This topic is locked from further discussion.
russia cant afford to go to war with anyone ...ever since the downfall of the soviet union
Honenheim
They still have all their nukes left
Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
[QUOTE="9mmSpliff"]RUSSIA: We are not facists....we are communists :evil:Honenheim
they have tons of 'em i know ....however they still have legal binding issues with the U.N. about those weapons
oh yeah i know. I am just saying it from old school Russian Communist Generals point of views that are still in power up there. They would love to have the "STANS"all back and be communist again.
But I think this is just Russian Govt and Military gettign some rises out there. you know, like "Hey dont forget about us, Mother Russia, USSR"
great, i can sleep better knowing that a super power is mad at us. Can i please go one day without hearing another story about how the words going to hell.At this point im thinking, why have kids, they are either gonna get blown up by a plane, stabbed in a mall, shoot at school, killed in war, stricken with disease, possibly deal with global warming, the worlds getting worst and worst every day and i dont see why i should bring another life into it. There needs to be some sort of change.
[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.BEAN_LARD_MULCH
Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. I geuss you're right. We should allow crazy the crazy idiots in Iran, Russia, and North Korea to run around with Nuclear weapons programs and threaten to blow people up just because its not fair for the US to be the only one to have Nukes. Why should someone that has plans to kill people have that sort of technology.
[QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
[QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
It is ridiculously irresponsible to let countries who have threatened to wipe out other countries have WMDs. Your analogy would be more accurate if you replaced "kid" with "psycopath" and "car" withh "assault rifle".
Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Because like every other country we're trying to protect ourselves. Can you seriously say that you wouldn't mind Iran having nukes? It's not about fairness it's about trying to maintain our safety. You think they wouldn't try to keep us from having them if they could?Â
[QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Its more like this, take the US and Iran. You have ten cars, a kid down the street says he wants to run someone over and kill them, and they want to buy a car also. Do you give him a car? Iran says its wants to destroy Isreal, do you give him a nuke? Hell no.
http://news.aol.co.uk/russia-will-target-europe-putin/article/20070603133609990005Doom_HellKnight
i'm sick and tired of politicians and their war.. seriously. the world is very dangerous for all of us.. one push of a button and a few phonecalls and mill of people will die. that's how much power a person around the world holds.
 why can't they drop teh missiles and find new ways to make rockets.. or whatever they need the missiles for.. just by having them it's a threat to the rest of the world. i blame some of that on USA too.. even though i live here i hate the stupid politicians here.. all they care about is conquering and becoming rich.
Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Actually, by most estimates Russia has almost as many as the US.
2001 estimates according to the BBC2004 estimates according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative
And who knows what's developed since 2004? The Russian government is so corrupt, there's no telling how many they have.
Â
Also Russia is not the tattered remains of the USSR and Soviet Union anymore. They are getting wealthier from oil trade.
[QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.reservoir_doggy
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.SaintLeonidas
Its more like this, take the US and Iran. You have ten cars, a kid down the street says he wants to run someone over and kill them, and they want to buy a car also. Do you give him a car? Iran says its wants to destroy Isreal, do you give him a nuke? Hell no.
Let us think that you are right. Who the hell said that US could run over with his car that kid to prevent "any further damage"? You, my kid, no matter how you try to say it are not the world`s police, and specially if you are half way around the world and there is no direct threat to you.great, i can sleep better knowing that a super power is mad at us. Can i please go one day without hearing another story about how the words going to hell.At this point im thinking, why have kids, they are either gonna get blown up by a plane, stabbed in a mall, shoot at school, killed in war, stricken with disease, possibly deal with global warming, the worlds getting worst and worst every day and i dont see why i should bring another life into it. There needs to be some sort of change.
SaintLeonidas
Man... I feel with you. Thinking everyday the same thing.
Â
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.The US isnt the only counntry with nukes, russia has them so do many others. The catch is the fact that we are logical countries. We dont try to exterminate other races, or wake up every moring wishing another country was gone. Iran, wants to destroy Isreal, North Korea is run by a power hungry dictator who wants south korea and the US gone. You cant put weapons that could killed hundreds of thousands of civilians into those peoples hands. The US, Russia wouldnt us nukes unless absolutely necessary. You make no sense with what your saying, its like saying that its okay to trust a child molester around children, he cant be trusted. If i said I wanted to kill you, would you let me in your house and give me a gun?
[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="BEAN_LARD_MULCH"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Its more like this, take the US and Iran. You have ten cars, a kid down the street says he wants to run someone over and kill them, and they want to buy a car also. Do you give him a car? Iran says its wants to destroy Isreal, do you give him a nuke? Hell no.
Let us think that you are right. Who the hell said that US could run over with his car that kid to prevent "any further damage"? You, my kid, no matter how you try to say it are not the world`s police, and specially if you are half way around the world and there is no direct threat to you.Okay,you can go to sleep at night knowing thousands die, and we could do something but we dont, because of course with you, your so self centered that, hell its not me being brutally murdered, raped and blown up, why should i care. Its called morals, its called caring for your fellow human. If you were in a room, and a guy with a gun went to shoot you, and i was there with a biggger one, and you cried for help id shoot the guy to save you, id expect you to do the same.
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst. Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.
Yeah! The Red Menace is back baby! Â
Lord_Daemon
The only good thing to come out of this is better Bond films.
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.SaintLeonidas
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.The US isnt the only counntry with nukes, russia has them so do many others. The catch is the fact that we are logical countries. We dont try to exterminate other races, or wake up every moring wishing another country was gone. Iran, wants to destroy Isreal, North Korea is run by a power hungry dictator who wants south korea and the US gone. You cant put weapons that could killed hundreds of thousands of civilians into those peoples hands. The US, Russia wouldnt us nukes unless absolutely necessary. You make no sense with what your saying, its like saying that its okay to trust a child molester around children, he cant be trusted. If i said I wanted to kill you, would you let me in your house and give me a gun?
Please, if my statements were untrue or wrong do so, but don´t try to tell me about good and evil of some countries while I have shown the villany from the place who wants to "protect the world". Did you realize the fact that you couldn´t refuse my logic??? You just turned the other way around. To hide the fact that you had no answer. There is historic proof of how america isn´t the place of angels. They kill and invade in menas to get economic profit. The fact that they name or point other countries as evil, is just a way to keep USA imperialism. USA isn´t better than any iraki extremist. At least those guys are defending their faith, not money.[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.It would've been considerbly cheaper to just buy the oil illegally like many other countries were doing. But no, heaven forbid that someone stands up for what's right and demands that a country follow the obligations it agreed to.Â
The lack of war doesn't mean peace.Â
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.reservoir_doggy
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst. Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.
So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.russia cant afford to go to war with anyone ...ever since the downfall of the soviet union
Honenheim
Sure they can, They could crush Sweden really easy... :p
Anyone can crush Sweden... We got like. the worst army ever.
 Oh and, this thing bout Russia scares me :S That putin guy is evil and he looks so hostile...
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.Vampyronight
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.It would've been considerbly cheaper to just buy the oil illegally like many other countries were doing. But no, heaven forbid that someone stands up for what's right and demands that a country follow the obligations it agreed to.Â
The lack of war doesn't mean peace.Â
Care to disagree. There is a thing called Army economy. If your economy is downgrading, there is a simple thing to reactivate it. Do WAR. Soldiers need ammo, vests, food, communications, etc. This costs and creates work sources, thus moving an economic cycle. Then after war you can "help to rebuild" the place you just invaded which again is an incoming for constructor companies, then while you are there, extracting oil becomes an extra benefit. See? There is no hocus pocus in this. War does benefits a country.I wonder how Bush will F*** up this situation taking any bets guys??sniperdoggy
Ya my bet is the missle defense shields will be put in place and russia will act accordingly.. Now you can bet what happens after thatÂ
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.
So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.CNN is very liberal, and anti-war. And it's spelled "Iraq".
[QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.Rhazakna
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.
So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.CNN is very liberal, and anti-war. And it's spelled "Iraq".
Sorry in my country it is spelled Irak. I`,m Mexican if you ask.By the way, still you can´t answer any of my statements. You just defend. Admit your wrong. This does not needs to go any further.[QUOTE="SaintLeonidas"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.The US isnt the only counntry with nukes, russia has them so do many others. The catch is the fact that we are logical countries. We dont try to exterminate other races, or wake up every moring wishing another country was gone. Iran, wants to destroy Isreal, North Korea is run by a power hungry dictator who wants south korea and the US gone. You cant put weapons that could killed hundreds of thousands of civilians into those peoples hands. The US, Russia wouldnt us nukes unless absolutely necessary. You make no sense with what your saying, its like saying that its okay to trust a child molester around children, he cant be trusted. If i said I wanted to kill you, would you let me in your house and give me a gun?
Please, if my statements were untrue or wrong do so, but don´t try to tell me about good and evil of some countries while I have shown the villany from the place who wants to "protect the world". Did you realize the fact that you couldn´t refuse my logic??? You just turned the other way around. To hide the fact that you had no answer. There is historic proof of how america isn´t the place of angels. They kill and invade in menas to get economic profit. The fact that they name or point other countries as evil, is just a way to keep USA imperialism. USA isn´t better than any iraki extremist. At least those guys are defending their faith, not money.What villainy, you tried to make a statement about how we go after economic gain, yet you used two example, both werent back up worth good proof. We are evil country? We must be, we obviously dont allow freedom, or the right to vote. In another country you could be killed for the things you say, but i guess the US is still worse. Not like weve gone in to countries in attempts to save lives. Not like we dont supply millions in aid around the world, not like we help train troops from around the world and offer help to them. Not like we go after countries that attempt to invade another. You make no sense, defending faith and not money? yeah thats it, your so right. I mean, its not like every time we go into a place we try to liberate the people, give them a voice, loosen the strict rules they were forced to obey. Freedom means nothing to us, its all money. We have gained so much from Iraq, I mean those 400 billions weve spent on it sure have made us rich. Man, thats a awesome plan, lets invade more countries, spend billions to do so, lose lives, because then we gain economically. once we gain back the 400billin already spent.
In the interview, Putin was asked whether the US move build a missile defence shield in Eastern Europe would compel Moscow to direct its own missiles at locations and US military sites in Europe, as during the Cold War.
Â
Well thankfully it will be targeted at US military and not my house.Â
[QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst. Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.
So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.I said when it's about countries being destroyed then it's about safety. If Iran was allowed to have a huge Nuclear weapons program then Israel would already possibly be destroyed. You really think we should let Iran do that? The difference between the US having Nukes and Iran having Nukes is that we don't threaten to obliterate countries while they do. The Iraq war is a mess and I really don't agree with it. They said that had weapons of mass destruction and they were wrong, after that we should have left and kept close watch, but instead we put them in a civil war.Â
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"][QUOTE="reservoir_doggy"][QUOTE="curono"]Seriously, Why does US makes so much fuzz about the nuclear bombs all around the world? USA has maybe the biggest NUCLEAR arsenal in the world and it is ok, but anyone but them attempts to get that technology and bombs are the worst thing in the world. That is hipocrisy.curono
Except for the whole we don't theaten to take out Europe thing. Seriously we will use them if we have to because other people might use them first, but we don't run around threatening to kill millions of people like some of these other countries. ...
So Irak and Iran are your responsibility and every attack to middle east has nothing to do with OIL (oh, it happens to be just by chance that the region I`m speaking of is maybe the richest place in oil), the invasion to Panama was an act of charity (The Panama canal was built and a year after the US invasion and a lot of money was gotten from there). I could go on and on with examples. Please, if you have two brain cells connected you will notice that most invasions (if not all) have an economic basis behind it. Don´t be ridiculous. US is hell worst.Almost every nation has something economically valuable to them. That does not mean that that is the cause of the invasion. So say what you say is true and we are the worst nation out their, you would want someone else that is angry with us to have the same technology. I know I wouldn't. When your talking about Nukes, its not about ethics, its about our safety.
So if it is about your safety, tell me. Before the invasion to Irak and Saddam affairs what reasons did those guys had to obliterate USA?? NONE. You just want to justify this wars with arguments CNN brings you.CNN is very liberal, and anti-war. And it's spelled "Iraq".
Sorry in my country it is spelled Irak. I`,m Mexican if you ask.By the way, still you can´t answer any of my statements. You just defend. Admit your wrong. This does not needs to go any further.Your statements aren't really on the same track. You question why the US is concerned about other countries nukes, then when that's answered, you talk about the war in Iraq. They're not the same issue.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment