[QUOTE="nZiFFLe"][QUOTE="kuraimen"]""We (the world leaders) affirm that the targeting and deliberate killing of civilians and non-combatants cannot be justified or legitimised by any cause or grievance, and we declare that any action intended to cause death or serious bodily harm to civilians or non-combatants, when the purpose of such an act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population or to compel a government or an international organisation to carry out or to abstain from any act, cannot be justified on any grounds, and constitutes an act of terrorism." " That last definition perfectly fits H&N. It says nothing about the one making a terrorist being a state or a separate group.kuraimen
and that's why it's a poor definition.
Lol so you go from it being not debatable as you claim to you simply not agreeing with it? figures...look, you could argue that the acts of the us were immoral, sure, i'm not saying otherwise. but to say that the bombings were acts of terrorism is misleading because they are acts of war, by defintion.
Log in to comment