The Most Awesome Car Ever Made? (56k Warning)

  • 138 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for StrawberryHill
StrawberryHill

5321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 StrawberryHill
Member since 2008 • 5321 Posts

You know it's aweseome. And if the car isn't enough, know that it came with this:

Avatar image for theharlemshake
theharlemshake

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 theharlemshake
Member since 2009 • 808 Posts



Talk about a dream car
. I don't even want it (like most amazing cars) I just want to drive it...just once.

Avatar image for Lief_Ericson
Lief_Ericson

7082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Lief_Ericson
Member since 2005 • 7082 Posts
[QUOTE="Lief_Ericson"]

Sorry I hate Lotus, their models are very unappealing to me

FUBAR24
its not a Lotus its a Tesla :|

yeah but it was designed by Lotus
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#54 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
It's cool, but when they reviewed it on Top Gear they left it charging all night and it ran out of power after just a couple of hours, so they used the back-up and exactly the same thing happened to that too.
Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts
It's cool, but when they reviewed it on Top Gear they left it charging all night and it ran out of power after just a couple of hours, so they used the back-up and exactly the same thing happened to that too.Ninja-Hippo
They always push cars to their limits. If I had one, I wouldn't drive it like that.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#56 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Automotive perfection right there. But if we're talking about something i could reasonably afford:

A john cooper works mini. Take an already awesome Mini Cooper S and soup it up to damn-near supercar levels of awesomeness.

Avatar image for Mr_Oblivio
Mr_Oblivio

898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#57 Mr_Oblivio
Member since 2007 • 898 Posts

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/05/delorean.jpg

Why drive at 200 to pull the skin back on your face when you can drive at 88 mph and travel through time...yeah.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#58 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]It's cool, but when they reviewed it on Top Gear they left it charging all night and it ran out of power after just a couple of hours, so they used the back-up and exactly the same thing happened to that too.Rikusaki
They always push cars to their limits. If I had one, I wouldn't drive it like that.

What's the point in owning a supercar if you're never going to drive it fast through fear of it breaking down? Also, i think it's silly to assume that the only reason it broke down was because they pushed it to hard. They do that with literally every car on the track, including the god-awful car they throw around the track every week for 'star in a reasonably priced car' and that doesn't break down. It just seemed like a huge warning sign when not one but TWO of them broke down on them after just a few hours of racing them around a track.
Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]It's cool, but when they reviewed it on Top Gear they left it charging all night and it ran out of power after just a couple of hours, so they used the back-up and exactly the same thing happened to that too.Ninja-Hippo
They always push cars to their limits. If I had one, I wouldn't drive it like that.

What's the point in owning a supercar if you're never going to drive it fast through fear of it breaking down? Also, i think it's silly to assume that the only reason it broke down was because they pushed it to hard. They do that with literally every car on the track, including the god-awful car they throw around the track every week for 'star in a reasonably priced car' and that doesn't break down. It just seemed like a huge warning sign when not one but TWO of them broke down on them after just a few hours of racing them around a track.

Top-Gear is biased and is sponsored by oil companies. The cars probably never broke down. Many people own the Tesla Roadster and are satisfied with their purchase.

Avatar image for joesh89
joesh89

8489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 308

User Lists: 0

#60 joesh89
Member since 2008 • 8489 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"] They always push cars to their limits. If I had one, I wouldn't drive it like that.Rikusaki

What's the point in owning a supercar if you're never going to drive it fast through fear of it breaking down? Also, i think it's silly to assume that the only reason it broke down was because they pushed it to hard. They do that with literally every car on the track, including the god-awful car they throw around the track every week for 'star in a reasonably priced car' and that doesn't break down. It just seemed like a huge warning sign when not one but TWO of them broke down on them after just a few hours of racing them around a track.

Top-Gear is biased and is sponsored by oil companies. The cars probably never broke down. Many people own the Tesla Roadster and are satisfied with their purchase.

no there not, the bbc make top gear and there are not sponsored by anyone. and they did a whole segment on the honda hydrogen car and said it was the future of motoring... doesn't sound biased to oil to me.

Avatar image for Smoke89
Smoke89

3575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#61 Smoke89
Member since 2003 • 3575 Posts

Why drive at 200 to pull the skin back on your face when you can drive at 88 mph and travel through time...yeah. Mr_Oblivio

Where can you get a continuum transfunctioner?

Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"]It's cool, but when they reviewed it on Top Gear they left it charging all night and it ran out of power after just a couple of hours, so they used the back-up and exactly the same thing happened to that too.Ninja-Hippo
They always push cars to their limits. If I had one, I wouldn't drive it like that.

What's the point in owning a supercar if you're never going to drive it fast through fear of it breaking down? Also, i think it's silly to assume that the only reason it broke down was because they pushed it to hard. They do that with literally every car on the track, including the god-awful car they throw around the track every week for 'star in a reasonably priced car' and that doesn't break down. It just seemed like a huge warning sign when not one but TWO of them broke down on them after just a few hours of racing them around a track.

umm since when does running out of juice mean breaking down

Avatar image for The_New_Homer
The_New_Homer

612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 The_New_Homer
Member since 2009 • 612 Posts
awesome.
Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts
[QUOTE="FUBAR24"][QUOTE="Lief_Ericson"]

Sorry I hate Lotus, their models are very unappealing to me

Lief_Ericson
its not a Lotus its a Tesla :|

yeah but it was designed by Lotus

no lotus had nothing to do with the production. they just gave tesla the right to use the body style of the elise and even then its not an elise body
Avatar image for StrawberryHill
StrawberryHill

5321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 StrawberryHill
Member since 2008 • 5321 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_Oblivio"]

Why drive at 200 to pull the skin back on your face when you can drive at 88 mph and travel through time...yeah. Smoke89

Where can you get a continuum transfunctioner?

I think Hot Topics sells those.

Avatar image for joesh89
joesh89

8489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 308

User Lists: 0

#66 joesh89
Member since 2008 • 8489 Posts

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"][QUOTE="Rikusaki"] They always push cars to their limits. If I had one, I wouldn't drive it like that.FUBAR24

What's the point in owning a supercar if you're never going to drive it fast through fear of it breaking down? Also, i think it's silly to assume that the only reason it broke down was because they pushed it to hard. They do that with literally every car on the track, including the god-awful car they throw around the track every week for 'star in a reasonably priced car' and that doesn't break down. It just seemed like a huge warning sign when not one but TWO of them broke down on them after just a few hours of racing them around a track.

umm since when does running out of juice mean breaking down

they didnt just run out of juice, the brakes broke on one, and the motor overheated on the other.

Avatar image for Smoke89
Smoke89

3575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67 Smoke89
Member since 2003 • 3575 Posts

[QUOTE="Smoke89"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Oblivio"]

Why drive at 200 to pull the skin back on your face when you can drive at 88 mph and travel through time...yeah. StrawberryHill

Where can you get a continuum transfunctioner?

I think Hot Topics sells those.

Oh yeah, I totally forgot. They are right next to the slipknot action figures and hello kitty thongs.

Avatar image for StrawberryHill
StrawberryHill

5321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 StrawberryHill
Member since 2008 • 5321 Posts

[QUOTE="StrawberryHill"]

[QUOTE="Smoke89"]

[QUOTE="Mr_Oblivio"]

Why drive at 200 to pull the skin back on your face when you can drive at 88 mph and travel through time...yeah. Smoke89

Where can you get a continuum transfunctioner?

I think Hot Topics sells those.

Oh yeah, I totally forgot. They are right next to the slipknot action figures and hello kitty thongs.

Exactly. :)

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#69 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Top-Gear is biased and is sponsored by oil companies. The cars probably never broke down. Many people own the Tesla Roadster and are satisfied with their purchase.

Rikusaki
Right, Top Gear's last episode was a feature on the Honda Clarity and how amazing it's going to be and how it'll finally break our dependence on oil if it catches on. :roll:
Avatar image for scoots9
scoots9

3505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#70 scoots9
Member since 2006 • 3505 Posts

Oh and a hennessy tuned venom 1000 viper will belittle anything on a straight away (Including a Bugatti)

Acceleration (Stock 6-Speed Transmission): 1000hp (1200hp option available)
0-60: 2.25 sec.
1/4 mile: 9.75 sec. @ 148+ mph
Note: Times were obtained with MT "ET Street" tires.

Smoke89

ORLY?

1984-1986 Ford RS200 E2

2.0 Turbo I4

700 HP

4WD

0-60 - under 2.0

Avatar image for joesh89
joesh89

8489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 308

User Lists: 0

#71 joesh89
Member since 2008 • 8489 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

Top-Gear is biased and is sponsored by oil companies. The cars probably never broke down. Many people own the Tesla Roadster and are satisfied with their purchase.

Ninja-Hippo

Right, Top Gear's last episode was a feature on the Honda Clarity and how amazing it's going to be and how it'll finally break our dependence on oil if it catches on. :roll:

correct ;)

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

[QUOTE="Ninja-Hippo"] What's the point in owning a supercar if you're never going to drive it fast through fear of it breaking down? Also, i think it's silly to assume that the only reason it broke down was because they pushed it to hard. They do that with literally every car on the track, including the god-awful car they throw around the track every week for 'star in a reasonably priced car' and that doesn't break down. It just seemed like a huge warning sign when not one but TWO of them broke down on them after just a few hours of racing them around a track. joesh89

Top-Gear is biased and is sponsored by oil companies. The cars probably never broke down. Many people own the Tesla Roadster and are satisfied with their purchase.

no there not, the bbc make top gear and there are not sponsored by anyone. and they did a whole segment on the honda hydrogen car and said it was the future of motoring... doesn't sound biased to oil to me.

Oil companies are pushing for hydrogen because it is easier for them.
Avatar image for Lief_Ericson
Lief_Ericson

7082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Lief_Ericson
Member since 2005 • 7082 Posts

[QUOTE="Smoke89"]

Oh and a hennessy tuned venom 1000 viper will belittle anything on a straight away (Including a Bugatti)

Acceleration (Stock 6-Speed Transmission): 1000hp (1200hp option available)
0-60: 2.25 sec.
1/4 mile: 9.75 sec. @ 148+ mph
Note: Times were obtained with MT "ET Street" tires.

scoots9

ORLY?

1984-1986 Ford RS200 E2

2.0 Turbo I4

700 HP

4WD

0-60 - under 2.0

the ****?! I didn't know there were such things as American Ricers

Avatar image for joesh89
joesh89

8489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 308

User Lists: 0

#74 joesh89
Member since 2008 • 8489 Posts

[QUOTE="joesh89"]

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"] Top-Gear is biased and is sponsored by oil companies. The cars probably never broke down. Many people own the Tesla Roadster and are satisfied with their purchase.

Rikusaki

no there not, the bbc make top gear and there are not sponsored by anyone. and they did a whole segment on the honda hydrogen car and said it was the future of motoring... doesn't sound biased to oil to me.

Oil companies are pushing for hydrogen because it is easier for them.

easier ? could you explain why ?

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="joesh89"]

no there not, the bbc make top gear and there are not sponsored by anyone. and they did a whole segment on the honda hydrogen car and said it was the future of motoring... doesn't sound biased to oil to me.

joesh89

Oil companies are pushing for hydrogen because it is easier for them.

easier ? could you explain why ?

They can set up hydrogen stations, lol!

With electric,restaurants and stores have charging plugs in the parking lots.

Oil companies don't want that! :o

Avatar image for mozzlingman
mozzlingman

449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 mozzlingman
Member since 2004 • 449 Posts

mowers2.jpg

here we go

Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts

Ferrari F430 Scuderia (lighter, faster version of the F430)

508HP

0-60 in 3.1 seconds

Avatar image for joesh89
joesh89

8489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 308

User Lists: 0

#78 joesh89
Member since 2008 • 8489 Posts

[QUOTE="joesh89"]

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"] Oil companies are pushing for hydrogen because it is easier for them.Rikusaki

easier ? could you explain why ?

They can set up hydrogen stations, lol!

With electric,restaurants and stores have charging plugs in the parking lots.

Oil companies don't want that! :o

ok.... :?

Avatar image for thelastguy
thelastguy

12030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 thelastguy
Member since 2007 • 12030 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

[QUOTE="joesh89"]

easier ? could you explain why ?

joesh89

They can set up hydrogen stations, lol!

With electric,restaurants and stores have charging plugs in the parking lots.

Oil companies don't want that! :o

ok.... :?

He means that with Hydrogen, the oil companies can still have the status quo on energy

Since electricity is every where and easily accesible, the oil companies would lose all control

Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#80 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts

[QUOTE="scoots9"]

[QUOTE="Smoke89"]

Oh and a hennessy tuned venom 1000 viper will belittle anything on a straight away (Including a Bugatti)

Acceleration (Stock 6-Speed Transmission): 1000hp (1200hp option available)
0-60: 2.25 sec.
1/4 mile: 9.75 sec. @ 148+ mph
Note: Times were obtained with MT "ET Street" tires.

Lief_Ericson

ORLY?

1984-1986 Ford RS200 E2

2.0 Turbo I4

700 HP

4WD

0-60 - under 2.0

the ****?! I didn't know there were such things as American Ricers

you obviously dont know what a ricer is if you think thats a ricer

Avatar image for joesh89
joesh89

8489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 308

User Lists: 0

#81 joesh89
Member since 2008 • 8489 Posts

[QUOTE="joesh89"]

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

They can set up hydrogen stations, lol!

With electric,restaurants and stores have charging plugs in the parking lots.

Oil companies don't want that! :o

thelastguy

ok.... :?

He means that with Hydrogen, the oil companies can still have the status quo on energy

Since electricity is every where and easily accesible, the oil companies would lose all control

i see... thanks.

Avatar image for bigblunt537
bigblunt537

6907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#82 bigblunt537
Member since 2003 • 6907 Posts

Best car ever made... I will own this car within the next 5 years even if I'm paying 2-300 a month. I don't like the wing on the car though. Thats a no no :(. But still this my dream car and its affordable now at around 17k-28k.

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

I can't believe all of you like cars with petrol engines! :x

Haha, jk. I wish there were more cool eco-friendly cars.

Avatar image for matenmoe
matenmoe

1238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 4

#84 matenmoe
Member since 2004 • 1238 Posts

My awesome car=

1. One I could buy

2. Paid off a year early

3. still runs after I paid it off

4.continually runs with minimal financial investment

:oops: sorry, just read some other posts here

didn't know you meant some other criteria! nvmd

:P

Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#85 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts

I can't believe all of you like cars with petrol engines! :x

Haha, jk. I wish there were more cool eco-friendly cars.

Rikusaki

http://www.globalmotors.net/lightning-gt-700-hp-electric-supercar

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2008/12/02/275505.html

Avatar image for warbmxjohn
warbmxjohn

6014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#86 warbmxjohn
Member since 2007 • 6014 Posts

I can't believe all of you like cars with petrol engines! :x

Haha, jk. I wish there were more cool eco-friendly cars.

Rikusaki

Welcome to America. :P

Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

I can't believe all of you like cars with petrol engines! :x

Haha, jk. I wish there were more cool eco-friendly cars.

FUBAR24

http://www.globalmotors.net/lightning-gt-700-hp-electric-supercar

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2008/12/02/275505.html

The first link doesn't work . :( And that car looks great on paper, but I don't like the design! IMO, it's ugly. :o

Avatar image for FUBAR24
FUBAR24

12185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 FUBAR24
Member since 2005 • 12185 Posts

[QUOTE="FUBAR24"]

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"]

I can't believe all of you like cars with petrol engines! :x

Haha, jk. I wish there were more cool eco-friendly cars.

Rikusaki

http://www.globalmotors.net/lightning-gt-700-hp-electric-supercar

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2008/12/02/275505.html

The first link doesn't work . :( And that car looks great on paper, but I don't like the design! IMO, it's ugly. :o

the first link works for me
Avatar image for CBR600-RR
CBR600-RR

9695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 CBR600-RR
Member since 2008 • 9695 Posts

Audi R8

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127733 Posts
I like that they actually make electrical sports cars.
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#91 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
I hope they can replicate it with a larger car. Its great that they've been able to create something that goes fast and with a good range, but ultimately it needs to be big enough for a family. With enough investment in hybrids and electric cars, it should be a viable alternative for almost everyone within the next few years.
Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#92 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts

I hope they can replicate it with a larger car. Its great that they've been able to create something that goes fast and with a good range, but ultimately it needs to be big enough for a family. With enough investment in hybrids and electric cars, it should be a viable alternative for almost everyone within the next few years.Bourbons3
They already do. It's called the Model S, It seats 7, has a 300 mile range and charges up from 0% in under 45 minutes.

Avatar image for theharlemshake
theharlemshake

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 theharlemshake
Member since 2009 • 808 Posts

Audi R8

CBR600-RR

For the price, I'd get the Porche. ( :cry: Why am I so biased?)

Avatar image for FunkWeasel
FunkWeasel

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#94 FunkWeasel
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts

M3+M3=M6

Avatar image for kipknots
kipknots

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 kipknots
Member since 2003 • 492 Posts

In case you're suicidal:

Around 530kg and > 500 bhp. 0-60 time of under 3 seconds (probably hold back by low weight, so not enough grip on the tires) but it can actually do corners as well.

Adn a video of someone driving one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVNDGx8NNP4&feature=related

Avatar image for CBR600-RR
CBR600-RR

9695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 CBR600-RR
Member since 2008 • 9695 Posts

In case you're suicidal

kipknots

If you want speed then just get a bike. :P

Avatar image for kipknots
kipknots

492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 kipknots
Member since 2003 • 492 Posts

[QUOTE="kipknots"]

In case you're suicidal

CBR600-RR

If you want speed then just get a bike. :P

I'm pretty sure that the caterham will beat out (nearly) every bike you can get. The power to weight ratio actually gets close to formula one cars.

I just looked up the power to weight ratio of a kawasaki ZZR1400 and it's 170 bhp to 235 kg, quite a bit lower then the caterham and that's without factoring in the weight of the driver. Are there any faster road legal bikes?

Avatar image for HiResDes
HiResDes

5919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 HiResDes
Member since 2004 • 5919 Posts

Bugatti Veryron duh, I can't believe this is even still a question

The car can hit 60 mph in just 2.5 seconds, 100 mph in 5.5 seconds, and 150 mph in 9.8 seconds. Getting to 200 mph takes 18.3 seconds, and 250 mph takes 42.3 seconds.

A special key is required to "unlock" the Veyron's top speed of 250+ mph. The car is then lowered to just 3.5 inches from the ground. A hydraulic spoiler extends at speed, and it can also serve as an air brake.

The Veyron weighs a hulking 4,160 lbs, but even its harshest critics admit its handling is surprisingly sharp. Gordon Murray, designer of the McLaren F1 was very skeptical of the Veyron during its development, but after driving the finished car, he conceded it is a "huge achievement."

Avatar image for Co0kieMonsterxX
Co0kieMonsterxX

717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Co0kieMonsterxX
Member since 2008 • 717 Posts

Bugatti Veryron duh, I can't believe this is even still a question

The car can hit 60 mph in just 2.5 seconds, 100 mph in 5.5 seconds, and 150 mph in 9.8 seconds. Getting to 200 mph takes 18.3 seconds, and 250 mph takes 42.3 seconds.

A special key is required to "unlock" the Veyron's top speed of 250+ mph. The car is then lowered to just 3.5 inches from the ground. A hydraulic spoiler extends at speed, and it can also serve as an air brake.

The Veyron weighs a hulking 4,160 lbs, but even its harshest critics admit its handling is surprisingly sharp. Gordon Murray, designer of the McLaren F1 was very skeptical of the Veyron during its development, but after driving the finished car, he conceded it is a "huge achievement."

HiResDes

I was going to come in here and post the veyron and link to that video. Looks like I was beaten to it. :P

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38936 Posts

that tesla is great for what it is, but it still doesn't have the sounds of a super car.

joesh89
until it changes what the sounds of a supercar are.