This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'd take the $100 million. With that amount of money I would save hundreds, if not thousands of lives.uhoh_hotdogsExactly what I was thinking
Initially 100 million, but since you said they would become my new closest friend, I would save them. Hell, my best friend..If someone offered me 100 million to never see her again, I wouldn't take it. I'm a big softie for good friends, they are hard to come by.
Inherit the 100 million then donate 50 million to cancer research. That way its a win-win situation.
Well thinking about it you could easily rationalize it by saying that you could use that money to save lots of people's lives instead of just one. But a person is worth more than 100 million dollars and in the moment I don't think I could let them die.artichokeI think an american in prime working years is about 2million. children and elderly are worth less. at least according to the accountants. in 3rd world countries lives are worth much less which is why if you want the most bang for your donation buck it's better to help ppl in the 3rd world. 1k could feed a village for months rather than just 1 dude in the US.
i really rather save a dying person then take the money i,m not selfish i want to save people not kill them.8)
You're not killing someone, you're just not saving them.i really rather save a dying person then take the money i,m not selfish i want to save people not kill them.8)
princecaspian38
I honestly doubt many here would donate the 100mil to charity.SaxsoonI wouldn't. I would honestly take the money, and basically say, "**** that guy" as I walked off smiling like an idiot thinking about all the crap I am going to purchase, and prudently making plans to invest so that I do not just piss away the money.
[QUOTE="Saxsoon"]I honestly doubt many here would donate the 100mil to charity.clayronI wouldn't. I would honestly take the money, and basically say, "**** that guy" as I walked off smiling like an idiot thinking about all the crap I am going to purchase, and prudently making plans to invest so that I do not just piss away the money.
you are empty
I wouldn't. I would honestly take the money, and basically say, "**** that guy" as I walked off smiling like an idiot thinking about all the crap I am going to purchase, and prudently making plans to invest so that I do not just piss away the money.[QUOTE="clayron"][QUOTE="Saxsoon"]I honestly doubt many here would donate the 100mil to charity.jpph
you are empty
Empty? No. Just honest. I am not going to say I would save the person when I know for a fact I wouldn't. People die, its the way the world works. I am going to look out for myself, first and foremost, to hell with the dying man.Its always this or that thread on gamespot what did you think? :(
Eh probably save the person as many of you would if you were actually facing said sitiation.
Dystopian-X
Its always this or that thread on gamespot what did you think? :(Yeh, just pointing the new one out and still doesn't make it something positive.krazy-blazer
I gladly take you are not a doctor or a paramedic?i'd take the money everyone dies in the end, it was his time oh well
l4dak47
hmmm. while 100 million is a lot, if i saved the dying person, i could use that to get famous and get some money. i could probably get on oprah and all sorts of other shows, have magazine articles printed about me, hell i could probably write a book and even if it sucked, it would sell because i was 'that guy that saved a person instead of taking $100 million'
what if the person you save is a child molester or something? Rorschach doesn't seem to care if they die.save the person. i dont think i could live with myself, also its sticking to my prinicipals.
as rorschach says "no compromise, even in the face of armageddon"
not that it would be armageddon. but you know what i mean
jpph
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment