Should businesses have the right to drug test people for low-level positions?

  • 108 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Darth_Tyrev
Darth_Tyrev

7072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 Darth_Tyrev
Member since 2005 • 7072 Posts
Do you think they have a right to drug test for low-level jobs? I mean, I can understand for jobs that involve driving (or anything else that requires you to be completely sober) but I don't understand why they need to drug test for a job like fast-food, or bagging groceries. You could even do those jobs WHILE high (and many people do).
Avatar image for needled24-7
needled24-7

15902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 needled24-7
Member since 2007 • 15902 Posts
Yeah, I think they should be able to if they want to.
Avatar image for SaintLeonidas
SaintLeonidas

26735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 SaintLeonidas
Member since 2006 • 26735 Posts

If they wish, it doesnt violate any rights like one of your poll options, they can do as they wish, if the person applying doesnt want to drug test then he must find abother job.

Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
Absolutely
Avatar image for Super_Socialist
Super_Socialist

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Super_Socialist
Member since 2008 • 729 Posts

NO

businesses are evil and only want to exploit ppl!

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#6 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts
If being high is going to seriously affect the person's ability to do the job, I don't see why not.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
Yes. They should also be allowed to carry out random pregnancy tests and psychosexual profiling.
Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts
Of course the business should be allowed to do a drug test on all applicants.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Yes its a private organization that you are being paid for to represent.. The only drug testing I am absolutely against is for public schools.
Avatar image for teh_destroyer
teh_destroyer

35328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 teh_destroyer
Member since 2004 • 35328 Posts
They have a right too,most jobs like having a clean work invornmant and not seeing that there employees are using drugs to there advantage.Its basically cheating.
Avatar image for FalcoLX
FalcoLX

4452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 FalcoLX
Member since 2007 • 4452 Posts
Of course. Even if it isn't a problem now, it could always become one in the future.
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts
No matter where you work, you've got access to money, and/or stuff companies would rather not see broken, dissapeared, or other issues.
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

Avatar image for Darth_Tyrev
Darth_Tyrev

7072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 Darth_Tyrev
Member since 2005 • 7072 Posts

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

Jaysonguy

Wow, that is one of the worst ideas I've ever heard. I can't even imagine how fast our jails would fill up...

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

Jaysonguy

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Avatar image for jfcundiff
jfcundiff

6365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 jfcundiff
Member since 2007 • 6365 Posts
They should be tested. I would not a drug addict running my cashiers and talking with consumers about things. I want people who follow the law and who will follow the rules at the job.
Avatar image for jfcundiff
jfcundiff

6365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 jfcundiff
Member since 2007 • 6365 Posts

NO

businesses are evil and only want to exploit ppl!

Super_Socialist

Must you troll on every board out there.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

jimmyjammer69

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Employers do not care if you injest alochol (inless you are underage) as long as you don't come to work wasted.

Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

sSubZerOo

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Employers do not care if you injest alochol (inless you are underage) as long as you don't come to work wasted.

Ok, so why should they care if you have taken drugs, as long as it doesn't affect your performance? Bit of a double standard there. Alcohol is a drug.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

jimmyjammer69

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Employers do not care if you injest alochol (inless you are underage) as long as you don't come to work wasted.

Ok, so why should they care if you have taken drugs, as long as it doesn't affect your performance? Bit of a double standard there. Alcohol is a drug.

Would you hire a cocaine addict for a job that deals with handling money?

Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts
Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

sSubZerOo

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Employers do not care if you injest alochol (inless you are underage) as long as you don't come to work wasted.

Ok, so why should they care if you have taken drugs, as long as it doesn't affect your performance? Bit of a double standard there. Alcohol is a drug.

Would you hire a cocaine addict for a job that deals with handling money?

Hey, I've got no problem with the drug testing thing. Just think they should have alcohol testing too :)

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

jimmyjammer69

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Employers do not care if you injest alochol (inless you are underage) as long as you don't come to work wasted.

Ok, so why should they care if you have taken drugs, as long as it doesn't affect your performance? Bit of a double standard there. Alcohol is a drug.

No, not at all If you can't pass a breathalyzer test you should be fired If you can't pass a drug test you should be fired This isn't complicated
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

jimmyjammer69

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Employers do not care if you injest alochol (inless you are underage) as long as you don't come to work wasted.

Ok, so why should they care if you have taken drugs, as long as it doesn't affect your performance? Bit of a double standard there. Alcohol is a drug.

Would you hire a cocaine addict for a job that deals with handling money?

Hey, I've got no problem with the drug testing thing. Just think they should have alcohol testing too :)

Why its a legal drug.. If anything you would be opening your self up for lawsuit for some kind of descrimination of apersons legal rights.

Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

Jaysonguy

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Employers do not care if you injest alochol (inless you are underage) as long as you don't come to work wasted.

Ok, so why should they care if you have taken drugs, as long as it doesn't affect your performance? Bit of a double standard there. Alcohol is a drug.

No, not at all If you can't pass a breathalyzer test you should be fired If you can't pass a drug test you should be fired This isn't complicated

Do you understand how drug tests work?
Avatar image for Foolz3h
Foolz3h

23739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#26 Foolz3h
Member since 2006 • 23739 Posts
No, drug use will not necessarily affect someone's performance and work, so why should they be tested?
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="jimmyjammer69"][QUOTE="Jaysonguy"]

They should be tested for all jobs, if they fail the police should be contacted and they should be jailed.

This idea that society gets to do whatever it wants while it's at work is why America has fallen in the workplace. If you are paid to do a job you do that job to the very best of your ability every second of ever hour.

sSubZerOo

Yeah, but not to the exclusion of your entire life. I can't have a beer after work because I'm destroying brain cells? They don't belong to my employer, however useful they are to him.

Hope you're joking with the police thing.

Employers do not care if you injest alochol (inless you are underage) as long as you don't come to work wasted.

Ok, so why should they care if you have taken drugs, as long as it doesn't affect your performance? Bit of a double standard there. Alcohol is a drug.

Would you hire a cocaine addict for a job that deals with handling money?

Hey, I've got no problem with the drug testing thing. Just think they should have alcohol testing too :)

Why its a legal drug.. If anything you would be opening your self up for lawsuit for some kind of descrimination of apersons legal rights.

Thought you were arguing from the point of view of performance at work, not from legality.

Avatar image for Super_Socialist
Super_Socialist

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Super_Socialist
Member since 2008 • 729 Posts

Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. NearTheEnd

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. Super_Socialist

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

Its not just that.. But some of these drugs like cocaine, meth, Heroine.. Are extremely addictive drugs.. Drugs that the employee is ran by meaning they may skip out into the bathroom to shoot up.. Furthermore some of these drug addictions are not only extreme but costly, would you trust them handling money or to not steal from them? Not to mention there is a extreme negative pub that could come from this as well if they allowed this..

Avatar image for UT_Wrestler
UT_Wrestler

16426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#30 UT_Wrestler
Member since 2004 • 16426 Posts
Yes, aside from the fact that drug abuse can affect your work performance, narcotics are illegal. Drug testing goes right along the same lines as a criminal background check (unless you also believe that employers don't have the right to look up criminal records).
Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. Super_Socialist

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

What if they don't want people who don't vote for their political party working for them?

What if they don't want people who have kinky sex working for them?

What if they don't want people who smoke cigarettes working for them?

What if they don't want gay people working for them?

It shouldn't matter if it doesn't effect the quality of work the employee does.

Avatar image for Super_Socialist
Super_Socialist

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Super_Socialist
Member since 2008 • 729 Posts
[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. sSubZerOo

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

Its not just that.. But some of these drugs like cocaine, meth, Heroine.. Are extremely addictive drugs.. Drugs that the employee is ran by meaning they may skip out into the bathroom to shoot up.. Furthermore some of these drug addictions are not only extreme but costly, would you trust them handling money or to not steal from them? Not to mention there is a extreme negative pub that could come from this as well if they allowed this..

in my opinion if people want to do drugs thats totally fine, however a person (or business) chooses to not have any association with someone who does these things thats up to them. Its not like you have to work there, theres plenty of jobs already and to be made.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
Yes they do. Businesses have the right to run it however they want, and hire whoever they want. If they don't want to hire people who use drugs, they shouldn't have to. Don't like it? Don't work there.
Avatar image for Super_Socialist
Super_Socialist

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Super_Socialist
Member since 2008 • 729 Posts
[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. NearTheEnd

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

What if they don't want people who don't vote for their political party working for them?

What if they don't want people who have kinky sex working for them?

What if they don't want people who smoke cigarettes working for them?

What if they don't want gay people working for them?

It shouldn't matter if it doesn't effect the quality of work the employee does.

then thats up to the employer.

You come to agreements as you sign the paperwork.

Its the same thing as if someone dosent want people who smoke in their home.

For the record, if the employer dosent seem to care then whatever. But dont expect the world to bend over backwards for you.

Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts
[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. sSubZerOo

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

Its not just that.. But some of these drugs like cocaine, meth, Heroine.. Are extremely addictive drugs.. Drugs that the employee is ran by meaning they may skip out into the bathroom to shoot up.. Furthermore some of these drug addictions are not only extreme but costly, would you trust them handling money or to not steal from them? Not to mention there is a extreme negative pub that could come from this as well if they allowed this..

Then FIRE THEM. Get them out of the company. Conduct interviews. If would be very difficult for anyone who is heavily adicted to meth to pass an interview.
Avatar image for Lakrum
Lakrum

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Lakrum
Member since 2008 • 399 Posts
Worst topic ever. Yes they should be able to drug test anyone, I mean they are paying you to come to work and do the best you can and while you are under the influence that is impossible. The only reason I can think of you making this thread is because your a pothead and you failed a drug test.
Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts
[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. Super_Socialist

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

What if they don't want people who don't vote for their political party working for them?

What if they don't want people who have kinky sex working for them?

What if they don't want people who smoke cigarettes working for them?

What if they don't want gay people working for them?

It shouldn't matter if it doesn't effect the quality of work the employee does.

then thats up to the employer.

You come to agreements as you sign the paperwork.

Its the same thing as if someone dosent want people who smoke in their home.

I guess I used a bad example with cigarettes. I didn't mean "smoke at work," I meant they did it on their own time.

It is NOT up to the employer. For example, asking people what political party people support during an interview is illegal.

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
Yes of course.
Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts
Worst topic ever. Yes they should be able to drug test anyone, I mean they are paying you to come to work and do the best you can and while you are under the influence that is impossible. The only reason I can think of you making this thread is because your a pothead and you failed a drug test.Lakrum
Again, do you understand how drug tests work? They are not like breath tests that check to see if you're under the influence right then and there.
Avatar image for Super_Socialist
Super_Socialist

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Super_Socialist
Member since 2008 • 729 Posts
[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="NearTheEnd"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. NearTheEnd

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

What if they don't want people who don't vote for their political party working for them?

What if they don't want people who have kinky sex working for them?

What if they don't want people who smoke cigarettes working for them?

What if they don't want gay people working for them?

It shouldn't matter if it doesn't effect the quality of work the employee does.

then thats up to the employer.

You come to agreements as you sign the paperwork.

Its the same thing as if someone dosent want people who smoke in their home.

I guess I used a bad example with cigarettes. I didn't mean "smoke at work," I meant they did it on their own time.

It is NOT up to the employer. For example, asking people what political party people support during an interview is illegal.

I wasnt talking about someone who was smoking at the time.

I dont care if its illegal, it shouldnt be.

If I wanted green libertarian nationalist socialists (I think thats an actual party too, maybe a joke one im not sure) only, then I should be able to have that. The business is my property and I have the right to allow who I want to work for me.

Just like im allowed to deny anyone into my house for any silly reason under the sun. Same thing.

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#42 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

Sadly drug testing only catches potheads. All "hard" drugs are out of your system in a day or two, and are really hard to catch. Pot stays in the system for roughly 20 days, and is the most common drug caught on employeer screenings.

Drug testing just doesn't work, and you also run the risk of losing good employees who might smoke a little pot on the side. The company I work for doesn't do any drug testing unless suspicion is raised, and then they will only do a drug test if substance abuse help is refused. Honestly if my work did drug tests I'd guess they'd loose about 1/2 their employees.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="NearTheEnd"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. Super_Socialist

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

What if they don't want people who don't vote for their political party working for them?

What if they don't want people who have kinky sex working for them?

What if they don't want people who smoke cigarettes working for them?

What if they don't want gay people working for them?

It shouldn't matter if it doesn't effect the quality of work the employee does.

then thats up to the employer.

You come to agreements as you sign the paperwork.

Its the same thing as if someone dosent want people who smoke in their home.

I guess I used a bad example with cigarettes. I didn't mean "smoke at work," I meant they did it on their own time.

It is NOT up to the employer. For example, asking people what political party people support during an interview is illegal.

I wasnt talking about someone who was smoking at the time.

I dont care if its illegal, it shouldnt be.

If I wanted green libertarian nationalist socialists (I think thats an actual party too, maybe a joke one im not sure) only, then I should be able to have that. The business is my property and I have the right to allow who I want to work for me.

Just like im allowed to deny anyone into my house for any silly reason under the sun. Same thing.

The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party is indeed a real party

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#44 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21107 Posts
Yes! they have every right to do so. Who would want a drug abuser doing work. Death happens and murders.
Avatar image for Super_Socialist
Super_Socialist

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Super_Socialist
Member since 2008 • 729 Posts
[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="NearTheEnd"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="NearTheEnd"][QUOTE="Super_Socialist"]

[QUOTE="NearTheEnd"]Absolutely not. What I do outside of work is none of my employer's business. If I come to work stoned, if I steal, or if I am incapable of doing the job, fire me. But if it doesn't have any effect on how I do the job, it doesn't matter. Drug tests are an invasion of privacy. Rhazakna

But what if the employer dosent want someone who does those things to work for them period?

What if they don't want people who don't vote for their political party working for them?

What if they don't want people who have kinky sex working for them?

What if they don't want people who smoke cigarettes working for them?

What if they don't want gay people working for them?

It shouldn't matter if it doesn't effect the quality of work the employee does.

then thats up to the employer.

You come to agreements as you sign the paperwork.

Its the same thing as if someone dosent want people who smoke in their home.

I guess I used a bad example with cigarettes. I didn't mean "smoke at work," I meant they did it on their own time.

It is NOT up to the employer. For example, asking people what political party people support during an interview is illegal.

I wasnt talking about someone who was smoking at the time.

I dont care if its illegal, it shouldnt be.

If I wanted green libertarian nationalist socialists (I think thats an actual party too, maybe a joke one im not sure) only, then I should be able to have that. The business is my property and I have the right to allow who I want to work for me.

Just like im allowed to deny anyone into my house for any silly reason under the sun. Same thing.

The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party is indeed a real party

what exactly do they stand for?

Avatar image for -TheSecondSign-
-TheSecondSign-

9303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#46 -TheSecondSign-
Member since 2007 • 9303 Posts

No one has a right to stop them, just like no one has a right to keep pot illegal.

Avatar image for Rhazakna
Rhazakna

11022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Rhazakna
Member since 2004 • 11022 Posts
[QUOTE="Rhazakna"]

The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party is indeed a real party

Super_Socialist

what exactly do they stand for?

A "tolerant" form of Nazism that promotes the idea that all races have a grand ancestry that should be preserved, and not mixed with other races. They're also environmentalists.

Avatar image for -TheSecondSign-
-TheSecondSign-

9303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#48 -TheSecondSign-
Member since 2007 • 9303 Posts
[QUOTE="Super_Socialist"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"]

The Libertarian National Socialist Green Party is indeed a real party

Rhazakna

what exactly do they stand for?

A "tolerant" form of Nazism that promotes the idea that all races have a grand ancestry that should be preserved, and not mixed with other races. They're also environmentalists.

They sound bat**** crazy.

Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts
Yes! they have every right to do so. Who would want a drug abuser doing work. Death happens and murders.Gaming-Planet
Big time LOL.
Avatar image for Super_Socialist
Super_Socialist

729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Super_Socialist
Member since 2008 • 729 Posts

No one has a right to stop them, just like no one has a right to keep pot illegal.

-TheSecondSign-

its not a matter of stopping them; the only way to could stop someone is through force, which is a violation of a humans inherit rights. This a matter of having the type of people you want on your property.