Save a dying person or inherit $100 million.

Ok so the mysterious G-man comes up to you and offers you two choices.

1. Save a dying person passed out on the side of the road somewhere.

OR

2. Take $100 million.

If you save the person, he/she will return to great health and start a happy family and become one of your closest/best friends.

If you take the money, he/she will die.

I´ll take the $100 million in a heartbeat.

EDIT:

In retrospect... No, i wouldn´t take the $100 million. I´d rush to the dying person. I wouldn´t act as rational as my initial comment suggests, i would act out of emotion, and my emotions dictates me trying to save a persons life

give me the 100mil.. :P.. ill help out the poverty problem in my country.

Inherit 100million.

Save the dying person, and start a business with him and succeed. I get to sleep well at night and make some nice money too.hiphops_savior

hmmm, logic fail.

$100 million could save many lives.

I'd take the $100 million. With that amount of money I would save hundreds, if not thousands of lives.uhoh_hotdogs

This.

Eh probably save the person as many of you would if you were actually facing said sitiation.

Eh probably save the person as many of you would if you were actually facing said sitiation.

Dystopian-X

I'ld save them, if they're a good person then they're worth way more than 100mil. If they're such a good freind i suspect they may give me a reward or at least some awesome Xmas/Bday presents considering they have 100mil. Even better if it's a she and she grows up and makes a happy family with me :)

ill take the money thank you very much....who knows....maybe the person that needs help is a racist :wink: ReaperV7

Take the money I dont need anymore friends and this dude isnt importaint to me.

[QUOTE="ReaperV7"]ill take the money thank you very much....who knows....maybe the person that needs help is a racist :wink: markop2003

ill take the money thank you very much....who knows....maybe the person that needs help is a racist :wink: ReaperV7

Money is irrelevant without morality.

Life > money.

/Thread.

Money is irrelevant without morality.

SUD123456

[QUOTE="SUD123456"]

Money is irrelevant without morality.

Ontain

Life > money.

/Thread.

Jamiemydearx3

correct, which is why I would take teh money.

keep one million in one bank, the other 99mil in another

in a bank with 5% interest, and does it quater anually, one million is 200,000. thats enough to live very comfortably, and I would put what isnt spent into teh other account. 99million in a similar bank is 19.8million every year. almost 20 million every year to go to charities and such. one person will die, maybe even a great and loved person. but I would save countless lives througout my live and after I die. 1 person means nothing against thousands or even millions in teh end. the people who are saving the one person because tehy will know them personally are just as bad in my book as teh people who would take the money and be greedy with it.

Save a dying person. The money is going to get taxed to death or 'redistributed'

Depends if i actually care about the person. If i don't, a 100 million is a lot of money that could both enrich you and give you the opportunity to save a lot of other lives. Unless it is someone you know, the logical solution is to take the money and do good for more people.tok1879

[QUOTE="tok1879"]Depends if i actually care about the person. If i don't, a 100 million is a lot of money that could both enrich you and give you the opportunity to save a lot of other lives. Unless it is someone you know, the logical solution is to take the money and do good for more people.CaptainSchwamm

one man means nothing in the greater scheme of things.

[QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="SUD123456"]

Money is irrelevant without morality.

LJS9502_basic

[QUOTE="Jamiemydearx3"]

Life > money.

/Thread.

SamusFreak

correct, which is why I would take teh money.

keep one million in one bank, the other 99mil in another

in a bank with 5% interest, and does it quater anually, one million is 200,000. thats enough to live very comfortably, and I would put what isnt spent into teh other account. 99million in a similar bank is 19.8million every year. almost 20 million every year to go to charities and such. one person will die, maybe even a great and loved person. but I would save countless lives througout my live and after I die. 1 person means nothing against thousands or even millions in teh end. the people who are saving the one person because tehy will know them personally are just as bad in my book as teh people who would take the money and be greedy with it.

[QUOTE="CaptainSchwamm"][QUOTE="tok1879"]Depends if i actually care about the person. If i don't, a 100 million is a lot of money that could both enrich you and give you the opportunity to save a lot of other lives. Unless it is someone you know, the logical solution is to take the money and do good for more people.SamusFreak

one man means nothing in the greater scheme of things.

]I think the evidence is there as to who it goes to dude.;)LJS9502_basic

I suppose that if it was a girl around my age, I'd save her. Otherwise I'd take the money.

Yes they get what IS necessary to sustain life.:|LJS9502_basic