Exactly what purpose would this serve the 10th planet?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="_R34LiTY_"][QUOTE="xaos"] Or texts: chapter and verse of the Bible for the things that support your reading would be a good, easy to reference starting point. Also, specific places in texts that support the interpretation you are giving would be interesting reading I'm sure. Otherwise, I'm going to be forced to assume that you have no primary sources and are reiterating something from a conspiracy theory web site :(xaos
Well, I did say the story of the Garden of Eden in todays bible as opposed to the much older of the Sumerians Story of Creation. The Great Flood to Noahs Ark etc.
The story of the Tower of Babel for example, in the Sumerian/Babylonian version of the biblical story, the people of Bablyon were building a tower whos head shall reach the heavens, in whicha shem space rocket was to be installed under the direction of their supreme god, but the Anunnaki dieties were not amused with this forey of mankind into the space age.The Anunnaki weren'tpleased and neither was God. In fact,in Genesis Chapter:
11.5Yahweh came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men built.
11.6Yahweh said, "Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is what they begin to do. Now nothing will be withheld from them, which they intend to do.
11.7Come, let's go down, and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another's speech."
11.8So Yahweh scattered them abroad from there on the surface of all the earth. They stopped building the city.
11:9Therefore the name of it was called Babel, because Yahweh confused the language of all the earth, there. From there, Yahweh scattered them abroad on the surface of all the earth.
11:10This is the history of the generations of Shem. Shem was one hundred years old, and became the father of Arpachshad two years after the flood.
What in your opinion is a non radical way of reading the text? I know it sounds crazy, all things considered, so does 'Christianity'.
Is not to say the bible and the events described in it are a hoax, but rather just rewritten.
No, it is outlined within evolution.MattUD1
Well, lets take a look at our DNA.
If you look at the Human Genome, sure, we can see that it looks very much like a Prime Ape Genome, except that the second and third chromosones are fused into one. So that gives you all the chromosonal material of the prime ape, but it's now only taking up the space in the combining process of 46. It is 46 chromosones, with 48 chromosones of genetic material still in there,
My question is, Hiow could nature fuse the chromosone together in any length of time? How could we evolve so quickly, in a sense, over looking at anthropological terms and be remotely related to Darwinism?
[QUOTE="MattUD1"]No, it is outlined within evolution._R34LiTY_
Well, lets take a look at our DNA.
If you look at the Human Genome, sure, we can see that it looks very much like a Prime Ape Genome, except that the second and third chromosones are fused into one. So that gives you all the chromosonal material of the prime ape, but it's now only taking up the space in the combining process of 46. It is 46 chromosones, with 48 chromosones of genetic material still in there,
My question is, Hiow could nature fuse the chromosone together in any length of time? How could we evolve so quickly, in a sense, over looking at anthropological terms and be remotely related to Darwinism?
You act like I know all the answers... I'd love to take a stab in the dark and call it a mutation... but I personally don't know. Ask a biologist or a "Darwinist.There's a tenth planet now? Why wasn't I informed?super_mario_128What's a planet? Do they revolve around the Earth like the Sun?
[QUOTE="_R34LiTY_"]
[QUOTE="MattUD1"]No, it is outlined within evolution.MattUD1
Well, lets take a look at our DNA.
If you look at the Human Genome, sure, we can see that it looks very much like a Prime Ape Genome, except that the second and third chromosones are fused into one. So that gives you all the chromosonal material of the prime ape, but it's now only taking up the space in the combining process of 46. It is 46 chromosones, with 48 chromosones of genetic material still in there,
My question is, Hiow could nature fuse the chromosone together in any length of time? How could we evolve so quickly, in a sense, overnight looking at it inanthropological terms,and still be remotely related to Darwinism?
You act like I know all the answers... I'd love to take a stab in the dark and call it a mutation... but I personally don't know. Ask a biologist or a "Darwinist.I think you misunderstood my post. I wasn't asking you per se, but it is merely it is 'My question to the evolution theory'
I suppose there is somewhere I can send money to hear more about this wonderful research?
Fandangle
What do you mean? Like a donation?
I don't know about all that. You just have to look to our past and understand it before we can understand who we are and where we are headed in the near future.
For the people who are massively confused this is what the dude is on about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nibiru_collision (Is it really that hard to provide info?) That's a crazy conspiracy theory if I've ever heard one.domatron23
lol i didn't expect it to be on Wiki. I must read to see how accurate it's info is in relation to the related information, as we all know how credible Wiki is.
In any event, I understand that itsounds crazy, but why is that?
Well aliens, directed panspermia, doomsday predictions, random celestial bodies that nobody has ever heard of, Biblical mythology, Sumerian mythology are all things that raise a skeptical eyebrow. When they're all put together what you get is a crazy conspiracy.lol i didn't expect it to be on Wiki. I must read to see how accurate it's info is in relation to the related information, as we all know how credible Wiki is.
In any event, I understand that itsounds crazy, but why is that?
_R34LiTY_
[QUOTE="Known2regect"]I just read that the person who came up with that theory, "revised"(:O) it to around 2010, how correct is a theory that you have to revise it?MattUD1It's partly how the 7th Day Adventists got started... 2 false prophecies. Its totally going to be right this time I can feel it. Every other prediction that I was sure was going to happen was wrong but not this one.
[QUOTE="MattUD1"][QUOTE="Known2regect"]I just read that the person who came up with that theory, "revised"(:O) it to around 2010, how correct is a theory that you have to revise it?domatron23It's partly how the 7th Day Adventists got started... 2 false prophecies. Its totally going to be right this time I can feel it. Every other prediction that I was sure was going to happen was wrong but not this one. Hey, if it's wrong, don't worry, we can revise it :P
[QUOTE="Known2regect"]I just read that the person who came up with that theory, "revised"(:O) it to around 2010, how correct is a theory that you have to revise it?MattUD1It's partly how the 7th Day Adventists got started... 2 false prophecies.
I saw that part also. What a coincidence that Nancy Lieber decided to revise her prediction of an ancient prophecy.
And Wiki is wrong that the theory stemmed from Ms. Lieber. It's been brought up well before her time, and only recently are the details becoming more clear, I didn't here of this woman until just now, though the conclusion I'm being led to is from visting places, reading books like the bible and it's origin. Ms. Lieber is not a 'chosen electee' that was randomly picked to warn the world of Nibiru/Planet/Eris, it's ancient knowledge that has been rewritten and passed through time. So, for Wiki or Ms. Lieber to say that she was the sole proprietor of this 'theory' is a misrepresentation of the subject.
The Ancient Chinese, Mayans etc., give a date that we translate through our current calendaras Dec 21, 2012, but whether or not they are correct, we will certainly find out in the near future as therecently discovered tenth planetmakes it's way towardsthe Sun, disrupting the order os the cosmos.
I don't know, were there any witnesses?An advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system created man kind for various reasons, which coincides with the creation story that is outlined in the document of Genesis within the bible.
Do you believe it?
_R34LiTY_
[QUOTE="_R34LiTY_"]I don't know, were there any witnesses?An advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system created man kind for various reasons, which coincides with the creation story that is outlined in the document of Genesis within the bible.
Do you believe it?
Hungry_bunny
The Sumerians.
They were the first civilization that popped out of nowhere and roamed the land of Mesopotamia, Babylon, Akaddian, which is located between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers in what is known today as Iraq.
They have 7 Tablets that were inscribed into stone that when translated, tells a story identical to Bible. Which puts more emphasis that the bible is nothing but a retelling of an older civilization that walked and lived amongst actual living gods, the Anunnaki(so to speak).
For the people who are massively confused this is what the dude is on about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nibiru_collisiondomatron23
"The idea was first proposed in 1995 by Nancy Lieder, founder of the website ZetaTalk. Lieder describes herself as a contactee and claims to channel messages from extra-terrestrials called Zetas (from the Zeta Reticuli star system; see Betty and Barney Hill) through an implant in her brain".
If we cut her head open and find nothing, then none of this is true.
There's a tenth planet now? Why wasn't I informed?super_mario_128Well there are more than that in regular orbit, and Pluto doesn't count anymore.
I don't know, were there any witnesses?[QUOTE="Hungry_bunny"][QUOTE="_R34LiTY_"]
An advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system created man kind for various reasons, which coincides with the creation story that is outlined in the document of Genesis within the bible.
Do you believe it?
_R34LiTY_
The Sumerians.
They were the first civilization that popped out of nowhere and roamed the land of Mesopotamia, Babylon, Akaddian, which is located between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers in what is known today as Iraq.
They have 7 Tablets that were inscribed into stone that when translated, tells a story identical to Bible. Which puts more emphasis that the bible is nothing but a retelling of an older civilization that walked and lived amongst actual living gods, the Anunnaki(so to speak).
And people are certain that it was a religion? That the people (including the writers) believed in it, and that it wasn't just a writer's attempt of making an epic fiction novel? :P PS. Similarities aren't proof of plagiarism >_>[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]This theory is laughable. Just laughable. I have contributed._R34LiTY_
As is the evolution theory, or that of some invincible being creating man from dirt and a counterpart by the man's rib.
Or is that blasphemous?
Please... =| Theory of evolution is not laughable, since everything we claim to know about biology would not make sense without it.For the people who are massively confused this is what the dude is on about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nibiru_collision (Is it really that hard to provide info?) That's a crazy conspiracy theory if I've ever heard one.domatron23
What's even crazier is that it's been debunked by NASA over and over again and yet these pseudo-scientific conspiracy theories dealing with celestial bodies are still around.
That is kinda creepy to think the human race was created by an alien race and we are created in thier likeness....:?
ET is God!
[QUOTE="BiancaDK"]This theory is laughable. Just laughable. I have contributed._R34LiTY_
As is the evolution theory, or that of some invincible being creating man from dirt and a counterpart by the man's rib.
Or is that blasphemous?
Look up the evolution theory and point out what makes it so laughable?[QUOTE="_R34LiTY_"][QUOTE="BiancaDK"]This theory is laughable. Just laughable. I have contributed.T_P_O
As is the evolution theory, or that of some invincible being creating man from dirt and a counterpart by the man's rib.
Or is that blasphemous?
Look up the evolution theory and point out what makes it so laughable?I already stated what makes the evolution theory that we evolved from prime apes is questionable. Maybe you missed that part. I'll reiterrate
Lets take a look at our DNA
If you look at the Human Genome, sure, we can see that it looks very much like a Prime Ape Genome, except that the second and third chromosones are fused into one. So that gives you all the chromosonal material of the prime ape, but it's now only taking up the space in the combining process of 46. It is 46 chromosones, with 48 chromosones of genetic material still in there,
My question is, Hiow could nature fuse the chromosone together in any length of time? How could we evolve so quickly, in a sense, overnight looking at it in anthropological terms, and still be anythingremotely related to Darwinism?
No offense, but it's hard to consider you an expert on this topic when you refer to primates as 'prime apes'.I already stated what makes the evolution theory that we evolved from prime apes is questionable. Maybe you missed that part. I'll reiterrate
Lets take a look at our DNA
If you look at the Human Genome, sure, we can see that it looks very much like a Prime Ape Genome, except that the second and third chromosones are fused into one. So that gives you all the chromosonal material of the prime ape, but it's now only taking up the space in the combining process of 46. It is 46 chromosones, with 48 chromosones of genetic material still in there,
My question is, Hiow could nature fuse the chromosone together in any length of time? How could we evolve so quickly, in a sense, overnight looking at it in anthropological terms, and still be anythingremotely related to Darwinism?
_R34LiTY_
Wrong, wrong, wrong. We once were a very advanced race but a catastrophe caused our planet to explode and some of us escaped to Earth. The Asteroid Belt is perfect evidence of a Planetary Destruction on a large scale.
Look up the evolution theory and point out what makes it so laughable?[QUOTE="T_P_O"][QUOTE="_R34LiTY_"]
As is the evolution theory, or that of some invincible being creating man from dirt and a counterpart by the man's rib.
Or is that blasphemous?
_R34LiTY_
I already stated what makes the evolution theory that we evolved from prime apes is questionable. Maybe you missed that part. I'll reiterrate
Lets take a look at our DNA
If you look at the Human Genome, sure, we can see that it looks very much like a Prime Ape Genome, except that the second and third chromosones are fused into one. So that gives you all the chromosonal material of the prime ape, but it's now only taking up the space in the combining process of 46. It is 46 chromosones, with 48 chromosones of genetic material still in there,
My question is, Hiow could nature fuse the chromosone together in any length of time? How could we evolve so quickly, in a sense, overnight looking at it in anthropological terms, and still be anythingremotely related to Darwinism?
Wauw, you really do know nothing of the subject at hand, do you?
Comparing chimp chromosomes with homo sapien sapien chromosomes, thinking that "god is in the gap"? (notice him ignoring the fact that accepted biology does not work without the theory of evolution)
We did not evolve from chimps, our lineage is historically correlated to the chimp, but it is not directly connected to it, it´s a different lineage we pursued. Seriously, buddy. That is just weaksauce. =|
Yah, Yah... and monkeys were just test runs.An advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system created man kind for various reasons, which coincides with the creation story that is outlined in the document of Genesis within the bible.
Do you believe it?
_R34LiTY_
Good news, we aren't descended from chimps, so your question is moot.I already stated what makes the evolution theory that we evolved from prime apes is questionable. Maybe you missed that part. I'll reiterrate
Lets take a look at our DNA
If you look at the Human Genome, sure, we can see that it looks very much like a Prime Ape Genome, except that the second and third chromosones are fused into one. So that gives you all the chromosonal material of the prime ape, but it's now only taking up the space in the combining process of 46. It is 46 chromosones, with 48 chromosones of genetic material still in there,
My question is, Hiow could nature fuse the chromosone together in any length of time? How could we evolve so quickly, in a sense, overnight looking at it in anthropological terms, and still be anythingremotely related to Darwinism?
_R34LiTY_
An advanced civilization from the tenth planet in our solar system created man kind for various reasons, which coincides with the creation story that is outlined in the document of Genesis within the bible.
Do you believe it?
_R34LiTY_
Hmm, let me guess...
...the point of this is to get religious people to call this idea absurd, and then to attempt to call them out for believing something you deem equally absurd.
The problem, of course, is that you make reference to a tenth planet, which kind of kills your theory... >_>
[QUOTE="super_mario_128"]There's a tenth planet now? Why wasn't I informed?_R34LiTY_
Sorry, I forgot to send you the memo.
Nontheless, the ever so elusive, Planet X does infact exist. I think they finally found it back late 07 after a long time of searching fpr the celesstial object after concluding through various astronomical equations that there is a tenth planet that hasn't been seen. Some people call the planet by it most popular name, Nibiru, while the scientist have dubbed it Planet Eris.
According to ancient cultures, this planet has a 3600 yr orbit and when it comes close to the sun, it come dangerously close Earth, disrupting every planets magnectic field which would result in various worldwide calamities such as earthquakes, floods. unimaginable storms etc., God's wrath, so to speak and possibly even shifting poles. This is what the bible calls the Destroyer, the Devil.
Lucky for us then Eris is only a dwarf planet, of which there are many. And lucky for us there are only 8 planets in the solar system now so we'd have to find two more in order to find a tenth planet.And a little information on Nibiru. I haven't read the whole thread but the TC is taking his thoughts and ideas from a book originally written by Zacharia Sitchin concernign the Summerians and their beliefs. He was a major proponent of this planet Nibiru which an alien race known as the Annanuki were suppose to live on. Evidentally, accroding to him, the Summerians became aware of this race that he believes formed modern humans by combining Homo Erectus DNA with their DNA so as to produce better slaves to work in their gold mines. This planet Nibiru, Sitchin believed, was the enormous object that originally crashed into the Earth and formed the moon and other objects. And yet after this it miracualously continued on it's journey and the Annanuki were unaffected. He believed that this Nibiru had a very eccentric orbit that stretched outside the orbit of Neptune to within the orbit of Venus, much like a short period comet. Eris does have an eccentric orbit, yes, but it stretches only to within the orbit of Neptune then is flung otu once again to the extreme depths of space. And how these Annanuki could exist on a plent with such an extremly eccentric orbit, given by Sitchin, is beyond me.
And evolution is one of the most factual scientific theories known to man. We have witnessed speciation occur many times and we know exactly how it happens. Perhaps you need to study up more on evolutionary theory in order to come to grips with it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment