[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]
Dear god, you're looking waaay too far into this. It's simplified for a reason. Basically, my point was to address the post of yours that said this;
"Before money is stripped away from people, I'd like to know where that money is going".
Then you asked if I had a problem with that statement. The answer is, yes, I do, and I bet you do too.
If you believe that statement, then you believe that ANYONE should get the money regardless of whether them getting the money is right or wrong. If you believe that statment, then someone who commits grand theft auto in college should get the money because you don't want to strip money away from people.
If you'd like to change your statement, go ahead. If not, then you're contradicting yourself.
Now, do you see what's wrong with your way of thinking? If something isn't right, we shouldn't keep doing it just because we don't know where the funds would be going. If a policy condones racism, that policy should be done away with. You're way of thinking is exactly why slavery wasn't abolished sooner. Too much money was involved even though they knew it was wrong.
MrGeezer
I'm pretty sure that "helping students get an education" and "keeping people as slaves" aren't quite on the same level.
You can keep saying that they're equivalent since "they both promote racism", but that's clearly a crock of ****.
As I said, this bakesale is racist. And yet, a hell of a lot of people here are fine with THAT racism because they think it serves an important purpose (exposing other racism). You notice how I haven't picked out the people who supported the racist bake sale and tried to equate them with klansmen and slave owners?
You'll also notice that I never said that I'm against taking away money from ALL people (unless I know where the money is going). I never said that it that statement applies to EVERYONE. So...good job on determining that I don't believe that that statement applies to everyone. Instead of running around trying to play games, you could have just asked me that to begin with.
Helping students get an education based on what color their skin is and keeping people as slaves based on what color their skin is aren't on the same level, you're right. One is much worse than the other. But that is irrelevant. Using you're logic, both should be kept going due to financial reasons, regardless of whether they aren't fair or wrong.
Let's just drop this though. It's getting ridiculous.
Let's just both agree to this statement; If the amount of financial aid in the budget stays the same, then AA should be abolished. Agreed?
Log in to comment