1-Only a person who wants to have sex rapes. 2-I truly doubt those comments would have existed had shakira wore something that covered all but her face, and hadn't shaken her *** suggestively. Now I'm not saying everyone who wants to have sex is a rapist, I'm just saying that only when provoked, the unfortunate reaction happens.

Rape is mostly about power, not lust. It's coercive so it's chiefly based on overpowering someone else.

If its not about lust, explain how 99% of boners are formed when a man sees an attractive woman, and rape cant be done without a boner. Overpowering someone is more often done through wresteling and fighting, not when extinguishing sexual desires.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#121 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]I believe that He was a manifestation of God's will for his time and Geography. I believe the same of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Zoroaster, Buddha, Krishna and the Bab, among others as well.RationalAtheist

Why not include the Polytheistic religions too? Why would they be wrong?

Why believe the manifestations, yet feel free to criticise their legacies?

What about Jo Smith? Scientology? Where does faith end with you? Will you believe anything?

Polytheistic religions don't acknowledge the one true god. Joseph was a convicted criminal and known con man. He is not a manifestation. Scientology. LOL Do you worship Jedi and George Lucas? I don't understand what you mean by the other two questions. Where does Faith end with me? That doesn't make sense. Will I believe anything? No? Not sure what you are getting at.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#122 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] :lol: Stand tall and go down with that sinking ship....LJS9502_basic

I'll try this again. Maybe you will get it. Tell me at anytime is it stated that Condom use is not a sin.

Commentary on "Light of the World: The Pope, the Church and the Sign of the Times"

"The pope said that to prevent infection with HIV, for instance in the case of a male prostitute, a condom can be the first step in assuming moral responsibility. "

"The pope did not condone the use of condoms as birth control and he did not specifically mention female prostitutes. "

"The Vatican's position on contraception can be traced back more than 800 years when theologians argued against any form of sex not meant to produce children. "

"He's not changing church teaching," Fessio said. "What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality, but in itself the act is still immoral."

""I am sure we will not see a change either in this papacy or after this papacy," Fessio said. "The church's teaching is clear. The moral principles are quite solid and it's just a question of explaining it better to the people."

Does it say anywhere that Condom use is not a Sin?

So you don't understand justification and exception? The Pope would NOT tell anyone at anytime to use a condom if it was sin. In the Catholic church...which you are not a member.....what the pope allows on earth is allowed in heaven...and the opposite. It comes from Scripture in the NT since you like that in religion threads where Jesus gives that authority. Matthew 18:18 "Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.

Obviously you can't comprehend what you read, and what is being said. Using a Condom is a Sin according to the Pope.

Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#123 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts
[QUOTE="Asim90"]

You are clearly confused. Different schools establish different teachings, there isn't a one rule fits all. The fact that it says there is no compulsion in religion is clear proof that people are not forced to agree. Slavery and wife beating? Really? Those are problems that occur in every part of the world and are human problems, what does that have to do with Islam.

The Prophet Muhammed freed thousands of slaves and never hit a woman. You are naive.

ghoklebutter
I said look that stuff up in the surat I mentioned. And just because Muhammad freed slaves, doesn't mean slavery was prohibited. Likewise, just because Muhammad probably didn't hit women (except, perhaps, Aisha) doesn't mean that the Qur'an has a verse clearly advising men to beat disobedient wives.

1. when you speak about slavery, I can't help but think of the most conservative Muslim country on the planet - Saudi Arabia - itself got rid of slavery in the Kingdom all together. slavery - like a lot of things back in those times - was an established practice but it was understood it would be better if it didn't exist, not to mention there was the possibility of earning your freedom. slavery in ancient times was not simply like it was in America where "your a different color ergo you will be my slave forever". 2. you quote the the surah, the word that gets translatad is 'idribhunna" root word being 'daraba' which is to 'hit', yet the same word shows up in two other verses in 14:24 and 4:94, but are used in a different context and don't necessarily mean 'hit', but rather 'give example' or 'leave'. then you ignore a surah verse 2:331 that says not to harm your (soon to be ex)wives. you also ignore emphasis from surah's and hadiths that emphasizes the ability to control one's anger and to treat women with kindness, which there are quite a few. I don't know why i'm bothering with this, but i'm merely pointing out to you that isn't as cut and dry as you make it out to be. When you say "if i am against these then i must not be a Muslim" your essentially agreeing with the fundamentalists that they are correct. Your positions are the same. You give no room for interpretation or argument, to you it is simply a matter of absolutes. When if you simply took a history lesson of the Islamic world and thought, could easily tell you that is simply not true.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]I'll try this again. Maybe you will get it. Tell me at anytime is it stated that Condom use is not a sin.

Commentary on "Light of the World: The Pope, the Church and the Sign of the Times"

"The pope said that to prevent infection with HIV, for instance in the case of a male prostitute, a condom can be the first step in assuming moral responsibility. "

"The pope did not condone the use of condoms as birth control and he did not specifically mention female prostitutes. "

"The Vatican's position on contraception can be traced back more than 800 years when theologians argued against any form of sex not meant to produce children. "

"He's not changing church teaching," Fessio said. "What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality, but in itself the act is still immoral."

""I am sure we will not see a change either in this papacy or after this papacy," Fessio said. "The church's teaching is clear. The moral principles are quite solid and it's just a question of explaining it better to the people."

Does it say anywhere that Condom use is not a Sin?

Nuck81

So you don't understand justification and exception? The Pope would NOT tell anyone at anytime to use a condom if it was sin. In the Catholic church...which you are not a member.....what the pope allows on earth is allowed in heaven...and the opposite. It comes from Scripture in the NT since you like that in religion threads where Jesus gives that authority. Matthew 18:18 "Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.

Obviously you can't comprehend what you read, and what is being said. Using a Condom is a Sin according to the Pope.

One of us cannot comprehend what we read....and it's not me.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#125 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="yanbuco2712"]

Huh?

Woman shows skin>sexual desire is awakend>desire to fulfill said desire>worst case scenario=rape crime

or to put it simply, heres an example: you're hungry, your wife/mom/whatever is still cooking and wont be finished for 30 minutes, and you walk around a street trying to pass the time, suddenly: you look at a restaurant where the finest foods are being served, and you see people enjoying it: you remember your hunger, and wish you were eating said food. If you hadn't seen the food, you wouldnt have remembered your hunger as quickley.

Likewise, if a man sees an unmodestly dressed woman: he, in most cases, remembers his sexual desires. Which CAN POSSIBELY, I say CAN POSSIBELY cause rape, Islam doesnt allow such a possibility.

And if I may speak for myself, I dont usually get aroused from seeing a woman's face, but from her other "assets".

yanbuco2712

I think that's a personal problem. I can see a womans cleavage and not get overcome with the desire to rape her...

Maybe you can, but not everyone does. Have you never read the comments on a "music video" like, for example, Shakira's "She Wolf", describing how so many viewers want to bang her? Like I said, the possibility of a disaster is dangerous, and eliminiating any chance of it is always preferable in any situation.

Again, someone saying they want to "bang" Rihanna does not mean that they are going to go out and Rape her.... that is asinine.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#126 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]So you don't understand justification and exception? The Pope would NOT tell anyone at anytime to use a condom if it was sin. In the Catholic church...which you are not a member.....what the pope allows on earth is allowed in heaven...and the opposite. It comes from Scripture in the NT since you like that in religion threads where Jesus gives that authority. Matthew 18:18 "Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.

LJS9502_basic

Obviously you can't comprehend what you read, and what is being said. Using a Condom is a Sin according to the Pope.

One of us cannot comprehend what we read....and it's not me.

"He's not changing church teaching," Fessio said. "What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality, but in itself the act is still immoral."

Do you honestly not understand what this means? Or are you being intentionally obtuse just for trolling purpose? If you're trolling, I admit, you got me

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] Obviously you can't comprehend what you read, and what is being said. Using a Condom is a Sin according to the Pope.

Nuck81

One of us cannot comprehend what we read....and it's not me.

"He's not changing church teaching," Fessio said. "What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality, but in itself the act is still immoral."

Do you honestly not understand what this means? Or are you being intentionally obtuse just for trolling purpose? If you're trolling, I admit, you got me

Yes I do. But you don't. He's saying it's okay for a male prostitute to use a condom. That doesn't mean he agrees with promiscuity. He's not saying casual sex is fine BUT THAT IT'S OKAY, JUSTIFIED, AN EXCEPTION FOR A CONDOM TO BE USED. Which by Church doctrine means the use of the condom in that case is NOT a sin. Promiscuity still is. The more you know....
Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="ghoklebutter"][QUOTE="Asim90"]

You are clearly confused. Different schools establish different teachings, there isn't a one rule fits all. The fact that it says there is no compulsion in religion is clear proof that people are not forced to agree. Slavery and wife beating? Really? Those are problems that occur in every part of the world and are human problems, what does that have to do with Islam.

The Prophet Muhammed freed thousands of slaves and never hit a woman. You are naive.

SaudiFury

I said look that stuff up in the surat I mentioned. And just because Muhammad freed slaves, doesn't mean slavery was prohibited. Likewise, just because Muhammad probably didn't hit women (except, perhaps, Aisha) doesn't mean that the Qur'an has a verse clearly advising men to beat disobedient wives.

1. when you speak about slavery, I can't help but think of the most conservative Muslim country on the planet - Saudi Arabia - itself got rid of slavery in the Kingdom all together. slavery - like a lot of things back in those times - was an established practice but it was understood it would be better if it didn't exist, not to mention there was the possibility of earning your freedom. slavery in ancient times was not simply like it was in America where "your a different color ergo you will be my slave forever". 2. you quote the the surah, the word that gets translatad is 'idribhunna" root word being 'daraba' which is to 'hit', yet the same word shows up in two other verses in 14:24 and 4:94, but are used in a different context and don't necessarily mean 'hit', but rather 'give example' or 'leave'. then you ignore a surah verse 2:331 that says not to harm your (soon to be ex)wives. you also ignore emphasis from surah's and hadiths that emphasizes the ability to control one's anger and to treat women with kindness, which there are quite a few. I don't know why i'm bothering with this, but i'm merely pointing out to you that isn't as cut and dry as you make it out to be. When you say "if i am against these then i must not be a Muslim" your essentially agreeing with the fundamentalists that they are correct. Your positions are the same. You give no room for interpretation or argument, to you it is simply a matter of absolutes. When if you simply took a history lesson of the Islamic world and thought, could easily tell you that is simply not true.

Sshhh.. don't question him. He's clearly an Islamic Scholar who has studied the religion, can speak arabic and has a broad understanding of the religion and was taught by qualified teachers. OR, he's an internet troll who looks at quotes online through his troll goggles and plucks out whatever he can to match his troll agenda.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

Sshhh.. don't question him. He's clearly an Islamic Scholar who has studied the religion, can speak arabic and has a broad understanding of the religion and was taught by qualified teachers. OR, he's an internet troll who looks at quotes online through his troll goggles and plucks out whatever he can to match his troll agenda.

Asim90

I believe at one time he was a Muslim. He questioned it and found he didn't agree with it. Nothing wrong with that. Nonetheless, is the religion so out of touch with the population that only the opinon of a "scholar" is important?

Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

Polytheistic religions don't acknowledge the one true god. Joseph was a convicted criminal and known con man. He is not a manifestation. Scientology. LOL Do you worship Jedi and George Lucas? I don't understand what you mean by the other two questions. Where does Faith end with me? That doesn't make sense. Will I believe anything? No? Not sure what you are getting at.Nuck81

Couldn't Polytheistic religions be an interpretation of a single God though? If not, why not?

Can't ex-con-men also be prophets? Why wouln't Huxley be another prophet? Why not Jedi? Why did the prophets stop arriving all that time ago and not turn up more recently? Is it because they's be less credible?

It seems to me like you pick and choose stuff to believe, like picking cherries from a tree, for no other reason than that it suits you? You seem to demolish the very doctrine that supports your prophets.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#131 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
[QUOTE="Nuck81"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] One of us cannot comprehend what we read....and it's not me.

LJS9502_basic

"He's not changing church teaching," Fessio said. "What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality, but in itself the act is still immoral."

Do you honestly not understand what this means? Or are you being intentionally obtuse just for trolling purpose? If you're trolling, I admit, you got me

Yes I do. But you don't. He's saying it's okay for a male prostitute to use a condom. That doesn't mean he agrees with promiscuity. He's not saying casual sex is fine BUT THAT IT'S OKAY, JUSTIFIED, AN EXCEPTION FOR A CONDOM TO BE USED. Which by Church doctrine means the use of the condom in that case is NOT a sin. Promiscuity still is. The more you know....

LOL, so you CAN'T comprehend what is being said. Ok then, I'll explain it for you. 1. He's not changing Church teaching- This means he is not changing church teaching. That means that what the Church has always taught before is still being taught. 2. What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality- This means that if a male prostitute decides to use a condom because he wants to prevent disease then that shows a first step towards greater moral attitude. If he's using a condom to stop disease then maybe one day he can turn his life around. 3. in itself the act is still immoral.- Condom use is bad. It's a Sin. No where does it say that condom use is not a sin.
Avatar image for SaudiFury
SaudiFury

8709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

#132 SaudiFury
Member since 2007 • 8709 Posts

[QUOTE="SaudiFury"][QUOTE="ghoklebutter"] I said look that stuff up in the surat I mentioned. And just because Muhammad freed slaves, doesn't mean slavery was prohibited. Likewise, just because Muhammad probably didn't hit women (except, perhaps, Aisha) doesn't mean that the Qur'an has a verse clearly advising men to beat disobedient wives.Asim90

1. when you speak about slavery, I can't help but think of the most conservative Muslim country on the planet - Saudi Arabia - itself got rid of slavery in the Kingdom all together. slavery - like a lot of things back in those times - was an established practice but it was understood it would be better if it didn't exist, not to mention there was the possibility of earning your freedom. slavery in ancient times was not simply like it was in America where "your a different color ergo you will be my slave forever". 2. you quote the the surah, the word that gets translatad is 'idribhunna" root word being 'daraba' which is to 'hit', yet the same word shows up in two other verses in 14:24 and 4:94, but are used in a different context and don't necessarily mean 'hit', but rather 'give example' or 'leave'. then you ignore a surah verse 2:331 that says not to harm your (soon to be ex)wives. you also ignore emphasis from surah's and hadiths that emphasizes the ability to control one's anger and to treat women with kindness, which there are quite a few. I don't know why i'm bothering with this, but i'm merely pointing out to you that isn't as cut and dry as you make it out to be. When you say "if i am against these then i must not be a Muslim" your essentially agreeing with the fundamentalists that they are correct. Your positions are the same. You give no room for interpretation or argument, to you it is simply a matter of absolutes. When if you simply took a history lesson of the Islamic world and thought, could easily tell you that is simply not true.

Sshhh.. don't question him. He's clearly an Islamic Scholar who has studied the religion, can speak arabic and has a broad understanding of the religion and was taught by qualified teachers. OR, he's an internet troll who looks at quotes online through his troll goggles and plucks out whatever he can to match his troll agenda.

no. he's simply an ex-Muslim. he's got his own thoughts and opinions, as he is entitled to. but i am guessing he grew up and still thinks Islam is a religion of absolutes and nothing more. This is where we differ.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Nuck81"] "He's not changing church teaching," Fessio said. "What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality, but in itself the act is still immoral."

Do you honestly not understand what this means? Or are you being intentionally obtuse just for trolling purpose? If you're trolling, I admit, you got me

Nuck81

Yes I do. But you don't. He's saying it's okay for a male prostitute to use a condom. That doesn't mean he agrees with promiscuity. He's not saying casual sex is fine BUT THAT IT'S OKAY, JUSTIFIED, AN EXCEPTION FOR A CONDOM TO BE USED. Which by Church doctrine means the use of the condom in that case is NOT a sin. Promiscuity still is. The more you know....

LOL, so you CAN'T comprehend what is being said. Ok then, I'll explain it for you. 1. He's not changing Church teaching- This means he is not changing church teaching. That means that what the Church has always taught before is still being taught. 2. What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality- This means that if a male prostitute decides to use a condom because he wants to prevent disease then that shows a first step towards greater moral attitude. If he's using a condom to stop disease then maybe one day he can turn his life around. 3. in itself the act is still immoral.- Condom use is bad. It's a Sin. No where does it say that condom use is not a sin.

Honestly dude. You just don't get it and this is getting tiresome. You're just plain wrong. Period.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#134 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]Polytheistic religions don't acknowledge the one true god. Joseph was a convicted criminal and known con man. He is not a manifestation. Scientology. LOL Do you worship Jedi and George Lucas? I don't understand what you mean by the other two questions. Where does Faith end with me? That doesn't make sense. Will I believe anything? No? Not sure what you are getting at.RationalAtheist

Couldn't Polytheistic religions be an interpretation of a single God though? If not, why not?

Can't ex-con-men also be prophets? Why wouln't Huxley be another prophet? Why not Jedi? Why did the prophets stop arriving all that time ago and not turn up more recently? Is it because they's be less credible?

It seems to me like you pick and choose stuff to believe, like picking cherries from a tree, for no other reason than that it suits you? You seem to demolish the very doctrine that supports your prophets.

I think you have a lack of even a very basic understanding of the Baha'i Faith.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#135 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yes I do. But you don't. He's saying it's okay for a male prostitute to use a condom. That doesn't mean he agrees with promiscuity. He's not saying casual sex is fine BUT THAT IT'S OKAY, JUSTIFIED, AN EXCEPTION FOR A CONDOM TO BE USED. Which by Church doctrine means the use of the condom in that case is NOT a sin. Promiscuity still is. The more you know....LJS9502_basic

LOL, so you CAN'T comprehend what is being said. Ok then, I'll explain it for you. 1. He's not changing Church teaching- This means he is not changing church teaching. That means that what the Church has always taught before is still being taught. 2. What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality- This means that if a male prostitute decides to use a condom because he wants to prevent disease then that shows a first step towards greater moral attitude. If he's using a condom to stop disease then maybe one day he can turn his life around. 3. in itself the act is still immoral.- Condom use is bad. It's a Sin. No where does it say that condom use is not a sin.

Honestly dude. You just don't get it and this is getting tiresome. You're just plain wrong. Period.

I can't explain it any better. Unless I try to explain like I'm talking to a three year old?
Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

Sshhh.. don't question him. He's clearly an Islamic Scholar who has studied the religion, can speak arabic and has a broad understanding of the religion and was taught by qualified teachers. OR, he's an internet troll who looks at quotes online through his troll goggles and plucks out whatever he can to match his troll agenda.

LJS9502_basic

Nonetheless, is the religion so out of touch with the population that only the opinon of a "scholar" is important?

Considering I have yet to meet a Muslim who has actually read the Qur'an, I don't think its a stretch. The problem with a lot of religious people is that they don't even know their own religions, they are simply in that faith because they were born into it.

Another funny thing is that Islam encourages teaching, it stresses that religion should be continued by scholars who are versed in the religion and teach it. Collective thought and interpration is encouraged for this reason.

Why do you think their prophet said "beware of extremism in religion because it is extremism in religion that destroyed the people before you". I simply don't buy all the fear mongering. I honestly believe that people today even in supposedly religious countries aren't even capable of understanding religion as it is intended.

I'm going to end my rant now.

Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

[QUOTE="RationalAtheist"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]Polytheistic religions don't acknowledge the one true god. Joseph was a convicted criminal and known con man. He is not a manifestation. Scientology. LOL Do you worship Jedi and George Lucas? I don't understand what you mean by the other two questions. Where does Faith end with me? That doesn't make sense. Will I believe anything? No? Not sure what you are getting at.Nuck81

Couldn't Polytheistic religions be an interpretation of a single God though? If not, why not?

Can't ex-con-men also be prophets? Why wouln't Huxley be another prophet? Why not Jedi? Why did the prophets stop arriving all that time ago and not turn up more recently? Is it because they's be less credible?

It seems to me like you pick and choose stuff to believe, like picking cherries from a tree, for no other reason than that it suits you? You seem to demolish the very doctrine that supports your prophets.

I think you have a lack of even a very basic understanding of the Baha'i Faith.

Aww, won't you share?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] LOL, so you CAN'T comprehend what is being said. Ok then, I'll explain it for you. 1. He's not changing Church teaching- This means he is not changing church teaching. That means that what the Church has always taught before is still being taught. 2. What he did say is if someone, a male prostitute for example, who decides to use a condom because he has some glimmer of moral responsibility to prevent disease, that could be a first step towards a greater moral attitude, better moral attitude to sexuality- This means that if a male prostitute decides to use a condom because he wants to prevent disease then that shows a first step towards greater moral attitude. If he's using a condom to stop disease then maybe one day he can turn his life around. 3. in itself the act is still immoral.- Condom use is bad. It's a Sin. No where does it say that condom use is not a sin.Nuck81

Honestly dude. You just don't get it and this is getting tiresome. You're just plain wrong. Period.

I can't explain it any better. Unless I try to explain like I'm talking to a three year old?

You can't explain it because you have no understanding of how the Catholic Church functions nor the part of the Pope within it. Maybe you should stick to talking about your own faith. You might...and I stress might...do better in that regard.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#139 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="RationalAtheist"]

Couldn't Polytheistic religions be an interpretation of a single God though? If not, why not?

Can't ex-con-men also be prophets? Why wouln't Huxley be another prophet? Why not Jedi? Why did the prophets stop arriving all that time ago and not turn up more recently? Is it because they's be less credible?

It seems to me like you pick and choose stuff to believe, like picking cherries from a tree, for no other reason than that it suits you? You seem to demolish the very doctrine that supports your prophets.

RationalAtheist

I think you have a lack of even a very basic understanding of the Baha'i Faith.

Aww, won't you share?

I'll share this. One of the Founding principles of the Baha'i Faith The responsibility of each person to independently search for truth
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#140 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] Honestly dude. You just don't get it and this is getting tiresome. You're just plain wrong. Period.

LJS9502_basic

I can't explain it any better. Unless I try to explain like I'm talking to a three year old?

You can't explain it because you have no understanding of how the Catholic Church functions nor the part of the Pope within it. Maybe you should stick to talking about your own faith. You might...and I stress might...do better in that regard.

And yet you're the one that can't comprehend that Condom Use is a sin in his own Faith?

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

Sshhh.. don't question him. He's clearly an Islamic Scholar who has studied the religion, can speak arabic and has a broad understanding of the religion and was taught by qualified teachers. OR, he's an internet troll who looks at quotes online through his troll goggles and plucks out whatever he can to match his troll agenda.

Asim90

Nonetheless, is the religion so out of touch with the population that only the opinon of a "scholar" is important?

Considering I have yet to meet a Muslim who has actually read the Qur'an, I don't think its a stretch. The problem with a lot of religious people is that they don't even know their own religions, they are simply in that faith because they were born into it.

Another funny thing is that Islam encourages teaching, it stresses that religion should be continued by scholars who are versed in the religion and teach it. Collective thought and interpration is encouraged for this reason.

Why do you think their prophet said "beware of extremism in religion because it is extremism in religion that destroyed the people before you". I simply don't buy all the fear mongering. I honestly believe that people today even in supposedly religious countries aren't even capable of understanding religion as it is intended.

I'm going to end my rant now.

Don't differing scholars have differing views?
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Nuck81"] I can't explain it any better. Unless I try to explain like I'm talking to a three year old?Nuck81

You can't explain it because you have no understanding of how the Catholic Church functions nor the part of the Pope within it. Maybe you should stick to talking about your own faith. You might...and I stress might...do better in that regard.

And yet you're the one that comprehend that Condom Use is a sin in his own Faith?

Dude how dense are you? EXCEPTION means not a sin. Otherwise, it wouldn't be an EXCEPTION. Duh.
Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Asim90"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Nonetheless, is the religion so out of touch with the population that only the opinon of a "scholar" is important?

LJS9502_basic

Considering I have yet to meet a Muslim who has actually read the Qur'an, I don't think its a stretch. The problem with a lot of religious people is that they don't even know their own religions, they are simply in that faith because they were born into it.

Another funny thing is that Islam encourages teaching, it stresses that religion should be continued by scholars who are versed in the religion and teach it. Collective thought and interpration is encouraged for this reason.

Why do you think their prophet said "beware of extremism in religion because it is extremism in religion that destroyed the people before you". I simply don't buy all the fear mongering. I honestly believe that people today even in supposedly religious countries aren't even capable of understanding religion as it is intended.

I'm going to end my rant now.

Don't differing scholars have differing views?

Of course, which is why people should think with their brains and choose their own paths. The core beliefs are universal though and schools of thought only really differ on small things. I strongly belive in the importance of learning from someone who is educated. If people did that, none of the drama in the world today would even exist.

Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

I'll share this. One of the Founding principles of the Baha'i Faith The responsibility of each person to independently search for truthNuck81

How has all this independant thought conjoined at the Bahai faith?

I wonder at how independantly you can think when you try and connect all of the worlds main religions.

Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

Of course, which is why people should think with their brains and choose their own paths. The core beliefs are universal though and schools of thought only really differ on small things. I strongly belive in the importance of learning from someone who is educated. If people did that, none of the drama in the world today would even exist.

Asim90

There is a fundamental division in Islam between Sunni and Shia, isn't there?

People get well educated in universities, rather than Madrasahs.

Avatar image for Asim90
Asim90

3692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Asim90
Member since 2005 • 3692 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]I'll share this. One of the Founding principles of the Baha'i Faith The responsibility of each person to independently search for truthRationalAtheist

How has all this independant thought conjoined at the Bahai faith?

I wonder at how independantly you can think when you try and connect all of the worlds main religions.

Well the three Abrahamic Religions (Islam, Christianity and Judaism) are connected anyway to an extent.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#147 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts
[QUOTE="Nuck81"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You can't explain it because you have no understanding of how the Catholic Church functions nor the part of the Pope within it. Maybe you should stick to talking about your own faith. You might...and I stress might...do better in that regard.LJS9502_basic

And yet you're the one that comprehend that Condom Use is a sin in his own Faith?

Dude how dense are you? EXCEPTION means not a sin. Otherwise, it wouldn't be an EXCEPTION. Duh.

:roll: How many times does it have to be said. Condom use EVEN in the instance of preventing HIV is STILL a sin. The Pope said it, all the commentary said it, everyone says it but you. The Pope said that in using a condom to prevent the use of HIV for a male prostitute is the lesser of two evils. IT"S STILL EVIL THOUGH. Then it was stated quite clearly that, "He's not changing Church teaching" "in itself the act is still immoral." Condom use is still immoral, there is not changing of Church teaching, the Pope simply acknowledged that it was better to commit the sin of using a condom than commit the sin of spreading HIV.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e9044657a310
deactivated-5e9044657a310

8136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#148 deactivated-5e9044657a310
Member since 2005 • 8136 Posts

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]I'll share this. One of the Founding principles of the Baha'i Faith The responsibility of each person to independently search for truthRationalAtheist

How has all this independant thought conjoined at the Bahai faith?

I wonder at how independantly you can think when you try and connect all of the worlds main religions.

Investigate for yourself. Maybe you'll find your answer.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="RationalAtheist"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"]I'll share this. One of the Founding principles of the Baha'i Faith The responsibility of each person to independently search for truthAsim90

How has all this independant thought conjoined at the Bahai faith?

I wonder at how independantly you can think when you try and connect all of the worlds main religions.

Well the three Abrahamic Religions (Islam, Christianity and Judaism) are connected anyway to an extent.

I know they are purported to be....but I can't see how Islam follows after Christianity. Not if one understands Christianity anyway....
Avatar image for RationalAtheist
RationalAtheist

4428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 RationalAtheist
Member since 2007 • 4428 Posts

Well the three Abrahamic Religions (Islam, Christianity and Judaism) are connected anyway to an extent.

Asim90

They diverge as three very different varieties of faith that contradict each other.