Russia threatens to target Europe

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts
http://news.aol.co.uk/russia-will-target-europe-putin/article/20070603133609990005
Avatar image for Sir_Marwin
Sir_Marwin

9734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Sir_Marwin
Member since 2006 • 9734 Posts
great... just great...
Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts
and war keeps going and going.  War is like the villain in a horror movie.  It just doesnt die.  Im not against it, if its for good and not for evil. Wierd saying that, but I mean fighting against someone that attacks you first is what I mean.
Avatar image for zakkro
zakkro

48823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 zakkro
Member since 2004 • 48823 Posts

They just want attention "The Forgotten Country" >_>

[spoiler] jk [/spoiler]

Avatar image for Honenheim
Honenheim

5402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Honenheim
Member since 2007 • 5402 Posts
russia cant afford to go to war with anyone ...ever since the downfall of the soviet union
Avatar image for -JRL-
-JRL-

446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 -JRL-
Member since 2006 • 446 Posts

Nothing but whining.

Avatar image for BEAN_LARD_MULCH
BEAN_LARD_MULCH

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 BEAN_LARD_MULCH
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts
He just wants to say " IM STILL THE BULLY HERE YOU KNOW"
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts

russia cant afford to go to war with anyone ...ever since the downfall of the soviet union
Honenheim

They still have all their nukes left

Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts
RUSSIA: We are not facists....we are communists :evil:
Avatar image for Honenheim
Honenheim

5402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 Honenheim
Member since 2007 • 5402 Posts

RUSSIA: We are not facists....we are communists :evil:9mmSpliff

they have tons of 'em i know ....however they still have legal binding issues with the U.N. about those weapons  

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#11 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

isn't this basically them saying that if the US is going to put missle in europe we're going to target the missle sites?

And is a missle defense system an actual missle defense (like a defense against missles) or just a nice way of saying preemtive strike. 

Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#12 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts
Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.
Avatar image for BEAN_LARD_MULCH
BEAN_LARD_MULCH

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 BEAN_LARD_MULCH
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts
Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Well, put it this way, everyone has dinky weapons while you have a weapon that can take out entire cities. Don't you feel a little power?
Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts

[QUOTE="9mmSpliff"]RUSSIA: We are not facists....we are communists :evil:Honenheim

they have tons of 'em i know ....however they still have legal binding issues with the U.N. about those weapons

oh yeah i know. I am just saying it from old school Russian Communist Generals point of views that are still in power up there. They would love to have the "STANS"all back and be communist again.

But I think this is just Russian Govt and Military gettign some rises out there.  you know, like "Hey dont forget about us, Mother Russia, USSR"

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

great, i can sleep better knowing that a super power is mad at us. Can i please go one day without hearing another story about how the words going to hell.At this point im thinking, why have kids, they are either gonna get blown up by a plane, stabbed in a mall, shoot at school, killed in war, stricken with disease, possibly deal with global warming, the worlds getting worst and worst every day and i dont see why i should bring another life into it. There needs to be some sort of change.

Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#16 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts
[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.BEAN_LARD_MULCH

Well, put it this way, everyone has dinky weapons while you have a weapon that can take out entire cities. Don't you feel a little power?

Let me rephrase my argument. You have 10 cars, and the kid in your block wants a car. YOu start screaming that cars are evil and you make your friends hate/hurt/not speak that kid. When the fuzz is over, you try to get more and more cars, while you satanize cars.
Avatar image for sniperdoggy
sniperdoggy

257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 sniperdoggy
Member since 2004 • 257 Posts
I wonder how Bush will F*** up this situation taking any bets guys??
Avatar image for reservoir_doggy
reservoir_doggy

4054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 reservoir_doggy
Member since 2006 • 4054 Posts

Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. I geuss you're right. We should allow crazy the crazy idiots in Iran, Russia, and North Korea to run around with Nuclear weapons programs and threaten to blow people up just because its not fair for the US to be the only one to have Nukes. Why should someone that has plans to kill people have that sort of technology.

Avatar image for jongaska
jongaska

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 jongaska
Member since 2007 • 207 Posts
When have they not been targeting Europe?When have they not been targeting us?Just a question for everyone to ponder.Missiles are already programmed where they are going to go,just for quick launch purposes.They are sitting there on their pads or silos just waiting for a launch code.Its been like that forever,and on both sides.
Avatar image for soulfood4
soulfood4

5459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 soulfood4
Member since 2005 • 5459 Posts
IN SOVIET RUSSIA, CAT PETS YOU!!!
Avatar image for BEAN_LARD_MULCH
BEAN_LARD_MULCH

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 BEAN_LARD_MULCH
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts
[QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Well, put it this way, everyone has dinky weapons while you have a weapon that can take out entire cities. Don't you feel a little power?

Let me rephrase my argument. You have 10 cars, and the kid in your block wants a car. YOu start screaming that cars are evil and you make your friends hate/hurt/not speak that kid. When the fuzz is over, you try to get more and more cars, while you satanize cars.


Saying from your scenario, because he can have more power. Plus the Current American government is based on hypocrisy 
Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts

[QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Well, put it this way, everyone has dinky weapons while you have a weapon that can take out entire cities. Don't you feel a little power?

Let me rephrase my argument. You have 10 cars, and the kid in your block wants a car. YOu start screaming that cars are evil and you make your friends hate/hurt/not speak that kid. When the fuzz is over, you try to get more and more cars, while you satanize cars.

It is ridiculously irresponsible to let countries who have threatened to wipe out other countries have WMDs. Your analogy would be more accurate if you replaced "kid" with "psycopath" and "car" withh "assault rifle".

Avatar image for sca321
sca321

1903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 sca321
Member since 2003 • 1903 Posts

Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Because like every other country we're trying to protect ourselves. Can you seriously say that you wouldn't mind Iran having nukes? It's not about fairness it's about trying to maintain our safety. You think they wouldn't try to keep us from having them if they could? 

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

[QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Well, put it this way, everyone has dinky weapons while you have a weapon that can take out entire cities. Don't you feel a little power?

Let me rephrase my argument. You have 10 cars, and the kid in your block wants a car. YOu start screaming that cars are evil and you make your friends hate/hurt/not speak that kid. When the fuzz is over, you try to get more and more cars, while you satanize cars.

Its more like this, take the US and Iran. You have ten cars, a kid down the street says he wants to run someone over and kill them, and they want to buy a car also. Do you give him a car? Iran says its wants to destroy Isreal, do you give him a nuke? Hell no.

Avatar image for beldugo
beldugo

2374

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 beldugo
Member since 2003 • 2374 Posts

http://news.aol.co.uk/russia-will-target-europe-putin/article/20070603133609990005Doom_HellKnight

i'm sick and tired of politicians and their war.. seriously. the world is very dangerous for all of us.. one push of a button and a few phonecalls and mill of people will die. that's how much power a person around the world holds.

 why can't they drop teh missiles and find new ways to make rockets.. or whatever they need the missiles for.. just by having them it's a threat to the rest of the world. i blame some of that on USA too.. even though i live here i hate the stupid politicians here.. all they care about is conquering and becoming rich.

Avatar image for deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
deactivated-57e5de5e137a4

12929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-57e5de5e137a4
Member since 2004 • 12929 Posts

Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Actually, by most estimates Russia has almost as many as the US.

2001 estimates according to the BBC2004 estimates according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative

And who knows what's developed since 2004? The Russian government is so corrupt, there's no telling how many they have.

 

Also Russia is not the tattered remains of the USSR and Soviet Union anymore. They are getting wealthier from oil trade.

Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#27 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.reservoir_doggy

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.
Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#28 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts

[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.SaintLeonidas


Well, put it this way, everyone has dinky weapons while you have a weapon that can take out entire cities. Don't you feel a little power?

Let me rephrase my argument. You have 10 cars, and the kid in your block wants a car. YOu start screaming that cars are evil and you make your friends hate/hurt/not speak that kid. When the fuzz is over, you try to get more and more cars, while you satanize cars.

Its more like this, take the US and Iran. You have ten cars, a kid down the street says he wants to run someone over and kill them, and they want to buy a car also. Do you give him a car? Iran says its wants to destroy Isreal, do you give him a nuke? Hell no.

Let us think that you are right. Who the hell said that US could run over with his car that kid to prevent "any further damage"? You, my kid, no matter how you try to say it are not the world`s police, and specially if you are half way around the world and there is no direct threat to you.
Avatar image for PullTheTricker
PullTheTricker

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 PullTheTricker
Member since 2006 • 4749 Posts

great, i can sleep better knowing that a super power is mad at us. Can i please go one day without hearing another story about how the words going to hell.At this point im thinking, why have kids, they are either gonna get blown up by a plane, stabbed in a mall, shoot at school, killed in war, stricken with disease, possibly deal with global warming, the worlds getting worst and worst every day and i dont see why i should bring another life into it. There needs to be some sort of change.

SaintLeonidas

Man... I feel with you. Thinking everyday the same thing.

 

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

The US isnt the only counntry with nukes, russia has them so do many others. The catch is the fact that we are logical countries. We dont try to exterminate other races, or wake up every moring wishing another country was gone. Iran, wants to  destroy Isreal, North Korea is run by a power hungry dictator who wants south korea and the US gone. You cant put weapons that could killed hundreds of thousands of civilians into those peoples hands. The US, Russia wouldnt us nukes unless absolutely necessary. You make no sense with what your saying, its like saying that its okay to trust a child molester around children, he cant be trusted. If i said I wanted to kill you, would you let me in your house and give me a gun?

Avatar image for Lord_Daemon
Lord_Daemon

24535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#31 Lord_Daemon
Member since 2005 • 24535 Posts

wsfds

Yeah! The Red Menace is back baby!  

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"]

[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono


Well, put it this way, everyone has dinky weapons while you have a weapon that can take out entire cities. Don't you feel a little power?

Let me rephrase my argument. You have 10 cars, and the kid in your block wants a car. YOu start screaming that cars are evil and you make your friends hate/hurt/not speak that kid. When the fuzz is over, you try to get more and more cars, while you satanize cars.

Its more like this, take the US and Iran. You have ten cars, a kid down the street says he wants to run someone over and kill them, and they want to buy a car also. Do you give him a car? Iran says its wants to destroy Isreal, do you give him a nuke? Hell no.

Let us think that you are right. Who the hell said that US could run over with his car that kid to prevent "any further damage"? You, my kid, no matter how you try to say it are not the world`s police, and specially if you are half way around the world and there is no direct threat to you.

Okay,you can go to sleep at night knowing thousands die, and we could do something but we dont, because of course with you, your so self centered that, hell its not me being brutally murdered, raped and blown up, why should i care. Its called morals, its called caring for your fellow human. If you were in a room, and a guy with a gun went to shoot you, and i was there with a biggger one, and you cried for help id shoot the guy to save you, id expect you to do the same.

Avatar image for reservoir_doggy
reservoir_doggy

4054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 reservoir_doggy
Member since 2006 • 4054 Posts
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

 Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.

Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

wsfds

Yeah! The Red Menace is back baby!  

Lord_Daemon

The only good thing to come out of this is better Bond films.

Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#35 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.SaintLeonidas

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

The US isnt the only counntry with nukes, russia has them so do many others. The catch is the fact that we are logical countries. We dont try to exterminate other races, or wake up every moring wishing another country was gone. Iran, wants to  destroy Isreal, North Korea is run by a power hungry dictator who wants south korea and the US gone. You cant put weapons that could killed hundreds of thousands of civilians into those peoples hands. The US, Russia wouldnt us nukes unless absolutely necessary. You make no sense with what your saying, its like saying that its okay to trust a child molester around children, he cant be trusted. If i said I wanted to kill you, would you let me in your house and give me a gun?

Please, if my statements were untrue or wrong do so, but don´t try to tell me about good and evil of some countries while I have shown the villany from the place who wants to "protect the world". Did you realize the fact that you couldn´t refuse my logic??? You just turned the other way around. To hide the fact that you had no answer. There is historic proof of how america isn´t the place of angels. They kill and invade in menas to get economic profit. The fact that they name or point other countries as evil, is just a way to keep USA imperialism. USA isn´t better than any iraki extremist. At least those guys are defending their faith, not money.
Avatar image for Vampyronight
Vampyronight

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 Vampyronight
Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

It would've been considerbly cheaper to just buy the oil illegally like many other countries were doing. But no, heaven forbid that someone stands up for what's right and demands that a country follow the obligations it agreed to. 

The lack of war doesn't mean peace. 

Avatar image for Giovanni19
Giovanni19

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 Giovanni19
Member since 2005 • 2744 Posts
This doesn't suprise me at all.I wish there was no war but let's face it,things will never change.
Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#38 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.reservoir_doggy

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

 Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.

So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.
Avatar image for sinistergoggles
sinistergoggles

9919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 sinistergoggles
Member since 2005 • 9919 Posts
Stuff like this.. makes me wish some alien race would just invade Earth and put us humans out of our misery.
Avatar image for Selrath
Selrath

3333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Selrath
Member since 2005 • 3333 Posts

russia cant afford to go to war with anyone ...ever since the downfall of the soviet union
Honenheim

Sure they can, They could crush Sweden really easy... :p

Anyone can crush Sweden... We got like. the worst army ever.

 Oh and, this thing bout Russia scares me :S That putin guy is evil and he looks so hostile...

Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#41 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.Vampyronight

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

It would've been considerbly cheaper to just buy the oil illegally like many other countries were doing. But no, heaven forbid that someone stands up for what's right and demands that a country follow the obligations it agreed to. 

The lack of war doesn't mean peace. 

Care to disagree. There is a thing called Army economy. If your economy is downgrading, there is a simple thing to reactivate it. Do WAR. Soldiers need ammo, vests, food, communications, etc. This costs and creates work sources, thus moving an economic cycle. Then after war you can "help to rebuild" the place you just invaded which again is an incoming for constructor companies, then while you are there, extracting oil becomes an extra benefit. See? There is no hocus pocus in this. War does benefits a country.
Avatar image for whitetiger3521
whitetiger3521

4686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 whitetiger3521
Member since 2005 • 4686 Posts

I wonder how Bush will F*** up this situation taking any bets guys??sniperdoggy

Ya my bet is the missle defense shields will be put in place and russia will act accordingly.. Now you can bet what happens after that 

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.

So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.

CNN is very liberal, and anti-war. And it's spelled "Iraq".

Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#44 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.Rhazakna

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.

So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.

CNN is very liberal, and anti-war. And it's spelled "Iraq".

Sorry in my country it is spelled Irak. I`,m Mexican if you ask.By the way, still you can´t answer any of my statements. You just defend. Admit your wrong. This does not needs to go any further.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts
[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

The US isnt the only counntry with nukes, russia has them so do many others. The catch is the fact that we are logical countries. We dont try to exterminate other races, or wake up every moring wishing another country was gone. Iran, wants to  destroy Isreal, North Korea is run by a power hungry dictator who wants south korea and the US gone. You cant put weapons that could killed hundreds of thousands of civilians into those peoples hands. The US, Russia wouldnt us nukes unless absolutely necessary. You make no sense with what your saying, its like saying that its okay to trust a child molester around children, he cant be trusted. If i said I wanted to kill you, would you let me in your house and give me a gun?

Please, if my statements were untrue or wrong do so, but don´t try to tell me about good and evil of some countries while I have shown the villany from the place who wants to "protect the world". Did you realize the fact that you couldn´t refuse my logic??? You just turned the other way around. To hide the fact that you had no answer. There is historic proof of how america isn´t the place of angels. They kill and invade in menas to get economic profit. The fact that they name or point other countries as evil, is just a way to keep USA imperialism. USA isn´t better than any iraki extremist. At least those guys are defending their faith, not money.

What villainy, you tried to make a statement about how we go after economic gain, yet you used two example, both werent back up worth good proof.  We are evil country? We must be, we obviously dont allow freedom, or the right to vote. In another country you could be killed for the things you say, but i guess the US is still worse.  Not like weve gone in to countries in attempts to save lives. Not like we dont supply millions in aid around the world, not like we help train troops from around the world and offer help to them. Not like we go after countries that attempt to invade another. You make no sense, defending faith and not money? yeah thats it, your so right. I mean, its not like every time we go into a place we try to liberate the people, give them a voice, loosen the strict rules they were forced to obey. Freedom means nothing to us, its all money. We have gained so much from Iraq, I mean those 400 billions weve spent on it sure have made us rich. Man, thats a awesome plan, lets invade more countries, spend billions to do so, lose lives, because then we gain economically. once we gain back the 400billin already spent.

Avatar image for Mudig
Mudig

1567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 Mudig
Member since 2007 • 1567 Posts

In the interview, Putin was asked whether the US move build a missile defence shield in Eastern Europe would compel Moscow to direct its own missiles at locations and US military sites in Europe, as during the Cold War.

 

Well thankfully it will be targeted at US military and not my house. 

Avatar image for BuddyAces
BuddyAces

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 BuddyAces
Member since 2007 • 401 Posts
In all honesty, Putin makes me feel ashamed that I am Russian. He's driven that country so far into the ground with his ******** policies. I wanna say "Oh, I wish Yeltsin was back" and I really do because at least he kept democracy alive.
Avatar image for reservoir_doggy
reservoir_doggy

4054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 reservoir_doggy
Member since 2006 • 4054 Posts
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

 Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.

So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.

I said when it's about countries being destroyed then it's about safety. If Iran was allowed to have a huge Nuclear weapons program then Israel would already possibly be destroyed. You really think we should let Iran do that? The difference between the US having Nukes and Iran having Nukes is that we don't threaten to obliterate countries while they do. The Iraq war is a mess and I really don't agree with it. They said that had weapons of mass destruction and they were wrong, after that we should have left and kept close watch, but instead we put them in a civil war. 

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"]

[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono

Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...

So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.

Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.

So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.

CNN is very liberal, and anti-war. And it's spelled "Iraq".

Sorry in my country it is spelled Irak. I`,m Mexican if you ask.By the way, still you can´t answer any of my statements. You just defend. Admit your wrong. This does not needs to go any further.

Your statements aren't really on the same track. You question why the US is concerned about other countries nukes, then when that's answered, you talk about the war in Iraq. They're not the same issue. 

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#50 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts

great... just great...Sir_Marwin

stupid Bush we cant make peace with anyone. i hate this "lets make enemies with the world" crapÂ