[QUOTE="Impulse808"][QUOTE="-Jiggles-"]Three days?! So what if the kid refused to give back the apple? He refused to comply because this act of 'theft' doesn't warrant any legal action.So because a large portion of 18 year olds aren't mature (or at least as mature as they should be), we should dismiss it and lower our expectations? Absolutely not. The minute we start lowering the expectations of intelligence and maturity that we hold for young adults, we will take a step back as an intelligent society. Human progression shouldn't be fettered by the ignorance of our youth; this student is an adult now, so he should start acting like one. That concept is something you don't seem to grasp that well.
Again I say, I agree that none of this should go on his permanent record, as it'll only hold him back from getting a job in the future. However, I feel he does deserve minimal jail time, 3 days max.
-Jiggles-
If somebody snatched a necklace away from you and refused to give it back, would you not call the police? The reason why I feel most people are defending the kid is because he was a student who stole an object away from the teacher on school grounds; why does this matter? He is old enough to know that stealing is wrong, and being stubborn to give back what doesn't belong to him is just flat-out immature. If he wasn't forseeing the consequences coming at him, then I don't show much pity for him either way, despite the fact that I myself feel the situation could've been resolved better than it was.
He could have easily eliminated all incriminating evidence by eating the steal. That's because it was only an apple. Apples grow on trees.
Log in to comment