What I want to know is, if they have their male genitals chopped off, and they have no female genitals, how do they get sexual pleasure? :?
_Marisa_
This is something I also want to know.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
it depends, there can still be prostate stimulation in various forms *shurgs* I'm no expertWhat I want to know is, if they have their male genitals chopped off, and they have no female genitals, how do they get sexual pleasure? :?
_Marisa_
What I want to know is, if they have their male genitals chopped off, and they have no female genitals, how do they get sexual pleasure? :?
_Marisa_
They fake it.
Well really, touch isn't the only thing to bring pleasure. Some people are aroused enough by visual stimulation. I personally have no idea how much detail they put into sexual reassignment surgery.
[QUOTE="_Marisa_"]it depends, there can still be prostate stimulation in various forms *shurgs* I'm no expertWhat I want to know is, if they have their male genitals chopped off, and they have no female genitals, how do they get sexual pleasure? :?
blooddemon666
But the prostate is removed in a sex-change I'm pretty sure.
[QUOTE="_Marisa_"]they can give them female stuffs... i think... :?What I want to know is, if they have their male genitals chopped off, and they have no female genitals, how do they get sexual pleasure? :?
Def_Jef88
Yeah but if the male genitals are removed, even if they make an artificial vagina they can't make the nerve endings that a woman has suddenly appear. Those nerve endings run all the way to the spine.
Well... the younger you are the more female you'll look at least, and if you're going to er... cut things off then you might as well aim to be as realistic as possible to have as little social problems as possible.
I mean model/pop star Harisu is another girl who you can't tell used to be a man and she recently had a celebrity wedding to a Korean musican, and they're now planning on adopting kids. Looking like she does probably helps in that as opposed to those who look in-between sexes.
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="_Marisa_"]they can give them female stuffs... i think... :?What I want to know is, if they have their male genitals chopped off, and they have no female genitals, how do they get sexual pleasure? :?
_Marisa_
Yeah but if the male genitals are removed, even if they make an artificial vagina they can't make the nerve endings that a woman has suddenly appear. Those nerve endings run all the way to the spine.
Well maybe they should work on that eh? Lazy doctors....:P
[QUOTE="_Marisa_"][QUOTE="Sim_genius"]Uh ok... I have to admit that he-she looks really, really pretty :?elmo90
I'm going to have to disagree with you here, based on your profile pic;)
[QUOTE="Sim_genius"]Uh ok... I have to admit that he-she looks really, really pretty :?_Marisa_
So does this count as a man crush?esb1118
I wouldn't say so... I'm suprised at how homophobic people are :?
[QUOTE="blooddemon666"][QUOTE="esb1118"]So does this count as a man crush?elmo90
I wouldn't say so... I'm suprised at how homophobic people are :?
But it's worse when you're talking about yourself.I have no problem saying a guy is good looking, and i have no problem saying that she is pretty hot too
[QUOTE="domatron23"]So tell me, where can i buy said car? :lol:Hmm okay I'm not too sure about what too feel about this one. Heres my thoughts on the matter.
dhyceis right to say that as we have no idea what this younggirl was going through we also cannot say that she was wrong to get a sex change asit is in no way justified to stop a person from helping themselves. However dhyce you cannot say that everyone on this board who has said "holy crap that is disgusting" is disgusting themselves for thinking like that. Just as the young girl has a right to live a certain way so too does everybody here have a right to disapprove of it. They must tolerate it but they by no means have to like it. My only concerns in this particular case is her age and the way that she could impact others around her. She's a model right and as a model she will undoubtedly be used to sell products to the public. Advertising uses sex to sell their products and as such the majority of the demographic would be heterosexual males. Isn't it kind of like false advertising to sell a heterosexual image of a product with something that not everyone would consider a woman. Now I realise they're selling cars or fast food or whatever not actual sex with the girl but when you're buying the product you're also buying the image that's attached to it. Say you buy a sports car because according to the advertisement it implys that you like to hang out with hot bikini clad models (this is the rationale behind ad's that sell sex) but in reality it is implying that you hang out with transvestites. Is that not fraudulent at some level? It would almost beas if you hired a hooker on the premise of heterosexual sex but found out afterwards that she used to be a boy!
What are your thoughts on this conundrum dhyce and everybody else? Am I way off track?
Def_Jef88
Any car advertisement with sexy models is getting people to subconsciously rationalise "hmm it appears that hot horny looking girls in bikinis like to surround this sports car. Maybe if I buy this sports car hot horny girls will surround me and I can have sex with them!!" Here's an example of this rationale http://www.eie.fceia.unr.edu.ar/~acustica/biblio/boom.htm
And here's an example of the image used http://www.intelligenthumor.com/adventuresofperry/Car-girl.jpg
Can anyone actually address what I was saying in the first place?
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="domatron23"]So tell me, where can i buy said car? :lol:Hmm okay I'm not too sure about what too feel about this one. Heres my thoughts on the matter.
dhyceis right to say that as we have no idea what this younggirl was going through we also cannot say that she was wrong to get a sex change asit is in no way justified to stop a person from helping themselves. However dhyce you cannot say that everyone on this board who has said "holy crap that is disgusting" is disgusting themselves for thinking like that. Just as the young girl has a right to live a certain way so too does everybody here have a right to disapprove of it. They must tolerate it but they by no means have to like it. My only concerns in this particular case is her age and the way that she could impact others around her. She's a model right and as a model she will undoubtedly be used to sell products to the public. Advertising uses sex to sell their products and as such the majority of the demographic would be heterosexual males. Isn't it kind of like false advertising to sell a heterosexual image of a product with something that not everyone would consider a woman. Now I realise they're selling cars or fast food or whatever not actual sex with the girl but when you're buying the product you're also buying the image that's attached to it. Say you buy a sports car because according to the advertisement it implys that you like to hang out with hot bikini clad models (this is the rationale behind ad's that sell sex) but in reality it is implying that you hang out with transvestites. Is that not fraudulent at some level? It would almost beas if you hired a hooker on the premise of heterosexual sex but found out afterwards that she used to be a boy!
What are your thoughts on this conundrum dhyce and everybody else? Am I way off track?
domatron23
Any car advertisement with sexy models is getting people to subconsciously rationalise "hmm it appears that hot horny looking girls in bikinis like to surround this sports car. Maybe if I buy this sports car hot horny girls will surround me and I can have sex with them!!" Here's an example of this rationale http://www.eie.fceia.unr.edu.ar/~acustica/biblio/boom.htm
And here's an example of the image used http://www.intelligenthumor.com/adventuresofperry/Car-girl.jpg
Can anyone actually address what I was saying in the first place?
I meant the one that would make trannies flock to me... >__>Anyways, on a serious not. I dont see how it could be fradulent in anyway for two main reasons.
A) In no way are they saying that anyone will have sex with you when you buy their car. If a person is stupid enough to reach that conclusion by watching a commercail.. Well, oh well, they must be idiots.
B) Where does it say theyre actually women. Just because they look like women doesent mean they are. And i dont think its the companies job to make sure you know, especially when they have nothing to do with the product anyways...
[QUOTE="domatron23"][QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="domatron23"]So tell me, where can i buy said car? :lol:Hmm okay I'm not too sure about what too feel about this one. Heres my thoughts on the matter.
dhyceis right to say that as we have no idea what this younggirl was going through we also cannot say that she was wrong to get a sex change asit is in no way justified to stop a person from helping themselves. However dhyce you cannot say that everyone on this board who has said "holy crap that is disgusting" is disgusting themselves for thinking like that. Just as the young girl has a right to live a certain way so too does everybody here have a right to disapprove of it. They must tolerate it but they by no means have to like it. My only concerns in this particular case is her age and the way that she could impact others around her. She's a model right and as a model she will undoubtedly be used to sell products to the public. Advertising uses sex to sell their products and as such the majority of the demographic would be heterosexual males. Isn't it kind of like false advertising to sell a heterosexual image of a product with something that not everyone would consider a woman. Now I realise they're selling cars or fast food or whatever not actual sex with the girl but when you're buying the product you're also buying the image that's attached to it. Say you buy a sports car because according to the advertisement it implys that you like to hang out with hot bikini clad models (this is the rationale behind ad's that sell sex) but in reality it is implying that you hang out with transvestites. Is that not fraudulent at some level? It would almost beas if you hired a hooker on the premise of heterosexual sex but found out afterwards that she used to be a boy!
What are your thoughts on this conundrum dhyce and everybody else? Am I way off track?
Def_Jef88
Any car advertisement with sexy models is getting people to subconsciously rationalise "hmm it appears that hot horny looking girls in bikinis like to surround this sports car. Maybe if I buy this sports car hot horny girls will surround me and I can have sex with them!!" Here's an example of this rationale http://www.eie.fceia.unr.edu.ar/~acustica/biblio/boom.htm
And here's an example of the image used http://www.intelligenthumor.com/adventuresofperry/Car-girl.jpg
Can anyone actually address what I was saying in the first place?
I meant the one that would make trannies flock to me... >__>Anyways, on a serious not. I dont see how it could be fradulent in anyway for two main reasons.
A) In no way are they saying that anyone will have sex with you when you buy their car. If a person is stupid enough to reach that conclusion by watching a commercail.. Well, oh well, they must be idiots.
B) Where does it say theyre actually women. Just because they look like women doesent mean they are. And i dont think its the companies job to make sure you know, especially when they have nothing to do with the product anyways...
A) I said that the companies were not selling actual sex but an image of sex. The person who buys the car can be satisfied with his delusion that he is now a ladies man. It's fraudulent because it would use a non-woman to sell a heterosexual image. Granted the guy would never know and would most likely be very happy with his purpose. I wasn'ttrying to imply that anybody who brought a car advertised by a tranny would instantly become bisexual, I was just saying that it can't be right to sell a productthat carriesan implied image with somebody who does not actually conform to that image.
B) I'm just assuming those chicks aren't trannies, just like any consumer would when confronted with the sort of image that our transexual friend might one day be in.
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="domatron23"][QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="domatron23"]So tell me, where can i buy said car? :lol:Hmm okay I'm not too sure about what too feel about this one. Heres my thoughts on the matter.
dhyceis right to say that as we have no idea what this younggirl was going through we also cannot say that she was wrong to get a sex change asit is in no way justified to stop a person from helping themselves. However dhyce you cannot say that everyone on this board who has said "holy crap that is disgusting" is disgusting themselves for thinking like that. Just as the young girl has a right to live a certain way so too does everybody here have a right to disapprove of it. They must tolerate it but they by no means have to like it. My only concerns in this particular case is her age and the way that she could impact others around her. She's a model right and as a model she will undoubtedly be used to sell products to the public. Advertising uses sex to sell their products and as such the majority of the demographic would be heterosexual males. Isn't it kind of like false advertising to sell a heterosexual image of a product with something that not everyone would consider a woman. Now I realise they're selling cars or fast food or whatever not actual sex with the girl but when you're buying the product you're also buying the image that's attached to it. Say you buy a sports car because according to the advertisement it implys that you like to hang out with hot bikini clad models (this is the rationale behind ad's that sell sex) but in reality it is implying that you hang out with transvestites. Is that not fraudulent at some level? It would almost beas if you hired a hooker on the premise of heterosexual sex but found out afterwards that she used to be a boy!
What are your thoughts on this conundrum dhyce and everybody else? Am I way off track?
domatron23
Any car advertisement with sexy models is getting people to subconsciously rationalise "hmm it appears that hot horny looking girls in bikinis like to surround this sports car. Maybe if I buy this sports car hot horny girls will surround me and I can have sex with them!!" Here's an example of this rationale http://www.eie.fceia.unr.edu.ar/~acustica/biblio/boom.htm
And here's an example of the image used http://www.intelligenthumor.com/adventuresofperry/Car-girl.jpg
Can anyone actually address what I was saying in the first place?
I meant the one that would make trannies flock to me... >__>Anyways, on a serious not. I dont see how it could be fradulent in anyway for two main reasons.
A) In no way are they saying that anyone will have sex with you when you buy their car. If a person is stupid enough to reach that conclusion by watching a commercail.. Well, oh well, they must be idiots.
B) Where does it say theyre actually women. Just because they look like women doesent mean they are. And i dont think its the companies job to make sure you know, especially when they have nothing to do with the product anyways...
A) I said that the companies were not selling actual sex but an image of sex. The person who buys the car can be satisfied with his delusion that he is now a ladies man. It's fraudulent because it would use a non-woman to sell a heterosexual image. Granted the guy would never know and would most likely be very happy with his purpose. I wasn'ttrying to imply that anybody who brought a car advertised by a tranny would instantly become bisexual, I was just saying that it can't be right to sell a productthat carriesan implied image with somebody who does not actually conform to that image.
B) I'm just assuming those chicks aren't trannies, just like any consumer would when confronted with the sort of image that our transexual friend might one day be in.
My point was though, no where does the company state that the image they are trying to sell is heterosexual. The customer is left to ASSUME that. You know what they say, dont ASSUME. It makes an ASS out of U and ME. :PEven so, I dont think it really matters anyways. Regardless of the advertisment, a car isnt going to cause hot women to instantly flock to you, and i think most men know that...
[QUOTE="domatron23"][QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="domatron23"][QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="domatron23"]So tell me, where can i buy said car? :lol:Hmm okay I'm not too sure about what too feel about this one. Heres my thoughts on the matter.
dhyceis right to say that as we have no idea what this younggirl was going through we also cannot say that she was wrong to get a sex change asit is in no way justified to stop a person from helping themselves. However dhyce you cannot say that everyone on this board who has said "holy crap that is disgusting" is disgusting themselves for thinking like that. Just as the young girl has a right to live a certain way so too does everybody here have a right to disapprove of it. They must tolerate it but they by no means have to like it. My only concerns in this particular case is her age and the way that she could impact others around her. She's a model right and as a model she will undoubtedly be used to sell products to the public. Advertising uses sex to sell their products and as such the majority of the demographic would be heterosexual males. Isn't it kind of like false advertising to sell a heterosexual image of a product with something that not everyone would consider a woman. Now I realise they're selling cars or fast food or whatever not actual sex with the girl but when you're buying the product you're also buying the image that's attached to it. Say you buy a sports car because according to the advertisement it implys that you like to hang out with hot bikini clad models (this is the rationale behind ad's that sell sex) but in reality it is implying that you hang out with transvestites. Is that not fraudulent at some level? It would almost beas if you hired a hooker on the premise of heterosexual sex but found out afterwards that she used to be a boy!
What are your thoughts on this conundrum dhyce and everybody else? Am I way off track?
Def_Jef88
Any car advertisement with sexy models is getting people to subconsciously rationalise "hmm it appears that hot horny looking girls in bikinis like to surround this sports car. Maybe if I buy this sports car hot horny girls will surround me and I can have sex with them!!" Here's an example of this rationale http://www.eie.fceia.unr.edu.ar/~acustica/biblio/boom.htm
And here's an example of the image used http://www.intelligenthumor.com/adventuresofperry/Car-girl.jpg
Can anyone actually address what I was saying in the first place?
I meant the one that would make trannies flock to me... >__>Anyways, on a serious not. I dont see how it could be fradulent in anyway for two main reasons.
A) In no way are they saying that anyone will have sex with you when you buy their car. If a person is stupid enough to reach that conclusion by watching a commercail.. Well, oh well, they must be idiots.
B) Where does it say theyre actually women. Just because they look like women doesent mean they are. And i dont think its the companies job to make sure you know, especially when they have nothing to do with the product anyways...
A) I said that the companies were not selling actual sex but an image of sex. The person who buys the car can be satisfied with his delusion that he is now a ladies man. It's fraudulent because it would use a non-woman to sell a heterosexual image. Granted the guy would never know and would most likely be very happy with his purpose. I wasn'ttrying to imply that anybody who brought a car advertised by a tranny would instantly become bisexual, I was just saying that it can't be right to sell a productthat carriesan implied image with somebody who does not actually conform to that image.
B) I'm just assuming those chicks aren't trannies, just like any consumer would when confronted with the sort of image that our transexual friend might one day be in.
My point was though, no where does the company state that the image they are trying to sell is heterosexual. The customer is left to ASSUME that. You know what they say, dont ASSUME. It makes an ASS out of U and ME. :PEven so, I dont think it really matters anyways. Regardless of the advertisment, a car isnt going to cause hot women to instantly flock to you, and i think most men know that...
I get ya but some assumptions are pretty safe to make. Could I make a hamburger fromdog meat and then say "what why would you assume this burger was made from beef, I never said that" same situation when using sex to sell cars
I get ya but some assumptions are pretty safe to make. Could I make a hamburger fromdog meat and then say "what why would you assume this burger was made from beef, I never said that" same situation when using sex to sell carsdomatron23That's not an assumption. Hamburgers are almost by definition made of beef (unless otherwise specified). Putting women, or in this case transexuals around a car isn't fraudulent. I don't know why they would use transexuals anyway unless they were tricked too. If it got out that they used a transexual in a commercial with sexual overtones to attract male customers,that would hurt their brand.
[QUOTE="domatron23"]I get ya but some assumptions are pretty safe to make. Could I make a hamburger fromdog meat and then say "what why would you assume this burger was made from beef, I never said that" same situation when using sex to sell carssca321That's not an assumption. Hamburgers are almost by definition made of beef (unless otherwise specified). Putting women, or in this case transexuals around a car isn't fraudulent. I don't know why they would use transexuals anyway unless they were tricked too. If it got out that they used a transexual in a commercial with sexual overtones to attract male customers,that would hurt their brand.
And aren't sexy women on cars also "almost by definition" meant to project a heterosexual image? What else is our model friend meant to advertise if not sex (given that she is very pretty)?
That's not an assumption. Hamburgers are almost by definition made of beef (unless otherwise specified). Putting women, or in this case transexuals around a car isn't fraudulent. I don't know why they would use transexuals anyway unless they were tricked too. If it got out that they used a transexual in a commercial with sexual overtones to attract male customers,that would hurt their brand.[QUOTE="sca321"][QUOTE="domatron23"]I get ya but some assumptions are pretty safe to make. Could I make a hamburger fromdog meat and then say "what why would you assume this burger was made from beef, I never said that" same situation when using sex to sell carsdomatron23
And aren't sexy women on cars also "almost by definition" meant to project a heterosexual image? What else is our model friend meant to advertise if not sex (given that she is very pretty)?
Of course they're projecting that, but they're not selling the women, they're just trying to get you to subconsciously associate them with their product.If you never knew, you probably would be happy to be with that girl......Am I the only person in this topic who would like to go on a date with her?
>______>
ElBanano216
Still, the copmany never said the burger in question was beef, and never denied that it wasnt dog meat. If a person reached that conclusion alone, then they assumed more than they should. And if a burger was being used to sell a car, It really wouldnt matter what it was made of, since it has nothing to do with the product.I get ya but some assumptions are pretty safe to make. Could I make a hamburger fromdog meat and then say "what why would you assume this burger was made from beef, I never said that" same situation when using sex to sell cars
domatron23
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment