No I don't see that wealth matters in the least in relation to music. Music is an art.[QUOTE="Danm_999"]You don't see what the wealth the Beatles generated for Britain as an advantage?
Ok, logical question then; why is the media force feeding the Beatles? Why is the media attempting to portray them as so influencial? Is the media falsifying the fact they are the best selling artist of all time? Is the media falsifying the fact that Yesterday is the most covered song of all time? Or, Occam's Razor, is it just that they were a popular and successful band?LJS9502_basic
The media force feeds The Beatles starting with they "hysteria" of their coming over. You have to look at the political landscape. You also have to understand that what initially sold the band was the boy band statues. They were "cute" and the girls went crazy. Now...take that away and what do you have in the early 60's? An okay pop band. The early songs were quite catchy but I don't think even the most ardent Beatles fan would say they were great. Most Beatles fans liked what came later more.
And when we talk of what came later we are seeing influences on The Beatles. But with all mainstream music.....the mainstream is what gets the radio play. It's what people gauge music on. And I think if one were honest......and the British Invasion hadn't come at the right time and place and the band had the look...which was culled for them....The Beatles would have been just another band.
Now I'm not saying they were a terrible band. I'm not saying they wouldn't have fans. I'm saying they wouldn't have the hype.
IF IF IF... no. If isn't what happened. You don't know why the Beatles became what they became. Too many forces at work. You can't really say why people achieve this level of fame... there are too many things you just don't know.
Log in to comment