This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well... places where guns are banned seem to have much much lower homicide rates... so I'm going to go with yes.MythofSisyphus
Actually some places show the exact opposite.
People who use them for crimes would still be able to get them somehow, but people using them for protection wouldntlolfiretruckObviously law enforcers would get them. Not all mind you, since there are many cases where the US police can't shoot for squat...
[QUOTE="MythofSisyphus"]Well... places where guns are banned seem to have much much lower homicide rates... so I'm going to go with yes.-TheSecondSign-
Actually some places show the exact opposite.
Such as?
[QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"][QUOTE="MythofSisyphus"]Well... places where guns are banned seem to have much much lower homicide rates... so I'm going to go with yes.MythofSisyphus
Actually some places show the exact opposite.
Such as?
Canada, Britain, Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Scotland, Wales, Luxemburg, Belgium, Switzerland, Japan, Australia, Singapore
all have banned guns and way lower homicide, only like bangladesh will show the opposite, but the exception proves the rule
[QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"][QUOTE="MythofSisyphus"]Well... places where guns are banned seem to have much much lower homicide rates... so I'm going to go with yes.MythofSisyphus
Actually some places show the exact opposite.
Such as?
Murder Capital-er, I mean Washington, USA.
No. Then we couldn't protect ourselves.Gran_BruceI don't understand this. Why not just abolish the entire police force then? You're claiming everyone to be worthy of dealing out justice with firearms so why not enroll everyone...
Nope. That would defeat my chances looking for a real, working panzerfaust that was used in World War II. It may be in museums, but that will never stop my search!
Banning guns would just be like banning drugs. More people will get them because of the "risk factor".
[QUOTE="MythofSisyphus"][QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"][QUOTE="MythofSisyphus"]Well... places where guns are banned seem to have much much lower homicide rates... so I'm going to go with yes.-TheSecondSign-
Actually some places show the exact opposite.
Such as?
Murder Capital-er, I mean Washington, USA.
well since there is no border to stop gun from coming in, and no real inforcement on it, and since that is in the USA, doesnt really count
yes, since the second amendment does not even APPLY to the modern society (there is no militia anymore)hormagaunt
There's still a militia but we just changed its name to the National Gaurd.
[QUOTE="MythofSisyphus"][QUOTE="-TheSecondSign-"][QUOTE="MythofSisyphus"]Well... places where guns are banned seem to have much much lower homicide rates... so I'm going to go with yes.hormagaunt
Actually some places show the exact opposite.
Such as?
Canada, Britain, Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Scotland, Wales, Luxemburg, Belgium, Switzerland, Japan, Australia, Singapore
all have banned guns and way lower homicide, only like bangladesh will show the opposite, but the exception proves the rule
My point exactly.
If you feel like violating the Bill of Rights, then SURE why not!
I'm not for banning guns, but I am for regulation and some restrictions.
i think england should ban alcohol, 800 children under the age of eight were admitted to hospital last year for alcohol poisoning >_>sauses3392It is banned for children aged eight....
Well... places where guns are banned seem to have much much lower homicide rates... so I'm going to go with yes.MythofSisyphusThat's very true. The whole, "Criminals will get them anyway", thing is crap, I really want a Mac 10, BUT I CAN'T ****ING GET ONE! It's not that easy to find things.
[QUOTE="hormagaunt"]yes, since the second amendment does not even APPLY to the modern society (there is no militia anymore)Suddenstriker52
There's still a militia but we just changed its name to the National Gaurd.
yeah and the National Guard are allowed guns, so there we go
[QUOTE="sauses3392"]i think england should ban alcohol, 800 children under the age of eight were admitted to hospital last year for alcohol poisoning >_>SolidSnake35It is banned for children aged eight....It makes it easier to get them, an Eight year old has to have parents, where in in 1930 America you'd have to have some guy with a shotgun...
[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="sauses3392"]i think england should ban alcohol, 800 children under the age of eight were admitted to hospital last year for alcohol poisoning >_>wemhimIt is banned for children aged eight....It makes it easier to get them, an Eight year old has to have parents, where in in 1930 America you'd have to have some guy with a shotgun...
[QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="SolidSnake35"][QUOTE="sauses3392"]i think england should ban alcohol, 800 children under the age of eight were admitted to hospital last year for alcohol poisoning >_>SolidSnake35It is banned for children aged eight....It makes it easier to get them, an Eight year old has to have parents, where in in 1930 America you'd have to have some guy with a shotgun...
No, the anti-gun sheeples can take mine from my cold dead hands.
Firearms will be needed when the cops decide to quit their jobs like they did in New Orleans during the Hurricane Katrina aftermath. Cops won't likely be there to answer your distress calls for you during a serious riot as well.
Firearms are going to be needed when the Mexicans start a violent separatist movement in the South-Western states in the future too.
NO NO NO NO AND NO! Guns should never be taken away from us! How else would I hunt? How else would I protect our farm from armadillos and other rodents that eat our crops?
[QUOTE="lolfiretruck"]People who use them for crimes would still be able to get them somehow, but people using them for protection wouldntSolidSnake35Obviously law enforcers would get them. Not all mind you, since there are many cases where the US police can't shoot for squat...
Spoken like a true englishman :P
I think they should be regulated a *bit* but not banned.
I hardly ever hear about guns bought and retained legally being used for crime at all.
All the money used for banning perfectly legit guns should be used to enforce laws to keep illegal firearms form entering the country.
separatist movement ..really?No, the anti-gun sheeples can take mine from my cold dead hands.
Firearms will be needed when the cops decide to quit their jobs like they did in New Orleans during the Hurricane Katrina aftermath. Cops won't likely be there to answer your distress calls for you during a serious riot as well.
Firearms are going to be needed when the Mexicans start a violent separatist movement in the South-Western states in the future too.
reagan80_basic
Certain guns like high powered rifles, automatic weapons or magnums. Those are unnecessarily powerful for either hunting, or home defence.yoshi-lnexApparently they need them to fight Mexicans.
[QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]Certain guns like high powered rifles, automatic weapons or magnums. Those are unnecessarily powerful for either hunting, or home defence.swizz-the-gamerApparently they need them to fight Mexicans.
You can't really hunt a bear with anything other than an extremely powerful firearm.
Apparently they need them to fight Mexicans.[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]Certain guns like high powered rifles, automatic weapons or magnums. Those are unnecessarily powerful for either hunting, or home defence.-TheSecondSign-
You can't really hunt a bear with anything other than an extremely powerful firearm.
So don't hunt bears.Firearms are going to be needed when the Mexicans start a violent separatist movement in the South-Western states in the future too.
reagan80_basic
Woooaaaaah. Hadn't realized the right wing hate had gone this far yet. I mean i was sure that mexicans would be used as a scapegoat used to blame the crumbling economy on... I know that hate crimes against mexicans have gone up... But now this... I'm sure you didn't make that little number up yourself either, im sure theres millions of others just like you. Quite disguesting. Anyone else thinking Jews after WWI?
Apparently they need them to fight Mexicans.[QUOTE="swizz-the-gamer"][QUOTE="yoshi-lnex"]Certain guns like high powered rifles, automatic weapons or magnums. Those are unnecessarily powerful for either hunting, or home defence.-TheSecondSign-
You can't really hunt a bear with anything other than an extremely powerful firearm.
Yeah but you don't need gun that shoot like 30 bullets a second to take down a bear.
No, the anti-gun sheeples can take mine from my cold dead hands.
Firearms will be needed when the cops decide to quit their jobs like they did in New Orleans during the Hurricane Katrina aftermath. Cops won't likely be there to answer your distress calls for you during a serious riot as well.
Firearms are going to be needed when the Mexicans start a violent separatist movement in the South-Western states in the future too.
reagan80_basic
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment