Scale of the Universe made me realise how AMAZING God is.

  • 191 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="Silenthps"]

Do you wish for there to be a large population of people who think that 1 + 1 = 3?

Do you wish for it to be politically un-correct to ever say that 1 + 1 = 2 or to say that the people who believe 1 + 1 = 3 are wrong because it would offend those who have different opinions?

Would you be saddened if the majority of OT believed that 1 + 1 = 3?

One can easily prove that 1+1=/=3.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

... No.. I accept the fact that people have difference of opinions from my self.. I hope for such a thing, because the world would be boring if we all agreed on things.. The fact of the matter is people of Atheist standing should not be treated like lepers.. Saddened? How about people showing humility that their way may not be the way for others.. For a religion that claims often times (regardless of the religion) to show humility, many followers sure seem to illustrate a clear lack of it.

Silenthps

Do you wish for there to be a large population of people who think that 1 + 1 = 3?

Do you wish for it to be politically un-correct to ever say that 1 + 1 = 2 or to say that the people who believe 1 + 1 = 3 are wrong because it would offend those who have different opinions?

Would you be saddened if the majority of OT believed that 1 + 1 = 3?

Yes, because matters of faith are absolutely equivalent to basic arithmetic. Hopelessly busted analogy is hopelessly busted.
Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
[QUOTE="Silenthps"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

... No.. I accept the fact that people have difference of opinions from my self.. I hope for such a thing, because the world would be boring if we all agreed on things.. The fact of the matter is people of Atheist standing should not be treated like lepers.. Saddened? How about people showing humility that their way may not be the way for others.. For a religion that claims often times (regardless of the religion) to show humility, many followers sure seem to illustrate a clear lack of it.

xaos

Do you wish for there to be a large population of people who think that 1 + 1 = 3?

Do you wish for it to be politically un-correct to ever say that 1 + 1 = 2 or to say that the people who believe 1 + 1 = 3 are wrong because it would offend those who have different opinions?

Would you be saddened if the majority of OT believed that 1 + 1 = 3?

Yes, because matters of faith are absolutely equivalent to basic arithmetic. Hopelessly busted analogy is hopelessly busted.

Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong.
Avatar image for Crimtmp
Crimtmp

2432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#54 Crimtmp
Member since 2006 • 2432 Posts

Annunaki is God.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]Do you wish for there to be a large population of people who think that 1 + 1 = 3?

Do you wish for it to be politically un-correct to ever say that 1 + 1 = 2 or to say that the people who believe 1 + 1 = 3 are wrong because it would offend those who have different opinions?

Would you be saddened if the majority of OT believed that 1 + 1 = 3?

Silenthps
Yes, because matters of faith are absolutely equivalent to basic arithmetic. Hopelessly busted analogy is hopelessly busted.

Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong.

But since one can be demonstrably and empirically shown to be true and the other is purely a matter of faith, the comparison doesn't seem particularly useful in any way that I can see.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong. Silenthps
Since we're bringing mathematical fallacies into this, I might begin to point fingers at the group that believes that the Earth is 6000 years old.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]Do you wish for there to be a large population of people who think that 1 + 1 = 3?

Do you wish for it to be politically un-correct to ever say that 1 + 1 = 2 or to say that the people who believe 1 + 1 = 3 are wrong because it would offend those who have different opinions?

Would you be saddened if the majority of OT believed that 1 + 1 = 3?

Silenthps

Yes, because matters of faith are absolutely equivalent to basic arithmetic. Hopelessly busted analogy is hopelessly busted.

Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong.

Not with something you can not prove that lies in the realm of metaphysics.. So yet again.. No there is no right or wrong answer, because it can't be proven in the end.. Hence faith is needed.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="xaos"] Yes, because matters of faith are absolutely equivalent to basic arithmetic. Hopelessly busted analogy is hopelessly busted.

Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong.

But since one can be demonstrably and empirically shown to be true and the other is purely a matter of faith, the comparison doesn't seem particularly useful in any way that I can see.

Wow... you guys are great at dodging the point of the question Replace 1 + 1 = 3 to "Child molestation being ethical behavior"
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong. Silenthps
But since one can be demonstrably and empirically shown to be true and the other is purely a matter of faith, the comparison doesn't seem particularly useful in any way that I can see.

Wow... you guys are great at dodging the point of the question Replace 1 + 1 = 3 to "Child molestation being ethical behavior"

No, you are just terrible at analogies as you continue to demonstrate. Since objective and verifiable harm results from child molestation, it would be quite a trick to treat it as ethical behavior in our world. The point that you are missing is that matters of faith are matters of faith.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong. Silenthps
But since one can be demonstrably and empirically shown to be true and the other is purely a matter of faith, the comparison doesn't seem particularly useful in any way that I can see.

Wow... you guys are great at dodging the point of the question Replace 1 + 1 = 3 to "Child molestation being ethical behavior"

:| What does have anything to do with what we are discussing.. We are discussing the metaphysics/supernatural/religion.. It is a completely intangible idea.. The things your stating are things that has nothing to do with faith NOTHING.. Life is not black and white.. its many shades grey..

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="xaos"] Yes, because matters of faith are absolutely equivalent to basic arithmetic. Hopelessly busted analogy is hopelessly busted.sSubZerOo

Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong.

Not with something you can not prove that lies in the realm of metaphysics.. So yet again.. No there is no right or wrong answer, because it can't be proven in the end.. Hence faith is needed.

Yeah you're right, it can't be proven. The atheist can look God dead in the face and still say He doesn't exist. He could be burning in hell for a million years yet still hold on to the belief that maybe he is hallucinating or that this is all one big dream. And just like how God can't be proven, neither can 1 + 1 = 2 since you can always say that maybe all human logic is faulty or maybe everything is one big dream and in reality 1 + 1 does = 3. Since both require faith, the analogy still stands.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong. Silenthps

Not with something you can not prove that lies in the realm of metaphysics.. So yet again.. No there is no right or wrong answer, because it can't be proven in the end.. Hence faith is needed.

Yeah you're right, it can't be proven. The atheist can look God dead in the face and still say He doesn't exist. He could be burning in hell for a million years yet still hold on to the belief that maybe he is hallucinating or that this is all one big dream. And just like how God can't be proven, neither can 1 + 1 = 2 since you can always say that maybe all human logic is faulty or maybe everything is one big dream and in reality 1 + 1 does = 3. Since both require faith, the analogy still stands.

You are destroying my faith in an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God with every post you make :(
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]Never said they were absolutely equivalent. It doesn't change the fact that one group is correct while the other is wrong. Silenthps

Not with something you can not prove that lies in the realm of metaphysics.. So yet again.. No there is no right or wrong answer, because it can't be proven in the end.. Hence faith is needed.

Yeah you're right, it can't be proven. The atheist can look God dead in the face and still say He doesn't exist.

You don't get it do you? YOUR NOT LOOKING GODS FACE.. WE HAVE NO REAL EVIDENCE of god, it is a matter FAITH.

He could be burning in hell for a million years yet still hold on to the belief that maybe he is hallucinating or that this is all one big dream.

THIS HAS nothing to do with my point..

And just like how God can't be proven, neither can 1 + 1 = 2 since you can always say that maybe all human logic is faulty or maybe everything is one big dream and in reality 1 + 1 does = 3. Since both require faith, the analogy still stands.

Seriously stop using that analogy it doesn't make sense.. We can prove that 1+1= 2, we can not prove the existence of god.. It is a article of faith..

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="xaos"] But since one can be demonstrably and empirically shown to be true and the other is purely a matter of faith, the comparison doesn't seem particularly useful in any way that I can see.

Wow... you guys are great at dodging the point of the question Replace 1 + 1 = 3 to "Child molestation being ethical behavior"

No, you are just terrible at analogies as you continue to demonstrate. Since objective and verifiable harm results from child molestation, it would be quite a trick to treat it as ethical behavior in our world. The point that you are missing is that matters of faith are matters of faith.

You're assuming that doing objective and verifiable harm is unethical. What if i don't believe it is unethical? Would it make you sad? Or would it make you happy that life would be less boring with more people having different beliefs?
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"] Wow... you guys are great at dodging the point of the question Replace 1 + 1 = 3 to "Child molestation being ethical behavior"

No, you are just terrible at analogies as you continue to demonstrate. Since objective and verifiable harm results from child molestation, it would be quite a trick to treat it as ethical behavior in our world. The point that you are missing is that matters of faith are matters of faith.

You're assuming that doing objective and verifiable harm is unethical. What if i don't believe it is unethical? Would it make you sad? Or would it make you happy that life would be less boring with more people having different beliefs?

No, it would just make me sad that you didn't know what ethics are
Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#66 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Not with something you can not prove that lies in the realm of metaphysics.. So yet again.. No there is no right or wrong answer, because it can't be proven in the end.. Hence faith is needed.

sSubZerOo

Yeah you're right, it can't be proven. The atheist can look God dead in the face and still say He doesn't exist.

You don't get it do you? YOUR NOT LOOKING GODS FACE.. WE HAVE NO REAL EVIDENCE of god, it is a matter FAITH.

He could be burning in hell for a million years yet still hold on to the belief that maybe he is hallucinating or that this is all one big dream.

THIS HAS nothing to do with my point..

And just like how God can't be proven, neither can 1 + 1 = 2 since you can always say that maybe all human logic is faulty or maybe everything is one big dream and in reality 1 + 1 does = 3. Since both require faith, the analogy still stands.

Seriously stop using that analogy it doesn't make sense.. We can prove that 1+1= 2, we can not prove the existence of god.. It is a article of faith..

It's sad, you don't even realize how much faith you put in everything you do in life. How do you even know what "real evidence" is? what is the definition of "real evidence" and how did you come up with that definition? You're putting faith in your own ability to even determine what real evidence is. And you're putting faith in your ability to know rather or not 1 + 1 = 2
Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="xaos"] No, you are just terrible at analogies as you continue to demonstrate. Since objective and verifiable harm results from child molestation, it would be quite a trick to treat it as ethical behavior in our world. The point that you are missing is that matters of faith are matters of faith.

You're assuming that doing objective and verifiable harm is unethical. What if i don't believe it is unethical? Would it make you sad? Or would it make you happy that life would be less boring with more people having different beliefs?

No, it would just make me sad that you didn't know what ethics are

And who are you to decide what ethics is?
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]You're assuming that doing objective and verifiable harm is unethical. What if i don't believe it is unethical? Would it make you sad? Or would it make you happy that life would be less boring with more people having different beliefs?Silenthps
No, it would just make me sad that you didn't know what ethics are

And who are you to decide what ethics is?

I didn't decide, I learned.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#69 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

[...] And just like how God can't be proven, neither can 1 + 1 = 2 [...] Silenthps

I can prove 1 + 1 = 2. There, I just did it. Math is absolute... the only absolute thing in the universe. Even our perceptions of "God" aren't absolute, even if one claims God is absolute.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]Yeah you're right, it can't be proven. The atheist can look God dead in the face and still say He doesn't exist.

You don't get it do you? YOUR NOT LOOKING GODS FACE.. WE HAVE NO REAL EVIDENCE of god, it is a matter FAITH.

He could be burning in hell for a million years yet still hold on to the belief that maybe he is hallucinating or that this is all one big dream.

THIS HAS nothing to do with my point..

And just like how God can't be proven, neither can 1 + 1 = 2 since you can always say that maybe all human logic is faulty or maybe everything is one big dream and in reality 1 + 1 does = 3. Since both require faith, the analogy still stands. Silenthps

Seriously stop using that analogy it doesn't make sense.. We can prove that 1+1= 2, we can not prove the existence of god.. It is a article of faith..

It's sad, you don't even realize how much faith you put in everything you do in life. How do you even know what "real evidence" is? what is the definition of "real evidence" and how did you come up with that definition? You're putting faith in your own ability to even determine what real evidence is. And you're putting faith in your ability to know rather or not 1 + 1 = 2

Of course.. I never stated otherwise.. We do a lot of faith in everything.. But yet again that doesn't make the faith of one person's belief in the supernatural is better or correct of the other.. They can not be proven.. For the last time.. There is no point in trying to argue whether a Atheist is correct or a Christian (or any one really who believes in a god or gods) because they articles of faith or lack thereof.. Furthermore yes life would be boring if we didn't have disagreements, nor would learn and grow from one another. In fact our entire individuality is based upon that, that we all have our unique perspective of life along with the ideas that are formed from them.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="xaos"] No, it would just make me sad that you didn't know what ethics are

And who are you to decide what ethics is?

I didn't decide, I learned.

You're dodging the point. Who did you learn from and who are they to decide what ethics is? And please don't give me an answer like "they learned too"
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]And who are you to decide what ethics is? Silenthps
I didn't decide, I learned.

You're dodging the point. Who did you learn from and who are they to decide what ethics is? And please don't give me an answer like "they learned too"

Ethics in many areas are not absolute.. They have changed as cultures of the world have progressed.. The ethics of one culture can be quite different from another in many regards.

Avatar image for metallica_fan42
metallica_fan42

21143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#73 metallica_fan42
Member since 2006 • 21143 Posts
That's cool man, but most of the posters here won't give you any support. Religion in OT is almost a waste of time, speaking from an unbiased poster of course.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]And who are you to decide what ethics is? Silenthps
I didn't decide, I learned.

You're dodging the point. Who did you learn from and who are they to decide what ethics is? And please don't give me an answer like "they learned too"

Ethics are a constructed human activity that encode and describe ideal norms of a society. I can't recall the text we used, but I learned them from a professor at Georgia Tech. I can't attest to his training in ethics, so gosh, I guess you have won.
Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]Amazed that people think the whole universe was created by a deity whose existence they cannot prove.sonicare
I believe Odin's existence has been proved more than once. You've just let Loki mislead you.

Oh no, you made zeus mad. :(

Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]He put us on a tiny tiny tiny planet to give us a taste of how big big big He truly is. Thats actually a really bad question. Would putting us on a larger planet prove that he created us. Your question on who created God is also pretty absurd since God is by definition un-created. It's like asking, who created the uncreated God? xaos
But who created the uncreated universe? :o

I did in an alternate reality. :o

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Seriously stop using that analogy it doesn't make sense.. We can prove that 1+1= 2, we can not prove the existence of god.. It is a article of faith..

sSubZerOo

It's sad, you don't even realize how much faith you put in everything you do in life. How do you even know what "real evidence" is? what is the definition of "real evidence" and how did you come up with that definition? You're putting faith in your own ability to even determine what real evidence is. And you're putting faith in your ability to know rather or not 1 + 1 = 2

Of course.. I never stated otherwise.. We do a lot of faith in everything.. But yet again that doesn't make the faith of one person's belief in the supernatural is better or correct of the other.. They can not be proven.. For the last time.. There is no point in trying to argue whether a Atheist is correct or a Christian (or any one really who believes in a god or gods) because they articles of faith or lack thereof.. Furthermore yes life would be boring if we didn't have disagreements, nor would learn and grow from one another. In fact our entire individuality is based upon that, that we all have our unique perspective of life along with the ideas that are formed from them.

So then would you agree that some beliefs are more valid than others? Or that it would be sad for some people to hold a particular belief?
Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#78 curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts
[QUOTE="no_more_fayth"]

[QUOTE="Solid_Snake325"]Pathetic to see so many atheists on OT.Solid_Snake325

Why?

Because most Americans consider themselves Christians and I assume most OTers are Americans. So it's saddening to see how so many OTers are atheist,

Mexican here, although mexico is a catholic country as a whole, I am atheist. And yes the universe is amazing, and no, God didnt create it in 7 days.
Avatar image for thriteenthmonke
thriteenthmonke

49823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 thriteenthmonke
Member since 2005 • 49823 Posts
The scale of the universe made me realize how amazing the universe is.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde

12935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 82

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-5cf0a2e13dbde
Member since 2005 • 12935 Posts
I'm amazed at the scale of the universe. However, it does nothing to sway me away from believing that God is a human construct.
Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

This fits nicely: Pale blue dot.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"] It's sad, you don't even realize how much faith you put in everything you do in life. How do you even know what "real evidence" is? what is the definition of "real evidence" and how did you come up with that definition? You're putting faith in your own ability to even determine what real evidence is. And you're putting faith in your ability to know rather or not 1 + 1 = 2Silenthps

Of course.. I never stated otherwise.. We do a lot of faith in everything.. But yet again that doesn't make the faith of one person's belief in the supernatural is better or correct of the other.. They can not be proven.. For the last time.. There is no point in trying to argue whether a Atheist is correct or a Christian (or any one really who believes in a god or gods) because they articles of faith or lack thereof.. Furthermore yes life would be boring if we didn't have disagreements, nor would learn and grow from one another. In fact our entire individuality is based upon that, that we all have our unique perspective of life along with the ideas that are formed from them.

So then would you agree that some beliefs are more valid than others? Or that it would be sad for some people to hold a particular belief?

Not when it comes to the metaphysics.. Where religion lies.. In which this entire thread more or less is about..

Avatar image for Scr00I
Scr00I

1130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 Scr00I
Member since 2009 • 1130 Posts

Not feeling the amazement today

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

Yeah, yeah...

Can we have your liver then?

Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]Amazed that people think the whole universe was created by a deity whose existence they cannot prove.BiancaDK
You believe in many things of which you cannot prove as well. (:

Enlighten me on at least one of these things :)
Avatar image for the_ChEeSe_mAn2
the_ChEeSe_mAn2

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 the_ChEeSe_mAn2
Member since 2003 • 8463 Posts
[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]Amazed that people think the whole universe was created by a deity whose existence they cannot prove.sonicare
I believe Odin's existence has been proved more than once. You've just let Loki mislead you.

Are they from the Norse mythology? Since those names (and Thor) are the extent of what I know about the Norse "gods".
Avatar image for strangeisland
strangeisland

1153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 strangeisland
Member since 2009 • 1153 Posts

Pretty amazing that our telescopes and satelites can see so far out.

Avatar image for rockinplanes
rockinplanes

266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 rockinplanes
Member since 2010 • 266 Posts
God is HUGE.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

God is HUGE.rockinplanes
Well, quite. Let us praise God.

Avatar image for PsychoRedFox666
PsychoRedFox666

2081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 PsychoRedFox666
Member since 2007 • 2081 Posts

Yup, bog sure is amazing. :S

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#92 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

heh god busted, religion is an evolutionary responce to keep you from jumping off a cliff at the absurdity and futility of existence.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/belief-and-the-brains-god-spot-1641022.html

now that the cause of the disease that has brought so much misery to world has been found we can hope for a cure with medication or surgery.

Riverwolf007


Funny how you spin that article into "religion is a disease" despite it just supporting the idea that it is an effect of the brain. And even the article spins it in a positive light: "Religious belief and behaviour are a hallmark of human life..." And the reason why we still exist isbecause of religion and belief in a God.

Avatar image for kerrman
kerrman

2904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#93 kerrman
Member since 2003 • 2904 Posts

I'm amazed at our unfathomably large, godless universe. :)

LikeHaterade

^this

Avatar image for MichaeltheCM
MichaeltheCM

22765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

#94 MichaeltheCM
Member since 2005 • 22765 Posts
it is indeed amazing. Praise be to God and glory to Him :) great thread man. thank you
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#95 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts
Its kinda funny that even if we travel at light speed, it could take us like billions of years to reach certain parts of the universe.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

heh god busted, religion is an evolutionary responce to keep you from jumping off a cliff at the absurdity and futility of existence.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/belief-and-the-brains-god-spot-1641022.html

now that the cause of the disease that has brought so much misery to world has been found we can hope for a cure with medication or surgery.

foxhound_fox


Funny how you spin that article into "religion is a disease" despite it just supporting the idea that it is an effect of the brain. And even the article spins it in a positive light: "Religious belief and behaviour are a hallmark of human life..." And the reason why we still exist isbecause of religion and belief in a God.

spirtuality is great, organized religion has caused more suffering and on a greater scale than anything else you can possibly name in human history.

there are questions and problems that need to be addressed in the modern world and not only does religion not answer these questions it actively seeks to stop progress.

so on top of being evil religion is obsolete.

Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

heh god busted, religion is an evolutionary responce to keep you from jumping off a cliff at the absurdity and futility of existence.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/belief-and-the-brains-god-spot-1641022.html

now that the cause of the disease that has brought so much misery to world has been found we can hope for a cure with medication or surgery.

Riverwolf007

I remember this. they made a helmet that made magnetic fields that stimulated those parts of that brain and the test subjects felt the presences of Christ, god, etc.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#98 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

Yeah, it's quite a feat for a nonexistent being.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#99 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Very cool. Don't see what it has to do with God though.
Avatar image for ProjectTrinity
ProjectTrinity

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 ProjectTrinity
Member since 2008 • 1262 Posts
[QUOTE="the_ChEeSe_mAn2"]Amazed that people think the whole universe was created by a deity whose existence they cannot prove.BiancaDK
You believe in many things of which you cannot prove as well. (:

You aren't allowed to speak logic. It hurts all sides of the debate.